Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization

Gülden Demet ORUÇ, (Assist.Prof.Dr. Urban and Regional Planning Department, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey E-mail: Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4303975X)
Özhan ERTEKİN, (Assoc.Prof.Dr. Urban and Regional Planning Department, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey, ( ) E-mail: Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-09932878)
Vedia DÖKMECİ, (Prof.Dr. Emeritus, Urban and Regianal Planning Department, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey E-mail: Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-29459910)
Prof Dr URBAN (Boş)
ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning
14 1
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 172 - 190 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization

Öz:
During the last century, the transformation of Istanbul’s urban structure from monocentric to multi-centric and its rapid population growth resulted in neighbourhood patterns which are spread across a large spectrum according to their location and their cultural, socio-economic and historical backgrounds. In urban settings, the potential environment is reinterpreted by its users, and is realized through the application of the space and time-specific societal norms within the context of technological advances. The present study investigates the selected neighbourhood patterns from historical to westernized, modern, postmodern (gated) and Manhattanized forms
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mimarlık Kentsel Çalışmalar
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahmad, N. (1992). Choice of location and mobility behavior of migrant in a third world city. Urban Studies, 29, 1147- 1157.
  • Akgun, A.A. and Baycan, T. (2011). Gated communities in Istanbul: The new walls of the city. Town Planning Review, 83, 1, DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2012.5
  • Aksoy, O. (1968). Osmanlı Devri Istanbul Sıbyan Mektepleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Ph.D. Thesis. Istanbul Technical University.
  • Asami, Y., Kubat, A.S. and Istek, C. (2000). Characterization of the street networks in the Turkish urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 5, 777-795.
  • Audirac, I. (2002). Information technology on urban forms. Journal of Planning Literature, 17, 2, 213-256.
  • Bardo, J.W. (1984). A reexamination of the neighbourhood as a socio-spatial schema. Social Inquiry, 54, 3, 346-357.
  • Bardo, J. W. and Dokmeci, V. (1992). Modernization, traditionalization and the changing structure of community satisfaction in two sub-communities in Istanbul, Turkey: Procrastination analysis. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 118, 273-292.
  • Brower, S. (1992). Introduction: Influences on Urban form. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9, 4 (Winter), 271-273.
  • Bundhun, R. (2016). Moving up, to escape the crowd. International New York Times, March 4, p.12.
  • Castells, M. (1994). European cities, the informational society, and the global economy. New Left Review, 204, 18-32.
  • Celik, Z. (1993). The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
  • Conzen, M.R.G. (2004). Thinking about Urban Form: Paper on Urban Morphology, 1932-1998. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Coy, P. and Pöhler, M. (2002). Gated communities in Latin American mega cities: Case studies in Brazil, and Argentina. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 355-370.
  • Dix, G. (1990). Conservation and change in the city. Third World Planning Review, 12, 385-406.
  • Dokmeci, V. and Berkoz, L. (1994). Transformation of Istanbul from a monocentric to a polycentric city. European Planning Studies,2, 2, 193-205.
  • Dokmeci, V. and Ciraci, H. (1988). Pera: A threatened historic European city within Istanbul. Ekistics, 333, Nov.-Dec., 359-369.
  • Dokmeci, V., Berkoz, L., Levent, H., Yürekli, H. and Cagdas, G. (1996). Residential preferences in Istanbul. Habitat International, 20, 2, 241-251.
  • Dokmeci, V. and Ciraci, H. (1999). From westernization to globalization: An old district of Istanbul. Planning History, 21, 3, 99-109.
  • Dokmeci, V. and Berkoz, L. (2000). Residential-location preferencesaccording to demographic characteristics in Istanbul. Lanscape and Urban Planning, 48, 1-2, 45-53.
  • Dokmeci, V. and Ozus, E. (2005). Effects of revitalization in historical city center of Istanbul. International Real Estate Review, 8, 1, 144-159.
  • Ergun, N. and Dundar, B. (2004). Functional change as an indicator of transformation near the old city centre of Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 12, 5, 723-738.
  • Ford, L.R. (1978). Continuity and change in historic cities: Bath, Chester, and Norwich. The Geographical Review, 68, 3, 253-273.
  • Gifford, R. (2007). The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review, 50, 1, 2-17.
  • Glasze, G. and Alkhayyal, A. (2002). Gated housing estates in the Arab World: Case studies in Lebanon and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, 29, 321-336.
  • Gooblar, A. (2002). Outside the walls: Urban gated communities and their regulation within the British Planning System. European Planning Studies, 10, 321-334.
  • Gur, E.A. (2015). Regeneration of the historical urban center and changing housing market dynamics: Fener-Balat. International Journal of Architectural Research, 9, 1, 232- 246.
  • Hunter, A. (1979). The urban neighbourhood : its analytical and social contexts. Urban Affairs, 14, 3, 267-288.
  • Jabareen, Y.R. (2006). Sustainable urbanforms: Their typologies, models, and concepts, Journal of Planning, Education and Research, 26, 1, 38-52.
  • Jo, S. (1998). Spatial configuration and built form. Journal of Urban Design, 3, 1, 285-301.
  • Kolcu, H. and Dokmeci, V. (2013). Analysis of Factors impacting land-use in transforming Istanbul historical city center. International Journal of Electronic, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering 3, 1, 477-492.
  • Kubat, A.S. (1999). The morphological history of Istanbul. Urban Morphology, 3, 28-41
  • Laskin, D.J. (2016). Into the soul of Venetian ghetto. International New York Times, p.21.
  • Lynch, K. and Rodwin, L. (1958). The theory of urban form. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 24, 4, 201-214.
  • Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of Urban Space. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley.
  • Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and Private Space of the City, New York: Routledge.
  • Mansel, F. (1995). Constantinople: City of the World’s Desires, 1453- 1924, London: Murray.
  • McCann, E.J. (1995) Neotraditional developments-The anatomy of a new urban form. Urban Geography, 16, 3, 210-233.
  • Mesev, T.V., Longley, P.A., Batty, M., and Xie, Y. (1995). Morphology from imagery: detecting and measuring the density of urban land. Environment and Planning A, 27, 5, 759-780.
  • Mehrabian, A. (1976). Public Places and Private Spaces. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.
  • Mitchell, K. (2000). The culture of urban space. Urban Geography, 21, 5, 443-449.
  • Müller-Wiener, W. (1977). Bildlexikon Zur Topographie Istanbuls. Wasmuth Verlag, Tübingen.
  • Oktem, B. (2011). The role of global city discourses in the development and transformation of the BuyukdereMaslak Axis into the International Business District of Istanbul. International Planning Studies, 16, 1, 27-42.
  • Rahman, O. M. A. (1993). The central area of Alexandria, Egypt: Development implications and urban conservation. Third World Planning Review, 15, 1, 37-54.
  • Rosenthal, S.E. (1980). The Politics of Dependency: Urban Pattern in Istanbul. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in World Economy. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge.
  • Senturk, T. and Dokmeci, V. (2010) Transformation of Istanbul’s urban structure and its impact on real estate prices.
  • Proceedings of 14th International Planning History Society Conference, July 12-15, Taşkışla, İTU, Istanbul.
  • Shaw, S.J. (1979). The population of Istanbul in the nineteenth century. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 10, 2, 265-277.
  • Song, Y. and Knaap, G.J. (2004). Measuring urban form. Journal of American Planning Association, 70, 2, 210-225.
  • Southworth, M. and Owens, P.M. (1993). The evolving Metropolis: Studies of community, neighbourhood , and street form at the urban edge. Journal of American Planning Association, 59, 3, 271-287.
  • Talen, E. (2005). Evaluated good urban form in an inner-city neighbourhood : An empirical application. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 3, 204-228.
  • Tarancik, R. (1986). Finding the Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Whitehand, J.W.R. (1981). The Urban Landscape: The Historical Development and Management. Institute of British Geographers Special Publication, No.13. London: Academic Press.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1992). The Making of the Urban Landscape. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Whitehand, J.W.R., Morton, N.J. and Carr, C.M.H. (1999). Urban morphogenesis at the microscale: how houses change. Environment and Planning A, 26, 503-515.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (2001). The physical form of cities, a historic geographical approach. Handbook of Urban Studies, London: Sage Publications.
  • Yazgi, B. and Dokmeci, V. (2006). Analysis of different urban forms in Istanbul. 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Volos, Greece.
  • Yazgi, B. and Dokmeci, V. (2009). Spatial analysis of urban form in Istanbul metropolitan area. in Gulersoy, N., Gezici, F.,
  • Onem, A. B., Arslanli, K. Y. (Eds.) New Approaches in Urban and Regional Planning, Istanbul: Cenkler Printing Office, 253-264.
  • Yazgi, B., Dokmeci, V., Koramaz, K. and Kiroglu, G. (2014). Impact of characteristics of origin and destination on interprovincial migration in Turkey, 1995-2000. European Planning Studies, 22, 6, 1182-1198.
  • Yenen, Z. (1992). Social and religious influences on the form of early Turkish cities of the Ottoman Period. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9, 4, 301-314.
  • Zukin, S. (1988). The post-modern debate over urban form. Theory, Culture and Society, 5, 431-46.
APA ORUÇ G, ERTEKİN Ö, Dokmeci V, URBAN P (2017). Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. , 172 - 190.
Chicago ORUÇ GÜLDEN DEMET,ERTEKİN Özhan,Dokmeci Vedia,URBAN Prof Dr Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. (2017): 172 - 190.
MLA ORUÇ GÜLDEN DEMET,ERTEKİN Özhan,Dokmeci Vedia,URBAN Prof Dr Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. , 2017, ss.172 - 190.
AMA ORUÇ G,ERTEKİN Ö,Dokmeci V,URBAN P Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. . 2017; 172 - 190.
Vancouver ORUÇ G,ERTEKİN Ö,Dokmeci V,URBAN P Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. . 2017; 172 - 190.
IEEE ORUÇ G,ERTEKİN Ö,Dokmeci V,URBAN P "Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization." , ss.172 - 190, 2017.
ISNAD ORUÇ, GÜLDEN DEMET vd. "Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization". (2017), 172-190.
APA ORUÇ G, ERTEKİN Ö, Dokmeci V, URBAN P (2017). Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, 5(2), 172 - 190.
Chicago ORUÇ GÜLDEN DEMET,ERTEKİN Özhan,Dokmeci Vedia,URBAN Prof Dr Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning 5, no.2 (2017): 172 - 190.
MLA ORUÇ GÜLDEN DEMET,ERTEKİN Özhan,Dokmeci Vedia,URBAN Prof Dr Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, vol.5, no.2, 2017, ss.172 - 190.
AMA ORUÇ G,ERTEKİN Ö,Dokmeci V,URBAN P Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning. 2017; 5(2): 172 - 190.
Vancouver ORUÇ G,ERTEKİN Ö,Dokmeci V,URBAN P Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning. 2017; 5(2): 172 - 190.
IEEE ORUÇ G,ERTEKİN Ö,Dokmeci V,URBAN P "Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization." ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, 5, ss.172 - 190, 2017.
ISNAD ORUÇ, GÜLDEN DEMET vd. "Neighbourhood Patterns in Istanbul: From Historical Form to Manhattanization". ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning 5/2 (2017), 172-190.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 4:51

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları