Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line

Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 129 - 147 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line

Öz:
To meet the demands of various stakeholders and to comply with environmental legislations, businesses started to look at their supply chain to enhance their overall sustainability profile. Supply chain operations with sustainability awareness have become an important issue in recent years and make the sustainable supplier performance evaluation and selection process as a central concept of sustainable supply chain management. In this study, supplier selection problem is modelled within the context of sustainable supply chain based on the triple bottom line concept. This paper examined the problem of identifying best supplier based on sustainability principles for supplier selection operations in supply chains. Due to it’s multi-criteria nature, the sustainable supplier selection process requires an appropriate multi-criteria analysis and solution approach. Fuzzy TOPSIS method is applied for the performance evaluation and selection of an appropriate sustainable supplier of an energy company. According to the results, Supplier is recommended with low risk as the best sustainable supplier alternative
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainable supply management: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 168–182.
  • Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12 (6), 1668–1677.
  • Amiri-Aref, M., Javadian, N., & Kazemi, M. (2012). A new fuzzy pozitive and negative ideal solution for fuzzy TOPSIS. WSEAS Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 11 (3), 92–103.
  • Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson-Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (5), 497–516.
  • Asrafzadeh, M., Rafiei, F. M., Isfahani, N. M., & Zare, Z. (2012). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: A case study. Interdiciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3 (9), 655–671.
  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124 (1), 252–264
  • Başkaya, Z., & Avcı Öztürk, B. (2012). Tedarikçi değerlendirme probleminde bulanık TOPSIS algoritması ile grup karar verme ve karar vericilerin bireysel kararları arasındaki ilişkiler. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, XXXI (1), 153–178.
  • Bellman R. E., & Zadeh L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17 (4), 141–164.
  • Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42 (4), 372–387.
  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in Industry, 62 (2), 164–174.
  • Büyüközkan, G. (2012). An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. International Journal of Production Research, 50 (11), 2892– 2909.
  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38 (5), 360–387.
  • Chen, C. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets And Systems, 114 (1), 1–9.
  • Chen, C., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal Of Production Economics, 102 (2), 289 –301.
  • Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multi attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System Series, Vol: 375, NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ding, J. (2011). An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking alternatives and its application. Journal Of Marine Science And Technology, 19 (4), 341–352.
  • Erol, İ., Sencer, S., & Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecological Economics, 70 (6), 1088–1100.
  • Ghorbani, M., Velayati, R., & Ghorbani, M. M. (2011). Using fuzzy TOPSIS to determine strategy priorities by SWOT analysis – Singapore, International Conference on Financial Management and Economics. IPEDR, vol. 11, IACSIT Press, 135–139.
  • Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 149–159.
  • Goebel, P., Reuter, C., Pibernik, R., & Sichtmann, C. (2012). The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 7–17.
  • Goel, P. (2010). Triple bottom line reporting: An analytical approach for corporate sustainability. Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 1 (1), 27–42.
  • Gopalakrishnan, K., Yusuf, Y. Y., Musa, A., Abubakar, T., & Ambursa, H. M. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 193–203.
  • Govindan K., Khodaverdi R., & Jafarian A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.
  • Guo, P., Feng, J., & Yang, L. (2008). Fuzzy TOPSIS algorithm for multiple criteria decision making with an application in information systems project selection – USA WiCOM 08.
  • 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. IEEE, 1–4.
  • Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 69–82.
  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications : a state-of-the-art survey. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Jackson, A., Boswell, K., & Davis, D. (2011). Sustainability and triple bottom line reporting – What is it all about?. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1 (3), 55–59
  • Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H., Hsu, C., & Hung, H. (2009). A green supplier selection model for hightech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (4), 7917–7927.
  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (2), 37–56.
  • Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (1), 19–37.
  • Rabenasolo, B., & Zeng, X. (2012). A risk-based multi-criteria decision support system for sustainable development in the textile supply chain. (Ed.) J. Lu, L. C. Jain & G. Zang, Handbook on Decision Making (pp. 151–170). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15), 1699– 1710.
  • Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170–179.
  • Verdecho, M. J., Alfaro-Saiz, J. J., & Rodriguez, R. R. (2012). A performance measurement framework for monitoring supply chain sustainability – Vigo. 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management. WCED report: Our common future (1987). http://conspect.nl/pdf/Our_Common_FutureBrundtland_Report_1987.pdf (Erişim Tarihi, 05 Haziran 2012).
  • Wen, L., Xu, L., & Wang, R. (2013). Sustainable supplier evaluation based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets group decision methods. Journal of Information & Computational Science, 10 (10), 3209–3220.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information And Control, 8 (3), 338–353. Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of selection methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107 (3), 577–529.
APA AVCI ÖZTÜRK B, ÖZÇELİK F (2014). Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. , 129 - 147.
Chicago AVCI ÖZTÜRK BURCU,ÖZÇELİK Funda Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. (2014): 129 - 147.
MLA AVCI ÖZTÜRK BURCU,ÖZÇELİK Funda Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. , 2014, ss.129 - 147.
AMA AVCI ÖZTÜRK B,ÖZÇELİK F Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. . 2014; 129 - 147.
Vancouver AVCI ÖZTÜRK B,ÖZÇELİK F Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. . 2014; 129 - 147.
IEEE AVCI ÖZTÜRK B,ÖZÇELİK F "Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line." , ss.129 - 147, 2014.
ISNAD AVCI ÖZTÜRK, BURCU - ÖZÇELİK, Funda. "Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line". (2014), 129-147.
APA AVCI ÖZTÜRK B, ÖZÇELİK F (2014). Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 129 - 147.
Chicago AVCI ÖZTÜRK BURCU,ÖZÇELİK Funda Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 5, no.3 (2014): 129 - 147.
MLA AVCI ÖZTÜRK BURCU,ÖZÇELİK Funda Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.5, no.3, 2014, ss.129 - 147.
AMA AVCI ÖZTÜRK B,ÖZÇELİK F Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2014; 5(3): 129 - 147.
Vancouver AVCI ÖZTÜRK B,ÖZÇELİK F Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2014; 5(3): 129 - 147.
IEEE AVCI ÖZTÜRK B,ÖZÇELİK F "Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line." İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, ss.129 - 147, 2014.
ISNAD AVCI ÖZTÜRK, BURCU - ÖZÇELİK, Funda. "Sustainable Supplier Selection with A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Triple Bottom Line". İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 5/3 (2014), 129-147.