Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme

a Meral KUFTT, (aProtetik Diş Tedavisi AD,)
Cenkhan BALB, (bPedodonti Servisi, TSK Etimesgut Hava Hastanesi, Ankara)
Bilge BAL TURHAN (aProtetik Diş Tedavisi AD, Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi,)
Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi
32 7
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 130 - 146 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme

Öz:
Dental restorasyonların estetik başarısı doğal dentisyonla olan renk uyumuna bağlıdır. Renkseçimi, dişlerin karmaşık optik özellikleri nedeni ile estetik diş hekimliğinde zorlayıcı ve önemli birişlemdir. Diş hekimliğinde renk seçimi görsel veya enstrümantal (aletsel) olmak üzere iki katego--riye ayrılabilir. Renk algısı birçok faktörden etkilenebildiği için renk skalaları kullanılarak görselolarak yapılan renk seçimi oldukça subjektiftir ve tutarsızlık göstermektedir. Bu subjektifliği azalt--mak için spektrofotometre, spektroradyometre, kolorimetre ve dijital görüntü analizi gibi çeşitliteknolojik sistemler geliştirilmiştir. Bu cihazların sayısal olarak ifade edilebilen, hızlı ve kolay eldeedilebilen objektif ve hassas sonuçlar vermeleri gibi avantajları vardır. Ancak dişlerin düz yüzeyliolmaması ve translusens yapıları cihazlarla yapılan ölçümlerde hatalara neden olmaktadır. Ayrıca,farklı ölçüm prensibiyle çalışan cihazlarla elde edilen sonuçlar arasında da tutarsızlıklar olabil--mektedir. Tüm diş yüzeyinden ölçüm yapan cihazlar bölgesel ölçüm yapanlardan daha başarılı sonuçlarvermektedir. Ancak bu cihazların maliyetlerinin yüksek olması, klinik kullanımlarının vekalibrasyonlarının zor olması, yazılım güncellemelerinin gerekliliği gibi kısıtlamaları mevcuttur. Bunedenle en güvenilir renk ölçümü, görsel yöntemin teknolojik sistemlerle kombinasyonuyla eldeedilmektedir. Bu çalışmada günümüzde kullanılan renk seçim sistemleri ve yeni gelişmeler hakkında bilgi verilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Actual Methods of Color Measurement: Systematic Review

Öz:
Esthetic success of dental restorations is depend on shade matching with the natural dentition. Shade selection in esthetic dentistry is a challenging and important process due to complex characteristics of the natural teeth. Color determination in dentistry can be divided into two categories as visual and instrumental. Since color perception is influenced by many factors; tooth shade matching using shade guides is highly subjective and inconsistent. To minimize this sub- jectivity spectrophotometer, spectroradiometer, colorimeter and digital image analysing systems were developed. Shade matching devices have advantages that readings are quantifiable, can obtain more rapidly and simply, objective and precise. However translucent structure and irregular sur- faces of teeth leads to inaccuracies in measurements with devices. Also between the results ob- tained by devices with different measurement principles may also be inconsistencies. Complete tooth surface measurement devices gives more succesfull results than limited area measurement devices. However these devices have limitations that high costs, difficult clinical practice and cal- ibration, software update requirements. For that reason the most reliable shade matching is achieved by combining visual method with technologic systems. This review provide knowledge about cur- rent shade selection systems and advances in shade selection.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Keyf F, Uzun G, Altunsoy S. [Choice of color in dentistry]. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakül- tesi Dergisi 2009;33(4):52-8.
  • Wee AG. Description of Color, Color Replica- tion Process, and Esthetics. In: Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J, eds. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4thed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p.709-39.
  • Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic Color Training in Dentistry. 1sted. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p. 3-170.
  • Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part I. The three-dimensional nature of color. 1973. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86(5):453-7.
  • Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(2):341-58.
  • O'Brien WJ. Color and Appearance, Dental Materials and Their Selection. 3rded. Illiniois: Quintessence Publishing; 2002. p.24-36.
  • Chu SJ, Devigus A, Mieleszko A. Fundamen- tals of Color: Shade Matching and Communi- cation in Esthetic Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2004. p. 14-85.
  • Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Spec- trophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56(1):35-40.
  • Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Chil- dress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(6): 642-8.
  • Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instru- mental measurements for tooth shade match- ing. Quintessence Int 2012;43(8):649-59.
  • Paravina RD. Performance assessment of dental shade guides. J Dent 2009;37(Suppl 1):e15-20.
  • Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Jakstat H, Moldovan O, Schwarz S, Hassel AJ. The lin- ear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master per- forms as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37(11):860- 5.
  • Khashayar G, Dozic A, Kleverlaan C, Feilzer AJ. Clinical success of shade guides arranged according to lightness measured digitally. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25(4):410-2.
  • Meireles SS, Demarco FF, dos Santos Ida S, Dumith Sde C, Bona AD. Validation and relia- bility of visual assessment with a shade guide for tooth-color classification. Oper Dent 2008;33(2):121-6.
  • Öngül D, Şermet B, Balkaya MC. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108(1):9-14.
  • Oh WS, Koh IW, O'Brien WJ. Estimation of vi- sual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides. Quintessence Int 2009;40(10):833-6.
  • Hassel AJ, Koke U, Schmitter M, Beck J, Rammelsberg P. Clinical effect of different shade guide systems on the tooth shades of ceramic-veneered restorations. Int J Prostho- dont 2005;18(5):422-6.
  • Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. In vivo spectroradio- metric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides. J Oral Rehabil
  • Bayindir F, Kuo S, Johnston WM, Wee AG. Coverage error of three conceptually differ- ent shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98(3):175- 85.
  • Ahn JS, Lee YK. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(1):18-28.
  • Corciolani G, Vichi A, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Colour correspondence of a ceramic system in two different shade guides. J Dent 2009;37(2):98-101.
  • Wee AG, Kang EY, Jere D, Beck FM. Clinical color match of porcelain visual shade-match- ing systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17(6):351-7.
  • Ishikawa-Nagai S, Wang J, Seliger A, Lin J, Da Silva J. Developing a custom dental porce- lain shade system for computer color match- ing. J Dent 2013;41(Suppl 3):e3-10.
  • Wang P, Wei J, Li Q, Wang Y. Evaluation of an optimized shade guide made from porce- lain powder mixtures. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(6):1553-8.
  • Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Optical, Thermal, and Electrical Properties, Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. 12thed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 2006. p.27-50.
  • Kahramanoğlu E, Kulak Özkan Y. [Esthetic and color in dentistry]. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2013;16(4):339-47.
  • Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Pe- riodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23(5):467- 79.
  • Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent 2014;42(1):48-52.
  • Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Keyvanloo S, Alavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Shade matching per- formance of dental students with three various lighting conditions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):100-3.
  • Alomari M, Chadwick RG. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two differ- ent shade guides. Br Dent J 2011;211(11): E23.
  • Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan A. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(6): 391-6.
  • Winkler S, Boberick KG, Weitz KS, Datikashvili I, Wood R. Shade matching by dental students. J Oral Implantol 2006;32(5): 256-8.
  • Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, et al. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent 2009;37(Suppl 1):e40-4.
  • Milagres V, Teixeira ML, Miranda ME, Osorio Silva CH, Ribeiro Pinto JR. Effect of gender, experience, and value on color perception. Oper Dent 2012;37(3):228-33.
  • Judeh A, Al-Wahadni A. A comparison be- tween conventional visual and spectrophoto- metric methods for shade selection. Quintessence Int 2009;40(9):e69-79.
  • Alsaleh S, Labban M, AlHariri M, Tashkandi E. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means. J Dent 2012;40(Suppl 1):e82-7.
  • Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer popu- lations and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater 2009;25(2):276-81.
  • Jaju RA, Nagai S, Karimbux N, Da Silva JD. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of den- tal students. J Dent Educ 2010;74(9):1002-10.
  • Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Moldovan O, Dreyhaupt J, Hassel AJ. Effect of external light conditions during matching of tooth color: an intraindividual comparison. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(1):75-7.
  • Sinmazisik G, Trakyali G, Tarcin B. Evaluat- ing the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color. J Pros- thet Dent 2014;112(6):1559-66.
  • Turgut S, Bağış B. [Color in dentistry and color measuring methods]. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2012;Suppl 5: 65-75.
  • Seghi RR. Effects of instrument-measuring geometry on colorimetric assessments of den- tal porcelains. J Dent Res 1990;69(5):1180-3.
  • Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window colour measure- ment, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994;39(7):1133-42.
  • Johnston WM. Color measurement in den- tistry. J Dent 2009;37(Suppl 1):e2-6.
  • Karamouzos A, Papadopoulos MA, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. Precision of in vivo spec- trophotometric colour evaluation of natural teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(8):613-21.
  • Douglas RD. Precision of in vivo colorimetric assessments of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(5):464-70.
  • Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Per- formance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989;68(12):1755-9.
  • Lagouvardos PE, Fougia AG, Diaman- topoulou SA, Polyzois GL. Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color se- lection devices in matching and measuring tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(1):40- 5.
  • Goodkind RJ, Keenan K, Schwabacher WB. A comparison of Chromascan and spec- trophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1985 53(1):105- 9.
  • Doğan A, Yüzügüllü B. [Recent technological developments in color selection]. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2011;Suppl 4:65-72.
  • Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Den- tal color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent 2010;38(Suppl 2):e2-16.
  • Khurana R, Tredwin CJ, Weisbloom M, Moles DR. A clinical evaluation of the individual re- peatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices. Br Dent J 2007;203(12):675-80.
  • Freedman GA, Goldstep F . Color and Shade. In: Waldman SD. Contemporary Esthetic Den- tistry. 1sted. UK: Elsevier Mosby; 2012. p. 135-60.
  • Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and com- munication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005;199(1):43-9.
  • Guan YH, Lath DL, Lilley TH, Willmot DR, Marlow I, Brook AH. The measurement of tooth whiteness by image analysis and spec- trophotometry: a comparison. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(1):7-15.
  • Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnston WM. Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry. Dent Mater 2006;22(6):553-9.
  • Schropp L. Shade matching assisted by digi- tal photography and computer software. J Prosthodont 2009;18(3):235-41.
  • Tung OH, Lai YL, Ho YC, Chou IC, Lee SY. Development of digital shade guides for color assessment using a digital camera with ring flashes. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15(1):49-56.
  • Tam WK, Lee HJ. Dental shade matching using a digital camera. J Dent 2012;40(Suppl 2):e3-10.
  • Vivek R, Singh A, Soni R, Singh S. Conven- tional and digitally assisted shade matching- A comparative study. Indian J Dent 2013;4(4):191-9.
  • Da Silva JD, Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa- Nagai S. Clinical performance of a newly de- veloped spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction. J Prosthet Dent
  • Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27(1):97-108.
  • Chang J, Chen W, Huang T, Wang J, Fu P, Chen J, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and limitations of three tooth-color measuring ma- chines. J Dent Sci 2015;10(1):16-20.
  • Yuan K, Sun X, Wang F, Wang H, Chen JH. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three com- puter-aided shade matching instruments. Oper Dent 2012;37(3):219-27.
  • Khashayar G, Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Data comparison between two dental spectrophotometers. Oper Dent 2012;37(1): 12-20.
  • Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Goula H. Matching repeatability and interde- vice agreement of 2 intraoral spectropho- tometers. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107(3): 178-85.
  • Llena C, Lozano E, Amengual J, Forner L. Re- liability of two color selection devices in match- ing and measuring tooth color. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(1):19-23.
  • Witkowski S, Yajima ND, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Reliability of shade selection using an in- traoral spectrophotometer. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(3):945-9.
  • Imbery TA, Geissberger M, Hakim F, Al-Anezi S, Uram-Tuculescu S, Gottlieb R, et al. Eval- uation of four dental clinical spectrophotome- ters relative to human shade observation. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144(10):1183-6.
  • Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(3):193-9.
  • Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five com- mercially available tooth color-measuring de- vices. J Prosthodont 2007;16(2):93-100.
  • Zenthöfer A, Cabrera T, Corcodel N, Ram- melsberg P, Hassel AJ. Comparison of the Easyshade Compact and Advance in vitro and in vivo. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18(5):1473-9.
  • Lehmann KM, Igiel C, Schmidtmann I, Scheller H. Four color-measuring devices compared with a spectrophotometric refer- ence system. J Dent 2010;38(Suppl 2):e65- 70.
  • Yilmaz B, Karaagaclioglu L. Comparison of vi- sual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(10):789-94.
  • Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Aoshima H, Spiek- erman CF. Efficacy of a computerized shade selection system in matching the shade of an- terior metal-ceramic crowns- a pilot study. Quintessence Int 2006;37(10):793-802.
  • Hugo B, Witzel T, Klaiber B. Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination. 2005;9(4):244-50. Investig
  • Browning WD, Chan DC, Blalock JS, Brackett MG. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer. Oper Dent 2009;34(3):337-43.
  • Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Celemin- Viñuela A, Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour. J Dent 2014;42(6):742-5.
  • Pimental W, Tiossi R. Comparison between visual and instrumental methods for natural tooth shade matching. Gen Dent 2014;62(6):47-9.
  • Derdilopoulou FV, Zantner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Evaluation of visual and spec- trophotometric shade analyses: a clinical com- parison of 3758 teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20(4):414-6.
  • Li Q, Wang YN. Comparison of shade match- ing by visual observation and an intraoral den- tal colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(11):848-54.
  • Klemetti E, Matela AM, Haag P, Kononen M. Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33(1):31-5.
  • Lasserre JF, Pop-Ciutrila IS, Colosi HA. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and con- ventional visual and spectrometric methods. J Dent 2011;39(Suppl 3):e29-36.
APA KUFTT a, BALB C, BAL TURHAN B (2016). Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. , 130 - 146.
Chicago KUFTT a Meral,BALB Cenkhan,BAL TURHAN Bilge Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. (2016): 130 - 146.
MLA KUFTT a Meral,BALB Cenkhan,BAL TURHAN Bilge Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. , 2016, ss.130 - 146.
AMA KUFTT a,BALB C,BAL TURHAN B Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. . 2016; 130 - 146.
Vancouver KUFTT a,BALB C,BAL TURHAN B Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. . 2016; 130 - 146.
IEEE KUFTT a,BALB C,BAL TURHAN B "Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme." , ss.130 - 146, 2016.
ISNAD KUFTT, a Meral vd. "Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme". (2016), 130-146.
APA KUFTT a, BALB C, BAL TURHAN B (2016). Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(2), 130 - 146.
Chicago KUFTT a Meral,BALB Cenkhan,BAL TURHAN Bilge Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 22, no.2 (2016): 130 - 146.
MLA KUFTT a Meral,BALB Cenkhan,BAL TURHAN Bilge Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.22, no.2, 2016, ss.130 - 146.
AMA KUFTT a,BALB C,BAL TURHAN B Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016; 22(2): 130 - 146.
Vancouver KUFTT a,BALB C,BAL TURHAN B Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016; 22(2): 130 - 146.
IEEE KUFTT a,BALB C,BAL TURHAN B "Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme." Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 22, ss.130 - 146, 2016.
ISNAD KUFTT, a Meral vd. "Güncel Renk Ölçüm Yöntemleri: Sistematik Derleme". Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 22/2 (2016), 130-146.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
08-05-2024 12:7

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları