Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 129 - 140 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/jems.2018.86648 İndeks Tarihi: 21-01-2019

Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports

Öz:
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the technical efficiency (productivity) of Mediterranean container ports by employing the data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. In recent years, maritime transportation volume has been increasing with the trend of trade globalization. This tendency has positive effects on container cargo flows. Accordingly, container terminals have incessant expansions to meet this growing demand. However, before making an investment in the terminal area or handling equipment, efficiency evaluation is required to reveal optimal throughput with the present resources. As the Mediterranean Basin is an important region for container transportation, there should be studies on the efficiency of container terminals in this region. In this study, relative efficiency analysis is conducted for Mediterranean container ports which are on the list of world busiest container ports based on the year 2016 data. The findings show that subjected container terminals can increase their output by 1,47 times without expanding their inputs. Efficiency is slightly increasing from eastern through the western part of this region.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Denizcilik

Akdeniz Konteyner Limanlarının Verimlilik Analizi Öz

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, veri zarflama metodu kullanarak, Akdeniz konteyner limanlarının teknik verimliliklerini (üretkenlik) değerlendirmektir. Son yıllarda, ticaretin küreselleşme eğilimi ile birlikte deniz taşımacılığı hacmi artmaktadır. Bu eğilim konteyner kargo akışını da olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Buna bağlı olarak büyüyen talebi karşılamak için konteyner terminalleri aralıksız genişlemektedir. Fakat terminal alanına veya elleçleme ekipmanına yatırım yapmadan önce, mevcut kaynaklarla optimum üretim miktarını ortaya çıkarmak için verimlilik analizi gereklidir. Akdeniz Körfezi konteyner taşımacılığı için önemli bir bölge olduğundan, bu bölge için konteyner terminallerinin etkinliği konusunda çalışmalar yapılmalıdır.Bu çalışmada, 2016 yılı verilerine göre dünyanın en yoğun konteyner limanları listesinde bulunan Akdeniz konteyner limanları için göreceli verimlilik analizi yapılmıştır.Bulgular gösteriyor ki, çalışmaya dahil edilen konteyner terminalleri girdilerini genişletmeden çıktılarını 1,47 kat artırabilir. Ayrıca verimlilik bu bölgenin doğusundan batı bölümüne doğru biraz artmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Denizcilik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [62] Cullinane, K., Wang, T.-F., Song, D.-W., & Ji, P. (2006). The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(4), 354-374.
  • [61] Wang, T., & Cullinane, K. (2015). The Efficiency of European Container Terminals and Implications for Supply Chain Management. In Port Management (pp. 253-272): Springer
  • [60] RealworldSoft. (2017). Retrieved from http://maxdea.com/MaxDEA.htm,
  • [59] Mersin International Port. Retrieved from https://en.mersinport.com.tr/, Access Year 2016.
  • [58] Kumport. Retrieved from http://www.kumport.com.tr/, Access Year 2016.
  • [57] Marport. Retrieved from http://www.marport.com.tr/anasayfa.html, Access Year 2016.
  • [56] Mardaş. Retrieved from http://www.mardas.com.tr, Access Year 2016.
  • [55] Noatum Container Terminal Valencia. Retrieved from http://www.noatum.com/en/noatum-ports/valencia/, Access Year 2016.
  • [54] MSC Terminal Valencia. Retrieved from https://www.msctv.es/, Access Year 2016.
  • [53] Valencia APM Terminals. Retrieved from http://www.tcv.es/, Access Year2016.
  • [52] Barcelona Europe South Terminal. Retrieved from http://www.best.com. es/, Access Year 2016.
  • [51] Terminals, B. A. Retrieved from https://www.tcbcn.com/web/tcb/inicio_e.htm, Access Year 2016.
  • [50] Total Terminal International Algeciras. Retrieved from http://www.apba.es/ en/containers, Access Year 2016.
  • [49] Algeciras APM Terminals. Retrieved from http://www.apba.es/en/ containers, Access Year 2016.
  • [48] Sines Container Terminal. Retrieved from http://www.portodesines.pt/en/, Access Year 2016.
  • [47] Eurogate Tanger. Retrieved from http://www.eurogate-tanger.com/About-us/EUROGATE-Tanger, Access Year 2016.
  • [46] Tangier APM Terminals. Retrieved from http://www.tmpa.ma/en/, Access Year 2016.
  • [45] Marsaxlokk Container Terminals. Retrieved from http://www.maltafreeport.gov.mt/index.html, Access Year 2016.
  • [44] Medcenter Container Terminal. Retrieved from https://www.contshipitalia.com/en/subsidiaries/medcenter-container-terminal, Access Year 2016.
  • [43] Terminal San Giorgio. Retrieved from http://www.grupposcerni.it/, Access Year 2016.
  • [42] Southern European Container Hub. Retrieved from https://www.portsofgenoa.com/en, Access Year 2016.
  • [41] PSA Voltri-Prà. Retrieved from https://www.portsofgenoa.com/en, Access Year 2016.
  • [40] Messina Terminal. Retrieved from http://www.imterminal.it/index_en.html, Access Year 2016.
  • [39] Genoa Port Terminal. Retrieved from http://www.gruppospinelli.com/index.php/en/, Access Year 2016.
  • [38] Ashdod Port Company. Retrieved from https://www.ashdodport.co.il/english/pages/homepage.aspx, Access Year 2016.
  • [37] Piraeus Port Authority. Retrieved from http://www.olp.gr/en, Access Year 2016.
  • [36] Piraeus Container Terminal. Retrieved from http://www.pct.com.gr/, Access Year 2016.
  • [35] Port Said Container & Cargo Handling. Retrieved from http://www.pscchc.com/, Access Year 2016.
  • [34] Alexandria International Container Terminals. Retrieved from http:// www.aict.com.eg/, Access Year 2016.
  • [33] Alexandria Container and Cargo Handling Company. Retrieved from http://www.alexcont.com/, Access Year 2016.
  • [32] Suez Canal Container Terminal.Retrieved from https://scct.com.eg/, Access Year 2016.
  • [31] Lin, L., & Tseng, C. (2007). Operational performance evaluation of major container ports in the Asia-Pacific region. Maritime Policy & Management, 34(6), 535-551.
  • [30] Zhang, Y., & Bartels, R. (1998). The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA with an application to electricity distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. Journal of productivity analysis, 9(3), 187-204.
  • [29] Brooks, M. R., & Cullinane, K. (2006). Devolution, port governance and port performance (Vol. 17): Elsevier
  • [28] Jenkins, L., & Anderson, M. (2003). A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 147(1), 51-61.
  • [27] Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  • [26] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
  • [25] Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR spectrum, 32(3), 717-738.
  • [24] Turner, H., Windle, R., & Dresner, M. (2004). North American containerport productivity: 1984–1997. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 40(4), 339-356.
  • [23] Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), 405-424.
  • [22] Rios, L. R., & Maçada, A. C. G. (2006). Analysing the relative efficiency of container terminals of Mercosur using DEA. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(4), 331-346.
  • [21] Barros, C. P. (2006). A benchmark analysis of Italian seaports using data envelopment analysis. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(4), 347-365.
  • [20] Holvad, T. (2001). An Analysis of Efficiency Patterns for A Sample of Norwegian Bus Companies. Retrieved from
  • [19] Tongzon, J. L. (1995). Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29(3), 245-252.
  • [18] Kim, M., & Sachish, A. (1986). The structure of production, technical change and productivity in a port. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 209- 223.
  • [17] Neufville, R. D., & Tsunokawa, K. (1981). Productivity and returns to scale of container ports. Maritime Policy and Management, 8(2), 121-129.
  • [16] Talley, W. K. (1988). Optimum throughput and performance evaluation of marine terminals. Maritime Policy & Management, 15(4), 327-331.
  • [15] De Monie, G. (1987). Measuring and evaluating port performance and productivity. UNCTAD Monograph on Port Management. Retrieved from
  • [14] Ateş, A., & Esmer, S. (2014). Farklı Yöntemler ile Türk Konteyner Limanlarının Verimliliği. Verimlilik Dergisi, 1, 61-76.
  • [13] ATEŞ, A., ESMER, S., ÇAKIR, E., & BALCI, K. (2013). Karadeniz konteyner terminallerinin göreceli etkinlik analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1).
  • [12] LLOYD'sLIST. (2017). Top 100 Container Ports 2017. Retrieved from https://maritimeintelligence.informa. com/content/top-100-ports
  • [11] TheWorldBankGroup. (2017). Container port traffic (TEU: 20 foot equivalent units). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, Access Year 2017.
  • [10] Polyzos, S., & Niavis, S. (2013). Evaluating port efficiency in the Mediterranean. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies 7, 5(1), 84-100.
  • [9] Elsayeh, M.-E. (2015). The Impact of Port Technical Efficiency on Mediterranean Container Port Competitiveness. University of Huddersfield,
  • [8] De Oliveira, G. F., & Cariou, P. (2011). A DEA study of the efficiency of 122 iron ore and coal ports and of 15/17 countries in 2005. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(7), 727-743.
  • [7] Schøyen, H., & Odeck, J. (2013). The technical efficiency of Norwegian container ports: A comparison to some Nordic and UK container ports using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15(2), 197-221.
  • [6] Cullinane, K. P., & Wang, T.-F. (2006). The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 19-31.
  • [5] Tongzon, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 35(2), 107-122. doi:Doi 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00049-X
  • [4] Dynamar, B. V. (2013). Container Throughout & Terminal Capacity in the Mediterranean. Retrieved from
  • [3] Medda, F., & Carbonaro, G. (2007). Growth of container seaborne traffic in the Mediterranean basin: Outlook and policy implications for port development. Transport Reviews, 27(5), 573-587. doi:10.1080/01441640701322677
  • [2] Chang, S. M., Wang, J. S., Yu, M. M., Shang, K. C., Lin, S. H., & Hsiao, B. (2015). An application of centralized data envelopment analysis in resource allocation in container terminal operations. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(8), 776-788. doi:10.1080/03088839.2015.1037373
  • [1] UNCTAD. (2013). Recent developments and trends in international maritime transport affecting trade of eveloping countries. Paper presented at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.
APA GÖKÇEK V, SENOL y (2018). Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. , 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
Chicago GÖKÇEK Veysel,SENOL yunus emre Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. (2018): 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
MLA GÖKÇEK Veysel,SENOL yunus emre Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. , 2018, ss.129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
AMA GÖKÇEK V,SENOL y Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. . 2018; 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
Vancouver GÖKÇEK V,SENOL y Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. . 2018; 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
IEEE GÖKÇEK V,SENOL y "Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports." , ss.129 - 140, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
ISNAD GÖKÇEK, Veysel - SENOL, yunus emre. "Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports". (2018), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.86648
APA GÖKÇEK V, SENOL y (2018). Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6(2), 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
Chicago GÖKÇEK Veysel,SENOL yunus emre Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6, no.2 (2018): 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
MLA GÖKÇEK Veysel,SENOL yunus emre Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.6, no.2, 2018, ss.129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
AMA GÖKÇEK V,SENOL y Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(2): 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
Vancouver GÖKÇEK V,SENOL y Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(2): 129 - 140. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
IEEE GÖKÇEK V,SENOL y "Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6, ss.129 - 140, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.86648
ISNAD GÖKÇEK, Veysel - SENOL, yunus emre. "Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6/2 (2018), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.86648