Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo

ZHU, Xiangdong; HU, Qiang; ZHANG, Jianmin; FANG, Bing; Wang, Lin; CHEN, Gao

Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo

Bing FANG, (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou, China)

Gao CHEN, (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou, China)

Lin WANG, (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou, China)

Xiangdong ZHU, (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou, China)

Qiang HU, (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou, China)

Jianmin ZHANG (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou, China)

Turkish Neurosurgery

4 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 564 - 567 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo

Öz:

AIM: This study was designed to determine the anatomic position of the asterion and the relationship between the asterion and the transverse sigmoid sinus junction (TSSJ) in a Chinese cohort. MATERIAL and METHODS: Venous computed tomography (CT) angiography was performed in 32 patients to simultaneously obtain 3D-CT volume rendering images of the cranial bone and the dural sinus. The relationship between the TSSJ and the asterion was analyzed. RESULTS: The distance from the asterion to root of zygoma (ROZ) was 54.6 ± 5.50 mm on the right side and 54.1 ± 5.42 mm on the left side. The asterion was 49.10 ± 3.56 mm above the tip of mastoid process (TOP) on the right side and 48.70 ± 2.23 mm on the left side. The asterion's position was at the junction of the transverse-sigmoid sinus complex in 44 cases, below it in 19 cases, and above it in one case. CONCLUSION: 3D-CT volume rendering imaging is capable of accurately and simultaneously visualizing the bony landmark and the dural sinus structure outline in vivo, thus offering a new option for anatomic research and morphometric investigation. The accurate location of asterion can be found using the root of the zygoma and the tip of the mastoid process.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Ahlhelm F, Nabhan A, Naumann N, Grunwald I, Shariat K, Reith W: Skull base tumors. Radiologe 45(9): 807-815, 2005
2. Bozbuga M, Boran BO, Sahinoglu K: Surface anatomy of the posterolateral cranium regarding the localization of the initial burr-hole for a retrosigmoid approach. Neurosurg Rev 29(1): 61-63, 2006
3. da Silva EB Jr, Leal AG, Milano JB, da Silva LF Jr, Clemente RS, Ramina R: Image-guided surgical planning using anatomical landmarks in the retrosigmoid approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(5):905-910, 2010
4. Day JD, Tschabitscher M: Anatomic position of the asterion. Neurosurgery 42(1):198- 199, 1998
5. Gharabaghi A, Rosahl SK, Feigl GC, Liebig T, Mirzayan JM, Heckl S, Shahidi R, Tatagiba M, Samii M: Image-guided lateral suboccipital approach: Part 1-individualized landmarks for surgical planning. Neurosurgery 62(3) Suppl 1: 18-22, 2008
6. Hamasaki T, Morioka M, Nakamura H, Yano S, Hirai T, Kuratsu J: A 3-dimensional computed tomographic procedure for planning retrosigmoid craniotomy. Neurosurgery 64(5) Suppl 2: 241-245, 2009
7. Martinez F, Laxague A, Vida L, Prinzo H, Sgarbi N, Soria VR, Bianchi C: Topographic anatomy of the asterion. Neurocirugia (Astur) 16(5):441-446, 2005
8. Mwachaka PM, Hassanali J, Odula PO: Anatomic position of the asterion in Kenyans for posterolateral surgical approaches to cranial cavity. Clin Anat 23(1):30-33, 2010
9. Oishi M, Fukuda M, Saito A, Hiraishi T, Fuji Y: Presurgical evaluation for lateral suboccipital craniotomy using contrastenhanced CT volumetric imaging. No Shinkei Geka 37(5): 459-465, 2009
10. Ribas GC, Rhoton AL Jr, Cruz OR, Peace D: Suboccipital burr holes and craniectomies. Neurosurg Focus 19(2):E1, 2005
11. Sheng B, Lv F, Xiao Z, Ouyang Y, Deng J, You Y, Liu N: Anatomical relationship between cranial surface landmarks and venous sinus in posterior cranial fossa using CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 34(8):701-708, 2012
12. Tubbs R S, Loukas M, Shoja M M, Bellew M P, Cohen-Gadol A A: Surface landmarks for the junction between the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: Application of the "strategic" burr hole for suboccipital craniotomy. Neurosurgery 65 Suppl 6: 37-41, 2009
13. Ucerler H, Govsa F: Asterion as a surgical landmark for lateral cranial base approaches. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34(7):415- 420, 2006
14. Urculo E, Alfaro R, Arrazola M, Rejas G, Proano J, Igartua J: Anatomical landmarks and surgical limits in the suboccipital transmeatal approach to the acoustic neuroma. Neurocirugia (Astur) 14(2):107-115, 2003
15. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, Zhang ZL, Wang HZ, Zhao YE, Chai X, Zhou CS, Lu GM: Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: Image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):23-30, 2010

APA	FANG B, CHEN G, Wang L, ZHU X, HU Q, ZHANG J (2016). Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. , 564 - 567.
Chicago	FANG Bing,CHEN Gao,Wang Lin,ZHU Xiangdong,HU Qiang,ZHANG Jianmin Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. (2016): 564 - 567.
MLA	FANG Bing,CHEN Gao,Wang Lin,ZHU Xiangdong,HU Qiang,ZHANG Jianmin Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. , 2016, ss.564 - 567.
AMA	FANG B,CHEN G,Wang L,ZHU X,HU Q,ZHANG J Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. . 2016; 564 - 567.
Vancouver	FANG B,CHEN G,Wang L,ZHU X,HU Q,ZHANG J Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. . 2016; 564 - 567.
IEEE	FANG B,CHEN G,Wang L,ZHU X,HU Q,ZHANG J "Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo." , ss.564 - 567, 2016.
ISNAD	FANG, Bing vd. "Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo". (2016), 564-567.

APA	FANG B, CHEN G, Wang L, ZHU X, HU Q, ZHANG J (2016). Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. Turkish Neurosurgery, 26(4), 564 - 567.
Chicago	FANG Bing,CHEN Gao,Wang Lin,ZHU Xiangdong,HU Qiang,ZHANG Jianmin Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. Turkish Neurosurgery 26, no.4 (2016): 564 - 567.
MLA	FANG Bing,CHEN Gao,Wang Lin,ZHU Xiangdong,HU Qiang,ZHANG Jianmin Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. Turkish Neurosurgery, vol.26, no.4, 2016, ss.564 - 567.
AMA	FANG B,CHEN G,Wang L,ZHU X,HU Q,ZHANG J Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2016; 26(4): 564 - 567.
Vancouver	FANG B,CHEN G,Wang L,ZHU X,HU Q,ZHANG J Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2016; 26(4): 564 - 567.
IEEE	FANG B,CHEN G,Wang L,ZHU X,HU Q,ZHANG J "Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo." Turkish Neurosurgery, 26, ss.564 - 567, 2016.
ISNAD	FANG, Bing vd. "Skull Anatomic Landmarks for Retrosigmoid Craniotomy in a Chinese Cohort: A 3D-Computed Tomography Study in Vivo". Turkish Neurosurgery 26/4 (2016), 564-567.