Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses

DEMİROK, GÜLİZAR; BOSTANCI-CERAN, Başak; Can, İzzet; Takmaz, Tamer; UYSAL, BETÜL SEHER

Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses

Başak BOSTANCI-CERAN, (Ankara Ulucanlar Göz Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Tamer TAKMAZ, (Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye)

İzzet CAN, (Özel Maya Göz Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Gülizar DEMİROK, (Ufuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dr. Rıdvan Ege Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Betül Seher UYSAL (Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

0 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 597 - 603 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses

Öz:

Background/aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and optical performance of 4 different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Materials and methods: Ninety eyes of 51 patients who received Reviol MFM 611, Reviol MFM 625, Acri.LISA, and ReSTOR SN6AD3 multifocal IOLs after cataract surgery were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were similar in terms of age, sex, cataract hardness and axial length. The mean outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuity (DCIVA, DCNVA), intra or postoperative complications, and contrast sensitivity (CS) results under mesopic conditions. The mean follow up period was 10.5 months (range: 6 12 months). Results: All cases were within ± 0.75 D of emmetropia. Postoperative increase in UDVA and DCNVA was statistically significant in all groups. The Acri.LISA group showed slightly lower DCIVA compared with the other IOLs. CS was clinically similar between the groups. None of the patients developed any early or late postoperative complication or neuroadaptation problem, which necessitated explantation of the lens. Conclusion: All four multifocal lens designs provided satisfactory visual functions and CS results in patients who fulfilled the criteria for multifocal lens implantation.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Mester U, Hunold W, Wesendahl T, Kaymak H. Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refr Surg 2007; 33: 1033-1040.
2. Zelichowska B, Re Mickas M, Stankiewicz A, Cervino A, Montes-Mico R. Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: optical and visual evaluation. J Cataract Refr Surg 2008; 34: 2036-2042.
3. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Baamonde MB, MontesMico R. Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refr Surg 2007; 33: 1235-1243.
4. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM. The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831-836.
5. Richter-Mueksch S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W. Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refr Surg 2002; 28: 1957-1963.
6. Alio JL, Radner W, Plaza-Puche AB, Ortiz D, Neipp MC, QuilesnMJ, Rodriguez-Marin J. Design of short Spanish sentences for measuring reading performance: Radner-Vissum test. J Cataract Refr Surg 2008; 34: 638-642.
7. Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B. The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp 2002; 240: 461-467.
8. Heutz WW, Eckhardt HB, Reohrig B, Grolmus R. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refr Surg 2006; 32: 2015-2021.
9. Rodriguez-Galietero A, Monte´s-Mico´ R, Munoz G, Albarran- Diego C. Comparison of contrast sensitivity and color discrimination after clear and yellow intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refr Surg 2005; 31: 1736-1740.
10. Rodriguez-Galietero A, Montes-Mico R, Munoz G, AlbarranDiego C. Blue-light filtering intraocular lens patients with diabetes: contrast sensitivity and chromatic discrimination. J Cataract Refr Surg 2005; 31: 2088-2092.
11. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Valcarcel B, Montes-Mico R. Visual performances after Acrysof ReSTOR aspheric intraocular lens implantation. J Optom 2008; 1: 30-35.
12. Alfonso JF, Fernandez L, Puchades C, Montes,Mico R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refr Surg 2010; 36: 733- 739.
13. Alfonso J, Fernandez-Vega L, Senaris A, Montes-Mico R. Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refr Surg 2007; 33: 1930-1935.
14. Kaymak H, Mester U. First results with a new aberration correcting bifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmologe 2007; 104: 1046-1051 (article in German with an abstract in English).
15. Can İ, Bostancı Ceran B, Soyugelen G, Takmaz T. Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refr Surg 2012; 38: 60-67.
16. Akova Y, Arslan O, Baykara M, Cinh M, Takmaz AGT, Usta Y. Safety and effectiveness of Acriva Reviol MFB 625 multifocal intraocular lens: a prospective multicenter clinical study. In: The 30th Congress of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons; 812 September 2012; Milan, Italy: ESCRS; 2012.
17. Ravalico G, Parentin F, Baccara F. Effect of astigmatism on multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refr Surg 1999; 25: 804-807.
18. Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, Krist R, Pfeiffer N. Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1878-1886.
19. Monte´s-Mico´R, Espana E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses; mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 85-96.
20. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, RodriguezPratz J, Ayala MJ. Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refr Surg 2011; 37: 638-648.
21. Vingolo EM, Grenga PL, Iacobelli L, Grenga G. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refr Surg 2007; 33: 1244-1247.
22. Gray PJ, Lyall MG. Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implants for unilateral cataracts in prepresbyopic patients. Brit J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 336-337.
23. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Luke C, Jacobi FK. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in prepresbyopic patients with unilateral cataract. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 680686.
24. Haring G, Gronemeyer A, Hedderich J, de Decker W. Stereoacuity and aniseikonia after unilateral and bilateral implantation of the Array refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refr Surg 1999; 25: 1151-1156.
25. Cionni RJ, Osher R, Snyder ME, Nordlund ML. Visual outcome comparison of unilateral versus bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction Prospective 6-month study. J Cataract Refr Surg 2009; 35: 1033-1039.

APA	BOSTANCI-CERAN B, Takmaz T, Can İ, DEMİROK G, UYSAL B (2016). Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. , 597 - 603.
Chicago	BOSTANCI-CERAN Başak,Takmaz Tamer,Can İzzet,DEMİROK GÜLİZAR,UYSAL BETÜL SEHER Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. (2016): 597 - 603.
MLA	BOSTANCI-CERAN Başak,Takmaz Tamer,Can İzzet,DEMİROK GÜLİZAR,UYSAL BETÜL SEHER Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. , 2016, ss.597 - 603.
AMA	BOSTANCI-CERAN B,Takmaz T,Can İ,DEMİROK G,UYSAL B Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. . 2016; 597 - 603.
Vancouver	BOSTANCI-CERAN B,Takmaz T,Can İ,DEMİROK G,UYSAL B Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. . 2016; 597 - 603.
IEEE	BOSTANCI-CERAN B,Takmaz T,Can İ,DEMİROK G,UYSAL B "Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses." , ss.597 - 603, 2016.
ISNAD	BOSTANCI-CERAN, Başak vd. "Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses". (2016), 597-603.

APA	BOSTANCI-CERAN B, Takmaz T, Can İ, DEMİROK G, UYSAL B (2016). Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 46(3), 597 - 603.
Chicago	BOSTANCI-CERAN Başak,Takmaz Tamer,Can İzzet,DEMİROK GÜLİZAR,UYSAL BETÜL SEHER Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 46, no.3 (2016): 597 - 603.
MLA	BOSTANCI-CERAN Başak,Takmaz Tamer,Can İzzet,DEMİROK GÜLİZAR,UYSAL BETÜL SEHER Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.46, no.3, 2016, ss.597 - 603.
AMA	BOSTANCI-CERAN B,Takmaz T,Can İ,DEMİROK G,UYSAL B Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 46(3): 597 - 603.
Vancouver	BOSTANCI-CERAN B,Takmaz T,Can İ,DEMİROK G,UYSAL B Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 46(3): 597 - 603.
IEEE	BOSTANCI-CERAN B,Takmaz T,Can İ,DEMİROK G,UYSAL B "Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 46, ss.597 - 603, 2016.
ISNAD	BOSTANCI-CERAN, Başak vd. "Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 46/3 (2016), 597-603.