Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 180 - 183 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004 İndeks Tarihi: 31-10-2019

Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years

Öz:
Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction using either a free quadriceps tendon autograft or a quadrupled hamstring autograft with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using either a free quadriceps tendon autograft or hamstring tendon autograft from January 2013 to December 2014 were included. ACL reconstruction was done in all patients due to isolated ACL tears. Patients with associated cartilage lesions > Outerbridge III, meniscal lesions in need of meniscectomy or repair as well as patients with prior knee surgery on the affected or contralateral knee were excluded. The primary outcome evaluation was the side-to-side difference in instrumented Lachman testing. Secondary outcome evaluation consisted in the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati and SF-36 scores. Side-to-side difference in range of motion and thigh diameter was also documented. Results: After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 82 patients were identified and 72 (87.8%) presented to the hospital for follow-up. There were 39 patients with quadriceps graft (30.64 ± 8.71, range: 18e53 years) and 33 patients with hamstrings (28.60 ± 6.74, range: 18e46 years). No statistically significant difference between groups was detected with regard to KT-1000 measurements (p ¼ 0.326). No significant difference was found between the mean postoperative Lysholm (p ¼ 0.299), the modified Cincinnati (p ¼ 0.665) and the general SF-36 scores between groups (p ¼ 0.588). Less side-to-side thigh diameter difference was noted in the quadriceps graft group (p ¼ 0.026). Conclusion: In conclusion, similar clinical results, in terms of stability and subjective measures, can be obtained after ACL reconstruction both with a free quadriceps and a 4-strand hamstring tendons autograft.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ortopedi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Houck DA, Kraeutler MJ, Vidal AF, et al. Variance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft selection based on patient demographics and location within the multicenter orthopaedic outcomes network cohort. J Knee Surg. 2017;31:472e478.
  • Budny J, Fox J, Rauh M, Fineberg M. Emerging trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2017;30:63e69.
  • Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2459e2468.
  • Tibor L, Chan PH, Funahashi TT, Wyatt R, Maletis GB, Inacio MC. Surgical technique trends in primary ACL reconstruction from 2007 to 2014. J Bone Surg Am. 2016;98:1079e1089.
  • XieX, LiuX,ChenZ,Yu Y,PengS,Li Q.Ameta-analysis ofbone-patellar tendonbone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015;22:100e110.
  • Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, Nash CR. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:46e54.
  • Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K. A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1933e1940.
  • Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP. Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:462e472.
  • Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, et al. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25:149e159.
  • Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Surg Am. 2004;86:2143e2155.
  • Slone HS, Romine SE, Premkumar A, Xerogeanes JW. Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:541e554
  • Todor A, Caterev S, Nistor DV, Khallouki Y. Free bone plug quadriceps tendon harvest and suspensory button attachment for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e541ee544.
  • Fink C, Herbort M, Abermann E, Hoser C. Minimally invasive harvest of a quadriceps tendon graft with or without a bone block. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3: e509ee513
  • Schulz AP, Lange V, Gille J, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term clinical outcome after 24-36 months. Open Access J Sports Med. 2013;4:243e249.
  • Geib TM, Shelton WR, Phelps RA, Clark L. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1408e1414.
  • Buescu CT, Onutu AH, Lucaciu DO, Todor A. Pain level after ACL reconstruction: a comparative study between free quadriceps tendon and hamstring tendons autografts. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51:100e103.
  • Caterev S, Nistor DV, Todor A. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a free quadriceps tendon autograft. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1063ee1067.
  • Park SE, Ko Y. A novel graft preparation technique of the quadriceps tendon for arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;1:e197ee200.
  • Ma Y, Murawski CD, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Maldjian C, Lynch AD, Fu FH. Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:661e668.
  • Cohen SB, Fu FH. Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of a central medial portal. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:325.e1e325.e5.
  • Agel J, LaPrade RF. Assessment of differences between the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee patient outcome scores: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2151e2157.
  • Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150e154.
  • Lund B, Nielsen T, Faunø P, Christiansen SE, Lind M. Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:593e598.
  • Valeanu M, Cosma S, Cosma D, Moldovan G, Vasilescu D. Optimization for date redistributed system with applications. Int J Comput Commun. 2009;4:156e161.
  • Cosma S, Valeanu M, Cosma D, Vasilescu D, Moldovan G. Efficient data organisation in distributed computer systems using data warehouse. Int J Comput Commun. 2013;8:367e373.
  • Runer A, Wierer G, Herbst E, et al. There is no difference between quadricepsand hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;26:605e614
  • Cavaignac E, Coulin B, Tscholl P, Nik Mohd Fatmy N, Duthon V, Menetrey J. Is quadriceps tendon autograft a better choice than hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A comparative study with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1326e1332.
  • Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Okano T, Suruga M, Aizawa S, Fu FH. The evaluation of muscle recovery after anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1449e1453.
  • Middleton KK, Hamilton T, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Harner CD, Fu FH. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective, Part 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:1467e1482.
  • Lubowitz JH. Editorial commentary: quadriceps tendon autograft use for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predicted to increase. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:76e77.
  • Potage D, Duparc F, D'Utruy A, Courage O, Roussignol X. Mapping the quadriceps tendon: an anatomic and morphometric study to guide tendon harvesting. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:1063e1067.
  • Staubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Rincon L, Nolte LP. Quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament: cryosectional anatomy and structural properties in young adults. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4:100e110.
  • Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Marshall HA, Goodrich JA, McCarty EC. Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative studies with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:1699e1707.
  • Fischer F, Fink C, Herbst E, et al. Higher hamstring-to-quadriceps isokinetic strength ratio during the first post-operative months in patients with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;26:418e425.
APA TODOR A, NİSTOR D, CATEREV S (2019). Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. , 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
Chicago TODOR Adrian,NİSTOR Dan Viorel,CATEREV Sergiu Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. (2019): 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
MLA TODOR Adrian,NİSTOR Dan Viorel,CATEREV Sergiu Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. , 2019, ss.180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
AMA TODOR A,NİSTOR D,CATEREV S Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. . 2019; 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
Vancouver TODOR A,NİSTOR D,CATEREV S Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. . 2019; 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
IEEE TODOR A,NİSTOR D,CATEREV S "Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years." , ss.180 - 183, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
ISNAD TODOR, Adrian vd. "Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years". (2019), 180-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
APA TODOR A, NİSTOR D, CATEREV S (2019). Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53(3), 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
Chicago TODOR Adrian,NİSTOR Dan Viorel,CATEREV Sergiu Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53, no.3 (2019): 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
MLA TODOR Adrian,NİSTOR Dan Viorel,CATEREV Sergiu Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol.53, no.3, 2019, ss.180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
AMA TODOR A,NİSTOR D,CATEREV S Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(3): 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
Vancouver TODOR A,NİSTOR D,CATEREV S Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(3): 180 - 183. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
IEEE TODOR A,NİSTOR D,CATEREV S "Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years." Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53, ss.180 - 183, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004
ISNAD TODOR, Adrian vd. "Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years". Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53/3 (2019), 180-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.004