Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 52 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 705 - 733 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 16-01-2019

KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI

Öz:
Uluslararası Kooperatifler Birliği'nin kooperatif kimliği üzerine açıklaması bir kooperatifi"ortaklaşa sahip olunan ve demokratik olarak kontrol edilen bir işletme aracılığıyla ortakekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel ihtiyaç ve isteklerini karşılamak için gönüllü olarak bir arayagelen kişilerin özerk bir birliği" olarak tanımlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, kooperatif, birgrup bireyin karşılıklı faydaları için sahip olduğu ve işlettiği bir ticari organizasyon olarakdeğerlendirilebilir. Kooperatif üyeleri, ürün veya hizmetlerin üreticileri veya tüketicileriolarak veya çalışanları olarak yakın bir ilişki içindedir. Bu ilişkilerin kooperatiftoplumunda kurumsal yönetim ilkeleri perspektifinde ele alınması ve şeffaflığınsağlanması amacıyla modern denetim tekniklerinin uygulanması önemli olmaktadır.Kooperatiflerin denetimi temel olarak kooperatif toplumuna odaklanır ve her işin hukuksınırları dahilinde değerlendirilmesini sağlayan önemli bir görevdir. Bir kooperatiftoplumunun denetimi bir şirketin denetiminden farklıdır. Bunun en önemli nedeni birkooperatif toplumunun temel unsurları ve iş süreçleri bir şirketten çok farklıdır. Buaraştırma, kooperatiflerin uluslararası standartlara dayalı denetiminin öneminigöstermek için kooperatifler için yönetişim ve denetimle ilgili temel konuları analizetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca kooperatif denetiminde en iyi uygulama örnekleri içinpolitika önerileri yapılmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim İşletme İktisat İşletme Finans

IMPLEMENTATION OF MODERN AUDITING TECHNIQUES FOR COOPERATIV

Öz:
The International Cooperative Alliance’s Statement on the Cooperative Identity defines a cooperative as “an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise”. In that respect, cooperative is a business organization owned and operated by a group of individuals for their mutual benefit. Members have a close relationship with the enterprise as producers or consumers of its products or services, or as its employees. Addressing these relationships within the perspective of corporate governance principles and application of modern auditing techniques become important to ensure transparency for cooperative societies. Basically, cooperative auditing focuses on cooperative societies and the assessment of every work within the limits of the law signal an important task regarding the knowledge of employees and directors. The audit of a cooperative society is different from that of a limited liability company (company) because the objects and business processes of a cooperative society are quite different from those of a company. This research aims to analyze key issues on governance and auditing for cooperatives to demonstrate the importance of auditing for cooperatives based on international standards. Also policy recommendations are made for best practices of cooperative auditing.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İletişim İşletme İktisat İşletme Finans
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochran, P. L., (1999). “Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), pp. 41-58.
  • White, A. W., (1976). "The essentials for the effective internal audit department", Internal Auditor, April, pp. 30–3.
  • Thompson, A. A. and A. J. Strickland, (2001). "Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases" (International edition) (McGraw Hill, Boston)
  • Titera,W.R., (2013). "Updating Audit Standards—Enabling Audit Data Analysis," Journal of Information Systems, 27, 1, 325–331, Spring, 2013.
  • Trevino, L.K. and Weaver, G.R., (2003). "Managing Ethics in Organizations: A Social Scientific Perspective on Business Ethics", Stanford University Press, California.
  • Teece, D. J. (2010). "Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation." Long Range Planning 43(2/3): 172-194.
  • Thompson C (2001). "CAAT can do". Internal Auditor, 58(3): 73-75.
  • T.C. Yasalar (1969). 1163 Sayılı Kooperatifler Kanunu. Ankara : Resmi Gazete (13195 sayılı-10.05.1969).
  • Taylor Keith (2015). "Learning from the Co-operative Institutional Model: How to Enhance Organizational Robustness of Third Sector Organizations with More Pluralistic Forms of Governance", Administrative Sciences, ISSN 2076-3387
  • Sutton, S. G., (1993). "Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality of the audit process", Decision Sciences, , Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 88–105.
  • Steiger, J. H., and Lind, J. C., (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IA.
  • Spraakman, G., (1997). "Transaction cost economics: a theory of internal audit", Managerial Auditing Journal, , Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 323–30.
  • Selim, G. and McNamee, D. (1999). "Risk management and Internal auditing: What are the essential building blocks for successful paradign change", International Journal of Auditing Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 147-155.
  • Schneider, A., (1984). "Modeling external auditors’ evaluations of internal auditing", Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 22, pp. 657–78.
  • Sarens, G. and Beelde, I. D. (2006). "Internal auditors’ perception about their role in risk management: A comparison between US and Belgian companies", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 61-80.
  • Sarens, G. and Christopher, J. (2010). "The association between corporate governance guidelines and risk management and internal control practices: Evidence from a comparative study", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 288-208.
  • Sawyer, L. B. & Dittenhofer, M. A., (1996). "Sawyerˈs Internal Auditing: The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing", , 4th edition, Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors.
  • Sawyer, L. B., (1988). "Sawyerˈs Internal Auditing", Altamonte Springs, , FL: Institute of Internal Auditors.
  • Stern, G. M. (1994). "15 ways internal auditing departments are adding value", Internal Auditor, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 30–3.
  • Rasmussen, J. (1997). "Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem", Safety Science, Vol. 27 No. 2/3, pp. 183-213.
  • Pokrovac I, Tušek B, Oluiæ A (2010). "The Relation of Risk Management and Internal Audit Function: The Case of Croatia". 5th International Conference, An Enterprise Odysses: From Crisis to Prosperity Challenges for Government and Business, Held in Opatija (Hrvatska) on 26-29 May 2010. From <http: // biblio.irb.hr/prikazirad?andlang=EN%20Croatian% 20Scientific%20Biblography%20CR..andrad=480036>.
  • Ott John, Andrew MacLeod, and Kevin Mar Fan (2008). " Computer-assisted Audit Techniques: Value of Data Mining for Corporate Auditors", Information System Journal, Volume 3.
  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., and Tucci, C.L. (2005). "Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept." Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005(16): 1-25.
  • Mihret, D. G. (2013), "The risk management rationale of internal auditing: a labor process analysis", Working Paper, Vol. University of New England No. Armidale, Australia
  • Martin JR (2004). "Sampling made simple". Internal Auditor, 61(4): 21-24.
  • Marais M (2004). "Quality assurance in internal auditing: An analysis of the standards and guidelines implemented by the IIA". Meditari Accountancy Research, 12(2): 85- 107.
  • Mazzarol Tim, Elena Mamouni Limnios ve Sophie Reboud (2011). "Co-Operative Enterprise: A Unique Business Model?", Conference Paper, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235432100
  • Masanell Ramon Casadesus ve Joan Enric Ricart. (2010). " From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics", Long Range Planning 43 (2010) 195-215. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/lrp
  • Liebowitz J, Rubenstein-Montano B, McCaw D, Buchwalter J, Browning C, Newman B, Rebeck K (2000). "The knowledge audit". Knowledge and Process Management, 7(1): 3- 10.
  • KPMG (2013). "Transforming Internal Audit: A Maturity Model from Data Analytics to Continuous Assurance", https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/09/ch-pub-20150922- transforming-internal-audit-maturity-model-en.pdf
  • Kutum I, Fraser I, Hussainey K (2015). "The application of business risk audit methodology within non-Big-4 firms". Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 13(2): 226-246.
  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C.M., and Kagermann, H. (2008). "Reinventing Your Business Model." Harvard Business Review 86(12): 50-59.
  • Jacobus, D (2015). "New paradigm of managing risks: Risk and control self-assessment". Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 3: 32-34.
  • Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2015). " Data Analytics and the Future of Internal Audit", The IIA Research Foundation, in partnership with Grant Thornton.
  • Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2017). "The International Professional Practice Framework (IPPF)". Altamonte Springs, FL: The IIA.
  • International Co-operative Alliance. Available online: http://ica.coop/en/what-coop/co-operative-identity-values- principles
  • Hubbard LD (2002). "CSA by any name". Internal Auditor, 59(6): 22-23.
  • Harrington, L. (2015). " Driving Success in a Changing World: 10 Imperatives for Internal Audit", IIA International Conference Presentation, July 5-8 2015, Canada.
  • Hansmann, H. (1996). "The Ownership of Enterprise", Boston, Harvard University Press.
  • Flesher DL, De Magalhaes R (1995). "Electronic workpapers". Internal Auditor, 52(4): 38- 43.
  • Eriş, Gönen (2001). "Kooperatifler Hukuku", Üçüncü Baskı, Ankara.
  • Deryal, Yahya (1998). "Türk Hukukunda Kooperatiflerin Hukuki Niteliği Sorunu", İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, Prof. Dr. Oğuz İmregün Armağanı, İstanbul.
  • Dittenhofer M (1994). "Strategy for the internal audit engagement". Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8): 13- 17.
  • Desrochers, M & Fischer, K (2005). “The Power of Networks: Integration and Financial Cooperative Performance” Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics Vol 76 (3) pp 307-354.
  • Davis, K (2001). “Credit Union Governance and Survival of the Cooperative Form” Journal of Financial Services Research 19:2/3 197-210.
  • Cuevas, C and Fischer, K (2006). "Cooperative Financial Institutions: Issues in Governance, Regulation and Supervision", World Bank Working Paper No 82.
  • COSO (2004). "The new COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework", www.coso.org.tr
  • Coetzee P, Fourie H (2009). "Perceptions on the role of internal audit function in respect of risk". African Journal of Business Management, 3(13): 959-968.
  • Cornforth, C (2004). “The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 75:1 pp 11-32.
  • Christensen BE, Elder RJ, Glover SM (2015). "Behind the numbers: Insights into large audit firm sampling policies". Accounting Horizons, 29(1): 61-81.
  • Castanheira N, Rodrigues LL, Craig R (2010). "Factors associated with the adoption of risk based internal auditing". Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(1): 79- 98.
  • Burnaby P, Hass S (2009). "A summary of Global Common Body of Knowledge" 2006 (CBOK) study in internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(9): 813-834.
  • Bilgili, Fatih ve Demirkapı Ertan (2012). "Şirketler Hukuku", 2. Baskı, Adana.
  • Bellman, R. and C. Clark (1957). "On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game." Operations Research 5(4): 469-503.
  • Bailey JA (2010). "Core Competencies for Today’s Internal Auditor: Report II". The IIA Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs, FL: The IIARF.
  • Aktepe, Eyyüp (1988). Kooperatif İşletmeciliği, Ankara.
  • AICPA, (2012). "TheWorld in 2025: Technological Trends." www.aicpa.org/research/cpahorizons2025/globalforces/technological/ pages/default.aspx.
  • AICPA, (2015). " Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future". American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY 10036-8775.
  • Anderson Alan W. (2017). 4 Keys to the Future of Audit. White Paper. https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/wpcontent/private/pdf/checkpoint/whitepapers/Checkpoint-Al-AndersonWhitepaper.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.09.2017.
APA Bozkus Kahyaoglu S, KURT G (2017). KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. , 705 - 733.
Chicago Bozkus Kahyaoglu Sezer,KURT GANİTE KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. (2017): 705 - 733.
MLA Bozkus Kahyaoglu Sezer,KURT GANİTE KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. , 2017, ss.705 - 733.
AMA Bozkus Kahyaoglu S,KURT G KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. . 2017; 705 - 733.
Vancouver Bozkus Kahyaoglu S,KURT G KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. . 2017; 705 - 733.
IEEE Bozkus Kahyaoglu S,KURT G "KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI." , ss.705 - 733, 2017.
ISNAD Bozkus Kahyaoglu, Sezer - KURT, GANİTE. "KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI". (2017), 705-733.
APA Bozkus Kahyaoglu S, KURT G (2017). KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 52(4), 705 - 733.
Chicago Bozkus Kahyaoglu Sezer,KURT GANİTE KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi 52, no.4 (2017): 705 - 733.
MLA Bozkus Kahyaoglu Sezer,KURT GANİTE KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, vol.52, no.4, 2017, ss.705 - 733.
AMA Bozkus Kahyaoglu S,KURT G KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi. 2017; 52(4): 705 - 733.
Vancouver Bozkus Kahyaoglu S,KURT G KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi. 2017; 52(4): 705 - 733.
IEEE Bozkus Kahyaoglu S,KURT G "KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI." Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 52, ss.705 - 733, 2017.
ISNAD Bozkus Kahyaoglu, Sezer - KURT, GANİTE. "KOOPERATİFLERDE MODERN DENETİM TEKNİKLERİNİN UYGULANMASI". Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi 52/4 (2017), 705-733.