Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions

Betül DEMİRTAŞ, (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey)
Alemdar BAYRAKTAR, (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey)
Aydın DUMANOĞLU (Department of Civil Engineering, Canik Başarı University, Samsun, Turkey)
Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
3 0
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 99 - 112 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719 İndeks Tarihi: 25-10-2019

Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions

Öz:
The study investigates ambient vibration based model updating effects on the seismic behavior of a RC tall building subjected to far and near-fault ground motions. A 17-storey building built in Giresun, Turkey is selected as an application. Firstly, 3D initial finite element model of the selected building is created and determined analytical dynamic characteristics. Then, experimental dynamic characteristics of the building (frequencies, mode shapes, damping ratios) are determined by Operational Modal Analysis Method using the ambient vibration test data. According to experimental results, initial finite element model is calibrated by using boundary conditions and material properties. Initial and calibrated finite element models of the building are analysed under far and near-fault ground motions. Two models are compared with each other in terms of displacement, velocity, acceleration, base bending moment, base shear force, compressive and tensile stresses.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Kareem A, Gurle K. Damping in structures: its evaluation and treatment of uncertainty. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1996, 59(2):131–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00004-9
  • Au SK, Zhang FL. Ambient modal identification of a primary-secondary structure by fast Bayesian FFT method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2012; 28:280– 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.007
  • Au SK, Ni YC, Zhang FL, Lam HF. Full-scale dynamic testing and modal identification of a coupled floor slab system. Engineering Structures, 2012; 37:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.024
  • Au SK, Zhang FL and Ni YC. Bayesian operational modal analysis: theory, computation, practice. Computers and Structures, 2013;126:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.015
  • Ventura CE, Schuster ND. Structural dynamic properties of a reinforced concrete highrise building during construction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1996; 23:950-972. https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-901
  • Wu JR, Li QS. Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements. Engineering Structures, 2004;26(7):979-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.002
  • Miyashita K, Itoh M, Fujii K, Yamashita J, Takahashi T. Full-scale measurements of wind-induced responses on the Hamamatsu ACT tower. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998; 74: 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01676105(98)00086-5.
  • Xu YL, Zhan S. Field measurements of Di Wang tower during typhoon York. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001;89:73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00029-5
  • Li QS, Fang JQ, Jeary AP, Wong CK. Full scale measurements of wind effects on tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998;74:741– 750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00067-1
  • Li QS, Yang K, Wong CK and Jeary AP. The effect of amplitude-dependent damping on wind-induced vibration of super tall building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003;91: 1175–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01676105(03)00080-1
  • Li QS, Wu JR, Liang SG, Xiao YQ, Wong CK. Full-scale measurements and numerical evaluation of wind-induced vibration of a 63-story reinforced concrete tall building. Engineering Structures, 2004;26(12):1779-1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.014
  • Li QS, Xiao YQ, Fu JY, Li ZN. Full-scale measurements of wind effects on the Jin Mao building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007;95:445– 466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.09.002
  • Brownjohn JMW. Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2003;32(1): 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.215
  • Boroschek RL, Yá-ez FV. Experimental verification of basic analytical assumptions used in the analysis of structural wall buildings. Engineering Structures. 2000; 22(6): 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00007-3
  • Li Q, Yi J. Monitoring of dynamic behaviour of super-tall buildings during typhoons. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2016; 12(3): 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1010223
  • Liu T, Yang B, Zhang Q. Health monitoring system developed for Tianjin 117 highrise building. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016; B4016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000602
  • Zhang FL, Xiong HB, Shi WX, Ou X. Structural health monitoring of Shanghai Tower during different stages using a Bayesian approach. Structural Control and Health Monitoring,2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1840
  • Li QS, Wu JR. Correlation of dynamic characteristics of a super tall building from fullscale measurements and numerical analysis with various finite element models. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2004;33:1311-1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.405
  • Pan TC, Brownjohn JMW, You XT. Correlating measured and simulated dynamic responses of a tall building to long-distance earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2004;33(5):611-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.366
  • Chassiakos AG, Masri SF, Nayeri RD, Caffrey JP, Tzong G, Chen HP. Use of vibration monitoring data to track structural changes in a retrofitted building. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2005;14(2): 219-238.
  • Archila M, Boroschek R, Ventura CE, Molnar S. Modal testing of a repaired building after 2010 Chile earthquake. In Topics in Dynamics of Civil Structures,2013;4:119125.
  • Pan Y, Ventura CE, Feng Y, Li X, Kaya Y, Xiong H, Zhou M. Ambient vibration testing of a super tall building in Shanghai. InDynamics of Civil Structures, 2016;2:155-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29751-4_16
  • Liao WI, Loh CH, Lee BH. Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non- isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures, 2004;26(14):2173–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.016
  • Çavdar Ö. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of two suspension bridges in Istanbul, Turkey to near-and far-fault ground motion. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012; 12(2):459–473. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-459-2012
  • Dicleli M, Buddaram S. Equivalent linear analysis of seismic-isolated bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions with forward rupture directivity effect. Engineering Structures, 2007;29(1):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.004
  • Liu T, Luan Y, Zhong W. Earthquake responses of clusters of building structures caused by a near-field thrust fault. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012; 42:56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.002
  • Mazza F, Vulcano A. Effects of near-fault ground motions on the nonlinear dynamic response of base-isolated RC framed buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012;41(2):211–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1126
  • Mortezaeia A, Ronaghb HR, Kheyroddinc A. Seismic evaluation of FRP strengthened RC buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions having fling step. Composite Structures, 2010; 92(5):1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.017
  • Trifunac MD. The role of strong motion rotations in the response of structures near earthquake faults. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009; 29(2):382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.001
  • Jacobsen NJ, Andersen P, Brincker R. Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in Operational Modal Analysis. Proceedings of ISMA2006: International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium, 2006.
  • Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. 3th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, USA, 2004.
  • Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P. Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Antonio, USA, 2000.
  • SAP2000 (2008) Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.
  • PULSE (2006) Analyzers and Solutions, Release11.2. Bruel and Kjaer, Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S, Denmark.
  • OMA (2006) Operational Modal Analysis, Release 4.0. Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark.
  • http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html.
APA DEMİRTAŞ B, BAYRAKTAR A, DUMANOĞLU A (2017). Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. , 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
Chicago DEMİRTAŞ Betül,BAYRAKTAR Alemdar,DUMANOĞLU Aydın Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. (2017): 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
MLA DEMİRTAŞ Betül,BAYRAKTAR Alemdar,DUMANOĞLU Aydın Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. , 2017, ss.99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
AMA DEMİRTAŞ B,BAYRAKTAR A,DUMANOĞLU A Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. . 2017; 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
Vancouver DEMİRTAŞ B,BAYRAKTAR A,DUMANOĞLU A Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. . 2017; 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
IEEE DEMİRTAŞ B,BAYRAKTAR A,DUMANOĞLU A "Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions." , ss.99 - 112, 2017. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
ISNAD DEMİRTAŞ, Betül vd. "Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions". (2017), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
APA DEMİRTAŞ B, BAYRAKTAR A, DUMANOĞLU A (2017). Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, 3(2), 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
Chicago DEMİRTAŞ Betül,BAYRAKTAR Alemdar,DUMANOĞLU Aydın Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials 3, no.2 (2017): 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
MLA DEMİRTAŞ Betül,BAYRAKTAR Alemdar,DUMANOĞLU Aydın Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, vol.3, no.2, 2017, ss.99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
AMA DEMİRTAŞ B,BAYRAKTAR A,DUMANOĞLU A Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials. 2017; 3(2): 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
Vancouver DEMİRTAŞ B,BAYRAKTAR A,DUMANOĞLU A Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials. 2017; 3(2): 99 - 112. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
IEEE DEMİRTAŞ B,BAYRAKTAR A,DUMANOĞLU A "Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions." Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, 3, ss.99 - 112, 2017. 10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
ISNAD DEMİRTAŞ, Betül vd. "Model updating effects on the seismic behavior of tall buildings under far and near-fault ground motions". Research on Engineering Structures and Materials 3/2 (2017), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2016.64st0719
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 9:9

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları