Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 6 - 9 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.20856 İndeks Tarihi: 22-01-2019

3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?

Öz:
Three-dimensional (3D) printings are gaining a place in a variety of the medical sectors. With applicationsin urogenital diseases, 3D printing is a new tool that present difficulties at stages of imaging, planning, andcarry out therapeutic interventions. In this review we tried to find answers to the questions that come tomind on this new topic by empasizing the suitable 3D printing models in urology, their clinical usage, andthe limitations.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Üroloji ve Nefroloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Rohner D, Guijarro-Martinez R, Bucher P, Hammer B. Importance of patient-specific intraoperative guides in complex maxillofacial recon- struction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:382-90. [CrossRef]
  • Silberstein JL, Maddox MM, Dorsey P, Feibus A, Thomas R, Lee BR. Physical models of renal malignancies using standard cross- sectional imaging and 3-dimensional printers: a pilot study. Urology 2014;84:268-72. [CrossRef]
  • Bernhard JC, Isotani S, Matsugasumi T, Duddalwar V, Hung AJ, Suer E, et al. Personalized 3D printed model of kidney and tumor anatomy:a useful tool for patient education. World J Urol 2016;34:337-45. [CrossRef]
  • Chang D, Chong X, Kim C, Jun C, Petrisor D, Han M, et al. Geometric systematic prostate biopsy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2016;19:1-20.
  • Priester A, Natarajan S, Le JD, Garritano J, Radosavcev B, Grundfest W, et al. A system for evaluating magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer using patient-specific 3D printed molds. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2014;2:127-35.
  • Cool DW, Romagnoli C, Izawa JI, Chin J, Gardi L, Tessier D, et al. Comparison of prostate MRI-3D transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for first-time and repeat biopsy patients with previous atypical small acinar proliferation. Can Urol Assoc J 2016;10:342-8. [CrossRef]
  • Theisen KM, Kadow BT, Rusilko PJ. Three-Dimensional Imaging of Urethral Stricture Disease and Urethral Pathology for Operative Planning. Curr Urol Rep 2016;17:54. [CrossRef]
  • Golab A, Smektala T, Krolikowski M, Slojewski M. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using an Individual 3-Dimensionally Printed Surgical Guide. Urol Int 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Brehmer M, Beckman MO, Magnusson A. Three-dimensional com- puted tomography planning improves percutaneous stone surgery. Scand J Urol 2014;48:316-23. [CrossRef]
  • Peng N, Wang X, Zhang Z, Fu S, Fan J, Zhang Y. Diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT in renal trauma. Xray Sci Technol 2016;24:649-55. [CrossRef]
  • Smith GT, Lurie KL, Zlatev DV, Liao JC, Ellerbee Bowden AK. Multimodal 3D cancer-mimicking optical phantom. Biomed Opt Express 2016;7:648-62. [CrossRef]
  • Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:773-85. [CrossRef]
  • Patel MN. Use of rotational fluoroscopy and 3-D reconstruction for pre-operative imaging of complex cloacal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 2016;25:96-101. [CrossRef]
  • Margolin EJ, Mlynarczyk CM, Mulhall JP, Stember DS, Stahl PJ. Three-Dimensional Photography for Quantitative Assessment of Penile Volume-Loss Deformities in Peyronie's Disease. J Sex Med 2017;14:829-33. [CrossRef]
  • Nyga A, Neves J, Stamati K, Loizidou M, Emberton M, Cheema U. The next level of 3D tumour models: immunocompetence. Drug Discov Today 2016;21:1421-8. [CrossRef]
  • Pornrattanamaneewong C, Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cut- ting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg-Series 2013;95:354-9.
  • Kassab S, Pietrzak WS. Patient-specific positioning guides versus manual instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative comparison. J Surg Orthop Adv 2014;23:140-6. [CrossRef]
  • Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76:503-7. [CrossRef]
  • Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans P. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 2016;15:115. [CrossRef]
  • Wong NC, Hoogenes J, Guo Y, Quantz MA, Matsumoto ED. Techniques: Utility of a 3D printed bladder model for teaching minimally invasive urethrovesical anastomosis. Can Urol Assoc J 2017;11:321-2. [CrossRef]
  • Heller M, Bauer HK, Goetze E, Gielisch M, Roth KE, Drees P, et al. Applications of patient-specific 3D printing in medicine. Int J Comput Dent 2016;19:323-39.
APA ÖZGÜR B, AYYILDIZ A (2018). 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. , 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
Chicago ÖZGÜR Berat Cem,AYYILDIZ Ali 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. (2018): 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
MLA ÖZGÜR Berat Cem,AYYILDIZ Ali 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. , 2018, ss.6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
AMA ÖZGÜR B,AYYILDIZ A 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. . 2018; 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
Vancouver ÖZGÜR B,AYYILDIZ A 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. . 2018; 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
IEEE ÖZGÜR B,AYYILDIZ A "3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?." , ss.6 - 9, 2018. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
ISNAD ÖZGÜR, Berat Cem - AYYILDIZ, Ali. "3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?". (2018), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.20856
APA ÖZGÜR B, AYYILDIZ A (2018). 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. Turkish Journal of Urology, 44(1), 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
Chicago ÖZGÜR Berat Cem,AYYILDIZ Ali 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. Turkish Journal of Urology 44, no.1 (2018): 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
MLA ÖZGÜR Berat Cem,AYYILDIZ Ali 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. Turkish Journal of Urology, vol.44, no.1, 2018, ss.6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
AMA ÖZGÜR B,AYYILDIZ A 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2018; 44(1): 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
Vancouver ÖZGÜR B,AYYILDIZ A 3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2018; 44(1): 6 - 9. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
IEEE ÖZGÜR B,AYYILDIZ A "3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?." Turkish Journal of Urology, 44, ss.6 - 9, 2018. 10.5152/tud.2018.20856
ISNAD ÖZGÜR, Berat Cem - AYYILDIZ, Ali. "3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?". Turkish Journal of Urology 44/1 (2018), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.20856