Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women

CANPOLAT, Uğur; Özer, Necla

Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women

Uğur CANPOLAT, (Cardiology Clinic, Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital; Ankara-Turkey)

Necla ÖZER (Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University; Ankara-Turkey)

Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi

0 0

Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 8 Sayfa Aralığı: 741 - 746 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women

Öz:

Cardiovascular diseases are the foremost cause of morbidity and mortality for both genders worldwide. Appropriate diagnostic tests with increased accuracy and safety provide the decisive relationship between diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, it has been known that women at risk for occurrence of CAD are less often conducted for the proper diagnostic tests compared to men. Many noninvasive diagnostic modalities (exercise/stress electrocardiogram, echocardiography, nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and coronary computerized tomography) are available for this purpose in the women. In this review, we present the current data on the role of both conventional and modern noninvasive diagnostic tests in the assessment of women with CAD suspicion

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, Budoff MJ, Flamm SD, Hundley WG, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation 2005; 111: 682-96. [CrossRef]
2. Eaker ED, Packard B, Wenger NK, Clarkson TB, Tyroler HA. Coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 641-4. [CrossRef]
3. Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: S4-20. [CrossRef]
4. Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every NR, Barron HV, Krumholz HM. Sexbased differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 217-25. [CrossRef]
5. Özer N. Kadınlarda Kardiyak Görüntülemede Farklılıklar ve Benzerlik. İstanbul: Logos Yayıncılık Tic. A.Ş., 2011.
6. Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with "normal" coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA 2005; 293: 477-84. [CrossRef]
7. Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Pepine CJ, Reis SE, Kelsey SF, Sopko G, et al. Persistent chest pain predicts cardiovascular events in women without obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NIHNHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischaemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1408-15. [CrossRef]
8. Stangl V, Witzel V, Baumann G, Stangl K. Current diagnostic concepts to detect coronary artery disease in women. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 707-17. [CrossRef]
9. Wenger NK, Speroff L, Packard B. Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 247-56. [CrossRef]
10. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 221-5. [CrossRef]
11. Matchar DB, Mark DB, Patel MR, editors. Non-invasive imaging for coronary artery disease. Technology Assessment. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006. p. 2010.
12. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2012; 126: e354-471. [CrossRef]
13. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979; 300: 1350-8. [CrossRef]
14. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002; 106: 1883-92. [CrossRef]
15. Nesto RW, Phillips RT, Kett KG, Hill T, Perper E, Young E, et al. Angina and exertional myocardial ischemia in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: assessment by exercise thallium scintigraphy. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 170-5. [CrossRef]
16. Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, Kennedy JW, Schloss M, Tristani F, et al. Exercise stress testing. Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary-artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 230-5. [CrossRef]
17. Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, Segal M, Redberg R. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 660-6. [CrossRef]
18. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, Miller DD, Bonow RO, Berman DS, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease--the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction]. J Nucl Cardiol 2003; 10: 95-101. [CrossRef]
19. Sanfilippo AJ, Abdollah H, Knott TC, Link C, Hopman W. Stress echocardiography in the evaluation of women presenting with chest pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective comparison with electrocardiographic stress testing. Can J Cardiol 2005; 21: 405-12.
20. Marwick TH, Anderson T, Williams MJ, Haluska B, Melin JA, Pashkow F, et al. Exercise echocardiography is an accurate and cost-efficient technique for detection of coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 335-41. [CrossRef]
21. Sawada SG, Ryan T, Fineberg NS, Armstrong WF, Judson WE, McHenry PL, et al. Exercise echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 1440-7. [CrossRef]
22. Yorgun H, Tokgözoğlu L, Canpolat U, Gürses KM, Bozdağ G, Yapıcı Z, et al. The cardiovascular effects of premature ovarian failure. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 506-10. [CrossRef]
23. Laurienzo JM, Cannon RO 3rd, Quyyumi AA, Dilsizian V, Panza JA. Improved specificity of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography compared to standard tests for evaluation of coronary artery disease in women presenting with chest pain. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1402-7. [CrossRef]
24. Shaw LJ, Bugiardini R, Merz CN. Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1561-75. [CrossRef]
25. Goodgold HM, Rehder JG, Samuels LD, Chaitman BR. Improved interpretation of exercise Tl-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in women: characterization of breast attenuation artifacts. Radiology 1987; 165: 361-6. [CrossRef]
26. Mieres JH, Makaryus AN, Cacciabaudo JM, Donaldson D, Green SJ, Heller GV, et al. Value of electrocardiographically gated singlephoton emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a cohort of symptomatic postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1096-9. [CrossRef]
27. Bokhari S, Shahzad A, Bergmann SR. Superiority of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging compared with the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2008; 19: 399-404. [CrossRef]
28. Santana-Boado C, Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Aguadé- Bruix S, García-Burillo A, Canela T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of technetium-99m-MIBI myocardial SPECT in women and men. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 751-5.
29. Grady D, Chaput L, Kristof M. Diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease in women: systematic reviews of evidence on selected topics. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2003; 81: 1-4.
30. Meijboom WB, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR, van Pelt N, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1532-7. [CrossRef]
31. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008; 118: 586-606. [CrossRef]
32. Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Aytemir K, Hazırolan T, Kaya EB, Ateş AH, et al. Cardiovascular risk and coronary atherosclerotic plaques detected by multidetector computed tomography: Framingham and SCORE risk models underestimate coronary atherosclerosis in the symptomatic low-risk Turkish population. Coron Artery Dis 2012; 23: 195-200. [CrossRef]
33. Einstein AJ. Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? Heart 2008; 94: 1519-21. [CrossRef]
34. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, van Werkhoven JM, Boersma E, de Roos A, et al. Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Heart 2008; 94: 48-52. [CrossRef]
35. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1724-32. [CrossRef]
36. Jug B, Gupta M, Papazian J, Li D, Tsang J, Bhatia H, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography in women. J Nucl Cardiol 2012; 19: 1154-61. [CrossRef]
37. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Hucko T, Manka R, Mirelis JG, Hamdan A, et al. Dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. Heart 2010; 96: 616-20. [CrossRef]
38. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Grothues F, Firmin DN, Collins P, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1948-53. [CrossRef]
39. Cury RC, Techasith T, Feuchtner G, Dabus G. Cardiovascular disease and stroke in women: role of radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 265-73. [CrossRef]
40. Buchthal SD, den Hollander JA, Merz CN, Rogers WJ, Pepine CJ, Reichek N, et al. Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 829-35. [CrossRef]

APA	CANPOLAT U, Özer N (2014). Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. , 741 - 746.
Chicago	CANPOLAT Uğur,Özer Necla Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. (2014): 741 - 746.
MLA	CANPOLAT Uğur,Özer Necla Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. , 2014, ss.741 - 746.
AMA	CANPOLAT U,Özer N Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. . 2014; 741 - 746.
Vancouver	CANPOLAT U,Özer N Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. . 2014; 741 - 746.
IEEE	CANPOLAT U,Özer N "Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women." , ss.741 - 746, 2014.
ISNAD	CANPOLAT, Uğur - Özer, Necla. "Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women". (2014), 741-746.

APA	CANPOLAT U, Özer N (2014). Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 14(8), 741 - 746.
Chicago	CANPOLAT Uğur,Özer Necla Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 14, no.8 (2014): 741 - 746.
MLA	CANPOLAT Uğur,Özer Necla Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, vol.14, no.8, 2014, ss.741 - 746.
AMA	CANPOLAT U,Özer N Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi. 2014; 14(8): 741 - 746.
Vancouver	CANPOLAT U,Özer N Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi. 2014; 14(8): 741 - 746.
IEEE	CANPOLAT U,Özer N "Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women." Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, 14, ss.741 - 746, 2014.
ISNAD	CANPOLAT, Uğur - Özer, Necla. "Noninvasive cardiac imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women". Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi 14/8 (2014), 741-746.