Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties

Tekdal, Mehmet; KERT, Serhat Bahadır

Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties

Serhat Bahadır KERT, (Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Education, Computer Education & Instructional Technologies, İstanbul)

Mehmet TEKDAL (Çukurova University Faculty of Education Computer Education & Instructional Technologies, Adana)

Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

1 1

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1150 - 1161 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties

Öz:

Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı eğitim fakültelerinde okumakta olan son sınıf öğrencilerininbireysel yenilikçilik algılarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları YıldızTeknik Üniversitesi ve Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmenliği Bölümleri son sınıf öğrencilerinden oluşmuştur. Bu iki ÜniversiteTürkiye'de birbirinden uzak coğrafi bölgelerde yer almaktadırlar. Toplam katılımcısayısı 124 olarak belirlenmiştir. Verilerin toplanması amacıyla Hurt, Joseph veCook(1977) tarafından geliştirilen, Kılıçer ve Odabaşı (2010 ) tarafından Türkçeuyarlaması yapılan bireysel yenilikçilik ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonunda, farklıeğitim fakültelerinin aynı bölümlerine devam etmekte olan öğrencilerin bireyselyenilikçilik algılarının bir faktor bakımından farklılaştığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bununlabirlikte, tüm katılımcıların büyük oranda "sorgulayıcı" karakter gösterdikleri belirlenmiş,öğretmen adaylarında ortaya çıkan bu özellik çalışma içerisinde yorumlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Farklı Eğitim Fakültelerine Devam Eden Bireylerin Yenilikçilik Algılarının Karşılaştırılması

Öz:

The purpose of this research is to compare individual innovativeness perception of senior students from different education faculties. The participants of the study consists of the senior students attending to the Yildiz Technical University and Cukurova University's department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies. These two universities are in Turkey and different geographical regions away from each other. Total number of participants was determined as 124. The Individual Innovation Inventory developed by Hurt, Joseph and Cook(1977) and adopted in Turkish by Kılıçer and Odabaşı (2010) were used for obtainingdata. At the end of the study, it was emerged that the individual innovativenessperception of the students enrolled in same department of two different educationinstitutions differs according to one factor. Also, The survey points of all participantswere found as an indicator of "early majority" character of the senior students ofeducation faculties. The "early majority" characteristic of the teacher candidates wasanalyzed in the study.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Adair, J. E. (2007). Leadership for innovation. London: Kogan Page Publishing.
Alegre, J. Chiva, R. & Lapiedra, R.(2009). Measuring innovation in long product development cycle industries: an insight in biotechnology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(4), 535-546.
Bandura, A.(1994). Self-efficacy, in: Ramachaudran, V.S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp.71-81.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7 (2), 161-187.
Bong, M. (2008). Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. The Journal of Experimental Education. 76(2), 191-217.
Casanueva, C. & Gallego, A. (2010). Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks, Network Analysis Application in Innovation Studies, 12(1), 105-117.
Castro, L.M, Montoro-Sanchez, A. & Ortiz-De-Urbine-Criado, M. (2010). Innovation in services industries: current and future trends, The Service Industries Journal, iFirst, 1-14.
Choi, J.N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations, Human Performance, 17(4), 397 - 414.
Cohen, J.(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdle, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Curtis, R.C. & William, W.W. (2006). Innovation : The five disciplines for creating what customers want. New York: Crown Business.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
Garcia, T. & Pintrich, P.R.(1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies, in: Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B. J. (Ed.). Self-regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, pp. 127-153.
Howorth, C., Mueller, H. & Harvey, C.( 2002). The diffusion of an organisational innovation: Adopting 'patient-focused care' in an n.h.s. hospital trust, Competition and Change, 6(2), 213-232.
Jaskyte, K., Taylor, H. & Smariga, R. (2009). Student and faculty perceptions of innovative teaching, Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 111- 116.
Isaksen, A. & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: case studies of two regional industries in Norway, European Planning Studies, 18(12), (1993 - 2008).
Jin, Z., Hewitt-Dundas, N. & Thompson, N. (2004). Innovativeness and performance: evidence from manufacturing sectors, Journal Of Strategic Marketing, 2(4), 255-266.
Kılıçer, K. ve Odabaşı, H.F. (2010). Individual innovativeness scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability, Hacettepe University Journal of Eduaction, 38, 150-164.
Marshall, S. (2010). Change, technology and higher education: are universities capable of organisational change?, ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology,18(3), 179-192.
Mowery, D. C. & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems, in: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery & B. Verspagen (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 209 - 239.
Özer, A. 2010. Two-way MANOVA. [online]. http://www. psikolojiktestler.hacettepe.edu .tr / t.htm. [retrieved on 02.02.2011].
Ramstad, E. (2009). Expanding innovation system and policy - an organisational perspective, Policy Studies, 30(5), 533 - 553.
Ritchhart, R. (2004). Creative teaching in the shadow of the standards, Independent School, 63, 32-40.

APA	KERT S, Tekdal M (2012). Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. , 1150 - 1161.
Chicago	KERT Serhat Bahadır,Tekdal Mehmet Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. (2012): 1150 - 1161.
MLA	KERT Serhat Bahadır,Tekdal Mehmet Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. , 2012, ss.1150 - 1161.
AMA	KERT S,Tekdal M Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. . 2012; 1150 - 1161.
Vancouver	KERT S,Tekdal M Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. . 2012; 1150 - 1161.
IEEE	KERT S,Tekdal M "Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties." , ss.1150 - 1161, 2012.
ISNAD	KERT, Serhat Bahadır - Tekdal, Mehmet. "Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties". (2012), 1150-1161.

APA	KERT S, Tekdal M (2012). Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(4), 1150 - 1161.
Chicago	KERT Serhat Bahadır,Tekdal Mehmet Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11, no.4 (2012): 1150 - 1161.
MLA	KERT Serhat Bahadır,Tekdal Mehmet Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.11, no.4, 2012, ss.1150 - 1161.
AMA	KERT S,Tekdal M Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2012; 11(4): 1150 - 1161.
Vancouver	KERT S,Tekdal M Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2012; 11(4): 1150 - 1161.
IEEE	KERT S,Tekdal M "Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties." Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11, ss.1150 - 1161, 2012.
ISNAD	KERT, Serhat Bahadır - Tekdal, Mehmet. "Comparison Of Individual Innovativeness Perception Of Students Attending Different Education Faculties". Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11/4 (2012), 1150-1161.