Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 7 - 11 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Protaper Gold (PTG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer), One Shape New Generation (OSNG; MicroMega, Besancon, France), Twisted File Adaptive (TFA; SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), and K3XF (SybronEndo) nikel-titanyum enstrümantasyon sistemleri ile preparasyon boyunca apikalden taşan debris miktarını araştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Yetmiş beş insan tek köklü mandibular premolar diş rastgele olarak 5 gruba ayrılmıştır (n=15). Kök kanalları PTG, WOG, OSNG, TFA, ve K3XF eğeleri kullanılarak üreticinin talimatlarına göre prepare edilmiştir. Enstrümantasyon boyunca apikalden taşan debris önceden tartılmış ependorf tüplerin içinde toplanmıştır. Ependorf tüpler daha sonra 5 gün boyunca 70°C'de bir inkübatör içerisinde muhafaza edilmiştir. Tüpler yeniden tartıldı ve ilk ve son ağırlıkları arasındaki fark hesaplanmıştır. Veriler istatistiksel olarak tek yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey post-hoc testleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.Bulgular: TFA grubu diğer tüm gruplar ile karşılaştırıldığında önemli ölçüde daha fazla debris taşırmıştır (P<0,05). İstatistiksel olarak, K3XF ve OSNG grupları, WOG ve FTG gruplar ile karşılaştırıldığında daha fazla debris taşması ile ilişkili bulunmuştur (P<0,05). K3XF ve OSNG gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır (P>0,05). Buna ek olarak, WOG ve FTG grupları arasında apikalden taşan debris miktarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır (P>0,05).Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın koşulları altında, tüm enstrümantasyon sistemleri debrisin apikal ekstrüzyonu ile sonuçlandı. WOG ve PTG enstrümantasyon sistemleri diğer gruplar ile karşılaştırıldığında en az miktarda debris ekstrüzyonuna neden olmuştur. Apikalden taşan debris miktarı, kullanılan enstrümanın metalürjisine, kinematiğine ve tasarımına göre değişebilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Farklı enstrümentasyon sistemleri kullanılarak yapılan kök kanal preparasyonu sırasında apikalden taşan debris miktarının değerlendirilmesi
Öz: Aim: The aim of present study was to investigate the amount of debris extruded apically during preparation with ProTaper Gold (PTG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer), One Shape New Generation (OSNG; MicroMega, Besancon, France), Twisted File Adaptive (TFA; SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), and K3XF (SybronEndo) nickel-titanium instrumentation systems.Materials and Method: Seventy-five extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 15). The root canals were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions using the PTG, WOG, OSNG, TFA, and K3XF instruments. Debris apically extruded during instrumentation was collected in pre-weighed eppendorf tubes. The eppendorf tubes were then stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The tubes were weighed again, and the difference between the initial and final weights was calculated. The data were statistically analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests.Results: The TFA group extruded significantly more debris compared with all other groups (P<0.05). Statistically, K3XF and OSNG groups were associated with more debris extrusion compared with the WOG and PTG groups (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the K3XF and OSNG groups (P>0.05). Additionally, there was no statistical difference between the WOG and PTG groups in the amount of extruded debris (P>0.05).Conclusions: Under the conditions of this study, all instrumentation systems resulted in apical extrusion of debris. The WOG and PTG instrumentation systems caused the least amount of extruded debris compared with the other groups. The amount of apically extruded debris may vary according to metallurgy, kinematics and design of the instrument used.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. etio- logical factors. J Endod 1985; 11: 472-478.
- Nair PN. On the causes of persistent apical periodonti- tis: a review. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 249-281.
- Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instru- mentation systems. J Endod 2012; 38: 850-852.
- Xavier F, Nevares G, Romeiro MK, Gonçalves K, Gomin- ho L, Albuquerque D. Apical extrusion of debris from root canals using reciprocating files associated with two irri- gation systems. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 661-665.
- Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irriga- tion needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 31-35.
- Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Türker SA, Sağsen B, Er Ö. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2013; 39: 1278-1280.
- Reddy SA, Hicks ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1998; 24: 180-183.
- Kuştarci A, Akpinar KE, Er K. Apical extrusion of intraca- nal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumen- tation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra- diol Endod 2008; 105: 257-262.
- Arias A, Singh R, Peters OA. Torque and force induced by ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next during shaping of large and small root canals in extracted teeth. J Endod ; 40: 973-976. Gergi R, Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, Naaman A. Mi- cro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transpor- tation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nick- el-titanium instruments. J Endod 2014; 40: 1223-1227.
- Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Compara- tive study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 2014; 40: 852-856.
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1971; 32: 271-275.
- Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod ; 33: 1102-1105.
- Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991; 17: 275-279.
- Tinaz AC, Alacam T, Uzun O, Maden M, Kayaoglu G. The effect of disruption of apical constriction on periapi- cal extrusion. J Endod 2005; 31: 533-535.
- Hachmeister DR, Schindler WG, Walker WA, Thomas DD. The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod 2002; 28: 386-390.
- Yeter KY, Evcil MS, Ayrancı LB, Ersoy I. Weight of api- cally extruded debris following use of two canal instru- mentation techniques and two designs of irrigation nee- dles. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 795-799.
- Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Sannino G. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Rome) 2013; 4: 152-155.
- Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirli G. Quan- titative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded de- bris using three different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; : 250-257.
- Bidar M, Rastegar AF, Ghaziani P, Namazikhah MS. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques. J Calif Dent As- soc 2004; 32: 665-671.
- Mangalam S, Rao CV, Lakshminarayanan L. Evalua- tion of apically extruded debris and irrigant using three instrumentation techniques. Endodontology 2002; 14: 23.
- De-Deus GA, Nogueira Leal Silva EJ, Moreira EJ, de Almeida Neves A, Belladonna FG, Tameirão M. Assess- ment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-ad- justing file system. J Endod 2014; 40: 526-529.
- Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between Pro- Taper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at differ- ent levels. J Endod 2014; 40: 1477-1481.
- Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, Wang ZJ, Shen Y. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bend- ing and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper gold and ProTaper uni- versal instruments. J Endod 2015; 41: 1134-1138.
- Pongione G, Pompa G, Milana V, Di Carlo S, Giansir- acusa A, Nicolini E, De Angelis F. Flexibility and resistance to cyclic fatigue of endodontic instruments made with different nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative test. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2012; 3: 119-122.
- Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer P. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 30-76.
- Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, Pla- zas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals. J Endod 2015; 41: 1724.
| APA | Zan R, TOPÇUOĞLU H, HUBBEZOĞLU İ, TANALP J, KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M (2017). Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. , 7 - 11. |
| Chicago | Zan Recai,TOPÇUOĞLU Hüseyin Sinan,HUBBEZOĞLU İhsan,TANALP JALE,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR Meric Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. (2017): 7 - 11. |
| MLA | Zan Recai,TOPÇUOĞLU Hüseyin Sinan,HUBBEZOĞLU İhsan,TANALP JALE,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR Meric Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. , 2017, ss.7 - 11. |
| AMA | Zan R,TOPÇUOĞLU H,HUBBEZOĞLU İ,TANALP J,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. . 2017; 7 - 11. |
| Vancouver | Zan R,TOPÇUOĞLU H,HUBBEZOĞLU İ,TANALP J,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. . 2017; 7 - 11. |
| IEEE | Zan R,TOPÇUOĞLU H,HUBBEZOĞLU İ,TANALP J,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M "Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris." , ss.7 - 11, 2017. |
| ISNAD | Zan, Recai vd. "Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris". (2017), 7-11. |
| APA | Zan R, TOPÇUOĞLU H, HUBBEZOĞLU İ, TANALP J, KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M (2017). Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. 7tepe Klinik, 13(1), 7 - 11. |
| Chicago | Zan Recai,TOPÇUOĞLU Hüseyin Sinan,HUBBEZOĞLU İhsan,TANALP JALE,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR Meric Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. 7tepe Klinik 13, no.1 (2017): 7 - 11. |
| MLA | Zan Recai,TOPÇUOĞLU Hüseyin Sinan,HUBBEZOĞLU İhsan,TANALP JALE,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR Meric Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. 7tepe Klinik, vol.13, no.1, 2017, ss.7 - 11. |
| AMA | Zan R,TOPÇUOĞLU H,HUBBEZOĞLU İ,TANALP J,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. 7tepe Klinik. 2017; 13(1): 7 - 11. |
| Vancouver | Zan R,TOPÇUOĞLU H,HUBBEZOĞLU İ,TANALP J,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris. 7tepe Klinik. 2017; 13(1): 7 - 11. |
| IEEE | Zan R,TOPÇUOĞLU H,HUBBEZOĞLU İ,TANALP J,KAZANDAĞ KARAPINAR M "Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris." 7tepe Klinik, 13, ss.7 - 11, 2017. |
| ISNAD | Zan, Recai vd. "Evaluation of different instrumentation systems for apical extrusion of debris". 7tepe Klinik 13/1 (2017), 7-11. |
