EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA

Recep ULUCAK, (Assist.Prof.Dr., Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics)
Ekrem ERDEM (Prof.Dr., Erciyes University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics)
Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 115 - 147 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA

Öz:
Bu çalışmada çevrenin ekonomik büyüme modellerinde nasıl ele alındığı ve üretim fonksiyonu yaklaşımı çerçevesinde diğer üretim faktörleriyle birlikte nasıl sonuçlar verdiği araştırılmıştır. Ampirik uygulama kısmında üretim fonksiyonu yaklaşımı çerçevesinde ekolojik ayak izi değişkeni ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler için panel veri yöntemleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar gelişmekte olan ülkelerde çevre faktörünün hasıla üzerindeki etkisinin daha büyük olduğunu ve dolayısıyla çevreyi korumaya yönelik politikaların bu ülkelerde daha maliyetli olacağını göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme Endüstri Mühendisliği İşletme Finans

THE ENVIRONMENT IN ECONOMIC GROWTH MODELS: AN APPLICATION BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

Öz:
This study focuses on how environment is analysed in economic growth models and what results are obtained together with other production factors. Within this framework, ecological footprint as an indicator of environment is used. Later, the relationship between GDP and ecological footprint in developed and developing countries is econometrically analysed by using panel data techniques. Results show that the effect of environment on GDP is greater in developing countries than in developed ones, meaning that environment protection will be more costly in developing countries.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme Endüstri Mühendisliği İşletme Finans
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn, D. Hemous (2012), “Environment and Directed Technological Change”, American Economic Review, 102(1), 131-166.
  • Aghion, P., P. Howit (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Al-mulali, U. (2011), “Oil Consumption, CO2 Emission and Economic Growth in MENA Countries”, Energy, 36, 6165-6171.
  • Apergis, N.,D. C. Danuletio (2014), “Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: Evidence From The Sign of Panel Long Run Causality”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(4), 578-587.
  • Apergis, N., J.E. Payne (2011), “Renewable Energy Consumption-Growth Nexus in Central America”, Applied Energy, 88,343–347.
  • Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000), Environmental Economics for Non-Economists, Second Edition, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  • Asteriou, D., S.G. Hall. (2007), Applied Econometrics: a modern approach using eviews and microfit, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Baltagi, B.H., C. Kao (2000), “Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, 7-51.
  • Baltagi, Badi H. (2014), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Fifth Edition, Wiley Publishes.
  • Barbier, E.B. (1999), “Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 14, 51-74.
  • Bartelmus, P. (2008), Quantitative Eco-nomics: How Sustainable Are Our Economies?, Springer.
  • Becker, R.A. (1982), “Intergenerational Equity: The Capital-Environment Trade-Off”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 9, 165-185.
  • Bi Zambe, N. (2014), “Natural Resources And Economic Growth in Cote D’ivoire”, Journal of Empirical Economics, 3(4), 212-220.
  • Bildirici, M.E. (2014), “Relationship Between Biomass Energy And Economic Growth in Transition Countries: Panel ARDL Aproach”, Bioenergy, 6, 717-726.
  • Bildirici, M.E., T. Bakirtas (2014), The Relationship Among oil, Natural Gas and Coal Consumption and Economic Growth in BRICTS (Brazil, Russian, India, China, Turkey and South Africa) Countries. Energy, 65, 134–144.
  • Bilgili, F., I. Ozturk (2015), “Biomass Energy and Economic Growth Nexus in G7 Countries: Evidence From Dynamic Panel Data”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 132-138.
  • Bland, J.M., D.G. Altman (1996), Transforming data. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 312(7033), 770. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.312.7033.770
  • Borucke, M., D. Moore, G. Cranston, K. Gracey, K. Iha1, J. Larson, E. Lazarus, J. C. Morales, M. Wackernagel, A. Galli. (2011), ”Accounting for Demand and Supply of the Biosphere’s Regenerative Capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ Underlying Methodolgy and Framework”, Ecological Indicators, 24, 518-533.
  • Bovenberg, A., S. Smulders (1995), “Environmental Quality And Pollution — Augmenting Technological Change In a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model”, Journal of Public Economics, 57(3), 369–391.
  • Breitung, J., M.H. Pesaran (2004), “Unitroot and Cointegration in Panels”, Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies, No. 42/2005.
  • Breitung, J. (2005), “A Parametric Approach to The Estimation of Cointegration Vectors in Panel Data”, Econometric Reviews, 24(2), 151-173.
  • Breitung, J., M.H. Pesaran (2008), “Unitroot and Cointegration in Panels”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 1565.
  • Breusch, T.S., A.R. Pagan (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Testand its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies 47, 239–53.
  • Brock, W.A., M.S. Taylor (2010), “The Green Solow Model”, Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 127-153.
  • Burnnschweiler, C. N. (2007), “Cursing The Blessing? Natural Resources Abundance, Institutions and Economic Growth”, World Development, 36(3), 399-419.
  • Cavalcanti, T.V., K. Mohaddes, M. Raissi (2011), “Growth, Development and Natural Resources: New Evidence Using A Heterogenous Panel Analysis”, The Quarterly Review of Economics And Finance, 51, 305-318.
  • Chambers, D., J.T. Guo (2009), “Natural Resources and Economic Growth: Some Theory and Evidence”, Annals of Economics and Finance, 10(2), 367-389.
  • Choi, I. (2001), “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272.
  • Copeland, B.R. ,M.S. Taylor (1994), “Northsouth Trade and the Global Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 755-787.
  • D’Arge, R.C., K.C. Kogiku (1973), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Review of Economic Studies, 61-77.
  • Dasgupta, P.S., G.M. Heal (1974), “The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources”, Review of Economic Studies, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, 3-28.
  • Diamond, P. (1965), “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model”, American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126–1150.
  • Eberhardt, M., F. Teal (2008), “Modeling Technology And Technological Change in Manufacturing: How To Countries Differ”, Oxford CSAE WPS/2008-12.
  • EEA 2010, The European Environment State and Outlook 2010. Consumption and Environment European Environment Agency. http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_6_raporlar/1_3_diger/environment/eea__2010_the_europea n_environment_synthesis.pdf (04.04.2015).
  • Enders, W. (2009), Applied econometric Time Series, Third Edition, Wiley.
  • Ewing B., D. Moore, S. Goldfinger, A. Oursler, A. Reed, and M. Wackernagel. (2010), The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
  • Feng, C., H. Wang, N. Lu, X.M. Tu (2013), Log Transformation: Application and Interpretation in Biomedical Research. Statistics in Medicine, 32(2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5486
  • Fisher, R.A. (1932), Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 4th Edition.
  • Forster, B.A. (1973), “Optimal Capital Accumulation in a Polluted Environment”, Rev. Economic. Stud. 39, 544-547.
  • Geldrop, J., C. Withagen (2000) “Natural Capital and Sustainability”, Ecological Economics, 32(2000), 445-455.
  • GGBP (2014), Green Growth in Practice: Lessons From Country Experiences. http://www.ggbp.org/sites/all/themes/ggbp/uploads/Green-Growth-in-Practice-062014- Full.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 06.08.2015.
  • Gradus, R., S. Smulders (1993), “Thge Trade of Between Environmental Care And Long Term Growth-Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models”, Journal of Economics, 58(1), 25-51.
  • Granger, C.W.J., P. Newbold (1974), “Superious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
  • Grimaud A., L. Rouge (2005), “Polluting Non-Renewable Resources, Innovation and Growth: Wellfare and Environmental Policy”, Resources and Energy Economics, 27, 109-129.
  • Grimaud, A. (1999), “Pollution Permits and Sustainable Growth in a Schumpeterian Model”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(3), 249–266.
  • Grimaud, A., L. Rouge (2003), “Non-Renewable Resources and Growth With Vertical Innovations: Optimum, Equilibrium and Economic Policies”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 433–453.
  • Grimaud, A., L. Rouge (2008), “Environment, Directed Technical Change and Economic Policy”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(4): 439–63.
  • Groth, C. (2007), “A New Growth Perspective on Non Renewable Resources”, Inside: Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics, eds: L. Bretschger and S. Smulders, Springer.
  • Gruver, G.W. (1976), “Optimal Investment in Pollution Control Capital in a Neoclassical Growth Context”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3, 165-177.
  • Gylfason, T., G. Zoega (2006), “Natural Resources And Economic Growth: The Role of Investment”, The World Economy, 29, 1091–115.
  • Harris, R.D.F. , E. Tzavalis. (1999), “Inference For Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels Where the Time Dimension is Fixed”. Journal of Econometrics, 91, 201-226.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data. Second Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ivulska, A. (2012), Golden Growth: Restoring the Lustre of European Economic Model. Worldbank Report, http://siteresources.worldbank.org (06.08.2015).
  • Ji, Kan, J.R. Magnus, W. Wang (2013) “Natural Resources, Institutional Quality and Economic Growth in China”, Environ Resource Econ, DOI 10.1007/s10640-013-9673-8.
  • Jobert, T., F. Karanfil (2007), “Sectoral Energy Consumption by Source and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 35, 5447–5456.
  • Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economics Dynamic and Control, 12, 231-254.
  • Johansen, S. (1992), “Determination of Cointegration Rank in the Presence of a Linear Trend”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 383-97.
  • John, A., R. Pecchenino (1994), “An Overlapping Generations Model of Growth the Environment”, The Economic Journal, 104, 1393-1410.
  • Keeler, E., M. Spence, R. Zeckhauser (1971), “The Optimal Control of Pollution”, Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 19-34.
  • Kitzes, J., M. Wackernagel (2009), “Answers to Common Questions in Ecological Footprint Accounting”, Ecological Indicators, 9, 812-817.
  • Lazarus, E., G. Zokai, M. Borucke, D. Panda, K. Iha, J. C. Morales, M. Wackernagel, A. Galli, N. Gupta. (2014), Working Guidebook to the National Footprint Accounts: 2014 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
  • Lederman, D., W. Maloney (2003), ‘‘Trade Structure and Growth’’, Policy Research Paper, 3025, Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Lee, C.C., C.P. Chang (2007), “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Asian Economies: A More Comprehensive Analysis Using Panel Data”, Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 50-65.
  • Leeuven, Bas Van (2007), Human Capital and Economic Growth in India, Indonesia and Japan: A Quantitative Analysis 1890-2000. ISBN: 9789088910036, Netherlands.
  • Levin, A., C. Lin, C.J. Chu. (2002), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.
  • Lise, W., K.V. Montfort (2007), “Energy Consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is There a Co- Integration Relationship?”, Energy Economics, 29, 1166–1178.
  • Liu, Y. (2013), “Economic Growth Drag in the Central China: Evidence From A Panel Analysis”, Applied Economics, 45(16), 2163-2174.
  • Lucas, R.E. (1988), “On The Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
  • Maddala, G.S., S. Wu. (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.
  • Mahadevan, R., J. Asafu-Adjaye (2007), “Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Prices: A Reassessment Using Panel VECM for Developed and Developing Countries”, Energy Policy, 35, 2481–2490.
  • Menyah, K., Y. Wolde-Rufael (2010), “Energy Consumption, Pollutant Emissions and Economic Growth in South Africa”, Energy Econ., 32, 1374–1382.
  • Michel, P., G. Rotillon (1995), “Disutility of Pollution and Endogenous Growth”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 6(3), 279–300. OECD (2012), Environmental Performance Reviews: Germany 2012. http://www.oecd.org/env/country-reviews/50418430.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 06.08.2015.
  • Olufemi, S.M. (2012), “Energy Resources, Domestic Investment and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria”, Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment, 3(4), 320-328.
  • Paul, S., R.N. Battacharya (2004), “Causality Between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in India: A Note on Conflicting Results”, Energy Econ., 26(6), 977–983.
  • Pedroni, P. (1995), “Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Test with An Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Indiana University Working Papers in Economics, No. 95-013.
  • Pedroni, P. (2000), “Fully Modified OLS for Heterogenous Cointegrated Panels”, in: Baltagi, B., ed. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics. Vol. 15, Amsterdam: JAI Press, . 93–130.
  • Phillips, P.C.B., B.E. Hansen (1990), “Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variable Regression With I (1) Processes”, Rev. Econ. Studies, 57, 99–125.
  • Phillips, P.C.B., H. Moon (1999), “Lineer Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel Data”, Econometrica, 67, 1057-1111.
  • Ploeg, F.W.D., C. Withagen (1991), “Pollution Control and Ramsey Problem”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 1, 215-236.
  • Ramsey, F.P. (1928), “A Mathematical Theory of Saving”, Economic Journal, 38, 543-559.
  • Reyes, R.C. (2011), “The Green Solow Model with Natural Resources Constraint: A Theoretical Note”, DLSU Business and Economics Review, 21(1), 111-116.
  • Rao, B. B., K.C. Vadlamannati (2011), Globalization and growth in the low income African countries with the extreme bounds analysis. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 795–805.
  • Romer, D. (2006), Advanced Macroeconomics, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill.
  • Romer, P.M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.
  • Romer, P.M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5), 1002-1037.
  • Samuelson, P.A. (1958), “An Exact Consumption- Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money”, Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 467–482.
  • Sargan, J.D., A. Bhargava. (1983), “Testing For Residuals From Least Squares Regression Being Generated By Gaussian Random Walk”. Econometrica, 51, 153–174.
  • Schlauch M., G. Palmisano. (2013), “The Transition from the Neoclassical Growth Model to Ecology”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45867/ Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2015.
  • Scholl, A., W. Semmler (2002), “Sustainable Economic Growth and Exhaustible Resources: A Model and Estimation for The US”. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 7(2), 79- 92.
  • Scholz, C.M., G. Ziemes (1999), “Exhaustible Resources, Monopolistic Competition And Endogeneous Growth”, Environmental And Resource Economics, 13, 169–185.
  • Schou, P. (2000), “Polluting non-renewable resources and growth”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 16, 211–227.
  • Selden, T.M., D. Song (1994), “Environmental Quality and Development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147-162.
  • Solow, R. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
  • Stiglitz, J. (1974), “Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths”, Review of Economic Studies, 41(1), 123–137.
  • Stokey, N. L. (1998), “Are There Limits to Growth?”, International Economic Review, 39(1), 1– 31.
  • Stürmer, M., G. Schwerhoff (2012), “Non Renwable But Inexhaustible Resources in an Endogenous Growth Model”, Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn 2012/9.
  • Tahvonen, O., J. Kuuluvainen (1993), “Economic Growth, Pollution and Renewable Resources”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 01-118.
  • Tolo, W.B. (2011), “ The Determinants of Economic Growth in the Philippins: A New Look”, IMF Working Paper, WP/11/288
  • Torres, N., O. Afonso, I. Soares (2012), “Oil Abundance and Economic Growth – A Panel Data Analysis”, The Energy Journal, 33(2), 119-148.
  • UNDP (2014), Human Development Report 2014: Sustaining Human Progress, Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience, United Nations Development Programme, New York. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/ files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 04.04.2015.
  • Wackernagel, M., W.E. Rees. (1996), Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
  • Wackernagel, M. (2002), “What We Use and What We Have: Ecological Footprint and Ecological Capacity”, Redifening Progress, 1904 Franklin Street, Oakland, CA 94612 USA, http://stoa.usp.br/soniacoutinho/files/-1/19798/ texto_17.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 23.03.2015.
  • Wackernagel, M., J.D. Yount (2000), “Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2, 21-42.
  • Wang, X. (2009), “Research on Growth Drag of Water Resource on Agricultural Development in China”, International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, August 16-22.
  • Weil, D.N. (2005), Economic Growth, New York: Pearson Publishing.
  • Yang, H., W. Tian, Z. Ding (2010), “An Economic Growth Model with Renewable Resources And Stochastic Technology Change”, International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences, 1, 104-111.
  • Zhang, X., X. Cheng (2009), “Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth in China”, Ecol. Econ. 68 (10), 2706–2712.
APA Ulucak R, Erdem E (2017). EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. , 115 - 147.
Chicago Ulucak Recep,Erdem Ekrem EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. (2017): 115 - 147.
MLA Ulucak Recep,Erdem Ekrem EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. , 2017, ss.115 - 147.
AMA Ulucak R,Erdem E EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. . 2017; 115 - 147.
Vancouver Ulucak R,Erdem E EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. . 2017; 115 - 147.
IEEE Ulucak R,Erdem E "EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA." , ss.115 - 147, 2017.
ISNAD Ulucak, Recep - Erdem, Ekrem. "EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA". (2017), 115-147.
APA Ulucak R, Erdem E (2017). EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(4), 115 - 147.
Chicago Ulucak Recep,Erdem Ekrem EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 35, no.4 (2017): 115 - 147.
MLA Ulucak Recep,Erdem Ekrem EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.35, no.4, 2017, ss.115 - 147.
AMA Ulucak R,Erdem E EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 35(4): 115 - 147.
Vancouver Ulucak R,Erdem E EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 35(4): 115 - 147.
IEEE Ulucak R,Erdem E "EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA." Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, ss.115 - 147, 2017.
ISNAD Ulucak, Recep - Erdem, Ekrem. "EKONOMİK BÜYÜME MODELLERİNDE ÇEVRE: EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNİ ESAS ALAN BİR UYGULAMA". Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 35/4 (2017), 115-147.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 6:5

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları