Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 108 - 113 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2019

Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey

Öz:
Aim: The top 100 medicines having the highest annual average salesbetween the years 2006 and 2015, had exceeded one-fourth of thetotal pharmaceutical market’s value in these years. We aimed to studythe status of biotechnological medicines among these medicines andevaluate the effects of policy interventions on their sales.Methods: Sales of all medicines on an annual average value basis werecalculated. The top 100 medicines with the highest annual averagesales were included in the study. Time series analysis has been used forprospective estimations.Results: Up to 2007 biotechnological medicines had not been in thetop ten medicines; it increased dramatically after 2007 and in 2016,the sales of biotechnological medicines reached to 82% in top 10 salesin Turkey. On the other hand the number of biotechnological medicinesamong the top 100 medicines was 4 in 2003; it reached to 27 in2016. However the number of biotechnological medicines in the top10 medicines was 1 in 2003 and it reached to 8 in 2016.Conclusion: The shares of biotechnological medicines in both the totalpharmaceutical market and in the group of medicines with high salesare increasing every year. New policies should be developed to ensurethe stability of the reimbursement system.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp

Türkiye’de 2003-2016 Yılları Arasında En Çok Satılan Biyoteknolojik İlaçların Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: 2003 ve 2016 yılları arasında en yüksek yıllık satış tutarı olan 100 ilaç, bu yıllarda toplam ilaç pazar değerinin dörtte birinden fazlasını oluşturmuştur. Çalışmamızda bu ilaçlar arasında biyoteknolojik ilaçların durumunu ve satışlarını incelemeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Tüm ilaçların yıllık ortalama değer esasına göre satış tutarları hesaplandı. En yüksek yıllık ortalama satışa sahip ilk 100 ilaç, araştırmaya dahil edildi. İleriye dönük kestirim yapmak için zaman serileri analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Biyoteknolojik ilaçlar, 2007 yılına kadar en yüksek on ilaç arasında yer almamışken, 2016 yılında biyoteknolojik ilaç satış değerinin ilk 10 ilaç içinde %82’ye ulaştığı görüldü. Ayrıca, ilk 100 ilaç içinde biyoteknolojik ilaç sayısı 2003’de 4 iken, 2016’da bu sayı 27’ye ulaşmıştır. İlk 10 ilaçta yer alan biyoteknolojik ilaçlar; 2003’te sadece 1 adet iken 2016’da ilk 10 ilacın 8’i biyoteknolojik ilaçtır. Sonuç: Biyoteknolojik ilaçların hem toplam ilaç piyasasında hem de yüksek miktarda satılan ilaç grubunda payı her yıl artmaktadır. Geri ödeme sisteminin sürdürülebilirliğini sağlamak için bu grup ilaçlar için yeni politikalar üretilmelidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Kaplan W, Mathers C. The world medicines situation global health trends: global burden of dısease and pharmaceutıcal needs. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • IMS Institute, Global Medicines Use in 2020. Available from:https://www.iqvia.com/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/institutereports/global-medicines-use-in-2020.pdf?la=uk-ua&hash=9 68B71C0B0769A179F3A56E331C62754EEF74752; Date of Access: July 2018
  • Statistica: The Statistics Portal, Pharmaceutical market: worldwide revenue 2001-2016. Available from:http://www. statista.com/statistics/263102/pharmaceutical-marketworldwide-revenue-since-2001/ Date of Access: July 2016
  • Turkish Competition Board, Competition Report, Public interventions through the perspective of competition policy, 2013 Ankara. 6 Available from:http://www. rekabet.gov.tr/ File/ ?path=RO OT%2fDoc uments%2fG%C3% BCncel%2fr apor2013.pdf. Date of access: March 2016
  • European Commission, Consensus Information Paper 2013 What you need to know about Biosimilar Medicinal Products. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/document ts/8242/.../1/.../ pdf Date of access: March 2017
  • Vural EH. Türkiye ve Dünyada Biyoekonomiye Genel Bakış, Sağlık ve İnsan Dergisi 2013:16-7.
  • OECD, International Futures Project. The Bioeconomy to 2030, Designing a Policy Agenda, Main Findings and Policy Conclusions, Available from:https://www.oecd.org/futures/ long-termtechnologicalsocietalchallenges/42837897.pdf, Date of access: July 2017
  • European Commission, European Research Area, The Knowledge Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) in Europe: Achievements and Challenges Full Report. 14 September 2010. Available from:http://www.mercadosbiotecnologicos. com/documents/the_knowledge_based_bioeconomy_ kbbe_in_europe.pdf, Date of access: July 2018
  • Scientific American Worldview, Scientific American Worldview Scorecard 2016 Available from:http://www.saworldview. com/scorecard/the-2016-scientific-american-worldviewoverall-scores/, Date of access: July 2018
  • DTTL Life Sciences and Health Care Industry Group, Analysis of Industry Report: Group Biotechnology, IBISWorld, 2015. Available from:https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/ Deloitte/global/Documents/Life-Sciences-Health-Care/gxlshc-2015-life-sciences-report.pdf,Date of access: July 2018
APA VURAL E, ŞAFAK YILMAZ E, BEKTEMUR G, VURAL İ, BAYAR B, Gürsöz H (2019). Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. , 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
Chicago VURAL Elif Hilal,ŞAFAK YILMAZ ESRA,BEKTEMUR GUVEN,VURAL İSMAİL MERT,BAYAR BANU,Gürsöz Hakkı Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. (2019): 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
MLA VURAL Elif Hilal,ŞAFAK YILMAZ ESRA,BEKTEMUR GUVEN,VURAL İSMAİL MERT,BAYAR BANU,Gürsöz Hakkı Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. , 2019, ss.108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
AMA VURAL E,ŞAFAK YILMAZ E,BEKTEMUR G,VURAL İ,BAYAR B,Gürsöz H Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. . 2019; 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
Vancouver VURAL E,ŞAFAK YILMAZ E,BEKTEMUR G,VURAL İ,BAYAR B,Gürsöz H Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. . 2019; 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
IEEE VURAL E,ŞAFAK YILMAZ E,BEKTEMUR G,VURAL İ,BAYAR B,Gürsöz H "Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey." , ss.108 - 113, 2019. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
ISNAD VURAL, Elif Hilal vd. "Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey". (2019), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
APA VURAL E, ŞAFAK YILMAZ E, BEKTEMUR G, VURAL İ, BAYAR B, Gürsöz H (2019). Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, 57(2), 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
Chicago VURAL Elif Hilal,ŞAFAK YILMAZ ESRA,BEKTEMUR GUVEN,VURAL İSMAİL MERT,BAYAR BANU,Gürsöz Hakkı Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. Haseki Tıp Bülteni 57, no.2 (2019): 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
MLA VURAL Elif Hilal,ŞAFAK YILMAZ ESRA,BEKTEMUR GUVEN,VURAL İSMAİL MERT,BAYAR BANU,Gürsöz Hakkı Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, vol.57, no.2, 2019, ss.108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
AMA VURAL E,ŞAFAK YILMAZ E,BEKTEMUR G,VURAL İ,BAYAR B,Gürsöz H Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2019; 57(2): 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
Vancouver VURAL E,ŞAFAK YILMAZ E,BEKTEMUR G,VURAL İ,BAYAR B,Gürsöz H Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2019; 57(2): 108 - 113. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
IEEE VURAL E,ŞAFAK YILMAZ E,BEKTEMUR G,VURAL İ,BAYAR B,Gürsöz H "Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey." Haseki Tıp Bülteni, 57, ss.108 - 113, 2019. 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566
ISNAD VURAL, Elif Hilal vd. "Evaluation of Top-selling Biotechnological Medicine from 2003 to 2016 in Turkey". Haseki Tıp Bülteni 57/2 (2019), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4566