BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS

Drew S. FAGAN (Dr., College of Education, University of Maryland, USA)
Novitas-Royal
4 1
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 45 - 63 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS

Öz:
Sınıf ortamlarında sözlü öğretmen dönütünün öğrenme olanaklarını etkilediği dil öğrenme araştırmalarında belirtilmektedir, fakat, öğretmenlerin bu durumlarda dönütlerini nasıl ve neden yapılandırdıkları ile ilgili görgül kanıt eksikliği göze çarpmaktadır. Bu çalışma, bir İkinci Dil olarak İngilizce öğretmeninin öğrenci cevaplarını düzeltirken olumlu dönütlerini sistematik olarak nasıl yapılandırdığını, ve gerçek zamanlı kararlarını etkileyen faktörleri açıklayarak bu konuyu ele almaktadır. Konuşma çözümlemesi çerçevesi ile, çalışmada üç belirgin öğretmen uygulaması ortaya çıkmaktadır: olumlu değerlendirme yapmak, akran değerlendirmesine imkan sağlamak ve olumlu değerlendirme ima etmek. Her bir uygulama meydana geldikleri dizimsel ortamlara ve onların değişiklik gösteren yapılarına odaklanarak detaylandırılmaktadır. Söylemde açık olduğu üzere, öğretmenin bu uygulamaları sistematik bir şekilde kullanmasının temelinde o anki konuşmanın hedeflerine uygun olarak sınıftaki tüm öğrencilerle etkileşimsel akışı devam ettirmek ve bilgi anlaşılırlığını korumak vardır. Bulgular, öğretmenin dönüt verirken birçok faktörle eşzamanlı olarak nasıl ilgileneceğine karar vermesindeki becerisini göstererek hem olumlu dönüt hem de dil öğrenme literatürlerine katkıda bulunmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

-

Öz:
That oral teacher feedback influences learning opportunities in classroom settings is found acrosslanguage learning research, though there remains lack of empirical evidence concerning how and why teachersconstruct their feedback turns in situ. The current paper begins to address this by uncovering how one English asSecond Language (ESL) teacher systematically constructs the positive feedback turn when addressing what sheorients to as correct learner responses to her initiations, and the factors fo ın tfîdisc urs to influ nce her real--%d Utilizing the framework of conversation analysis (CA), %% MH pEfİKESâlâ? pğSlm th assessmfizé1nv1tmg .pîer assessmenEğ Mai posıtıve WGSSeğHIImZîW (Beğ?maintaining interactional flow and ensuring information clarity with all learnersın the classın relation to the goalsof the immediate talk. The findings contribute to both the positive feedback and language learning literatures byillustrating the dexterity teachers possess in deciding how to address multiple factors simultaneously when providing feedback.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Allwright, R. (1980). Turns, topics, and tasks: Patterns of participation in language learning and teaching. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research, (pp. 165-187). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25, 243 272.
  • Black, P., Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2], 5-31.
  • Bogdan, R., Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and practice (5th Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Borg, S. (1998). Teachers" pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 9-38.
  • Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: functional analysis. Review ofEducational Research, 51, 5- 32.
  • Burnett, P.C., Mandel, V. (2010). Praise and feedback in the primary classroom: Teachers' and students' perspectives. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 10, 145-154.
  • Clark, H.H., Schaefer, E.F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
  • Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. CouperKuhlen M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, (pp. 366- 405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Couper-Kuhlen, E., Selting, M. (1996). Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and prosodic perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional Studies, (pp. 11-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the F-move. ELT Journal, 56, 117- 127.
  • Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, ], 3-18.
  • Gass, S., Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output. AILA Review, 19, 3-17.
  • Goodwin, M.H., Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures and coparticipation in the activity of searching for word. Semiotica, 62, 51-75.
  • Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M.H. (1992). Context, activity, and participation. In P. Auer and A.
  • de Luzio (Eds.), The Contextualization of Language, (pp. 77-99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Gutierrez, A.G. (2008). Microgenesis, method and object: study of collaborative activity in Spanish as foreign language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 29, 120-148.
  • Hall, J.K. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: sociohistorical perspective of face-to face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 206-232.
  • Hall, J.K. (2002). Methods for teaching foreign languages: Creating community of learners in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hall, J.K., Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 21, 376-406.
  • Hattie, ., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review ofEducational Research, 77, 81-1 12.
  • Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analyzing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.
  • Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32, 79-104.
  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Antaki, C. (1997). Creating happy people by asking yes-no questions. Research on Language Social Interaction, 30, 285-313.
  • Irving, S.E., Harris, L.R., Petersen, E.R. (2011). "One assessment doesn't serve all purposes' or does it? New Zealand teachers describe assessment and feedback. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 413-426.3
  • Jean, G., Simard, D. (2011). Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students' and teachers' beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 1-36.
  • Jenks, C.J (2013). "Your pronunciation and your accent is very excellent': Orientations of identity during compliment sequences in English as lingua franca encounters. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13, 165-181.
  • Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on "latency" in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9, 153-183.
  • Jefferson, G. (1988). Preliminary notes on possible metric which provides for "standard maximum' silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective, (pp. 166-196). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Lantolf, J., Poehner, M. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/theory divide. New York: Routledge.
  • Lasagabaster, D., Sierra, J.M. (2005). Error correction: Students' vs. teachers' perceptions. Language Awareness, 14, 112-127.
  • Liu, Y. (2008). Teacher-student talk in Singapore Chinese language classrooms: case study of initiation/response/follow-up (IRF). Asia Pacific Journal ofEducation, 28, 87-102.
  • Long, M.H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lyster, R., Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
  • Lyster, R., Saito, K., Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Learning, 46, 1-40.
  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What the hands reveal about thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons." Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mori, R. (2011). Teacher cognition in corrective feedback in Japan. System, 39, 451-467.
  • Narciss, S., Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H.M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, R. Brunken (Eds), Instructional design for multimedia learning, (pp. 181-195). Munster, NY: Waxmann.
  • Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A. (1991). Student engagement: When recitation becomes conversation. In. H.C. Waxman H.J. Walberg (Eds), Effective teaching: Current research, (pp. 257-276). Berkeley, CA: McCutchen.
  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In .M. Atkinson J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ranta, L., Lyster, R. (2007). cognitive approach to improving immersion students" oral language abilities: The Awareness-Practice-Feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspective from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology, (pp. 141-160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
  • Reigel, D. (2008). Positive feedback in pairwork and its association with ESL course level promotion. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 79-98.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. (1974). The simplest systematics for the organization of tum-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
  • Schegloff, BA. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture ofthe language classroom." conversation analysis perspective. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Selting, M. (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29, 477-517.
  • Sinclair, .M., Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2007). Adult education annual report to congress year 2004--05 Washington, D.C.: Author.
  • Vigil, N.A., Oller, J.W. (1976). Rule fossilization: tentative model. Language Learning, 26, 281-295.
  • Waring, H.Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 577-594.
  • Wong, J., Waring, HZ. (2009). 'Very good' as teacher response. ELT Journal, 63, 195-203.
  • Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers' choice and learners' preference of corrective-feedback types. Language Awareness, 17, 78-93
APA FAGAN D (2014). BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. , 45 - 63.
Chicago FAGAN Drew S. BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. (2014): 45 - 63.
MLA FAGAN Drew S. BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. , 2014, ss.45 - 63.
AMA FAGAN D BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. . 2014; 45 - 63.
Vancouver FAGAN D BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. . 2014; 45 - 63.
IEEE FAGAN D "BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS." , ss.45 - 63, 2014.
ISNAD FAGAN, Drew S.. "BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS". (2014), 45-63.
APA FAGAN D (2014). BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. Novitas-Royal, 8(1), 45 - 63.
Chicago FAGAN Drew S. BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. Novitas-Royal 8, no.1 (2014): 45 - 63.
MLA FAGAN Drew S. BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. Novitas-Royal, vol.8, no.1, 2014, ss.45 - 63.
AMA FAGAN D BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. Novitas-Royal. 2014; 8(1): 45 - 63.
Vancouver FAGAN D BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS. Novitas-Royal. 2014; 8(1): 45 - 63.
IEEE FAGAN D "BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS." Novitas-Royal, 8, ss.45 - 63, 2014.
ISNAD FAGAN, Drew S.. "BEYOND "EXCELLENT ": UNCOVERING THE SYSTEMATICITY BEHIND POSITIVE FEEDBACK TURN CONSTRUCTION IN ESL CLASSROOMS". Novitas-Royal 8/1 (2014), 45-63.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
06-05-2024 13:38

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları