Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education

Ayşegül TAKKAÇ TULGAR (English Language Teaching Department, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey)
Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
0 0
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 321 - 335 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 20-03-2019

Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education

Öz:
This study aimed to get ideas formed by undergraduate foreign language students about the applicability,advantages and disadvantages of „selfie@ssessment‟, which can be regarded as an alternative form of selfassessmentutilizing modern mobile phone technologies and the available Internet facilities. Underpinning thisstudy of selfie@ssessment by undergraduate students is that an increasing body of research and a good manytheoretical views acknowledge the importance of self- and group assessment by students for their performancesin the activities they carry out in their learning process. This study, without contrasts with the prevailing notionin the self-assessment by students in assessment acquis, offers a new perspective to the traditional approachundergraduate students assess themselves for their learning performances and presentations within the class. Theunique approach in this study is that students are expected to send their selfie-recorded self- or groupassessments via mobile phones or cameras enabling self-recording to their teachers through the Internet.Implemented as a research to test how undergraduate students would approach the new concept, this study isintended to bring to the fore a new dimension in self-assessment utilizing modern methods of communicationand data transmission in the light of the framework of data obtained in the area self-assessment.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

Yükseköğretimde lisans seviyesinde alternatif özdeğerlendirme şekli olarak özçekimle özdeğerlendirme

Öz:
Bu çalışma lisans düzeyindeki yabancı dil öğrencilerinden, günümüz mobil telefon teknolojilerini ve var olan İnternet olanaklarını kullandıkları, alternatif bir özdeğerlendirme şekli olan özçekimle-özdeğerlendirme olgusunun uygulanabilirliği, avantajları ve dezavantajları konusunda bilgi toplamayı amaçlamaktadır. Öğrencilerin öğrenme süreçlerinde gerçekleştirdikleri etkinliklerdeki performansları için bireysel ve grup olarak özdeğerlendirme yapmaları konusunda yapılan çok sayıda araştırma ve birçok kuramsal görüş bulunması lisans öğrencilerinin özçekimle-özdeğerlendirme yapması konusunda yapılan bu çalışmaya öncülük etmiştir. Bu çalışma, değerlendirme alanındaki müktesebatta yer alan, öğrencilerin özdeğerlendirmeleri konusunda ortaya konulan anlayışla çelişki oluşturmaksızın, lisans öğrencilerinin kendilerinin öğrenme başarıları ve sınıf içi sunumları üzerinde değerlendirme yapmaları konusundaki geleneksel yaklaşıma yeni bir bakış açısı önermektedir. Bu çalışmadaki yaklaşımın özgünlüğü öğrencilerin mobil telefonu ya da özçekim yapmaya uygun kameralarla özçekimle yaptıkları bireysel ya da grup-özdeğerlendirmeleri öğretmenlerine İnternet üzerinden göndermelerinin beklenmesidir. Lisans öğrencilerinin bu yeni kavrama nasıl yaklaşacaklarını ortaya koymak için yapılan bu çalışma, özdeğerlendirme konusunda var olan veriler ışığında, modern iletişim yöntemleri ve veri iletiminden yararlanarak, özdeğerlendirme konusuna yeni bir boyut kazandırmayı amaçlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Andrade, H., &Valtcheva, A. (2009).Promoting learning and achievement through selfassessment.Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
  • Azorín, M. (1991). Self-assessment in second language teaching: Journals. RevistaAlicantina de EstudiosIngleses, 4, 91-101. DOI: 10.14198/raei.1991.4.09
  • Baars, M., Vink, S., van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., &Paas, F. (2014). Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving.Learning and Instruction, 33, 92-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.004
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Black, P., &Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
  • Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values.Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101-11.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377621
  • Boud, D. &Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-549.
  • Bourke, R. (2016). Liberating the learner through self-assessment.Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 97-111. DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2015.1015963
  • Brantmeier, C., Vanderplank, R., &Strube, M. (2012). What about me? Individual self-assessment by skill and level of language instruction.System, 40(1), 144- 160.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.003
  • Brevig, L. (2006). Engaging in retrospective reflection.The Reading Teacher, 59(6), 522-530. DOI: 10.1598/RT.59.6.2
  • Broadfoot, P. (2000). Assessment and intuition. In T. Atkinson & G. Claxton (Eds.), The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing (pp. 199-219). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Chen, Y.-M. (2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 2, 235-262. DOI: 10.1177/1362168807086293
  • Cleland, J. (1999). We can charts: Building blocks for student led conferences. The Reading Teacher, 52(6), 588-595.
  • Cooper, D. (2006). Collaborating with students in the assessment process.Orbit, 36(2), 20-23.
  • Cuesta Medina, L. (2010). Metacognitive instructional strategies: A study of e-learners‟ selfregulation. Fourteenth International Call Conference: Motivation and beyond. 20-24. http://uahost.uantwerpen.be/linguapolis/scuati/proceedings_CALL%202010.pdf
  • Cyboran, V. (2006). Self-assessment: Grading or knowing? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(3), 183-186.
  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., &Suls, J.M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69-106.
  • Falchikov, N. &Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395-430.
  • Flores, M. A., VeigaSimão, A., Barros, A., & Pereira, D. (2015). Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1523-1534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079.2014.881348.
  • Fullan, M., Hill, P.W. &Crévola C. (2006).Breakthrough.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Geeslin, K. (2003). Student self-assessment in the foreign language classroom: The place of authentic assessment instruments in the Spanish language classroom. Hispania, 86(4), 857-868. DOI: 10.2307/20062958
  • Goto Butler, Y., & J. Lee. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5-31. DOI:10.1177/0265532209346370.
  • Harris, M. (1997).Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings.ELT Journal, 51(1): 12-20. DOI:10.1093/elt/51.1.12.
  • Hattie, J. (2013). Calibration and confidence: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 24, 62-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.009
  • Herbert, E. (1998). Lessons learned about student portfolios. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 583-585.
  • Huang, S. (2016). Understanding learners‟ self-assessment and self-feedback on their foreign language speaking performance.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 803-820. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1042426
  • Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: The use of „authentic self- and peer-assessment for learning‟ to enhance the student learning experience.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875–891. DOI:10.1080/02602938.2012.751963.
  • Langan, A., D. Shuker, R. Cullen, D. Penney, R. Preziosi, & C. P. Wheater.(2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 179-190. DOI:10.1080/02602930701292498.
  • Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 137-147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515013
  • Levine, T. (2002). Stability and change in curriculum evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(02)00010-X
  • Libman, Z. (2010). Alternative assessment in higher education: An experience in descriptive statistics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 62-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.01.002
  • Mazloomi, S. &Khabiri, M. (2016).The impact of self-assessment on language learners‟ writing skill.Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1214078.
  • McMillan, J., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49.
  • Micán, A. & Cuesta Medina, L. (2015). Boosting vocabulary learning through self-assessment in an English language teaching context.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1118433
  • Mok, M. M. C., Lung, C. L., Cheng, D. P. W., Cheung, R. H. P., & Ng, M. L. (2006). Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 415-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679100
  • Nguyen, T., & Walker, M. (2014).Sustainable assessment for lifelong learning.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 97-111. DOI:10.1080/ 02602938.2014.985632.
  • Orsmond, P., Maw, S., Park, J., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. (2013). Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240-252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
  • Panadero, E., & Alonso, J. (2013). Self-assessment: theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students.Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11, 551-576.
  • Panadero, E., Alonso, J., &Huertas, J. A. (2012).Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on selfregulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education.Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 806-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
  • Poehner, M. (2012).The Zone of Proximal Development and the genesis of self-assessment.The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 610-622. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1540-4781.2012.01393.x
  • Poon, W., McNaught, C., Lam, P. & Kwan, H.S. (2009). Improving assessment methods in university science education with negotiated self‐ and peer‐ assessment, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 331-346, DOI: 10.1080/09695940903319729
  • Race, P. (2001).A Briefing on Self, Peer & Group Assessment. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network.
  • Rivers, W. (2001).Autonomy at all costs: An ethnography of metacognitive self-assessment and selfmanagement among experienced language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 279- 290. DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00109
  • Rodríguez Ochoa, E. (2007). Self-assessment practices: An empowering tool in the teaching and learning EFL processes. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 9, 229-246. http:// www.scielo.org.co/pdf/calj/n9/n9a12.pdf.
  • Ross, J. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment.Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 11(10), 1-13.
  • Saddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004).The writing rubric.Educational Leadership, 62(2), 48-52.
  • Segers, M., &Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in problem-based learning: The value-added of the students‟ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076291
  • Sluıjsmans, D., Dochy, F., &Moerkerke G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment.Learning Environments Research, 1, 293-319. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009932704458
  • Sullo, B. (2009). The motivated student: Unlocking the enthusiasm for learning. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD
  • Suzuki, M. (2009).The compatibility of L2 learners' assessment of self- and peer revisions of writing with teachers' assessment.TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 137-148. DOI: 10.1002/j.1545- 7249.2009.tb00233.x
  • Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615-631. DOI: 10.1080/01411920120095780
  • Webber, K. (2012).The use of learner-centered assessment in US colleges and universities.Research in Higher Education, 53, 201-228. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11162-011-9245-0.
  • Willey, K., & Gardner.A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429- 443. DOI:10.1080/03043797.2010.490577.
  • Wong, H. M. (2016). I can assess myself: Singaporean primary students' and teachers' perceptions of students' self-assessment ability, Education 3-13, 44(4), 442-457. DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2014.982672
  • Zamora, A., Suárez, J. &Ardura, D. (2016). Error detection and self-assessment as mechanisms to promote self-regulation of learning among secondary education students, The Journal of Educational Research, 1-11 DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2016.1225657
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
APA TAKKAÇ TULGAR A (2017). Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. , 321 - 335.
Chicago TAKKAÇ TULGAR AYŞEGÜL Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. (2017): 321 - 335.
MLA TAKKAÇ TULGAR AYŞEGÜL Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. , 2017, ss.321 - 335.
AMA TAKKAÇ TULGAR A Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. . 2017; 321 - 335.
Vancouver TAKKAÇ TULGAR A Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. . 2017; 321 - 335.
IEEE TAKKAÇ TULGAR A "Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education." , ss.321 - 335, 2017.
ISNAD TAKKAÇ TULGAR, AYŞEGÜL. "Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education". (2017), 321-335.
APA TAKKAÇ TULGAR A (2017). Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 321 - 335.
Chicago TAKKAÇ TULGAR AYŞEGÜL Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13, no.1 (2017): 321 - 335.
MLA TAKKAÇ TULGAR AYŞEGÜL Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol.13, no.1, 2017, ss.321 - 335.
AMA TAKKAÇ TULGAR A Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2017; 13(1): 321 - 335.
Vancouver TAKKAÇ TULGAR A Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2017; 13(1): 321 - 335.
IEEE TAKKAÇ TULGAR A "Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education." Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13, ss.321 - 335, 2017.
ISNAD TAKKAÇ TULGAR, AYŞEGÜL. "Selfie@ssessment as an alternative form of self-assessment at undergraduate level in higher education". Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 13/1 (2017), 321-335.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 11:3

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları