Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 132 - 137 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/meandros.13008 İndeks Tarihi: 09-09-2019
Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth
Öz: Objective: To compare the efficacy of 5 different methods for filling primary teeth root canals by digital radiography. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 extracted primary anterior teeth with no more than 25% root resorption were prepared using Mtwo® NiTi rotary instruments to a standard apical file size. Teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups, as follows according to the sealer application method. Group 1: Metapex® syringe (control); group 2: Metapex® syringe and Endoactivator® (sonic activation); group 3: Metapex® syringe and indirect ultrasonic activation; group 4: Endodontic irrigation needle; group 5: Lentulo spiral. Photostimulated phosphor radiographs of canals were evaluated for length of filling (underfilled, suboptimally filled, optimally filled, overfilled) and quality of filling (presence, localization and total sum of voids). Data was statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected MannWhitney U tests. Results: For the both length and the quality of the filling the worse results were seen in the endodontic irrigation needle group (group 4) (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the other groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study apart from the endodontic irrigation needle group, all the tested methods could be used for obturation of primary teeth.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
-
Öz: Amaç: Süt dişleri kök kanallarının dolumu için kullanılan beş farklı metodun etkinliğinin dijital radyografi yöntemiyle karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada kök rezorpsiyonu %25’ten fazla olmayan toplam 50 adet çekilmiş süt ön diş kullanıldı. Dişler, Mtwo® NiTi döner aletler kullanılarak standart bir apikal genişlik elde edilecek şekilde hazırlandı. Dişler rastgele 5 gruba ayrıldı: grup 1: Metapex® şırınga (kontrol); grup 2: Metapex® şırınga ve Endoaktivatör® (sonik aktivasyon); grup 3: Metapex® şırınga ve indirekt ultrasonik aktivasyon grup 4: Endodontik irrigasyon iğnesi; grup 5: Lentulo spiral. Kanalların fosfor plakla alınmış radyografik görüntüleri ile kanal dolgusunun uzunluğu (yetersiz, ideale yakın, ideal ve taşkın dolgu) ve kalitesi (boşlukların varlığı, lokalizasyonu ve toplam alanı) değerlendirildi. Veriler istatistiksel olarak KruskalWallis ve Bonferroni-düzeltmeli Mann-Whitney U testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Kök kanal dolumları hem uzunluk hem de kalite anlamında değerlendirildiğinde en kötü sonuçlar endodontik irrigasyon iğnesi grubunda elde edildi (grup 4) (p<0,05). Bununla birlikte diğer gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı (p>0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre; endodontik irrigasyon iğnesi grubu dışında tüm test edilen yöntemler süt dişlerinin kanal dolgusu sırasında kullanılabilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Thomas AM, Chandra S, Chandra S, Pandey RK. Elimination of infection in pulpectomized deciduous teeth: a short-term study using iodoform paste. J Endod 1994; 20: 233-5.
- Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 4th ed. Philadelhia; Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2005; pp. 375-90.
- Cohen S, Hargreaves K. Pediatric Endodontics: Endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. Pathways of pulp. 8th edition; 2002; pp. 893-5.
- Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28: 39-47.
- Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 347-50.
- Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/ iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 23: 289-94.
- Sridhar N, Tandon S. Continued root-end growth and apexification using a calcium hydroxide and iodoform paste (Metapex®): three case reports. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11: 63-70.
- Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, Korthals G, Nguyen PN. An in-vitro evaluation of sealer placement methods. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 181-6.
- Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 28: 323-6.
- Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, Elliott MA, Schneider LG, Czonstkowsky M. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15: 254-6.
- Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of selfetching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 369-74.
- Shahid S, Billington RW, Hill RG, Pearson GJ. The effect of ultrasound on the setting reaction of zinc polycarboxylate cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 2901-5.
- Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F. Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 2007; 33: 81-95.
- Grover R, Mehra M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013; 14: 104-8.
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271-5.
- Shantiaee Y, Maziar F, Dianat O, Mahjour F. Comparing microleakage in root canals obturated with nanosilver coated gutta-percha to standard gutta-percha by two different methods. Iran Endod J 2011; 6: 140-5.
- Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: 236-40.
- Payne RG, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Two-year outcome study of zinc oxide-eugenol root canal treatment for vital primary teeth. J Can Dent Assoc 1993; 59: 528-30, 533-6.
- Subba Reddy VV, Shakunthala B. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: An in-vivo study. Endodontology 1997; 9: 13-6.
- Gupta S, Das G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011; 29: 222-8.
- Bhandari SK, Anita, Prajapati U. Root canal obturation of primary teeth: disposable injection technique. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012; 30: 13-8.
- Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Evaluation of root canal obturation: a three-dimensional in vitro study. J Endod 2009; 35: 541-4.
- Ozawa T, Taha N, Messer HH. A comparison of techniques for obturating oval-shaped root canals. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 2904.
- Huybrechts B, Bud M, Bergmans L, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R. Void detection in root fillings using intraoral analogue, intraoral digital and cone beam CT images. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 675-85.
- Bernabé PF, Gomes-Filho JE, Bernabé DG, Nery MJ, OtoboniFilho JA, Dezan E Jr, et al. Sealing ability of MTA used as a root end filling material: effect of the sonic and ultrasonic condensation. Braz Dent J 2013; 24: 107-10.
- Gorseta K, Glavina D, Skrinjaric I. Influence of ultrasonic excitation and heat application on the microleakage of glass ionomer cements. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 453-7.
- Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, Korthals G, Nguyen PN. An in-vitro evaluation of sealer placement methods. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 181-6.
- Aghdasi MM, Asnaashari M, Aliari A, Fahimipour F, Soheilifar S. Conventional versus digital radiographs in detecting artificial voids in root canal filling material. Iran Endod J 2011; 6: 99-102.
- Nguyen NT. Obturation of the root canal system. In: CohenS, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 6the dn. St Louis,USA: Mosby,1994; pp. 219-71.
- Kositbowornchai S, Hanwachirapong D, Somsopon R, Pirmsinthavee S, Sooksuntisakoonchai N. Ex vivo comparison of digital images with conventional radiographs for detection of simulated voids in root canal filling material. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 287-92.
- Cheung GS. Survival of first-time nonsurgical root canal treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 596-604.
- Rebellato J, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Isaacson RJ, Davidovitch M, Vroom K. Lower arch perimeter preservation using the lingual arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112: 449-56.
| APA | ozer s, ŞEN TUNÇ E, KALYONCUOGLU E, GÜLCAN B (2018). Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. , 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| Chicago | ozer sezin,ŞEN TUNÇ EMİNE,KALYONCUOGLU ELIF,GÜLCAN Banu Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. (2018): 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| MLA | ozer sezin,ŞEN TUNÇ EMİNE,KALYONCUOGLU ELIF,GÜLCAN Banu Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. , 2018, ss.132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| AMA | ozer s,ŞEN TUNÇ E,KALYONCUOGLU E,GÜLCAN B Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. . 2018; 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| Vancouver | ozer s,ŞEN TUNÇ E,KALYONCUOGLU E,GÜLCAN B Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. . 2018; 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| IEEE | ozer s,ŞEN TUNÇ E,KALYONCUOGLU E,GÜLCAN B "Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth." , ss.132 - 137, 2018. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| ISNAD | ozer, sezin vd. "Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth". (2018), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| APA | ozer s, ŞEN TUNÇ E, KALYONCUOGLU E, GÜLCAN B (2018). Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, 19(2), 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| Chicago | ozer sezin,ŞEN TUNÇ EMİNE,KALYONCUOGLU ELIF,GÜLCAN Banu Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 19, no.2 (2018): 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| MLA | ozer sezin,ŞEN TUNÇ EMİNE,KALYONCUOGLU ELIF,GÜLCAN Banu Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, vol.19, no.2, 2018, ss.132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| AMA | ozer s,ŞEN TUNÇ E,KALYONCUOGLU E,GÜLCAN B Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal. 2018; 19(2): 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| Vancouver | ozer s,ŞEN TUNÇ E,KALYONCUOGLU E,GÜLCAN B Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal. 2018; 19(2): 132 - 137. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| IEEE | ozer s,ŞEN TUNÇ E,KALYONCUOGLU E,GÜLCAN B "Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth." Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, 19, ss.132 - 137, 2018. 10.4274/meandros.13008 |
| ISNAD | ozer, sezin vd. "Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth". Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 19/2 (2018), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.13008 |
