İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 66 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 66 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller

Öz:
Problem Durumu: Eğitim kurumlarında etkili eğitimin gerçekleştirilmesinde okullardaki yönetici, öğretmen ve öğrenciler yanında öğrenci velileriyle kurulan iletişim büyük önem taşır. Özellikle sınıf içindeki öğrenci performansına ilişkin öğretmen ve veliler arasında kurulan iletişim öğrenci sorunlarının daha iyi anlaşılması, velilerin eğitime olan desteklerinin artırılması, etkili yönlendirme ve rehberlik yapılması ve nihayet öğrenci güdülenmesinin ve başarısının artırılmasında yaşamsal önem taşır. Etkili iletişim, güçlü okul-aile işbirliğini yaratmak ve veli katılımını artırmak için gereklidir. Öğretmen sadece öğretme sanatında beceri sahibi olmamalı, aynı zamanda kendi veli topluluğuyla etkili iletişime yönelik bilgi veEurasian Journal of Educational Research 45
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel

How Do Students Prove Their Learning and Teachers Their Teaching? Do Teachers Make a Difference?

Öz:
Problem Statement: Gaining reasoning skills in early years affects the formalproving skills in the following years, thus it is quite significant. Theacquiring of this skill is only possible with the approaches that theteachers used in the process. At this point, the problem to be researched interms of making proofs is seen in how middle school students prove amathematical expression; what kinds of reasoning and proof types theyuse in this process; how the teachers of these students prove the sameexpression; and how they reflect it to their instruction.Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to investigate the middleschool students’ and their teachers’ reasoning types and proof methodswhile proving a mathematical expression.Method: A basic qualitative research design was conducted to investigatethe research problems. Participants in this study were two middle schoolmathematics teachers who have different professional experiences, and 18students from 6th, 7th and 8th grades. A clinical interview technique wasused to collect data and the interviews were video recorded. A thematicanalysis method was used to analyze the data.Findings and Results: The middle school students tried to decide on theargument by following specific cases in order to verify a mathematicalexpression, and in this context they performed several actions, such aspattern recognition, seeking the relationship between two variables, andmaking conjectures. They have performed three types of actions, namelyverification, explanation and abstraction during the proving of amathematical expression. Moreover, they have provided some argumentswhich were not accepted as proof, by offering experimental, intuitive or illogical justification. On the other hand, it has been observed that themiddle school mathematic teachers thought in the same way that theirstudents thought while proving a given mathematical expression.Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations: As a result of this study, it hasbeen found that students had difficulties in proving mathematicalstatements; they preferred to use experimental proofs and mostly adaptedan inductive approach. On the other hand, the proving tendency of theteachers was mostly at a verification and explanation level; they have asimilar structure of thinking with their students in the process of provingmathematical expressions. Reasoning and proof should be thefundamental aspects of mathematics teaching, should play a significantrole in mathematical contents without taking it independently, and shouldbe developed in the earlier years. In addition, to what extent mathematicstextbooks and mathematics curriculum in each grade level support thereasoning and proof standards should be investigated.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arslan, C. (2007). The development of elementary school students on their reasoning and proof ideas. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Uludag University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Bursa.
  • Aylar, E. (2014). Examination of 7th grade students’ ability on proving and their perception of proving. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University Graduate School of Educational, Ankara.
  • Ball, D.L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin. & D. Schifter. (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp 227-236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Becker, J. R. & Rivera, F. (2006). Sixth graders’ figural and numerical strategies for generalizing patterns in algebra. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Saiz, & A. Mendez (Eds.), Proceeding of The 28th Annual Meeting of The North American Chapter of The international Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2), (pp. 95-101). Merida, Mexico: Universidad Pedagogica Nacional.
  • Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., & Sumpter, L. (2006). Upper middle students’ task reasoning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31, 1495-1509.
  • Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, (pp. 547-589). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Guler, G. & Ekmekci, S. (2016). Examination of the proof evaluation skills of the prospective mathematics teachers: the example of sum of successive odd numbers. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 11 (1), 59-83.
  • Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: results from exploratory studies. In A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, (pp. 234 - 283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
  • Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Camhell & R. Zaskis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory, (pp. 185-212). New Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Iskenderoglu, T. A. & Baki, A. (2011). Quantitative analysis of pre-service elemantary mathematics teachers’ opinions about doing mathematical proof. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 2275-2290.
  • Jones, K. (2000). The student experience of mathematical proof at university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Scienceand Technology, 31(1), 53-60.
  • Knuth, E. J. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teachers Education, 5, 61 – 88.
  • Knuth, E.J., Slaughter, M., Chooppin, J., & Sutherland, J. (2002). Mapping the conceptual terrain of middle school students’ competencies in justifying and proving. In S. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. Y. White, H.G Wiegel, R. l. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.), Prooceeding of the 24th Meeting for PME-NA (pp. 1693-1700). Athens, GA.
  • Knuth, E. & Sutherland, J. (2004). Student understanding of generality. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, (pp. 561-567). Retrieved June 14, 2015, from
  • http://labweb.education.wisc.edu/~knuth/mathproject/papers/Knuth_PMENA04. pdf.
  • Leighton, J. P. (2003). Defining and describing reasoning. In J. P. Leighton & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 3-11). New York, NY: Cambridge.
  • Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: Conceptual and practical considerations. Pranee Liamputtong Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20(2), 133-139.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. First ed-San Francisso: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
  • Ministry of National Education (2013). Middle school mathematics 5-8. classes curriculum. Ankara.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school Mathematics. USA.
  • Reid, D. A. & Knipping, C. (2010), Proof in mathematics education research, learning and teaching. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.
  • Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Stylianides, G. J. (2010). Engaging secondary students in reasoning and proving. Mathematics Teaching, 219, 39-44.
  • Stylianides, G. J. & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40 (3), 314- 352.
  • Stylianides, G. (2008) An analytic framework of reasoning-and-proving, For The Learning of Mathematics, 28, 9-16.
  • Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Rotou, O. (2015). Undergraduate students’ understanding of proof: Relationships between proof conceptions, beliefs and classroom experiences with learning proof. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 91-134.
APA TANIŞLI D (2016). İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. , 44 - 66.
Chicago TANIŞLI Dilek İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. (2016): 44 - 66.
MLA TANIŞLI Dilek İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. , 2016, ss.44 - 66.
AMA TANIŞLI D İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. . 2016; 44 - 66.
Vancouver TANIŞLI D İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. . 2016; 44 - 66.
IEEE TANIŞLI D "İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller." , ss.44 - 66, 2016.
ISNAD TANIŞLI, Dilek. "İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller". (2016), 44-66.
APA TANIŞLI D (2016). İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(66), 44 - 66.
Chicago TANIŞLI Dilek İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 16, no.66 (2016): 44 - 66.
MLA TANIŞLI Dilek İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol.16, no.66, 2016, ss.44 - 66.
AMA TANIŞLI D İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 16(66): 44 - 66.
Vancouver TANIŞLI D İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 16(66): 44 - 66.
IEEE TANIŞLI D "İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller." Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16, ss.44 - 66, 2016.
ISNAD TANIŞLI, Dilek. "İlköğretim Okullarında Öğretmen-Veli İletişiminde Karşılaşılan Engeller". Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 16/66 (2016), 44-66.