In our country, the number of environmental issues and environment conflicts is quite a few. For the purpose of realiza-tion of environmental rights, the function of administrative courts in regard to these conflicts is, supervision of compliance with laws of Administral Decisions and activities which could effect environment; and the control of public or private institutions’ acts, which would disturb and affect the environment adversely . The control of admi-nistration by judicial remedy is a constitution based rule. Indeed in Article 125, it is stated that recourse to judicial review is available against all actions and acts of the administration. Judicial review is also important in terms of realization of environmental rights, which are regulated in Article 56 of the Constitution. However, to be able to prevent random petitioning, “personal interest violation” clau-se, which necessiates a link between the administrative act and the petitioner, was laid down as a condition. In each and every incident and case, judicial authorities decide whether there is a link between petitioner’s interest and the administrative procedure which is as-ked to be cancelled. In this study, “personal interest violation” term, which takes place in many Council of State decisions, will be examined not only within the scope of protection of environment, and historical and cultural values; but also within the scope of conflicts pertaining to town planning practice. “personal interest violation”, which is a re-quirement of form and procedure for the admissibility of a case, will be argued pursuant to various judicial decisions. Furthermore, this subject will be examined within the frame of Turkish Environmental Code and Aarhus Convention.