Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 103 - 107 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada; nasoenterik tüpün (NET) postpilorik alana geçtiğinin tespitinde ultrasonografinin (USG) başarı oranını sap- tamak ve bu yöntemi tüpün lokalizasyonu için yaygın kullanılan direkt batın grafisi ile karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: NET bir anestezist tarafından yerleştirildi. İki radyo- log tarafından USG ile görüntülendi. Tüm hastalarda tüpün loka- lizasyonu abdominal grafi ile doğrulandı. Bulgular: Otuz dört hastaya NET yerleştirmek için yatakbaşı kör yöntem kullanıldı. NET'lerin 11'inin USG ile postpilorik alana geçtiği USG ile tespit edildi. Bir hastada NET lokalizasyonunun ultrasonografi ile postpilorik görülemedi, fakat kontrol batın gra- fisinde postpilorik alanda olduğu tespit edildi. Yirmiiki hastada, NET'lerin kontrol batın grafilerinde midede oldukları saptandı. USG ile postpilorik görüntüleyebilme oranımız %91,6 olarak saptandı. Tüm vakalar düşünüldüğünde, USG ile katater lokali- zasyonunu doğrulama oranı %97 olarak saptandı (34 hastada 33). Sonuç: USG; nasogastrik tüp ve NET lokalizasyonu için kullanı- lan radyografiye, güvenilir, pratik bir alternatif yöntemdir
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Anestezi

Nasoenterik Tüp Lokalizasyonunun Tespitinde Ultrasonografinin Yeri

Öz:
Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the success rate of nasoenteric tube (NET) insertion into the postpyloric area using ultrasonography (USG) and compare with the commonly used method direct abdominal graphy. Methods: A single anaesthesiologist placed all the NETs. The NET was visualised by two radiologists simultaneously using USG. The localisation of the tube was confirmed using an ab- dominal graph in all patients. Results: The blind bedside method was used for NET insertion into 34 patients. Eleven of the tubes were detected passing through the postpyloric area using USG. In one case, the NET could not be visualised in the postpyloric area using USG; however, it was detected in the postpyloric area through control abdominal radi- ography. In 22 patients, NETs were detected in the stomach using control abdominal radiography. The rate of imaging post pyloric using USG was 91.6%. When all cases were considered, catheter localisation was detected accurately using USG by 97% (33 in 34 patients). Conclusion: USG is a reliable and practical alternative to radiog- raphy, which can be used to detect localisation of the nasogastric tube and NET.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Anestezi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • 1. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1495-501.
  • 2. Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut 2003; 52(Suppl VII):vii1-vii12.
  • 3. Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition:Intensive care. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 210-23. [CrossRef ]
  • 4. Bankhead R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guanter P, Krenitsky J, et al, ASPEN Board of directors. Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33: 122-67. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Kabaçam G, Özden A. Enteral Tüple Beslenme. Güncel Gastroenteroloji 2009; 13: 201-10.
  • 6. Kirby DF, Delegge MH, Fleming CR. American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on Tube Feeding for Enteral Nutrition. Gasrtoenterology 1995; 108: 1282-301. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Zaloga GP. Bedside method for placing small bowel feeding tubes in critically ill patients. A prospective study. Chest 1991; 100: 1643-6.
  • 8. Hernandez-Socorro CR, Marin J, Ruiz-Santana S, Santana L, Manzano JL. Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients. Crit Care Made 1996; 24: 1690-4. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Rees RG, Payne-James JJ, King C, Silk DB. Spontaneous transpyloric passage and performance of ‘fine bore’ polyuretane feeding tubes: a controlled clinical trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1988; 12: 469-72. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Lord LM, Weiser-Maimone A, Pulhamus M, Sax HC. Comparison of weighted vs unweighted enteral feeding tubes for efficacy of transpyloric intubation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1993; 17: 271-3. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Paz HL, Weinar M, Sherman MS. Motility agents for the placement of weighted and unweighted feeding tubes in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 301-4. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Gabriel SA, Ackermann RJ, Castresana MR. A new technique for placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes using external magnetic guidance. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 641-5. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Keidan I, Gallagher TJ. Electrocardiogram-guided placement of enteral feeding tubes. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 2631-3. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Lorenzo -Zuniga V, Moreno de Vega V, Moreno P, Muchard J, Boix J. Endoscopic placement of postpyloric nasoenteric feeding tubes: The importance of the guidewire used. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 355-6. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Hashimoto A, Oya M, Iwano M, Fuse C, Inoue T, Yamada T, et al. A secure “double-check”technique of bedside post pyloric feeding tube placement using transnasal endoscopy. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2012; 51: 213-5. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Hillard AE, Waddel JJ, Metzler MH, McAlpin D. Fluoroscopically guided nasoenteric feeding tube placement versus bedside placement. South Med J 1995; 88: 425-8. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Kaufman JP, Hughes WB, Kerstein MD. Pneumothorax after nasoenteral feeding tube placement. Am Surg 2001; 67: 772-3.
  • 18. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2003; 7: 46-51.
  • 19. Huerta G, Puri VK. Nasogastric Versus Feeding Tubes in Critically Ill Patients. Nutrition 2000; 16: 264-7. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Erzincanli S, Zaybak A, Güler A. Investigation of the efficacy of colorimetric capnometry method used to verify the correct placement of the nasogastric tube. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 2017; 38: 46-52. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Stock A, Gilbertson H, Babl FE. Confirming nasogastric tube position in the emergency department: pH testing is reliable. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 805-9. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Muslu B, Demircioglu RI, Gozdemir M, Usta B. Comparison of neck ultrasonography with a pH meter to confirm correct position of nasogastric tube. Clin Invest Med 2016; 39: 27520.
  • 23. Fang JC, Hilden K, Holubkov R, DiSario JA. Transnasal endoscopy vs fluoroscopy for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients. Gasrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 661-6. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Vigneau C, Baudel JL, Guidet B, Offenstadt G, Maury E. Sonography as an alternative to radiography for nasogastric feeding tube location. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1570-2. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Kim HM, So BH, Jeong WJ, Choi SM, Park KN. The effectiveness of ultrasonography in verifying the placement of a nasogastric tube in patients with low consciousness at an emergency center. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012; 20: 38.[CrossRef]
APA Dagli R, BAYIR H, DADALI Y, Tokmak T, erbesler z (2017). Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. , 103 - 107.
Chicago Dagli Recai,BAYIR Hakan,DADALI YELİZ,Tokmak Turgut Tursem,erbesler zeynel abidin Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. (2017): 103 - 107.
MLA Dagli Recai,BAYIR Hakan,DADALI YELİZ,Tokmak Turgut Tursem,erbesler zeynel abidin Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. , 2017, ss.103 - 107.
AMA Dagli R,BAYIR H,DADALI Y,Tokmak T,erbesler z Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. . 2017; 103 - 107.
Vancouver Dagli R,BAYIR H,DADALI Y,Tokmak T,erbesler z Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. . 2017; 103 - 107.
IEEE Dagli R,BAYIR H,DADALI Y,Tokmak T,erbesler z "Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube." , ss.103 - 107, 2017.
ISNAD Dagli, Recai vd. "Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube". (2017), 103-107.
APA Dagli R, BAYIR H, DADALI Y, Tokmak T, erbesler z (2017). Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, 45(2), 103 - 107.
Chicago Dagli Recai,BAYIR Hakan,DADALI YELİZ,Tokmak Turgut Tursem,erbesler zeynel abidin Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 45, no.2 (2017): 103 - 107.
MLA Dagli Recai,BAYIR Hakan,DADALI YELİZ,Tokmak Turgut Tursem,erbesler zeynel abidin Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, vol.45, no.2, 2017, ss.103 - 107.
AMA Dagli R,BAYIR H,DADALI Y,Tokmak T,erbesler z Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. 2017; 45(2): 103 - 107.
Vancouver Dagli R,BAYIR H,DADALI Y,Tokmak T,erbesler z Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation. 2017; 45(2): 103 - 107.
IEEE Dagli R,BAYIR H,DADALI Y,Tokmak T,erbesler z "Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube." Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, 45, ss.103 - 107, 2017.
ISNAD Dagli, Recai vd. "Role of Ultrasonography in Detecting the Localisation of theNasoenteric Tube". Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 45/2 (2017), 103-107.