IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA

Metehan Feridun SORKUN (İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, İzmir, Türkiye)
Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
5 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 239 - 268 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979 İndeks Tarihi: 03-09-2019

IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA

Öz:
This study investigates the ways of improving theeffectiveness of the recently constructed waste treatment plants inTurkey. Many municipalities have made large public investments onmodern solid waste treatment plants. These plants, designed toprocess hundred tons of waste per day, positively contribute to boththe environment and the economy. However, the inefficiencies inother waste management activities (e.g. waste collection,transportation) could limit these plants’ contributions, making it apriority to identify and remove the bottlenecks in the municipal solidwaste system. This study examines the municipal solid waste systemof Manisa, including the recently constructed Uzunburun Solid WasteTreatment Plant. Interviews with municipal public managers wereconducted to shed light on bottlenecks that could limit theeffectiveness of Uzunburun Plant. Then, integrated solid wastemanagement framework was used to reveal possible ways to removethese bottlenecks. According to results, socio-cultural issues are ofprime importance; however, the effects of actions addressing theseissues are only observable in the long-term. Nevertheless, the resultsshow that improvements can be made in a shorter-time periodthrough some technical, legal, and institutional steps.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Beşeri Bilimler

BÜTÜNLEŞİK SİSTEM YAKLAŞIMIYLA KATI ATIK İŞLEME TESİSLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN ARTTIRILMASI: MANİSA İLİ ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Öz:
Bu çalışma, ülkemizde yeni inşa edilen katı atık işleme tesislerinin etkinliğinin nasıl arttırılabileceğini araştırmaktadır. Son zamanlarda birçok belediye, modern katı atık işleme tesisleri için büyük kamu yatırımları yapmıştır. Günde yüzlerce ton atık işleyebilecek şekilde tasarlanan bu tesislerin hem çevreye hem de ekonomiye olumlu katkıları bulunmaktadır. Fakat diğer atık yönetimi faaliyetlerindeki (örn. atık toplama ve taşımadaki) verimsizlikler, bu tesislerin pozitif katkılarını sınırlayabilmektedir. Bu nedenle, inşa edilen bu atık işleme tesislerinden maksimum fayda elde edilebilmesi için belediye katı atık sistemindeki darboğazların tespit edilmesi ve giderilmesi gereklidir. Bu çalışma, Manisa’nın katı atık sistemini inceleyerek Manisa Büyükşehir Belediyesi tarafından yeni yapılan Uzunburun Katı Atık Bertaraf Tesisinin etkinliğinin nasıl arttırılabileceğini araştırmıştır. Bu çerçevede, belediye görevlileri ile görüşmeler yapılarak Uzunburun Katı Atık Bertaraf Tesisinin etkinliğini azaltan darboğazlara ışık tutulmuştur. Ardından, bu darboğazların giderilmesi için gerekli olan eylemler bütünleşik katı atık yönetimi modeli uygulanarak ortaya konmuştur. Sonuçlar, sosyo-ekonomik ve kültürel konuların öncelikli olduğunu gösterse de bu konularda yapılacak eylemlerin etkisinin ancak uzun zaman periyodunda görülmesinin mümkün olabileceğine işaret etmektedir. Bununla birlikte araştırma sonuçları, daha kısa sürede olumlu sonuçlar sağlayabilecek teknik, yasal ve kurumsal adımların da var olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Beşeri Bilimler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ABDOLI, M.A., REZAEI, M., & HASANIAN, H. (2016). Integrated solid waste management in megacities. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 2(3), 289-298.
  • BANAR, M., COKAYGİL, Z., & OZKAN, A. (2009). Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. Waste management, 29(1), 54-62.
  • BELL, J., HUBER, J., & VISCUSI, W.K. (2017). Fostering recycling participation in Wisconsin households through singlestream programs. Land Economics, 93(3), 481-502.
  • CHALMIN, P., & GAILLOCHET, C. (2009). From waste to resource, An abstract of world waste survey. Cyclope, Veolia Environmental Services, Edition Economica, France.
  • CONTRERAS, F., ISHII, S., ARAMAKI, T., HANAKI, K., & CONNORS, S. (2010). Drivers in current and future municipal solid waste management systems: cases in Yokohama and Boston. Waste Management & Research, 28(1), 76-93.
  • ÇED BRANCH DIRECTORATE (2017), Manisa ili 2016 yılı çevre durum raporu. Access: 28.06.2018. http://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/editordosya/MANISA%20%202 016%20ICDR.pdf
  • DEMİR, G., OZCAN, H.K., KARAKUS, P.K., & BAKİS, Y. (2017). Solid waste collection route optimisation by geographical information system in Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey. International Journal of Global Warming, 11(3), 263-272.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC), (2008). Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC), (1991). EU Landfill Directive 1991/31/EC.
  • FLYVBJERG, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about casestudy research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
  • FOLIANTO, F., LOW, Y.S., & YEOW, W.L. (2015, April). Smartbin: Smart waste management system. In Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), 2015 IEEE Tenth International Conference on (pp. 1-2). IEEE.
  • GOLDRATT E.M. (1984). The goal. North River Press, Crotonon-Hudson, NY.
  • GOLDRATT, E.M. (1990). What is this thing called theory of constraints and how should it be implemented?. North river press.
  • GRECO, G., ALLEGRINI, M., DEL LUNGO, C., SAVELLINI, P.G., & GABELLINI, L. (2015). Drivers of solid waste collection costs. Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 364-371.
  • GUERRERO, L.A., MAAS, G., & HOGLAND, W. (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste management, 33(1), 220-232.
  • HARGREAVES, J.C., ADL, M. S., & WARMAN, P.R. (2008). A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123(1-3), 1-14.
  • HENRY, R.K., YONGSHENG Z., & JUN, D. (2006) "Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries–Kenyan case study." Waste management, 26 (1), 92-100.
  • HOSSAIN, M. S., SANTHANAM, A., NORULAINI, N.N., & OMAR, A.M. (2011). Clinical solid waste management practices and its impact on human health and environment–A review. Waste management, 31(4), 754-766.
  • HÜRRİYET NEWSPAPER (2017). Kuburlu, C. Access: 20.07.2018 http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/belediyeleresorduk-sizinki-niye-pahali-1-cop-tesisi-4-farkli-bedel-40615245
  • İHLAS NEWS AGENCY (2016). Vahşi depolama tarihe gömülüyor. Access: 31.07.2018. https://www.haberturk.com/yerelhaberler/haber/47204785-vahsi-depolama-tarihe-gomuluyor#
  • KANAT, G. (2010). Municipal solid-waste management in Istanbul. Waste management, 30(8-9), 1737-1745.
  • KANAT, G., DEMİR, A., OZKAYA, B., & BİLGİLİ, M.S. (2006). Addressing the operational problems in a composting and recycling plant. Waste Management, 26(12), 1384-1391.
  • KAWAI, K. & TASAKI, T. (2016). Revisiting estimates of municipal solid waste generation per capita and their reliability. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 18(1), 1-13.
  • KINOBE, J. R., BOSONA, T., GEBRESENBET, G., NIWAGABA, C.B., & VINNERÅS, B. (2015). Optimization of waste collection and disposal in Kampala city. Habitat International, 49, 126-137.
  • KLUNDERT, A.V.D. & ANSCHUTZ, J. (2001). Integrated Sustainable Waste Management—The Concept: Tools for DecisionMakers. Experiences from the urban waste Expertise programme (1995–2001), Netherlands.
  • KORAI, M.S., MAHAR, R.B., & UQAILI, M.A. (2017). The feasibility of municipal solid waste for energy generation and its existing management practices in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 338-353.
  • KUM, V., SHARP, A., & HARNPORNCHAI, N. (2005). Improving the solid waste management in Phnom Penh city: a strategic approach. Waste management, 25(1), 101-109.
  • KUMAR, S., BHATTACHARYYA, J.K., VAIDYA, A.N., CHAKRABARTI, T., DEVOTTA, S., & AKOLKAR, A.B. (2009). Assessment of the status of municipal solid waste management in metro cities, state capitals, class I cities, and class II towns in India: An insight. Waste management, 29(2), 883-895.
  • LE COURTOIS, A. (2012). Municipal Solid Waste: turning a problem into resource. Private Sector & Development, (15).
  • MANISA METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (2014), 2015-2019 Manisa Büyükşehir Belediyesi Stratejik Planı. Manisa. Access: 19.06.2018. http://www.manisa.bel.tr/upload/teskilat/dosya/405ff5034e7b47a 79936824302421c62.pdf
  • MANISA METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (2017), Katı Atık Düzenli Depolama ve Bertaraf Tesisi İşletme Planı.
  • MANŞET NEWSPAPER (2016). Manisa’nın çöplükleri turizme açılacak. Erdoğan E., Access: 31.07.2018. http://www.bik.gov.tr/manisanin-coplukleri-turizme-acilacak/ MATTER, A., DIETSCHI, M., & ZURBRUGG, C. (2013).
  • Improving the informal recycling sector through segregation of waste in the household–The case of Dhaka Bangladesh. Habitat International, 38, 150-156.
  • MCKINNON, A., & EDWARDS, J. (2010). Opportunities for improving vehicle utilization. Green Logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics, 195-213.
  • MEEN‐CHEE, H., & NARAYANAN, S. (2006). Restoring the shine to a pearl: Recycling behaviour in Penang, Malaysia. Development and Change, 37(5), 1117-1136.
  • MIAFODZYEVA, S., & BRANDT, N. (2013). Recycling behaviour among householders: synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 4(2), 221-235.
  • MILIUTE-PLEPİENE, J., HAGE, O., PLEPYS, A., & REIPAS, A. (2016). What motivates households recycling behaviour in recycling schemes of different maturity? Lessons from Lithuania and Sweden. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 113, 40-52.
  • MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION (2017). 2018-2022 Stratejik Plan. Ankara: The Republic of Turkey. Access: 15.07.2018.http://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/strateji/icerikler/stratejk-plan_13-02-2018-20180213155630.pdf
  • NAOR, M., & COMAN, A. (2017). Offshore responsiveness: theory of Constraints innovates customer services. The Service Industries Journal, 37(3-4), 155-166.
  • NAROZNOVA, I., MØLLER, J., & SCHEUTZ, C. (2016). Global warming potential of material fractions occurring in sourceseparated organic household waste treated by anaerobic digestion or incineration under different framework conditions. Waste Management, 58, 397-407.
  • OGWUELEKA, T.C. (2009). Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering (IJEHSE), 6(3).
  • OYEKALE, A.S. (2015). Factors explaining households’ cash payment for solid waste disposal and recycling behaviors in South Africa. Sustainability, 7(12), 15882-15899.
  • OZCAN, H. K., GUVENC, S. Y., GUVENC, L., & DEMİR, G. (2016). Municipal solid waste characterization according to different income levels: A case study. Sustainability, 8(10), 1044.
  • PAKPOUR, A.H., ZEIDI, I.M., EMAMJOMEH, M.M., ASEFZADEH, S., & PEARSON, H. (2014). Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Waste management, 34(6), 980-986.
  • QDAİS, H. A. (2007). Techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste management in Jordan. Waste management, 27(11), 1666-1672.
  • ROUSTA, K., BOLTON, K., LUNDIN, M., & DAHLÉN, L. (2015). Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste. Waste management, 40, 22-30.
  • SADAT, S., CARTER, M.W., & GOLDEN, B. (2013). Theory of constraints for publicly funded health systems. Health care management science, 16(1), 62-74.
  • SEACAT, J.D., & BOILEAU, N. (2018). Demographic and community-level predictors of recycling behavior: A statewide, assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 12-19.
  • SIDIQUE, S.F., LUPİ, F., & JOSHİ, S.V. (2010). The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resources, conservation and recycling, 54(3), 163-170.
  • SHEKDAR, A. V. (2009). Sustainable solid waste management: an integrated approach for Asian countries. Waste management, 29(4), 1438-1448.
  • SORKUN, M.F. (2018a). How do social norms influence recycling behavior in a collectivistic society? A case study from Turkey. Waste Management, 80, 359-370.
  • SORKUN, M.F. (2018b). Üreticileri tersine lojistik faaliyetlerine yönelten motivasyonlar hiyerarşisi. Ege Akademik Bakis, 18(2), 243-259.
  • SORKUN, M.F., & ONAY, M. (2016). Ürün modülerliğinin ters lojistik süreçleri üzerinden tedarik zinciri stratejilerine etkisi. Sosyal Ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 41-57.
  • STOREY, D., SANTUCCI, L., FRASER, R., ALELUIA, J., & CHOMCHUEN, L. (2015). Designing effective partnerships for wasteto-resource initiatives: Lessons learned from developing countries. Waste Management & Research, 33(12), 1066-1075.
  • ŞİMŞİT, Z.T., GÜNAY, N.S., & VAYVAY, Ö. (2014). Theory of constraints: A literature review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 930-936.
  • TEIXEIRA, C.A., AVELINO, C., FERREIRA, F., & BENTES, I. (2014). Statistical analysis in MSW collection performance assessment. Waste management, 34(9), 1584-1594.
  • TOZLU, A., ÖZAHİ, E., & ABUŞOĞLU, A. (2016). Waste to energy technologies for municipal solid waste management in Gaziantep. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 809-815.
  • TRICKEY, H., & NEWBURN, M. (2014). Goals, dilemmas and assumptions in infant feeding education and support. Applying theory of constraints thinking tools to develop new priorities for action. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 10(1), 72-91.
  • TURAN, N. G., ÇORUH, S., AKDEMİR, A., & ERGUN, O.N. (2009). Municipal solid waste management strategies in Turkey. Waste Management, 29(1), 465-469.
  • TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE (2018). Amount of municipal waste collected. Access: 06.07.2018. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=119&locale=en
  • VUJIC, G., STANISAVLJEVIC, N., BATINIC, B., JURAKIC, Z., & UBAVIN, D. (2017). Barriers for implementation of “waste to energy” in developing and transition countries: a case study of Serbia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19(1), 55-69.
  • WAN, C., SHEN, G. Q., & YU, A. (2014). The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 141-151.
  • WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATION (2015). Official Gazette of Turkey, Date: 02.04.2015, No: 29314.
  • YAY, A. S. E. (2015). Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 284-293.
  • YILDIZ, S., YAMAN, C., DEMİR, G., OZCAN, H. K., COBAN, A., OKTEN, H. E., ... & GOREN, S. (2013). Characterization of municipal solid waste in Istanbul, Turkey. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 32(3), 734-739.
  • YIN, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods, Vol. 5). Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA. Rick Rantz Leading urban institutions of higher education in the new millennium Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 2002.
  • ZHANG, S., ZHANG, M., YU, X., & REN, H. (2016). What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 176-186.
APA Sorkun M (2018). IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. , 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
Chicago Sorkun Metehan Feridun IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. (2018): 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
MLA Sorkun Metehan Feridun IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. , 2018, ss.239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
AMA Sorkun M IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. . 2018; 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
Vancouver Sorkun M IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. . 2018; 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
IEEE Sorkun M "IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA." , ss.239 - 268, 2018. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
ISNAD Sorkun, Metehan Feridun. "IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA". (2018), 239-268. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
APA Sorkun M (2018). IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(4), 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
Chicago Sorkun Metehan Feridun IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 16, no.4 (2018): 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
MLA Sorkun Metehan Feridun IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.16, no.4, 2018, ss.239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
AMA Sorkun M IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018; 16(4): 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
Vancouver Sorkun M IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018; 16(4): 239 - 268. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
IEEE Sorkun M "IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA." Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, ss.239 - 268, 2018. 10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
ISNAD Sorkun, Metehan Feridun. "IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS VIA INTEGRATED SYSTEM APPROACH: A CASE STUDY ON MANISA". Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 16/4 (2018), 239-268. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.505979
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 8:37

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları