Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları

ERSOY, Burak

Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları

Burak ERSOY (Maltepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Plastik, Rekonstrüktif ve Estetik Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery

6 1

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 8 - 18 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları

Öz:

Amaç: Kongrelerde sunulan sözel ve poster bildiriler, en güncel bilimsel verilerin paylaşımı ve deneyimlerin aktarımını sağlayan önemli bir araç olarak kabul edilmekte ancak bu bildirilerin büyük bir kısmı bilimsel dergilerde yayına dönüştürülememektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayı'nda sunulan bildirilerin yabancı yayına dönüştürülme oranlarının saptanması ve yayına dönüşen bildirilerle ilişkili çeşitli değişkenlerin analiz edilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: PubMed veritabanı taranarak hakemli dergilerde yayınlanan ve 2009 ulusal kurultayında sunulmuş bildirilere uyan yayınlar saptandı. Tüm bildiriler için bildiri tipi, konu başlığı, birinci yazara ait kurum adı ve tipi; yayınlanmış bildiriler için ayrıca yayınlanma süresi, dergi adı ve etki faktörü, birinci isim değişikliği, yazar isimlerinde değişiklik olup olmaması kaydedildi. Elde edilen veriler ki-kare, Mann-Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Kurultayda sunulan toplam 569 bildiriden 96 tanesi (%16,8) beş yıl içinde uluslararası hakemli dergilerde yayınlanmıştır. Bu yayınlardan 21 tanesi kurultay öncesi döneme aitken geri kalan 75 bildiri için ortalama yayınlanma süresi 22±16,3 ay (1-57 ay) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sözel bildirilerin yayın olma oranı poster bildirilere kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha yüksektir (%30,5'e karşılık %13,3; p

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

What is the Ultimate Fate of Presented Abstracts? Conversion Rates of Presentations to International Publications from the 31st National Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery

Öz:

Objective: Oral and poster presentations held at national congresses are regarded as important means for sharing of latest scientific data and personal experiences. However, many ideas shared at annual conferences fail to be published. The objective of this study was to examine the publication rate of presentations held at the 31st National Congress of the Turkish Society of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons and to analyze various factors associated with publication.Material and Methods: The PubMed database was searched for peer-reviewed publications, corresponding to abstracts presented at the 2009 congress. For all abstracts, parameters including presentation type, topic, institution, author details, publication time, journal name, and impact factor were recorded. Collected data were analyzed using chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis tests for statistical significance. Results: In five years 16.8% of 569 proceedings were published in international peer-reviewed journals. The mean time to publication following the congress was 22 months (1–57 months) for 75 presentations, whereas 21 proceedings had been published prior to the congress. Compared with posters, the publication rate for oral presentations was significantly greater (30.5% vs. 13.3%; p

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Knobloch K. Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37(3): e1-2. [CrossRef]
2. Oliveira LR, Figueiredo AA, Choi M, Ferrarez CE, Bastos AN, Netto JM. The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2003 urological Brazilian meeting. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009; 64(4): 345-9. [CrossRef]
3. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2): MR000005. [CrossRef]
4. Schulte TL, Trost M, Osada N, Huck K, Lange T, Gosheger G, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132(2): 271-80. [CrossRef]
5. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA 1997; 277(11): 927-34. [CrossRef]
6. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Ryan G, Clifton J, Buckingham L, Willan A, et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA 1993; 269(21): 2749-53. [CrossRef]
7. Cartwright R, Khoo AK, Cardozo L. Publish or be damned? The fate of abstracts presented at the International Continence Society Meeting 2003. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26(2): 154-7. [CrossRef]
8. Kain N, Mishra A, McArthur P. Are we still publishing our presented abstracts from the British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (BAPRAS)? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63(9): 1572-3. [CrossRef]
9. Marx WF, Cloft HJ, Do HM, Kallmes D. The fate of neuroradiological abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20(6): 1173-7.
10. Evers JL. Publication bias in reproductive research. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(10): 2063-6. [CrossRef]
11. Harris IA, Mourad M, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM. Publication bias in abstracts presented to the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Orthop Surg 2007; 15(1): 62-6.
12. Jasko JJ, Wood JH, Schwartz HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (415): 98-103. [CrossRef]
13. Kwong Y, Kwong FN, Patel J. Publication rate of trauma abstracts presented at an international orthopaedic conference. Injury 2007; 38(7): 745-9. [CrossRef]
14. Morgan CJ, Cooper AJ, Dyer JP, Friedmann PS. The publication rates of abstracts presented at the British Association of Dermatologists Annual Meeting. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153(4): 855-7. [CrossRef]
15. Murry DB, Wright RW, Seiler JG, Day TE, Schwartz HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 1993 Annual Academy Meeting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (359): 247-53. [CrossRef]
16. Ng L, Hersey K, Fleshner N. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2004; 94(1): 79-81. [CrossRef]
17. Nguyen V, Tornetta P, Bkaric M. Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the OTA. Orthopaedic Trauma Association. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12(7): 457-9. [CrossRef]
18. Rao AR, Beatty JD, Laniado M, Motiwala HG, Karim OM. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the British Association of Urological Surgeons Annual Meeting. BJU Int 2006; 97(2): 306-9. [CrossRef]
19. Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, Jones A, Fenton JE. Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolaryngological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001; 26(3): 253-6. [CrossRef]
20. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Cook DJ, et al. Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(1): 158-63.
21. Wang JC, Yoo S, Delamarter RB. The publication rates of presentations at major spine specialty society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24(5): 425-7. [CrossRef]
22. Yentis SM, Campbell FA, Lerman J. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40(7): 632-4. [CrossRef]
23. Yoo S, Oh G, Wang JC. Publication rates of presentations made at annual meetings of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2002; 31(6): 367-9.
24. Kaya Mutlu E, Çelik D, Mutlu C, Razak Özdinçler A. Publication rates of oral presentations accepted at Advances in Physiotherapy Symposiums. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 2013; 24(2): 145-9.
25. Kalyoncu U, Çınar M, Demirağ MD, Yılmaz S, Erdem H, Kiraz S, ve ark. Ulusal Romatoloji Kongrelerinde sunulan bildirilerin irdelenmesi: Neredeyiz? RAED Dergisi 2011; 3(1-2): 6-10.
26. Özyurt S, Kaptanoğlu AF. 2004- 2008 Yılları Arasında İki Yılda Bir Yapılan Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongrelerinde Sunulan Özetlerin Yayınlanma Oranları. Dermatoz 2012; 3(1): 7-11.
27. Seçil M, Uçar G, Şentürk Ç, Karasu Ş, Dicle O. Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005; 11: 69-73.
28. Peng PH, Wasserman JM, Rosenfeld RM. Factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at the AAO-HNS Annual Meeting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 135(2): 197-203. [CrossRef]
29. Harris IA, Mourad MS, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting. ANZ J Surg 2006; 76(6): 427-31. [CrossRef]
30. Kleweno CP, Bryant WK, Jacir AM, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36(10): 1875-9. [CrossRef]
31. Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(5): 1428-35. [CrossRef]
32. Macdonald AL, Parsons C, Davenport M. Outcome of abstracts presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons congresses (1999–2008). J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47(2): 386-90. [CrossRef]
33. Li SF, Umemoto T, Crosley P, Cassidy C. SAEM abstracts to articles:1997 and 1999-2001. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11(9): 985-7. [CrossRef]
34. Schnatz PF, Romegialli A, Abrantes J, Marakovits K, Cunningham D, O’Sullivan DM, et al. The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menopause. 2008; 15(5): 996-1001. [CrossRef]
35. Schulte TL, Huck K, Osada N, Trost M, Lange T, Schmidt C, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the Spine Society of Europe (years 2000-2003). Eur Spine J 2012; 21(10): 2105-12. [CrossRef]
36. Yoon PD, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles. BJU Int 2012; 110(4): 485-9. [CrossRef]
37. von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramer MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3: 12. [CrossRef]
38. Glick N, MacDonald I, Knoll G, Brabant A, Gourishankar S. Factors associated with publication following presentation at a transplantation meeting. Am J Transplant 2006; 6(3): 552-6. [CrossRef]
39. Greenberg D, Wacht O, Pliskin JS. Peer review in publication: Factors associated with the full-length publication of studies presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making. Med Decis Making 2008; 28(6): 938-42. [CrossRef]
40. Guryel E, Durrant A, Alakeson R, Ricketts DM. From presentation to publication: The natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United Kingdom. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82(963): 70-2.
41. Turer AT, Mahaffey KW, Compton KL, Califf RM, Schulman KA. Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials: evidence from an academic medical center. Am Heart J 2007; 153(4): 674-80. [CrossRef]
42. Oliver DW, Whitaker IS, Chohan DP. Publication rates for abstracts presented at the British Association of Plastic Surgeons meetings: How do we compare with other specialties? Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56(2): 158-60. [CrossRef]
43. Gregory TN, Liu T, Machuk A, Arneja JS. What is the ultimate fate of presented abstracts? The conversion rates of presentations to publications over a five-year period from three North American plastic surgery meetings. Can J Plast Surg 2012; 20(1): 33-6.
44. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 1998; 280(3): 257-9. [CrossRef]
45. Hoag CC, Elterman DS, Macneily AE. Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: Determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol 2006; 176(6 Pt 1): 2624-9. [CrossRef]
46. Balasubramanian SP, Kumar ID, Wyld L, Reed MW. Publication of surgical abstracts in full text: a retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88(1): 57-61. [CrossRef]
47. Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R. Are abstract presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer reviewed-journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol 2007; 51(3): 833-40. [CrossRef]
48. Rodriguez JL, Laskin DM. Subsequent publication of oral and maxillofacial surgery meeting abstracts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70(5): 1261-4. [CrossRef]
49. Winnik S, Raptis DA, Walker JH, Hasun M, Speer T, Clavien PA. From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(24): 3034-45. [CrossRef]
50. Scholey JM, Harrison JE. Delay and failure to publish dental research. Evid Based Dent 2005; 6(3): 58-61. [CrossRef]
51. Dahllöf G, Wondimu B, Maniere MC. Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18(2): 91-7. [CrossRef]
52. Lee DJ, Yuan JC, Prasad S, Barao VA, Shyamsunder N, Sukotjo C. Analysis of abstracts presented at the prosthodontic research section of IADR General Sessions 2004-2005:demographics, publication rates, and factors contributing to publication. J Prosthodont 2012; 21(3): 225-31. [CrossRef]
53. Chung KJ, Lee JH, Kim YH, Kim TG, Ha JH. How many presentations are published as full papers? Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39(3): 238-43. [CrossRef]
54. Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, et al. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 2011; 115(6): 1258-61. [CrossRef]
55. Galang MT, Yuan JC, Lee DJ, Barao VA, Shyamsunder N, Sukotjo C. Factors influencing publication rates of abstracts presented at the ADEA annual session and exhibition. J Dent Educ 2011; 75(4): 549-56.
56. Petticrew M, Gilbody S, Song F. Lost information? The fate of papers presented at the 40th society for Social Medicine Conference. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53(7): 442-3. [CrossRef]
57. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272(2): 158-62. [CrossRef]
58. Walby A, Kelly AM, Georgakas C. Abstract to publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: how does emergency medicine compare? Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2001; 13(4): 460-4. [CrossRef]
59. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(7): 681-4. [CrossRef]
60. Poomkottayil D, Bornstein M, Sendi P. Lost in translation: the impact of publication language on citation frequency in the scientific dental literature. Swiss Med Wkly 2011; 141: w13148. [CrossRef]
61. Montané E, Vidal X. Fate of the abstracts presented at three Spanish clinical pharmacology congresses and reasons for unpublished research. BJU Int 2004; 94(1): 79-81.
62. Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won’t go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 703: 135-48. [CrossRef]
63. Koletsi D, Karagianni A, Pandis N, Makou M, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136(5): 632.e1-5; discussion 632-3.
64. Chan AW, Altman DG. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomized trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ 2005; 330(7494): 753-6. [CrossRef]
65. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291(20): 2457-65. [CrossRef]
66. Egger M, Smith GD, O’Rourke K. Rationale, potentials, and promise in systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith D G, Altman D G (eds.) Systematic reviews in health care meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London, UK; British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 2001: 3-19. [CrossRef]
67. de Andrade VA, Carpini S, Schwingel R, Calderan TR, Fraga GP. Publication of papers presented in a Brazilian Trauma Congress. Rev Col Bras Cir 2011; 38(3): 172-6.
68. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990; 263(10): 1405-8. [CrossRef]

APA	ERSOY B (2016). Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. , 8 - 18.
Chicago	ERSOY Burak Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. (2016): 8 - 18.
MLA	ERSOY Burak Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. , 2016, ss.8 - 18.
AMA	ERSOY B Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. . 2016; 8 - 18.
Vancouver	ERSOY B Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. . 2016; 8 - 18.
IEEE	ERSOY B "Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları." , ss.8 - 18, 2016.
ISNAD	ERSOY, Burak. "Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları". (2016), 8-18.

APA	ERSOY B (2016). Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 24(1), 8 - 18.
Chicago	ERSOY Burak Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery 24, no.1 (2016): 8 - 18.
MLA	ERSOY Burak Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol.24, no.1, 2016, ss.8 - 18.
AMA	ERSOY B Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2016; 24(1): 8 - 18.
Vancouver	ERSOY B Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2016; 24(1): 8 - 18.
IEEE	ERSOY B "Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları." Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 24, ss.8 - 18, 2016.
ISNAD	ERSOY, Burak. "Kongre Bildirilerinin Kaderi Nedir? TPRECD 31. Ulusal Kurultayında Sunulan Sözel ve Poster Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları". Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery 24/1 (2016), 8-18.