Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience

Atakan TANAÇAN, (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Perinatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
PINAR YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU, (TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
Fatih AKTOZ, (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Perinatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
Gökçen ÖRGÜL, (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Perinatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
Meral BEKSAÇ, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Kordon Kanı Bankası, Ankara, Türkiye)
Mehmet Sinan BEKSAÇ (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Perinatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
0 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 961 - 966 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-1802-54 İndeks Tarihi: 21-06-2019

Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience

Öz:
Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of certain maternal, fetal, and umbilical cord blood unit factors on storageand/or discard incidence of collected cord blood units from perinatal medicine patients.Materials and methods: A total of 273 cord blood units collected between January 2011 and December 2016 in the Division ofPerinatology of Hacettepe University Hospital were evaluated retrospectively in this study.Results: Of the collected cord blood units, 53.8% (147/273) were stored. Infant birth weight, cord blood unit volume, total nucleatedcell count, and CD34+ cell count were statistically significantly different between the eligible and discarded cord blood unit groups (P <0.001 for all). No cord blood units were discarded owing to contamination-related issues. The mean gestational age for pregnant womenwhose umbilical cord blood was stored was 36.6 ± 1.0 weeks.Conclusion: Infant birth weight, cord blood unit volume, total nucleated cell count, and CD34+ cell count were significantly differentbetween the eligible and discarded cord blood unit groups. The low rate of specimen storage was most likely because of the uniquecharacteristics of perinatal medicine patients. Physicians should choose appropriate donors for cord blood collection to increase therate of cord blood utilization.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Rocha V, Cornish J, Sievers EL, Filipovich A, Locatelli F, Peters C, Remberger M, Michel G, Arcese W, Dallorso S et al. Comparison of outcomes of unrelated bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplants in children with acute leukemia. Blood 2001; 97: 2962-2971.
  • Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR, Berkowitz RL, Cabbad M, Dobrila NL, Taylor PE et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1565-1577.
  • Urciuoli P, Passeri S, Ceccarelli F, Luchetti B, Paolicchi A, Lapi S, Nocchi F, Lamanna R, Iorio M, Vanacore R et al. Pre-birth selection of umbilical cord blood donors. Blood Transfus 2010; 8: 36.
  • Miniero R, Rocha V, Saracco P, Locatelli F, Brichard B, Nagler A, Roberts I, Yaniv I, Beksac M, Bernaudin F et al. Cord blood transplantation (CBT) in hemoglobinopathies. Eurocord. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 78-79.
  • Gluckman E, Broxmeyer H, Auerbach AD, Friedman HS, Douglas GW, Devergie A, Esperou H, Thierry D, Socie G, Lehn P et al. Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi’s anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1174-1178.
  • Rebulla P. Cord blood banking 2002: 112,010 of 7,914,773 chances. Transfusion 2002; 42: 1246-1248.
  • Brand A, Rebulla P, Engelfriet C, Reesink H, Beguin Y, Baudoux E, Kögler G, Ebrahimi M, Grazzini G, Costa AN et al. Cord blood banking. Vox Sang 2008; 95: 335-348.
  • Gluckman E. Ten years of cord blood transplantation: from bench to bedside. Br J Haematol 2009; 147: 192-199.
  • Moise Jr KJ. Umbilical cord stem cells. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1393-1407.
  • Reed W, Smith R, Dekovic F, Lee JY, Saba JD, Trachtenberg E, Epstein J, Haaz S, Walters MC, Lubin BH et al. Comprehensive banking of sibling donor cord blood for children with malignant and nonmalignant disease. Blood 2003; 101: 351- 357.
  • Rogers I, Holt D, Macpate F, Lains A, Hollowell S, Cruickshank B, Casper R. Human UC-blood banking: impact of blood volume, cell separation and cryopreservation on leukocyte and CD34+ cell recovery. Cytotherapy 2001; 3: 269-276.
  • Nakagawa R, Watanabe T, Kawano Y, Kanai S, Suzuya H, Kaneko M, Watanabe H, Okamoto Y, Kuroda Y, Nakayama T et al. Analysis of maternal and neonatal factors that influence the nucleated and CD34+ cell yield for cord blood banking. Transfusion 2004; 44: 262-267.
  • Aufderhaar U, Holzgreve W, Danzer E, Tichelli A, Troeger C, Surbek DV. The impact of intrapartum factors on umbilical cord blood stem cell banking. J Perinat Med 2003; 31: 317-322.
  • George TJ, Sugrue MW, George SN, Wingard JR. Factors associated with parameters of engraftment potential of umbilical cord blood. Transfusion 2006; 46: 1803-1812.
  • Solves P, Perales A, Moraga R, Saucedo E, Soler MA, Monleon J. Maternal, neonatal and collection factors influencing the haematopoietic content of cord blood units. Acta Haematol 2005; 113: 241-246.
  • Solves P, Perales A, Fillol M, Bonilla F, Mirabet V, Roig R. Presence of meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in cesarean deliveries increases the total nucleated cell content of umbilical cord blood units. Transfusion 2009; 49: 388-389.
  • Solves P, Perales A, Mirabet V, Roig R. Stress factors and umbilical cord blood banking. Transfusion Med 2007;17:205- 206.
  • Yamada T, Okamoto Y, Kasamatsu H, Horie Y, Yamashita N, Matsumoto K. Factors affecting the volume of umbilical cord blood collections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 830- 833.
  • Jones J, Stevens CE, Rubinstein P, Robertazzi RR, Kerr A, Cabbad MF. Obstetric predictors of placental/umbilical cord blood volume for transplantation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 503-509.
  • Cairo MS, Wagner EL, Fraser J, Cohen G, Van De Ven C, Carter SL, Kernan NA, Kurtzberg J. Characterization of banked umbilical cord blood hematopoietic progenitor cells and lymphocyte subsets and correlation with ethnicity, birth weight, sex, and type of delivery: A Cord Blood Transplantation (COBLT) Study report. Transfusion 2005; 45: 856-866.
  • Lasky LC, Lane TA, Miller JP, Lindgren B, Patterson HA, Haley NR, Ballen K. In utero or ex utero cord blood collection: which is better? Transfusion 2002; 42: 1261-1267.
  • Beksac M. How to improve cord blood transplantation: by enhancing cell counts or engraftment? Front Med 2016; 3: 20.
  • Beksac M, Yurdakul P. Modalities to improve cord blood engraftment. J Stem Cell Res Ther 2014; 4: 3.
  • Keersmaekers CL, Mason BA, Keersmaekers J, Ponzini M, Mlynarek RA. Factors affecting umbilical cord blood stem cell suitability for transplantation in an in utero collection program. Transfusion 2014; 54: 545-549.
  • Querol S, Rubinstein P, Marsh SG, Goldman J, Madrigal JA. Cord blood banking: providing cord blood banking for a nation. Br J Haematol 2009; 147: 227-235.
  • Faivre L, Couzin C, Boucher H, Domet T, Desproges A, Sibony O, Bechard M, Vanneaux V, Larghero J, Cras A et al. Associated factors of umbilical cord blood collection quality. Transfusion 2018; 58: 520-531.
APA TANAÇAN A, YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P, Aktoz F, Orgul G, Beksac M, BEKSAÇ M (2018). Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. , 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
Chicago TANAÇAN Atakan,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU PINAR,Aktoz Fatih,Orgul Gokcen,Beksac Meral,BEKSAÇ Mehmet Sinan Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. (2018): 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
MLA TANAÇAN Atakan,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU PINAR,Aktoz Fatih,Orgul Gokcen,Beksac Meral,BEKSAÇ Mehmet Sinan Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. , 2018, ss.961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
AMA TANAÇAN A,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P,Aktoz F,Orgul G,Beksac M,BEKSAÇ M Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. . 2018; 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
Vancouver TANAÇAN A,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P,Aktoz F,Orgul G,Beksac M,BEKSAÇ M Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. . 2018; 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
IEEE TANAÇAN A,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P,Aktoz F,Orgul G,Beksac M,BEKSAÇ M "Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience." , ss.961 - 966, 2018. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
ISNAD TANAÇAN, Atakan vd. "Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience". (2018), 961-966. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1802-54
APA TANAÇAN A, YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P, Aktoz F, Orgul G, Beksac M, BEKSAÇ M (2018). Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 48(5), 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
Chicago TANAÇAN Atakan,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU PINAR,Aktoz Fatih,Orgul Gokcen,Beksac Meral,BEKSAÇ Mehmet Sinan Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 48, no.5 (2018): 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
MLA TANAÇAN Atakan,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU PINAR,Aktoz Fatih,Orgul Gokcen,Beksac Meral,BEKSAÇ Mehmet Sinan Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.48, no.5, 2018, ss.961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
AMA TANAÇAN A,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P,Aktoz F,Orgul G,Beksac M,BEKSAÇ M Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018; 48(5): 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
Vancouver TANAÇAN A,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P,Aktoz F,Orgul G,Beksac M,BEKSAÇ M Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018; 48(5): 961 - 966. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
IEEE TANAÇAN A,YURDAKUL MESUTOĞLU P,Aktoz F,Orgul G,Beksac M,BEKSAÇ M "Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 48, ss.961 - 966, 2018. 10.3906/sag-1802-54
ISNAD TANAÇAN, Atakan vd. "Factors influencing the success of cord blood collection: a tertiary perinatal medicine center’s experience". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 48/5 (2018), 961-966. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1802-54
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 8:2

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları