Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 58 - 71 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES

Öz:
Ticaret açıklığı ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin ampirik sonuçları uzun süredir uluslararası iktisat yazınında tartışmalı bir konu halindedir. İlişkiyi yeniden araştırmak için; öncelikle değişkenlerin birim kök ve eşbütünleşme testlerinin uygunluğunun belirlenmesi amacıyla homojenlik ve kesitsel bağımlılık test sonuçları analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmamızın veri seti olarak 10 farklı Afrika ülkesinin 1990-2015 yılları arasında verileri kullanılmıştır. Panel otoregresif dağıtılmış gecikme (ARDL) modeli çerçevesinde havuz ortalamalı grup tahmincisi (PMG) kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma, Afrika ülkeleri için bir panel ARDL yaklaşımı kullanılarak ekonomik büyüme ve ticaret açıklığı arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyerek mevcut literatürü tamamlamaktadır. PMG modeli sonuçları, ticaretin açıklıktaki artışın uzun vadede ekonomik büyüme üzerinde olumlu etkide bulunacağını göstermektedir. Çalışma ile elde edilen değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkinin kanıtı, seçilen ülkelerde uzun dönemli ticari açıklık odaklı büyüme hipotezinin geçerli olduğunu ima etmektedir
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

TİCARİ AÇIKLIK VE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: ON AFRİKA ÜLKESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Öz:
The empirical results for the relationship between trade openness and economic growth have long been a debatable matter in international economics literature. To re-investigate the relationship; firstly, we analyzed the homogeneity and cross-sectional dependency tests of the variables to determine appropriate unit roots and cointegration tests. We use data set includes 10 Africa countries for the period of 1990-2015. We employ pool mean group estimator (PMG) under the panel Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model framework. This study complements existing literature by examining the relation between economic growth and trade openness using a panel ARDL approach for Africa countries. The results of PMG model suggest that an increase in trade openness has positive impact on economic growth in the long run. The evidence of a long-run relationship between the variables implies the validity of the long-run openness-led growth hypothesis in selected countries
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • Asfaw A.H.(2015) “Trade Policy and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Panel Data Approach”, American Journal of Trade and Policy, 2 (4):7-14.
  • Babatunte, M.A. (2012) “Africa’s Growth and Development Strategies: A Critical Review”, Africa Development, 37(4), 141-178.
  • Baltagi, B. (2012), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th edition, Chichester, Wiley.
  • Bangake, C. and Eggoh, J. C. (2011) “Further Evidence on Finance-Growth Causality: A panel Data Analysis”, Economic Systems, 35(2),176–188.
  • Breusch, T.S and Pagan A.R. (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, 47: 239-253.
  • Brueckner, M. and Lederman, D. (2015) “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: Panel Data Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa” Economica, 82, 1302-1323.
  • Dowrick S. and Golley J. (2004) “Trade Openness and Growth: Who Benefits?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 38-56.
  • Drozdz J. and Miškinis A. (2011) “Benefits and Threats of Free Trade”, Ekonomia Economics, 2(14), 40- 48.
  • Edwards, S. (1992). Trade Orientation, Distortions, And Growth İn Developing Countries”, Journal of Development Economics, 39(1), 31–57.
  • Frankel, J.A. and Romer, D. (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399.
  • Gries, T. and Redlin, M. (2012) “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis”, Center for International Economics Working Paper Series, No. 2011-06, June 2012.
  • Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1994) “Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 23–44.
  • Harrison, A. (1996). Openness And Growth: A Time Series, Cross-Country Analysis For Developing Countries”, Journal Development Economics, 48(2), 419–447.
  • Kim, D.H. (2011) “Trade, Growth And Income”, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 20(5), 677-709.
  • Kim D.H. and Lin S.C. (2009) “Trade and Growth at Different Stages of Economic Development”, The Journal of Development Studies, 45(8), 1211-1224.
  • Knetter, M. M. (1993) “International Comparisons Of Pricing-To Market Behaviour”, American Economic Review, 83 (3), 473-487.
  • Mercan, M., Kızılkaya O. and Okde, B. (2015) “Are The Kaldor’s Laws Valid? Panel Data Analysis under Cross Section Dependency for NIC Countries”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 140-145.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007) “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Presence Of Cross-Section Dependence”, J ournal of Applied Econometrics, 22: 265–312.
  • Pesaran, M. and Shin, Y. (1999). “An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modeling Approach To Cointegration Analysis”. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory İn The 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium (pp. 371–413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R.(1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimator Of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 621-634.
  • Pesaran, M, Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T.(2008) “A Bias-Adjusted LM Test Of Error Cross-Section Independence”, Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
  • Ravinthirakumaran, N. (2014) “Applicability of Openness-led Growth Hypothesis in Sri Lanka An ARDL Bounds Test”, South Asia Economic Journal, 15(2), 241-263.
  • Singh, A. (1994) “Openness and the Market Friendly Approach to Development: Learning the Rights Lessons from Development Experience', World Development 22, 1811-1823.
  • Solow, R. (1997) “Is There a Core of Usable Macroeconomics We Should All Believe In?”, American Economic Review, 87(2), 230-232.
  • UNIDO (2011), Economic Development in Africa: Report 2011-Fostering Industrial Development in Africa in the New Global Environment, Special Issue, United Nations Industrial Organization, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2011.
  • Vamvakidis, A., 2002. How Robust is The Growth-Openness Connection? Historical Evidence”, Journal of Economic Growth,7, 57–80.
  • Wacziarg, R. (2001) “Measuring the Dynamic Gains From Trade”, World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 393-429.
  • Wade, R. (1990) “Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization”, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Weisbrot, M. and Baker D. (2001) “The Relative Impact of Trade Liberalization on Developing Countries”, http://cepr.net/documents/publications/trade_2002_06_12.pdf[,.
  • Williams, G. (2007) “Why Structural Adjustment Is Necessary and Why It Doesn’t Work”, Review of African Political Economy, 21 (60), 214-225.
  • World Bank(2017), World Development Indicators, Yanikkaya, H. (2003). “Trade Openness And Economic Growth: A Cross Country Empirical İnvestigation”, Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 57–89.
  • Zeren, F. and Ari, A. (2013) “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A panel Causality Test”, International of Business and Social Science, 4(9),317-324.
APA AYHAN f, Kabaklarlı E, MANGIR F (2017). AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. , 58 - 71.
Chicago AYHAN fatih,Kabaklarlı Esra,MANGIR FATİH AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. (2017): 58 - 71.
MLA AYHAN fatih,Kabaklarlı Esra,MANGIR FATİH AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. , 2017, ss.58 - 71.
AMA AYHAN f,Kabaklarlı E,MANGIR F AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. . 2017; 58 - 71.
Vancouver AYHAN f,Kabaklarlı E,MANGIR F AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. . 2017; 58 - 71.
IEEE AYHAN f,Kabaklarlı E,MANGIR F "AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES." , ss.58 - 71, 2017.
ISNAD AYHAN, fatih vd. "AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES". (2017), 58-71.
APA AYHAN f, Kabaklarlı E, MANGIR F (2017). AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 58 - 71.
Chicago AYHAN fatih,Kabaklarlı Esra,MANGIR FATİH AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 15, no.1 (2017): 58 - 71.
MLA AYHAN fatih,Kabaklarlı Esra,MANGIR FATİH AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.15, no.1, 2017, ss.58 - 71.
AMA AYHAN f,Kabaklarlı E,MANGIR F AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 15(1): 58 - 71.
Vancouver AYHAN f,Kabaklarlı E,MANGIR F AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017; 15(1): 58 - 71.
IEEE AYHAN f,Kabaklarlı E,MANGIR F "AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES." Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15, ss.58 - 71, 2017.
ISNAD AYHAN, fatih vd. "AN ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FOR TEN AFRICAN COUNTRIES". Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 15/1 (2017), 58-71.