Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 119 - 128 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/jems.2018.24865 İndeks Tarihi: 21-01-2019

Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method

Öz:
All the electrical demand of ship are provided by diesel generators (DG). Failure of generators due to breakdown can lead to the blackout of the ship which may suddenly cause serious damage to ship’s main and/or auxiliary engines, human health and marine environment or any structure at ship’s route. Thus, the planned maintenance and repairs of the generators must be done properly without any deficiency or delay. And even then, since the generators run continuously failures may often occur. In this context, this paper provides a DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method to evaluate the critical operational faults in marine DGs. The DEMATEL method enables to identify and analyze the important faults of marine DG within the respect to the cause-effect relationship diagram. The obtained results of the research will contribute to ship safety at sea and prevention of hazardous machinery effects.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Denizcilik

Gemi Dizel Jeneratörlerinde Kritik Operasyonel Arızaların DEMATEL Metoduyla Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Geminin tüm elektriksel gereksinimleri dizel jeneratörler tarafından sağlanmaktadır. Jeneratörlerde meydana gelen arızalar geminin kararmasına (çökmesine) neden olabilir ve bu durum aniden gemi ana makinesi veya yardımcı makinelerinde, insan sağlığına, deniz çevresine veya geminin rotasındaki herhangi bir yapıya ciddi hasarlar verebilir. Bu yüzden, jeneratörlerin planlı bakım ve onarımları düzgün bir şekilde eksiksiz ve zamanında yapılmalıdır. Tüm bunlara rağmen, sürekli çalışan jeneratörlerde arızalar olabilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, bu makale gemi dizel jeneratörlerinde kritik operasyonel arızaları DEMATEL (Karar Verme Deneme ve Değerlendirme Laboratuvarı) metoduyla sunmaktadır. DEMATEL metodu gemi dizel motorlarında meydana gelen önemli arızaları sebep-etki ilişkisi diyagramıyla tanımlanma ve analiz etmeye yaramaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, denizde gemi emniyeti ve tehlikeli makine etkilerinin önlenmesine katkıda bulunacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Denizcilik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [25] A. H. Lee, H.-Y. Kang, C.-F. Hsu, and H.-C. Hung, (2009).“A green supplier selection model for hightech industry,” Expert systems with applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7917–7927.
  • [24] Y.-P. O. Yang, H.-M. Shieh, J.-D. Leu, and G.-H. Tzeng, (2008). “A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications,” International journal of operations research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 160–168.
  • [23] R.-J. Lin, (2013). “Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 40, pp. 32–39.
  • [22] C.-L. Lin and G.-H. Tzeng, (2009). “A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL,”Expert systems with applications, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 9683– 9697.
  • [21] A. Gabus and E. Fontela, (1972). “World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL,”Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • [20] Ü. Özdemir, (2016). “Investigation of occupational accidents occurred in ports by using fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy TOPSIS methods,” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 235–247.
  • [19] H. Nguyen, (2009). “The application of the ahp method in ship system risk estimation,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 16, no. 1.
  • [18] A. Mullai and U. Paulsson, (2011). “A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1590–1603.
  • [17] Ö. Y. Saatçıoğlu, B. Göksu, O. Yüksel, and Y. Gülmez, (2017). “Ship Engine Room Casualty Analysis by Using Decision Tree Method,” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–68.
  • [16] E. Akyuz, I. Akgun, and M. Celik, (2016). “A fuzzy failure mode and effects approach to analyse concentrated inspection campaigns on board ships,” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 887–908.
  • [15] Ikuobase Emovon, (2016). “MultiCriteria Decision Making Support Tools For Maintenance of Marine Machinery Systems,” Newcastle Unıversıty, School of Marine Science and Technology.PhD Thesis.
  • [14] Y. T. Xi, Z. L. Yang, Q. G. Fang, W. J. Chen, and J. Wang, (2017). “A new hybrid approach to human error probability quantification–applications in maritime operations,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 138, pp. 45–54.
  • [13] I. Emovon, R. A. Norman, A. Murphy J., and K. Pazouki, (2015). “An integrated multicriteria decision making methodology using compromise solution methods for prioritising risk of marine machinery systems,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 105, pp. 92–103.
  • [12] A. Mentes, H. Akyildiz, M. Yetkin, and N. Turkoglu,(2015). “A FSA based fuzzy DEMATEL approach for risk assessment of cargo ships at coasts and open seas of Turkey,” Safety science, vol. 79, pp. 1–10.
  • [11] E. Akyuz and E. Celik, (2015). “A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 38, pp. 243–253.
  • [10] O. A. Özsoysal, (2008). Gemi dizel motorları arızalar ve nedenleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • [9] C. Cai, X. Weng, and C. Zhang, (2017). “A novel approach for marine diesel engine fault diagnosis,” Cluster Computing, pp. 1–12.
  • [8] M. Fonte, P. Duarte, V. Anes, M. Freitas, and L. Reis, (2015). “On the assessment of fatigue life of marine diesel engine crankshafts,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 56, pp. 51–57.
  • [7] A. Jardine, P. Ralston, N. Reid, and J. Stafford, (1989). “Proportional hazards analysis of diesel engine failure data,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 207–216.
  • [6] A. Jardine, P. Anderson, and D. Mann, (1987). “Application of the Weibull proportional hazards model to aircraft and marine engine failure data,” Quality and reliability engineering international, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–82.
  • [5] K. Cicek and M. Celik, (2013). “Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship,” Safety Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 6–10.
  • [4] Y. Papadopoulos et al., (2011). “Engineering failure analysis and design optimisation with HiP-HOPS,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 590–608.
  • [3] J. U. Schröder-Hinrichs, M. Baldauf, and K. T. Ghirxi, (2011). “Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1187–1196.
  • [2] N. Akten, (2006). “Shipping accidents: a serious threat for marineenvironment,” Journal of Black ea/Mediterranean Environment, vol. 12, no. 3.
  • [1] “International Maritime Organization.” [Online]. Available: http://www.imo.org/en/Pages/Default.aspx. [Accessed: 03-Jan-2018].
APA BAŞHAN V, Demirel H (2018). Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. , 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
Chicago BAŞHAN Veysi,Demirel Hakan Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. (2018): 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
MLA BAŞHAN Veysi,Demirel Hakan Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. , 2018, ss.119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
AMA BAŞHAN V,Demirel H Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. . 2018; 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
Vancouver BAŞHAN V,Demirel H Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. . 2018; 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
IEEE BAŞHAN V,Demirel H "Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method." , ss.119 - 128, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
ISNAD BAŞHAN, Veysi - Demirel, Hakan. "Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method". (2018), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.24865
APA BAŞHAN V, Demirel H (2018). Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6(2), 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
Chicago BAŞHAN Veysi,Demirel Hakan Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6, no.2 (2018): 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
MLA BAŞHAN Veysi,Demirel Hakan Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.6, no.2, 2018, ss.119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
AMA BAŞHAN V,Demirel H Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(2): 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
Vancouver BAŞHAN V,Demirel H Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(2): 119 - 128. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
IEEE BAŞHAN V,Demirel H "Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6, ss.119 - 128, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.24865
ISNAD BAŞHAN, Veysi - Demirel, Hakan. "Evaluation of Critical Operational Faults of Marine Diesel Generator Engines by Using DEMATEL Method". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6/2 (2018), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.24865