Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 72 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 76 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de hemşire olma deneyiminin öne çıkan yönlerini hemşirelerin gözünden betimlemek, hemşireliğin erkekler açısından avantaj ve dezavantajlarını literatürdeki benzer çalışmalarla kıyaslayarak irdelemek ve sosyolojik olarak değerlendirmektir. Çalışma, 2015 yılında gerçekleştirilen, fenomenolojik desene sahip nitel bir alan araştırmasına dayanmaktadır. Örneklem, yarısı erkek yarısı kadın olan 42 hemşireden oluşmaktadır, veriler derinlemesine mülakatlarla toplanmış ve betimsel ve sistematik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, erkek hemşirelerin avantajlarının da dezavantajlarının da hegemonik erkeklik normları çerçevesinde deneyimlendiğini göstermektedir. Erkek hemşireler toplumsal cinsiyet kalıp yargılarını meslek içine taşıyarak ve sembolik şiddet uygulayarak meslek içinde avantajlı pozisyonlardan kadınları dışlamaktadırlar. Kadınların meslekte ilerlemesini sınırlandıran cam tavanı sağlamlaştıran bu süreç, erkek hemşirelerin en önemli avantajıdır. Erkek hemşirelerin başlıca dezavantajları ise hegemonik erkeklik normları ve meslek normları arasında sıkışmaları, kadın hastalara dokunmayı gerektiren durumlarda muhtemel cinsel taciz suçlamalarına ilişkin kaygı duymaları ve kadın yoğun bir meslekte çalıştıkları için cinsel kimliklerinin sorgulanmasıdır
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler

Being a Male Nurse in Turkey: Advantages and Disadvantages

Öz:
The aim of this study is to describe the nurses‟ opinions on male nurses‟ occupational experiences, to compare the advantages and disadvantages of being a male nurse in Turkey with related literature and to make a sociological evaluation. The study draws on the data of a qualitative field research conducted in 2015. The sample consists of 42 nurses, of whom half are male and half are female. The data are collected by indepth interviews and analyzed descriptively and systematically. The findings show that both the advantages and the disadvantages of male nurses are experienced around hegemonic masculinity. By transferring gender stereotypes into occupational area and by practicing symbolic violence, male nurses exclude female nurses from advantageous positions in the occupation. This process strengthens glass ceiling, which limits female nurses‟ career advancements, and seems to be the most important advantage of male nurses. The main disadvantages of male nurses are to be stuck between hegemonic masculinity norms and occupational norms; the concerns about female patients‟ potential charges of sexual harassment; and the implicit suspicions about their heterosexuality
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acar-Savran, Gülnur (2004), Beden Emek Tarih: Diyalektik Bir Feminizm İçin (İstanbul: Kanat Yayınları).
  • Andrews, Mary E., Norma J. Stewart, Debra G. Morgan ve Carl D'Arcy (2012), “More Alike Than Different: A Comparison of Male and Female RNs in Rural and Remote Canada”, Journal of Nursing Management, 20 (4): 561-570.
  • Atay, Tayfun (2012), Çin İşi Japon İşi: Cinsiyet ve Cinsellik Üzerine Antropolojik Değiniler (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları).
  • Baby, Maria, Glue, Paul ve Dave Carlyle (2014), “„Violence is Not Part of Our Job‟: A Thematic Analysis of Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses‟ Experiences of Patient Assaults From a New Zealand Perspective”, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35 (9): 647-655.
  • Battice, Juliet (2010), “Editorial: The Changing Face of Nursing in a Developing Country”, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19 (13-14): 1765-1766.
  • Bernard Hodes Group (2005), Men In Nursing Study, Hodes Research. http://aamn.org/docs/meninnursing 2005survey.pdf (22.08.2015).
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (2014), Eril Tahakküm (İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları) (Çev. Bediz Yılmaz).
  • Brown, Brian (2009), “Men in Nursing: Re-evaluating Masculinities, Re-evaluating Gender”, Contemporary Nurse, 33 (2): 120-129.
  • Brown, Claire ve Liz Jones (2004), “The Gender Structure of the Nursing Hierarchy: The Role of Human Capital”, Gender, Work and Organization, 11 (1): 1-25.
  • Bush, Patricia J. (1976), “The Male Nurse: A Challenge to Traditional Role Identities”, Nursing Forum, 15 (4): 390-405.
  • Chiarella, Mary ve Amanda Adrian (2014), “Boundary Violations, Gender and The Nature of Nursing Work”, Nursing Ethics, 21 (3): 267-277.
  • Cockburn, C. (1983), Brothers. Male Dominance and Technological Change (London: Pluto Press).
  • Connell, R. W. (1998), Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve İktidar (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları) (Çev: Cem Soydemir).
  • Dikmen Özarslan, Aylin (2015), “Hegemonik Erkekl k Bağlamında Erkek Hemşİreler”, Alternatif Politika, 7 (1): 118-142.
  • Ecevit, Yıldız (1998), “Türkiye‟de Ücretli Kadın Emeğinin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Temelinde Analizi”, Hacımirzaoğlu, Ayşe Berktay (Der.), 75. Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler (İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı ve Yapı Kredi Yayınları): 267-284.
  • Ehrenreich, Barbara ve Deidre English (1992), Cadılar, Büyücüler ve Hemşireler (İstanbul: Kavram Yayınları) (Çev. Ergun Uğur).
  • England, Kim V.L. (1993), “Suburban Pink Collar Ghettos: The Spatial Entrapment of Women?”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83 (2): 225-242.
  • Evans, Joan (1997), “Men in Nursing: Issues of Gender Segregation and Hidden Advantage”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (2): 226-231.
  • Evans, Joan (2002), “Cautious Caregivers: Gender Stereotypes and the Sexualisation of Men Nurses‟ Touch”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40 (4): 441-448.
  • Evans, Joan (2004), “Men Nurses: A Historical and Feminist Perspective”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47 (3): 321-328.
  • Federici, Silvia (2012), Caliban ve Cadı: Kadınlar, Beden ve İlksel Birikim (İstanbul: Otonom Yayıncılık) (Çev. Öznur Karakaş)
  • Fisher, Murray J. (2009), “„Being a Chameleon‟: Labour Processes of Male Nurses Performing Bodywork”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65 (12): 2668-2677.
  • Fox Keller, Evelyn (1985), Reflections on Gender and Science (New Haven: Yale University Press).
  • Gamarnikow, Eva (1978), “Sexual Division of Labour: The Case of Nursing” Kuhn, Anette ve Annmarie Wolpe (Der.), Feminism and Materialism (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul): 96-123.
  • Garfinkel, Harold (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
  • Gönç, Temmuz (2016), “Kadın Yoğun Meslekleri Erilleştirmeye Yönelik Stratejiler: Türkiye‟de Erkek Hemşireler Örneği”, Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19 (1).
  • Hader, Richard (2005), “Salary Survey 2005”, Nursing Management, 36 (7): 18-27.
  • Hakim, Catherine (1979), Occupational Segregation: A Comparative Study of the Degree and Pattern of the Differentiation Between Men and Women's Work in Britain, the United States and Other Countries (London: Department of Employment Research Paper No. 9).
  • Harding, Thomas (2007), “The Construction of Men who are Nurses as Gay”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60 (6): 636-644.
  • Hart, Karen A. (2005), “Study: Who are the Men in Nursing?”, National Student Nurses Association Imprint, (November-December): 32-34.
  • Heikes, Joel E. (1991), “When Men are the Minority: The Case of Men in Nursing”, The Sociological Quarterly, 32 (3): 389-401.
  • Herdman, Elizabeth ve Aysel Badir (2008), “Gender Equality or Patriarchal Dividend: Structural Change in Turkish Nursing”, Nursing and Health Sciences, 10 (2): 159-163.
  • Hochschild, Arlie ve Anne Machung (2012), The Second Shift (New York: Penguin Books).
  • Howe, Louise Kapp (1978), Pink Collar Workers: Inside the World of Women’s Work (New York: Avon Books).
  • Inoue, Madoka, Chapman, Rose ve Dianne Wynaden (2006), “Male Nurses‟ Experiences of Providing Intimate Care for Women Clients”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55 (5): 559- 567.
  • Kellett, Peter, Gregory, David M. ve Joan A. Evans (2014), “Patriarchal Paradox: Gender Performance and Men's Nursing Careers”, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29 (2): 77-90.
  • Keogh, Brian ve Madeline Gleeson (2006), “Caring for Female Patients: The Experience of Male Nurses”, British Journal of Nursing, 15 (21): 1172-1175.
  • LaRocco, Susan A. (2007), “A Grounded Theory Study of Socializing Men into Nursing”, The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15 (2): 120-129.
  • Liminana-Gras, Rosa M., M. Pilar Sanchez-Lopez, Ana I. Saavedra-San Roman, ve F. Javier Corbalan-Berna (2013), “Health and Gender in Female-Dominated Occupations: The Case of Male Nurses”, The Journal of Men’s Studies, 21 (2): 135-148.
  • Lindsay, Sally (2007), “Gendering Work: The Masculinization of Nurse Anesthesia”, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32 (4): 429-448.
  • Lloyd, Genevieve (1996), Erkek Akıl (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları) (Çev. Muttalip Özcan).
  • Lodge, Nicholas, Jane Mallett, Peter Blake ve Ian Fryatt (1997), “A Study to Ascertain Gynecological Patients‟ Perceived Levels of Endorsement with Physical and Psychological Care Given by Female and Male Nurses”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25 (5): 893-907.
  • Lou, Jiunn-Horng, Hsing-Y Yu, Hsiu-Yueh Hsu ve Hung-Da Dai (2007), “A Study of Role Stress, Organizational Commitment and Intention of Turnover for Male Nurses in Southern Taiwan”, Journal of Nursing Research, 15 (1): 43-53.
  • Loughrey, Mark (2008), “Just How Male are Male Nurses?” Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17 (10): 1327-1334.
  • MacDougall, Graham (1997), “Caring: A Masculine Perspective”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25 (4): 809-813.
  • Marsland, Louise, Sarah Robinson ve Trevor Murrells (2003), “Pursuing a career in nursing: Differences Between Men and Women Qualifying as Registered General Nurses”, Journal of Nursing Management, 4 (4): 231-241.
  • Matthews, Shaun. (2001), “Registered Male: A Discussion on Men in the Nursing Profession”, Contemporary Nurse, 11 (2-3): 231-235.
  • Mclean, Heather M. ve Rudolf Kalin (1994), “Congruence Between Self-Image and Occupational Stereotypes in Students Entering Gender-Dominated Occupations and Workplaces”, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26 (1): 142-162.
  • Meadus, Robert J. (2000), “Men in Nursing: Barriers to Recruitment”, Nursing Forum, 35 (3): 5-14.
  • Meadus, Robert J. ve J. Creina Twomey (2007), “Men in Nursing: Making the Right Choice”, Canadian Nurse, 103 (2): 13-16.
  • Muench, Ulrike, Jody Sindelar, Susan H. Busch ve Peter I. Buerhaus (2015), “Salary Differences Between Male and Female Registered Nurses in the United States”, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 313 (12): 1265-1267.
  • O‟Lynn, Chad ve Russell Tranberger (2006), Men in Nursing: History, Challenges and Opportunities (New York: Springer).
  • Orbe, Mark P. (1998), “An „Outsider Within‟ Perspective to Organizational Communication”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12 (2): 230-279.
  • Philips, Anne ve Barbara Taylor (1980), “Sex and Skill: Notes Towards a Feminist Economics”, Feminist Review, 6: 79-88.
  • Poole, Marilyn ve Dallas Isaacs (1997), “Caring: A Gendered Concept”, Women’s Studies International Forum, 20 (4): 529-536.
  • Porter, Sam (1992), “Women in a Women‟s Job: The Gendered Experience of Nurses”, Sociology of Health and Illness, 14 (4): 510-527.
  • Roberts, Joan I. ve Thetis M. Group (1995), Feminism and Nursing: An Historical Perspective on Power, Status and Political Activism in The Nursing Profession (Westport, CT: Praeger).
  • Sancar, Serpil (2013), Erkeklik: İmkansız İktidar: Ailede, Piyasada ve Sokakta Erkekler (İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık).
  • Simpson, Ruth (2005), “Men in Non-Traditional Occupations: Career Entry, Career Orientation and Experience of Role Strain”, Gender Work and Organization, 12 (4): 363-380.
  • Sinclair, M.Thea (1991), “Women, Work and Skill: Economic Theories and Feminist Perspectives”, Sinclair, M. Thea ve Nanneke Redclift (Der.), Working Women, International Perspectives on Labour and Gender Ideology (London: Routledge): 1-24.
  • Smith, Joshua S. (2006), “Exploring the Challenges for Nontraditional Male Students Transitioning into a Nursing Program”, Journal of Nursing Education, 45 (7): 263-269.
  • Street, Anette F. (1992), Inside Nursing: A Critical Ethnography of Clinical Nursing Practice (New York: SUNY Press).
  • Şimşek-Rathke, Leyla (2011), Dünden Kalanlar: Türkiye’de Hemşirelik ve GATA TSK Sağlık Meslek Lisesi Örneği (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları).
  • Tarihçi-Delice, S. (2006), Hemşirelik Mesleği ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rollerinin Hemşirelik Mesleğine Etkilerinin Betimlenmesi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi (Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Anabilim Dalı).
  • T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2014), Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı (Ankara: Sağlık Araştırmaları Genel Müdürlüğü).
  • Taylor, Catherine J. (2010), “Occupational Sex Composition and the Gendered Availability of workplace Support”, Gender & Society, 24 (2): 189-212.
  • Tracey, Catherine ve Honor Nicholl (2007), “The Multifaceted Influence of Gender in Career Progress in Nursing”, Journal of Nursing Management, 15 (7): 677-682.
  • Turner, Bryan S. (2011), Tıbbi Güç ve Toplumsal Bilgi (İstanbul: Sentez Yayınları) (Çev. Ümit Tatlıcan).
  • Urhan, Betül ve Nilay Etiler (2011), “Sağlık Sektöründe Kadın Emeğ n n Toplumsal C ns yet Açısından Analizi”, Çalışma ve Toplum, 2 (29): 191-215.
  • Walby, Sylvia (1990), Theorizing Patriarchy (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Waters, Mike Postic, Durocher, Sharla, Donker, Heather ve Ben Brenner (1999), “Janforum”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29 (2): 523.
  • Williams, Christine L. (1992), “The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the „Female‟ Professions”, Social Problems, 39 (3): 253-267.
  • Williams, Christine L. (Der.) (1993), Doing “Women's Work”: Men in Nontraditional Occupations (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
  • Wingfield, Adia Harvey (2009), “Racializing the Glass Escalator: Reconsidering Men‟s Experiences with Women‟s Work”, Gender and Society, 23 (5): 5-26.
  • Zamanzadeh, Vahid, Arman Azadi, Leila Valizadeh, Brian Keogh, Morteza Monadive ve Reza Negarandeh (2013), “Choosing and Remaining in Nursing: Iranian Male Nurses' Perspectives”, Contemporary Nurse, 45 (2): 220-227.
APA GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T (2017). TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. , 35 - 76.
Chicago GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN TEMMUZ TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. (2017): 35 - 76.
MLA GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN TEMMUZ TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. , 2017, ss.35 - 76.
AMA GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. . 2017; 35 - 76.
Vancouver GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. . 2017; 35 - 76.
IEEE GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T "TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR." , ss.35 - 76, 2017.
ISNAD GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN, TEMMUZ. "TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR". (2017), 35-76.
APA GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T (2017). TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 72(1), 35 - 76.
Chicago GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN TEMMUZ TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 72, no.1 (2017): 35 - 76.
MLA GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN TEMMUZ TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol.72, no.1, 2017, ss.35 - 76.
AMA GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2017; 72(1): 35 - 76.
Vancouver GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2017; 72(1): 35 - 76.
IEEE GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN T "TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR." Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 72, ss.35 - 76, 2017.
ISNAD GÖNÇ ŞAVRAN, TEMMUZ. "TÜRKİYE’DE ERKEK HEMŞİRE OLMAK: AVANTAJLAR ve DEZAVANTAJLAR". Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 72/1 (2017), 35-76.