Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 79 - 94 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir)

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

-

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to determine the awareness level of classroom teachers about teacher autonomy. For this purpose, related literature was reviewed and an item pool was prepared from the literature obtained and was presented to educational sciences and Turkish Language experts to be viewed. After the review of the experts, some of the items were eliminated and some of them had been rewritten. The participants of the study were expected to give answers for items given on ascale rangingfrom Totally Disagree, Disagree, No Idea, Agree and Totally Agree. The pilot study of the questionnaire was applied to 100 classroom teachers and final form of questionnaire was shaped.The questionnaires were distributed to 1000 instructors and 779 questionnaires have been returned. Factor analysis was thendone to determine the structure validity. Because of themodular structre of the scale, factor analysis was done seperately for each subtest which can be defined within the superstructure (Teacher Autonomy) and are relevant in and of themselves. The reliability of the scale has been analyzed through Cronbach’s Alpha Value and the scale was found to be reliable. It shows that the scale can be applied to determine the level of awareness of classroom teachers as it applies to teacher autonomy
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Anderson, L. W. (1987). The Decline of Teacher Autonomy: Teers or Cheers?. International Review ofEducation, (3), 357-373.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., E. K. Çakmak, Ö. E. Akgün, Ş. Karadeniz, F. Demirel. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınevi.
  • Can, N. (2009). The Leadership Behaviours of Teachers in Primary Schools in Turkey. Education, 129(3), 436-447.
  • Castle, K. (2004). The Meaning of Autonomy in Early Childhood Teacher Education. Journal ofEarly Childhood, Teacher education, 25(1), 3-10.
  • Euyrdice Avrupa Birimi. Avrupa’daki Öğretmenlerin Sorumluluk ve Özerklik Düzeyleri, 2008. <http://Www.euyrdice.org>
  • Firestone, W. A. (1991). Merit Pay and Job Enlargement as Reforms: Incentives, Implementation and Teacher Response. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(3), 269-288.
  • Freidman, [. A. (February 1999). Teacher-Perceived Work Autonomy: The Concept and lts Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
  • Franklin, H. N. (1988). Principle Consideraiton and its Relationship to Teacher Sense of Autonomy. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1998), Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Ingersol, R.M. (1997). The Status of Teaching As Profession: 1990-1991 (NCES 97-104). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Ingersol, R.M. (2007). Short on Power Long on Responsibility. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 20-25.
  • Lamb, T. E. (2007). Learner Autonomy and Teacher Autonomy, Synthesising an Agenda.
  • Lamb TE. and Reinders, H. (Eds.), Learner and Teacher Autonomy: Concepts, Realities and Responses içinde. Amsterdam: John Benj amins.
  • Lamb, T. E. (2000). indind Voice-Learner Autonomy-Teacher Education in an Urban Context. B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and TE. Lamb (Eds.), Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions içinde (118127). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Lightfoot, S. L. (1986). On Goodness of Shool: Themes of Empowerment. Peabody Journal ofEducation, 63(3), 9-28.
  • Little, J.V. (1990). The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers Professional Relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
  • Mackenzie, A. (2000). Changing Contexts: Connecting Teacher Autonomy and Institutional Development. A.S. Mackenzie, E. Mc Cafferty (Eds.), Developing Autonomy: Proceeings of the JALT CUE Conference içinde (223-232). Tokyo: The Japan Associaiton for Language Teaching College and University Edweators Special Interest Group.
  • McGrath, Ian. (2000). Teacher Autonomy. B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and E. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions içinde (100-110). London: Longman.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2005). Talim Terbiye Kurulu Program Geliştirme Çalışmaları. (http:/ /Www.meb.gov.tr)
  • Mustafa M. ve Cullingford C. (2008). Teacher Autonomy and Centralised Control: The Case of Textbooks. International Journal ofEducational Development, 28, 81-88.
  • Pearson, L. C. ve W. Moomaw. (2005a). The Relationship Between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment and Professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 28(1), 37-53.
  • Pearson, L. C. ve Moomaw. W. (2005b). Continuing Validation of the Teaching Autonomy Scale, Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Pearson, L. C. ve Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching Autonomy Scale. Journal of educational research, 86 (3), 172-177.
  • Porter, A. C. (1989). External Standarts and Good Teaching: The Pros and Cons of Telling Teachers What to Do. Educational Evaluation Policy Analysis, 11, 343-36.
  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1987). Education Reform Strategies: Will They Increase Teacher Commitment?. American Journal ofEducation, 95(4), 534-562.
  • Short, P. M. (1994). Defining Teacher Empowerment. Education, 114 (4), 488-492.
  • Smith, R. C. (2000). Starting with Ourselves: Teacher-Learner Autonomy in Language Learning. B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. E. Lamb (Eds.), Learner Autonomy-Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions içinde (89-99). London:Longman.
  • Smith, R.C. (2001). Learner and teacher development: Connections and Constraints. The Language Teacher, 25(6), 43-4.
APA ÜZÜM P, KARSLI M (2013). Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). , 79 - 94.
Chicago ÜZÜM Püren,KARSLI Mehmet Durdu Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). (2013): 79 - 94.
MLA ÜZÜM Püren,KARSLI Mehmet Durdu Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). , 2013, ss.79 - 94.
AMA ÜZÜM P,KARSLI M Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). . 2013; 79 - 94.
Vancouver ÜZÜM P,KARSLI M Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). . 2013; 79 - 94.
IEEE ÜZÜM P,KARSLI M "Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir)." , ss.79 - 94, 2013.
ISNAD ÜZÜM, Püren - KARSLI, Mehmet Durdu. "Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir)". (2013), 79-94.
APA ÜZÜM P, KARSLI M (2013). Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 79 - 94.
Chicago ÜZÜM Püren,KARSLI Mehmet Durdu Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14, no.3 (2013): 79 - 94.
MLA ÜZÜM Püren,KARSLI Mehmet Durdu Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.14, no.3, 2013, ss.79 - 94.
AMA ÜZÜM P,KARSLI M Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 14(3): 79 - 94.
Vancouver ÜZÜM P,KARSLI M Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 14(3): 79 - 94.
IEEE ÜZÜM P,KARSLI M "Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir)." İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, ss.79 - 94, 2013.
ISNAD ÜZÜM, Püren - KARSLI, Mehmet Durdu. "Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Authonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir)". İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14/3 (2013), 79-94.