Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 203 - 211 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537 İndeks Tarihi: 18-09-2019

An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography

Öz:
Background: The mesiodens, located in the palatal midline between the two maxillary central incisors, is the most common type of supernumerary tooth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of mesiodentes according to shape, position, and complications using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.Methods: This study was carried out retrospectively on the CBCT images of cases. The following data were recorded: age, gender, number, shape (conical, incisor, tuberculate, round), size (less than 8 mm, 8-16 mm, and over 16 mm), direction (vertical, semi-vertical, horizontal, inverted), position (impacted or erupted) of the mesiodens, any pathologies or complications (delayed eruption of adjacent tooth, root resorption, cystic formation, diastema, displacement of adjacent tooth) and relation with neighboring anatomical structures (nasal cavity, nasopalatine canal). Results: The age distribution of the patients ranged from 7 to 61 years; mean 16.8±14.2 years. In total, 65 mesiodens were seen in 50 patients. The results showed that; mesiodentes were observed in the form of an incisor tooth (38.5%) mostly, followed conical shape (33.8%). A majority of the mesiodentes were in vertical direction (38.5%) and impacted (92.3%) in the CBCT images. Thirty-six patients (72%) had one mesiodens, 13 patients (26%) had two, and one patient (2%) had three mesiodentes. The most common complication was delayed eruption (29.2%). No complications were found in 49.2% of the cases. Sixteen cases (24.1%) were associated with the nasal cavity, while 43 cases (66.1%) were associated with the nasopalatine canal. Conclusion: Radiographic examination, especially with CBCT images, is important for an exact diagnosis, evaluation, and management of mesiodens.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Meziodenslerin değerlendirilmesi: Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile retrospektif bir çalışma

Öz:
Amaç: Meziodens, süpernümerer dişlerin en yaygın türüdür ve iki maksiller orta kesici diş arasındaki palatal orta hatta yerleşmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, meziodenslerin karakteristik özelliklerini konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) görüntüleri ile değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, olguların KIBT görüntülerinin retrospektif olarak incelenmesi ile yapıldı. Belirtilen veriler kaydedildi: Yaş, cinsiyet, meziodenslerin sayısı, şekli (konik, kesici diş, tüberküllü, yuvarlak), boyutu (8 mm’den küçük, 8-16 mm arasında ve 16 mm’den büyük), yönü (vertikal, semi-vertikal, horizontal, ters), pozisyonu (gömülü ya da sürmüş), herhangi bir patoloji veya komplikasyon oluşturup oluşturmaması (komşu dişin sürmesinde gecikme, kök rezorpsiyonu, kistik oluşum, diastema, komşu dişin yer değiştirmesi) ve komşu anatomik yapılarla (burun boşluğu, nasopalatin kanal) ilişkisi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş dağılımı 7 ila 61 yıl arasında olup ortalama yaş 16.8±14.2’dir. Toplamda 50 hastada 65 adet meziodens görüldü. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre; meziodenslerin çoğunlukla kesici diş (% 38.5) ve konik şekilli (% 33.8) olduğu tespit edildi. Meziodenslerin en sık görülen yönünün vertikal yön (% 38.5) olduğu ve büyük çoğunluğunun gömülü (% 92.3) kaldığı belirlendi. Otuz altı hastada (% 72) bir meziodens, 13 hastada (% 26) iki tane, bir vakada ise üç meziodens (% 2) vardı. En sık görülen komplikasyon sürme gecikmesi (% 29.2) idi. Olguların % 49.2'sinde herhangi bir komplikasyon görülmedi. On altı olgu (% 24.1) burun boşluğu, 43 olguda (% 66.1) ise nazopalatin kanalla ilişkiliydi. Sonuç: Radyografik inceleme, özellikle KIBT görüntüleri, meziodenslerin kesin tanısı, değerlendirmesi ve tedavisi için önemlidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Canoglu E, Er N, Cehreli ZC. Double inverted mesiodentes: Report of an unusual case. Eur J Dent 2009; 3: 219-23.
  • Kim SG, Lee SH. Mesiodens: A clinical and radiographic study. J Dent Child 2003; 70: 58-60.
  • De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in Brazilian children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18: 98-106.
  • Van Buggenhout G, Bailleul-Forestier I. Mesiodens. Eur J Med Genet 2008; 51: 178-81.
  • Saruhanoğlu A, Altın N, Ergun S, Tanyeri H. A case series study of mesiodens among children who presented to Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2014; 3: 1-8.
  • Tyrologou S, Koch G, Kurol J. Location, complications and treatment of mesiodentes- a retrospective study in children. Swed Dent J 2005; 29: 1-9.
  • Lara TS, Lancia M, da Silva Filho OG, Garib DG, Ozawa TO. Prevalence of mesiodens in orthodontic patients with deciduous and mixed dentition and its association with other dental anomalies. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 93-9.
  • Ersin NK, Candan U, Alpoz AR, Akay C. Mesiodens in primary, mixed and permanent dentitions: a clinical and radiographic study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 28: 295-8.
  • Asaumi JI, Shibata Y, Yanagi Y, Hisatomi M, Matsuzaki H, Konouchi H, et al. Radiographic examination of mesiodens and their associated complications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 125-7.
  • Choi HM, Han JW, Park IW, Baik JS, Seo HW, Lee JH, et al. Quantitative localization of impacted mesiodens using panoramic and periapical radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent 2011; 41: 63-9.
  • Hyun HK, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Hahn SH, Kim JW. Clinical characteristics and complications associated with mesiodentes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 263943.
  • Itaya S, Oka K, Kagawa T, Oosaka Y, Ishii K, Kato Y, et al. Diagnosis and management of mesiodens based on the investigation of its position using cone-beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent J 2016; 26: 60-6.
  • Kim Y, Jeong T, Kim J, Shin J, Kim S. Effects of mesiodens on adjacent permanent teeth: a retrospective study in Korean children based on conebeam computed tomography. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017 Jul 8. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12317.
  • Omami M, Chokri A, Hentati H, Selmi J. Cone-beam computed tomography exploration and surgical management of palatal, inverted, and impacted mesiodens. Contemp Clin Dent 2015; 6: 289-93.
  • White SC, Pharoah MJ. Dental anomalies, In: Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation, 7th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2014.
  • Gunduz K, Celenk P, Zengin Z, Sumer P. Mesiodens: A radiographic study in children. J Oral Science 2008; 50: 287-91.
  • Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Yildirim H, Ceylan I. The frequency and characteristics of mesiodens in a Turkish patient population. Eur J Dent 2011; 5: 361-5
  • Lee SS, Kim SG, Oh JS, You JS, Jeong KI, Kim YK, et al. A comparative analysis of patients with mesiodenses: a clinical and radiological study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 41: 190-3.
  • Yildizer Keris E, Ozuturk O. Bir grup Türk populasyonunda meziodenslerin insidansı, özellikleri ve komplikasyonlarının konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile incelenmesi. Ortadogu Med J 2016; 8: 129-34.
  • Ertas ET, Sisman Y, Yırcalı Atıcı M. The frequency, characteristics and complications of mesiodens in Turkish population. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2013; 16: 267-72.
  • Mukhopadhyay S. Mesiodens: a clinical and radiographic study in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011; 29: 34-8.
  • Dayı E, Orbak R. Meziodensler ve tedavi yaklaşımları. Ataturk Univ Diş Hek Fak Derg 1999; 9: 91-5.
  • Arikan V, Memis Ozgul B, Tulga Oz F. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a child population from Central Anatolia–Turkey. Oral Health Dent Manag 2013; 12: 269-72.
  • Over H, Uysal I, Cetinkaya M. The evaluation of mesiodens: a clinical and radiographic study. J Dent Fac Ataturk Uni 2012; 22: 1204.
  • Bereket C, Cakir-Ozkan N, Sener I, Bulut E, Baştan A. Analyses of 1100 supernumerary teeth in a nonsyndromic Turkish population: A retrospective multicenter study. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18: 731-8.
  • Roychoudhury A, Gupta Y, Parkash H. Mesiodens: a retrospective study of fifty teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2000; 18: 144-6.
  • Alaçam A, Bani M. Mesiodens as a risk factor in treatment of trauma cases. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 25-31
  • Russell KA, Folwarczna MA. Mesiodens–diagnosis and management of a common supernumerary tooth. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 362-6.
  • Alberti G, Mondani PM, Parodi V. Eruption of supernumerary permanent teeth in a sample of urban primary school population in Genoa, Italy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006; 7: 89-92.
  • Kupietzky A, Rotstein I, Kischinovsky D. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of an intruded maxillary permanent incisor complicated by the presence of to mesiodentes. Ped Dent 2000; 22: 499-503.
  • Meighani G, Pakdaman A. Diagnosis and management of supernumerary (mesiodens): a review of the literature. J Dent (Tehran) 2010; 7: 41-9.
APA akay g, Özdede M, GÜNGÖR K (2018). An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. , 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
Chicago akay gülsün,Özdede Melih,GÜNGÖR Kahraman An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. (2018): 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
MLA akay gülsün,Özdede Melih,GÜNGÖR Kahraman An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2018, ss.203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
AMA akay g,Özdede M,GÜNGÖR K An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. . 2018; 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
Vancouver akay g,Özdede M,GÜNGÖR K An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. . 2018; 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
IEEE akay g,Özdede M,GÜNGÖR K "An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography." , ss.203 - 211, 2018. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
ISNAD akay, gülsün vd. "An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography". (2018), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
APA akay g, Özdede M, GÜNGÖR K (2018). An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. Selcuk Dental Journal, 5(3), 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
Chicago akay gülsün,Özdede Melih,GÜNGÖR Kahraman An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. Selcuk Dental Journal 5, no.3 (2018): 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
MLA akay gülsün,Özdede Melih,GÜNGÖR Kahraman An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol.5, no.3, 2018, ss.203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
AMA akay g,Özdede M,GÜNGÖR K An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2018; 5(3): 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
Vancouver akay g,Özdede M,GÜNGÖR K An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2018; 5(3): 203 - 211. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
IEEE akay g,Özdede M,GÜNGÖR K "An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography." Selcuk Dental Journal, 5, ss.203 - 211, 2018. 10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537
ISNAD akay, gülsün vd. "An evaluation of mesiodentes: A retrospective study with cone-beam computed tomography". Selcuk Dental Journal 5/3 (2018), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj. 359537