Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma

Mehmet ERSOY, (Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
IŞIL KABAKÇI YURDAKUL, (Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
Beril CEYLAN (Ege Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü, İzmir, Türkiye)
Eğitim ve Bilim
3 3
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 41 Sayı: 186 Sayfa Aralığı: 119 - 135 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisi'ne (TPİB) odaklanan bir deneysel uygulama öncesi ve sonrasındaki TPİB yeterliklerinin BİT kullanım düzeyi, BİT kullanım aşamaları ve cinsiyet değişkenleri açısından incelenmesidir. Araştırmada deneme modellerinden öntestsontest kontrol grupsuz yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışma 2011-2012 öğretim yılında bir devlet üniversitesinin eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim görmekte olan 61 öğretmen adayı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaca uygun olarak TPACK-deep Ölçeği ile BİT Kullanım Aşamaları ve BİT Kullanım Düzeyleri anketleri veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi sonucunda TPİB yeterliklerine odaklanan deneysel uygulamanın etkili olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Deneysel uygulamanın sonrasında orta düzeyde olan TPİB yeterliklerinin ileri düzeye yükseldiği görülmüştür. Buna ek olarak TPACK-deep Ölçeği alt boyutları olan tasarım, uygulama, etik ve uzmanlaşma alanlarının her birinde ilerleme görülmüştür. Öğretmen adaylarının uygulama sonunda BİT kullanım aşamalarının olumlu yönde değişim gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının BİT kullanım düzeyi arttıkça TPİB yeterliklerinin de yükseldiği belirtilmiştir. TPİB yeterlikleri ile cinsiyet arasında ise anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır. BİT kullanım aşamaları ile TPİB yeterlikleri alt alanları arasındaki ilişki incelendiğinde ise orta düzeyde bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına dayalı olarak bir dizi öneri getirilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Allan, W. C., Erickson, J. L., Brookhouse, P. ve Johnson, J. L. (2010). Teacher professional development through a collaborative curriculum project-an example of TPACK in Maine. TechTrends, 54(6), 36- 43.
  • Altun, T. (2013). Examination of classroom teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge on the basis of different variables. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(2), 365-397.
  • Angeli, C. ve Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, andassessment of ICT-TPACK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-16.
  • Archambault, L. M. ve Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662.
  • Archambault, L. ve Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
  • Bingimlas, K. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
  • Ceylan, B., Türk, M., Yaman, F. ve Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2014). Determining the changes of information and communication technology guidance teacher candidates' technological pedagogical content knowledge competency, information and communication technology usage phases and levels. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(1), 171-201.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. ve Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Ho, H. N. J. ve Tsai, C. C. (2012). Examining preservice teachers' perceived knowledge of TPACK and cyberwellness through structural equation modeling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1000-101.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C. ve Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. ve Tsai, C. C. (2011). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK). The Asia-pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595-603.
  • Chang, Y., Tsai, M. F. ve Jang, S. J. (2014). Exploring ICT use and TPACK of secondary science teachers in two contexts. US-China Education Review, 4(5), 298-311.
  • Chen, H. Y. ve Syh Jong, J. (2013). Exploring the reasons for using electric books and technological pedagogical and content knowledge of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 131-141.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. bs.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cox, S. ve Graham, C. R. (2009). Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-71.
  • Efilti, E. ve Çoklar, A. N. (2013). The study of the relationship between teachers' teaching styles and TPACK education competencies. World Journal on Educational Technology, 5(3), 348-357.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first and second order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  • Forssell, K. S. (2010). Supporting teacher technology learning: Important relationships in the learning ecology. American Educational Research Association yıllık toplantısında sunulmuş poster, Denver, CO.
  • Fransson, G. ve Holmberg, J. (2012). Understanding the theoretical framework of technological pedagogical content knowledge: A collaborative self-study to understand teaching practice and aspects of knowledge. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 8(2), 193-204.
  • Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L. ve Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
  • Guzey, S. S. ve Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers' development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 9, 25-45.
  • Harris, J., Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.
  • Hew, K. F. ve Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
  • Hewitt, J. (2008). Reviewing the handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 8(4), 355-360.
  • Hixon, E., ve Buckenmeyer, J. (2009). Revisiting technology integration in schools: Implications for professional development. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary. Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 26(2), 130-146.
  • Hofer, M. ve Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary MA Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83-106.
  • Horzum, M. B. (2013). An investigation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge of pre- service teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 303-317.
  • Hosseini, Z. ve Kamal, A. (2013). A survey on pre-service and in-service teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 1-7.
  • Hsu, S. (2011). Who assigns the most ICT activities? Examining the relationship between teacher and student usage. Computers & Education, 56(3), 847-855.
  • Hughes, J. E. ve Scharber, C. M. (2008). Leveraging the development of English TPCK within the deictic nature of literacy. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.). Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators içinde (s. 87-106). New York: Routledge.
  • Hutchinson, A. (2007). Literature Review Exploring the Integration of Interactive Whiteboards in K-12 Education. http://simpsomark.pbworks.com/f/cbewhiteboardreview.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Jamieson Proctor, R., Finger, G. ve Albion, P. (2010). Auditing the TK and TPACK confidence of pre- service teachers: Are they ready for the profession?. Australian Educational Computing, 25(1), 8-17.
  • Jang, S. J. ve Tsai, M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566-580.
  • Jang, S. J. ve Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre- service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564.
  • Jang, S. J. ve Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327- 338.
  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259-1269.
  • Jordan, K. (2011). Beginning teacher knowledge: Results from a self-assessed TPACK survey. Australian Educational Computing, 26(1), 16-26.
  • Jordan, K. (2013). The influence of gender on beginning teachers' measurement of TPACK knowledge. Australian Educational Computing, 28(2).
  • Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Odabaşı, H. F., Şahin, Y. L. ve Çoklar, A. (2013). A TPACK course for Developping Pre-service Teachers' Technology Integration Competencies: From Design and Application to Evaluation. J. Keengwe (Ed.). Research Perspectives and Best Practices in Educational Technology Integration içinde (s. 242-269). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. ve Çoklar, A. N. (2014). Modeling preservice teachers' TPACK competencies based on ICT usage. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 363-376.
  • Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Odabaşı, H. F., Kılıçer, K, Çoklar, A. N., Birinci, G. ve Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977.
  • Koehler, M. J. ve Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  • Koehler, M. J. ve Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators içinde (s. 3-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Koehler, M. J. ve Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. ve Yahya, K. (2004, Nisan). Content, pedagogy, and technology: Testing a model of technology integration. American Education Research Association yıllık toplantısında sunulmuş sözlü bildiri, San Diego, CA.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. ve Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762.
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K. ve Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technoogy and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
  • Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S. ve Mishra, P. (2011). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes ve M. L. Niess (Ed.). Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches içinde (s. 16-31). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Koehler, M., Mishra, P. ve Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
  • Koh, J. H. L. ve Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70, 222-232.
  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S. ve Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563-573.
  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S. ve Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793-809.
  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S. ve Tsai, C. C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers' perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185-196.
  • Koh, J. H. L. ve Divaharan, S. (2013). Towards a TPACK-fostering ICT instructional process for teachers: Lessons from the implementation of interactive whiteboard instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2).
  • Lee, M. H. ve Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers' perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web, Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.
  • Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Education Technology Research & Development, 55(1), 83-116.
  • Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S. ve Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336.
  • McGrath, J., Karabas, G. ve Willis, J. (2011). From TPACK concept to TPACK practice: An analysis of the suitability and usefulness of the concept as a guide in the real world of teacher development. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.
  • Meriç, G. (2014). Determining science teacher candidates' self-reliance levels with regard to their technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education, 10(2), 352- 367.
  • Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers' knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  • Otrel Cass, K., Khoo, E. ve Cowie, B. (2012). Scaffolding with and through videos: An example of ICT- TPACK. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(4), 369-390.
  • Pierson, M. (1999). Technology practice as a function of pedagogical expertise (Doktora tezi). Arizona State University.
  • Polly, D. (2008). Modeling the influence of calculator use and teacher effects on first grade students' mathematics achievement. Journal of Technology in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 245-263.
  • Polly, D. (2014). Deepening pre-service teachers' knowledge of technology, pedagogy, and content (TPACK) in an elementary school mathematics methods course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(2), 233-250.
  • Ritter, D. S. (2012). Teachers' planning process: TPACK, professional development, and the purposeful integration of technology (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Montana State Üniversitesi, ABD.
  • Robyler, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. ve Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Simpson, M. (2006). Field experience in distance delivered initial teacher education programmes. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 241-254.
  • Swain, C. (2006). Preservice teachers' self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching and learning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 29-59.
  • Sweeney, T. ve Drummond, A. (2013). How prepared are our pre-service teachers to integrate technology? A pilot study. Australian Educational Computing, Special Edition: Teaching Teachers for the Future Project, 27(3), 117-123.
  • Toledo, C. (2005). A five-phase model of computer technology integration into teacher education curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 177-191.
  • Tuysuz, C. (2014). Determination of pre-service teachers' self-confidence levels towards technology subdimension of technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(1), 34-41.
  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J. ve van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121.
  • Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 411-419.
  • Wang, Q. ve Woo, H. L. (2007). Systematic planning for ICT integration in topic learning. Educational Technology and Society, 10(1), 148-156.
  • Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D. C. ve Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 173-206.
APA ERSOY M, KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I, CEYLAN B (2016). Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. , 119 - 135.
Chicago ERSOY MEHMET,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL IŞIL,CEYLAN BERİL Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. (2016): 119 - 135.
MLA ERSOY MEHMET,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL IŞIL,CEYLAN BERİL Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. , 2016, ss.119 - 135.
AMA ERSOY M,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I,CEYLAN B Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. . 2016; 119 - 135.
Vancouver ERSOY M,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I,CEYLAN B Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. . 2016; 119 - 135.
IEEE ERSOY M,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I,CEYLAN B "Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma." , ss.119 - 135, 2016.
ISNAD ERSOY, MEHMET vd. "Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma". (2016), 119-135.
APA ERSOY M, KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I, CEYLAN B (2016). Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(186), 119 - 135.
Chicago ERSOY MEHMET,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL IŞIL,CEYLAN BERİL Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim 41, no.186 (2016): 119 - 135.
MLA ERSOY MEHMET,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL IŞIL,CEYLAN BERİL Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.41, no.186, 2016, ss.119 - 135.
AMA ERSOY M,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I,CEYLAN B Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2016; 41(186): 119 - 135.
Vancouver ERSOY M,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I,CEYLAN B Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2016; 41(186): 119 - 135.
IEEE ERSOY M,KABAKÇI YURDAKUL I,CEYLAN B "Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma." Eğitim ve Bilim, 41, ss.119 - 135, 2016.
ISNAD ERSOY, MEHMET vd. "Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Becerileri Işığında Teknopedagojik İçerik Bilgisine İlişkin Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi: Deneysel Bir Araştırma". Eğitim ve Bilim 41/186 (2016), 119-135.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 1:2

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları