In this paper, the direct impact of increasing political and economic relations on the defense industry are analyzed by globalization process. In this context; under the assumption that the crisis resulted in the increasing dependency relationship with globalization, the importance of the defense industry is intended to be queried via the power of the nation state. To strengthen the region by spreading to other parts of the industrialization with globalization, affects the global balance of power by the starting the war. In terms of the effects of globalization after 1980, after 1870 the increasing dependency relationship is observed that the increasing dependency relationship likewise changed. Before global crisis (especially after2000), looking at the distribution of 49 % increase in defence spending during the period of 2000-2009, first in the United States then China is ranked as France, UK and Saudi Arabia. When looking at the distribution of 49 % increase in defence spending during the period of 2000-2009, it is ranked as first United States and then China, France, UK and Saudi Arabia. When evaluating defense spending during the crisis; spending declined relatively from 2010, while in 2015 it is observed that due to the increased political tensions reached $ 1,7 trillion. According to the distribution of spending in the 2010-2015 range, the US itself, after spending much of his total from 14 countries, is seen as China and Saudi Arabia followed him. According to the distribution of spending in the 2010-2015 range, the US’s spending is equal to total of 14 countries. It is observed that China and Saudi Arabia are followed the United States. During the crisis, in Europe has cut spending because of the appreciation of the euro and emerging countries seems to make investments towards the development of weapons technology. At this point the interdependence relationships through transnational advocacy initiatives and supply chain of the national defense industry is increasing with globalization but in the absence of government support inside, creating challenging conditions for being part of a global network of national secondary producers. This creates a cycle of American hegemony in the defense industry can not be broken.