Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms

NURAN BAYRAM ARLI, (Uludag University)
Mine AYDEMİR, (Uludag University)
Zuhal YILDIRIM, (Uludag University)
Reyhan Leba TANSÖKER (Uludag University)
İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi
2 1
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 749 - 758 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms

Öz:
The share of small and medium-sized enterprises in the economy has increased in recent times. Nevertheless, it is seen among the most risky groups when evaluated in terms of tax compliance. The aim of the present study is to investigate the reliability and structural validity. Because of this aim we used the Turkish version of the tax compliance intention, general fairness, procedural fairness and social norms scale. The study group consists of 320 participants. We used AMOS program for the data analysis. As a result, the best fit indices are obtained. All factor loadings were found statistically significant after confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is calculated to determine the reliability of the scale in this study. Cronbach's alpha values of the all dimensions were found within the range between 0.73 and 0.90. The Turkish form of tax compliance intention, general fairness, procedural fairness and social norms scale was found to be adequate and reliable. These instruments can be used by the researchers in research in Turkey
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Azmi, A. C., & Perumal, A. K. (2008). Tax fairness dimensions in an Asian context: The Malaysian perspective. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 11-19.
  • Barbutamışu, N. (2011). A review of factors for tax compliance. Fascicle I. Economics and Applied Informatics, 1: 69-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254404758
  • Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş AMOS uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Benk, S., Tamer, B., & Çakmak, A. (2012). Tax professionals’ perceptions of tax fairness: Survey evidence in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(2), 112-117.
  • Blanthorne, C., & Kaplan, S. (2008). An egocentric model of the relations among the opportunity to underreport, social norms, ethical beliefs and underreporting behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7-8), 684-703.
  • Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13-38.
  • Bobek, D. D., Robin, W. R., & Sweeney, J. S. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 49-64.
  • Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2011). The social norms of tax compliance: Scale development, social desirability and presentation effects. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 15, 37–66.
  • Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the role of social norms in tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 451–468.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Çevik, S. (2012). Mükellefin devlet ve toplumla etkileşimi, bireysel normlar ve vergi ahlakı. Maliye Dergisi, 163, 258-289.
  • Christensen, A. L., Weihrich, S. G., & Gerbing, M. D. (1994). The impact of education on perceptions tax fairness. Advances in Taxation, 6, 63-94.
  • Cialdini, R., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Lindzey G., (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Boston: Oxford University Press.
  • Farrar, J. M. (2011). The impact of tax fairness dimensions on tax compliance: Canadian evidence. Schulich School of Business York University, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Toronto.
  • Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Tax compliance as a result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law & Policy, 29(1), 102-120.
  • Geberegbe, F. B., Idornigie G. A., & Nkanbia-Davies L. O. (2015). Perception of tax fairness and personal income tax compliance in Ken Saro-Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori. Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(6), 1-11.
  • George, G., & Richardson, G. (2005). Perceptions of tax fairness and tax compliance in Australia and Hong Kong - A Preliminary Study. Journal of Financial Crime, 12(4), 331-343.
  • Gerbing, M. D. (1988). An empirical study of taxpayer perceptions of fairness. University of Texas, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
  • Hanno, D. M., & Violette, G.R. (1996). An analysis of moral and social influences on taxpayer behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 57-75.
  • Hauptman, L., Horvat, M., & Korez-Vıde, R. (2014). Improving tax administration's services as a factor of tax compliance: The case of tax audit. Journal of Local Self-Government, 12(3), 481-501.
  • Hite, A. P. (1996). Commentary on analysis of moral and social influences on taxpayer behaviour. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8,76-79.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Hoyle, R. H., editor, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, 1-15. Sage Publications.
  • Jimenez, P. D. (2013). Tax compliance in a social setting: The influence of norms, perceptions of fairness and trust in government on taxpayer compliance. University of North Texas, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
  • Kazemi, A. (2009). There is more fairness in taxation than fair taxes: Introducing a multi-facated fairness framework of taxation. Dynamics Within and Outside the Lab,. Proceedings from The 6h Nordic Conference on Group and Social Psychology (May 2008, Lund), (Eds. S. From Jern and J. Näslund), 147-158.
  • Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kirchler E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346.
  • Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, (30), 607-610.
  • Marti, L. O., Migvi, S. W., & Obara, M. (2010). Taxpayers’ attitudes and tax compliance behaviour in Kenya. Afrikan Journal of Business & Management, 1, 112-122.
  • Murphy, K. (2007). Procedural justice and the regulation of tax compliance behaviour: The moderating role of personnel norms, (International Studies Program Working Paper 07-31 December, Georgia State University Andrew Young School of Policy Studies), 1-20.
  • Nabaweessi, J. (2006). Social norms and tax compliance among small business enterprises in Uganda. Makarere University, Unpublished Master Thesis.
  • Niesiobedzka, M. (2014). Relations between procedural fairness, tax morale, institutional trust and tax evasion. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 5(1), 1-12.
  • Nkwe, N. (2013). Tax payers’ attitude and compliance behavior among small medium enterprises (SMEs) in Botswana. Business and Management Horizons, 1(1), 113-137.
  • OECD (2010). Understanding and influencing taxpayers’ compliance behaviour, forum on tax administration: Small/medium enterprise (SME) compliance subgroup information note, Center for Tax Policy and Administration. https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/46274793.pdf, 16.11.2016.
  • Onu, D., & Outs L. (2014). Social norms and tax compliance. Tax Administration Research Centre, Discussion Paper: 006- 14.
  • Richardson, G. (2005). An exploratory cross-cultural study of tax fairness perceptions and tax compliance behaviour in Australia and Hong Kong. International Tax Journal, 31(1), 11-22.
  • Saad, N. (2011). Fairness perceptions and compliance behaviour: Taxpayers’ judgments in self-assessment environments. Doctor of Philosophy in Taxation, University of Canterbury.
  • Saad, N. (2012). Tax compliance behaviour: Taxpayer's view. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 344-351.
  • Saborit, E. B. (2015). Using social norms and pre-populated forms to improve tax collection in Manises. Dissertation - LSE Exec MSc on Behavioural Sciences, 1-36.
  • Smart, M. (2012). The application of the theory of planned behaviour and structural equation modelling in tax compliance behaviour: A New Zealand study. University of Canterbury, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modi_cation: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180.
  • Thomas, C. (2012). Assessing tax fairness dimensions in a small developing economy. Business and Economics Journal, 62, 1-8.
  • Topal, M. H. (2011). Refah devletine yönelik tutumlar ve vergi adaleti algısı: Türkiye üzerine bir araştırma. KTÜ Sosya Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Trabzon.
  • Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16, 657-684.
  • Trivedi, V.U., Shehata M., & Mestelman, S. (2005). Attitudes, incentives, and tax compliance. Canadian Tax Journal/Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 53(1), 29-61.
  • Wenzel, M. (2001). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers’ identity. Working Paper, No: 6.
  • Wenzel, M. (2004). The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5), 547-567.
  • Wenzel, M. (2004a). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213-228.
  • Wenzel, M. (2005). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(6), 862–883.
APA BAYRAM ARLI N, AYDEMIR DEV M, Yıldırım Z, TANSÖKER R (2017). Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. , 749 - 758.
Chicago BAYRAM ARLI NURAN,AYDEMIR DEV MINE,Yıldırım Zuhal,TANSÖKER Reyhan Leba Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. (2017): 749 - 758.
MLA BAYRAM ARLI NURAN,AYDEMIR DEV MINE,Yıldırım Zuhal,TANSÖKER Reyhan Leba Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. , 2017, ss.749 - 758.
AMA BAYRAM ARLI N,AYDEMIR DEV M,Yıldırım Z,TANSÖKER R Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. . 2017; 749 - 758.
Vancouver BAYRAM ARLI N,AYDEMIR DEV M,Yıldırım Z,TANSÖKER R Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. . 2017; 749 - 758.
IEEE BAYRAM ARLI N,AYDEMIR DEV M,Yıldırım Z,TANSÖKER R "Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms." , ss.749 - 758, 2017.
ISNAD BAYRAM ARLI, NURAN vd. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms". (2017), 749-758.
APA BAYRAM ARLI N, AYDEMIR DEV M, Yıldırım Z, TANSÖKER R (2017). Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 749 - 758.
Chicago BAYRAM ARLI NURAN,AYDEMIR DEV MINE,Yıldırım Zuhal,TANSÖKER Reyhan Leba Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 8, no.4 (2017): 749 - 758.
MLA BAYRAM ARLI NURAN,AYDEMIR DEV MINE,Yıldırım Zuhal,TANSÖKER Reyhan Leba Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.8, no.4, 2017, ss.749 - 758.
AMA BAYRAM ARLI N,AYDEMIR DEV M,Yıldırım Z,TANSÖKER R Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 8(4): 749 - 758.
Vancouver BAYRAM ARLI N,AYDEMIR DEV M,Yıldırım Z,TANSÖKER R Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 8(4): 749 - 758.
IEEE BAYRAM ARLI N,AYDEMIR DEV M,Yıldırım Z,TANSÖKER R "Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms." İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, ss.749 - 758, 2017.
ISNAD BAYRAM ARLI, NURAN vd. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis on Tax Compliance Intentions, General Fairness, Procedural Fairness and Social Norms". İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 8/4 (2017), 749-758.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 3:15

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları