Yıl: 2003 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 367 - 373 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey

Öz:
Türkiye'nin muz üretimi iç tüketimin küçük bir oranını karşılamaktadır. 2000 değerleriyle tüketim 188,000 t civarında iken üretim 64,000 t olarak gerçekleşerek toplam tüketimin ancak % 34'ü karşılanmıştır. Tüketim ve üretim arasındaki bu fark ithalat yoluyla karşılanmakta olup uluslararası beş firma dünya muz ticaretinin % 80'ini kontrol etmektedir. Bu firmaların dünya muz ticaretindeki etkinliği dikkate alındığında, oligopol teorisi belli başlı yapısal güçlerin varlığının pazar gücünü artırıcı etki yapabileceğini ileri sürmektedir. Bu çalışmada, muz ticareti için dış ticaret ve Yeni Endüstriyel Organizasyonu bütün olarak dikkate alan bir model geliştirilmiştir. Bu model ile Türkiye muz ithalatı pazarındaki pazar gücü derecesi ekonometrik olarak hesaplanmıştır. 1984-2000 dönemi verileri kullanılmış ve araştırma dönemi için pazar gücü katsayısı 0.19 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu sonuç, Türkiye muz ithalatının tam rekabet koşullarında gerçekleşmediğini ancak firmaların davranışlarının tam rekabet koşullarına, monopolden daha yakın olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: pazarlama ithalat uluslararası ticaret pazar fiyatları Türkiye muz

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği

Türkiye muz ithalatında pazar gücünün belirlenmesi

Öz:
Banana production in Turkey represents a small fraction of that required to meet domestic consumption. Domestic consumption totaled 188,0001 in 2000, whereas production amounted to just 64,0001, or 34% of consumption. The gap between consumption and production is made up by imports and 5 multinational firms control the flow of more than 80% of the global banana trade. Given this firm dominance in the world trade of bananas, oligopoly theory would suggest the presence of underlying structural forces that could facilitate price-enhancing market power. As such, this study develops an integrated trade and new empirical industrial organization (NEIO-) model of the banana trade and this model is estimated econometrically to derive the degree of market power in the Turkish market for banana imports. The İ 984-2000 data period is used and the model's results yield a market power parameter of 0.19. This result shows that the banana import market in Turkey is not perfectly competitive, but that the behavior of firms is much closer to price-taking than to collusion.
Anahtar Kelime: Turkey bananas marketing imports international trade market prices

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Borrell, B. 1994. EU Bananarama III. World Bank Working Paper. No: 1386, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Brander, J.A. and P.R. Krugman. 1980. A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade. Paper Presented at the Summer Workshop on International Trade and Finance. Warwick University, UK.
  • Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer. 1982. Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competition. In: Monopolistic Competition in International Trade (Ed.: H. Kierzkowski). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 194-206.
  • Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer. 1985. Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry. Journal of International Economics. 18: 83-100.
  • Bresnahan, T.F. 1982. The Oligopoly Solution Concept is Identified. Economics Letters. 10: 87-92.
  • Bresnahan, T.F. and R. Schmalensee. 1987. The Empirical Renaissance in Industrial Economics: An Overview. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 35: 371-378.
  • Buschena, D.E. and J.M. Perloff. 1991. The Creation of Dominant Firm . Market Power in the Coconut Oil Market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 73: 1000-1008.
  • Chambron, A.C. 1999. Bananas: The Green Gold of the TNCS. UK Food Group, Norwich, UK.
  • Deodhar, S.Y. and I.M. Sheldon. 1995. Is Foreign Trade Perfectly Competitive? An Analysis of the. German Market for Banana Imports. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 46: 336-348.
  • Dixit, A. 1984. International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries. The Economic Journal. 94 (376a): 1-16.
  • EXPCT (Export Promotion. Center of Turkey). 2002. Import Regulation. Ankara.
  • FA0.2001. FAOSTAT Agriculture Database. Various Years. Rome. http://www.fao.org
  • Gujarati, D.N. 1995. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, USA. Karp, L. and J.M. Perloff. 1989. Dynamic Oligopoly in the Rice Export Market. Review of Economics and Statistics. 11: 584-602.
  • Krishna, K. 1983. Trade Restrictions as Facilitating Practices. Manuscript, Princeton University, New Jersey, USA.
  • Krugman, P.R. 1982. Import Protection as Export Promotion: International Competition in the Presence of Oligopoly and Economies of Scale. In: Monopolistic Competition in International Trade (Ed.: H. Kierzkowski). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 180-193.
  • Lope,z, R and Z. You. 1993. Determinants of Oligopsony Power: The Haitian Coffee Case. Journal of Development Economics. 41: 275-284.
  • PeTloff, J.M. 1991. Econometric Analysis of Imperfect Competition and Implications for Trade Research. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Industrial Organization and International Trade. NC-194, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Read, R.A. 1994. The EC Internal Banana Market: The Issues and Dilemma. The World Economy. 17: 219-235.
  • SIS. 2000. Agricultural Structure: State Institute of Statistics. Ankara.
  • SIS., 2001a. Retail Price Statistics. State Institute of Statistics. Ankara.
  • SIS. 2001b. Basic Economic Indicators. State Institute of Statistics. ' Ankara.
APA HATIRLI S, JONES E, AKTAŞ A (2003). Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. , 367 - 373.
Chicago HATIRLI Selim Adem,JONES Eugene,AKTAŞ Ali Rıza Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. (2003): 367 - 373.
MLA HATIRLI Selim Adem,JONES Eugene,AKTAŞ Ali Rıza Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. , 2003, ss.367 - 373.
AMA HATIRLI S,JONES E,AKTAŞ A Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. . 2003; 367 - 373.
Vancouver HATIRLI S,JONES E,AKTAŞ A Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. . 2003; 367 - 373.
IEEE HATIRLI S,JONES E,AKTAŞ A "Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey." , ss.367 - 373, 2003.
ISNAD HATIRLI, Selim Adem vd. "Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey". (2003), 367-373.
APA HATIRLI S, JONES E, AKTAŞ A (2003). Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27(6), 367 - 373.
Chicago HATIRLI Selim Adem,JONES Eugene,AKTAŞ Ali Rıza Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27, no.6 (2003): 367 - 373.
MLA HATIRLI Selim Adem,JONES Eugene,AKTAŞ Ali Rıza Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.27, no.6, 2003, ss.367 - 373.
AMA HATIRLI S,JONES E,AKTAŞ A Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2003; 27(6): 367 - 373.
Vancouver HATIRLI S,JONES E,AKTAŞ A Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2003; 27(6): 367 - 373.
IEEE HATIRLI S,JONES E,AKTAŞ A "Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27, ss.367 - 373, 2003.
ISNAD HATIRLI, Selim Adem vd. "Measuring the market power of the banana import market in Turkey". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27/6 (2003), 367-373.