Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 22 - 28 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 İndeks Tarihi: 04-12-2019
Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions
Öz: A wide variety of distribution functions are used in the literature for wind speed modelling. It is the most widely used Weibull distribution (WD) functionin wind speed modelling. In this paper, two-parameter WD, Rayleigh distribution (RD) which is a special form of WD, and Inverse Weibull distribution(IWD) offered for a new seasonal wind speed modelling are considered and analyzed for six different regions (Gökçeada, Bozcaada, Bandırma, Bilecik,Yalova and Sakarya regions) in the Northwest of Turkey, comparatively. The hourly wind speed data for the period of October 2015 to 30 September2016 is taken from Turkish State Meteorological Service. As a result of the comparison, it is seen that the WD is generally suitable, although IWD has goodseasonal results in some regions. All the comparative results are given in tables.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- H. Saleh, A.A.E.A. Aly, S. Abdel-Hady, “Assessment of different methods used to estimate Weibull distribution parameters for wind speed in Zafarana wind farm, Suez Gulf, Egypt”, Energy, vol. 44, pp. 710-719, 2012. [CrossRef]
- M. Gökçek, H.H. Erdem, A. Bayülken, “A techno-economical evaluation for installation of suitable wind energy plants in Western Marmara, Turkey”, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, vol. 25, pp. 407-427, 2007. [CrossRef]
- M. Bassyouni, S.A. Gutub, U. Javaid, M. Awais, S. Rehman, S.S. Hamid, M.H. Abdel-Aziz, A. Abouel-Kasem, H. ‘’Shafeek Assessment and analysis of wind power resource using weibull parameters’’, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, vol. 33, pp.105-122, 2015. [CrossRef]
- J. Yingni, Y. Xiuling, C. Xiaojun, P. Xiaoyun, “Wind potential assessment using the Weibull model at the Inner Mongolia of China” Energy Exploration and Exploitation, vol. 24, pp. 211-221, 2006. [CrossRef]
- H. Yue, G. Li and M. Zhou, “A probabilistic approach to small signal stability analysis of power systems with correlated wind sources”, Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, pp. 1605-1614, 2013. [CrossRef]
- A. Garcia, J.L. Torres, E. Prieto, A. De Francisco, “Fitting wind speed distributions: a case study”, Solar Energy, vol. 62, pp. 139-144, 1998. [CrossRef]
- R.E. Luna, H.W. Church, “Estimation of long-term concentrations using a “universal” wind speed distribution” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 13, pp. 910-916, 1974. [CrossRef]
- C.G. Justus, W.R. Hargraves, A. Yalcin, “Nationwide assessment of potential output from wind-powered generators”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 15, pp. 673-678, 1976. [CrossRef]
- P. Kiss, I.M. Jánosi, “Comprehensive empirical analysis of ERA-40 surface wind speed distribution over Europe”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 49, pp. 2142-2151, 2008. [CrossRef]
- W.E. Bardsley, “Note on the use of the inverse Gaussian distribution for wind energy applications”, Journal of Applied Meteorology”, vol. 19, pp.1126-1130, 1980. [CrossRef]
- R.M. Vogel, T.A. McMahon, F.H. Chiew, “Floodflow frequency model selection in Australia”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 146, pp. 421-449, 1993. [CrossRef]
- N.B. Guttman, J.R.M. Hosking, J.R. Wallis, “Regional precipitation quantile values for the continental United States computed from L-moments”, Journal of Climate, vol. 6, pp. 2326-2340, 1993. [CrossRef]
- J.R. Stedinger, “Fitting log normal distributions to hydrologic data” Water Resources Research, vol. 16, pp. 481-490, 1980. [CrossRef]
- F.C. Kaminsky “Four probability densities/log-normal, gamma, Weibull, and Rayleigh/and their application to modelling average hourly wind speed”, In International Solar Energy Society Annual Meeting, vol. 19, 1977, pp.6-10.
- R.H. Sherlock, “Analyzing winds for frequency and duration” In on Atmospheric Pollution. American Meteorological Society, pp. 42-49, 1951.
- E.C. Morgan, M. Lackner, R.M. Vogel, L.G. Baise, “Probability distributions for offshore wind speeds”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 52, pp. 15-26, 2011. [CrossRef]
- E. S. Takle, J. M. Brown, “Note on the use of Weibull statistics to characterize wind-speed data”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 17, pp. 556-559, 1978. [CrossRef]
- O.A. Jaramillo, M.A. Borja, “Wind speed analysis in La Ventosa, Mexico: a bimodal probability distribution case”, Renewable Energy, vol. 29, pp. 1613-1630, 2004. [CrossRef]
- E. Dokur, S. Ceyhan, M. Kurban, “Finsler Geometry for Two-Parameter Weibull Distribution Function”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, pp. 1-6, 2017. [CrossRef]
- J.A. Carta, P. Ramirez, S. Velazquez, “A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp.13, pp. 933-955, 2009.
- L. Van der Auwera, F. De Meyer, L.M. Malet “The use of the Weibull three-parameter model for estimating mean wind power densities”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 19, pp. 819-825, 1980. [CrossRef]
- F.G. Akgül, B. Şenoğlu, T. Arslan, “An alternative distribution to Weibull for modeling the wind speed data: Inverse Weibull distribution”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 114, pp. 234-240, 2016. [CrossRef]
- M. Carrasco-Díaz, D. Rivas, M. Orozco-Contreras, O. Sánchez-Montante, “An assessment of wind power potential along the coast of Tamaulipas, northeastern Mexico”, Renewable Energy vol. 78, pp. 295-305, 2015. [CrossRef]
- J.F. Manwell, J.G. McGowan, A.L. Rogers “Wind energy explained: theory, design and application” John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
- S. Mathew “Wind energy: fundamentals, resource analysis and economics”, Heidelberg: Springer, vol. 1, 2006. [CrossRef]
- C.G. Justus, W.R. Hargraves, A. Mikhail, D. Graber, “Methods for estimating wind speed frequency distributions”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 17, pp. 350-353, 1978. [CrossRef]
- S.A. Akdag, A. Dinler, “A new method to estimate Weibull parameters for wind energy applications”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 50, pp. 1761-1766, 2009. [CrossRef]
- M. Kurban, E. Dokur, S. Ceyhan. “A novel information geometry method for estimating parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution.” Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences vol. 67, pp. 39-49, 2018. [CrossRef]
- E.H. Lysen “Introduction to wind energy”, Consultancy services wind energy developing countries (CWD), 1982.
- M.J.M. Stevens, P.T. Smulders, “The estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy utilization purposes”, Wind engineering vol. 3, pp. 132-145, 1979.
| APA | Dokur E, ceyhan s, Kurban M (2019). Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. , 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| Chicago | Dokur Emrah,ceyhan salim,Kurban Mehmet Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. (2019): 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| MLA | Dokur Emrah,ceyhan salim,Kurban Mehmet Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. , 2019, ss.22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| AMA | Dokur E,ceyhan s,Kurban M Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. . 2019; 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| Vancouver | Dokur E,ceyhan s,Kurban M Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. . 2019; 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| IEEE | Dokur E,ceyhan s,Kurban M "Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions." , ss.22 - 28, 2019. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| ISNAD | Dokur, Emrah vd. "Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions". (2019), 22-28. https://doi.org/0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| APA | Dokur E, ceyhan s, Kurban M (2019). Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. Electrica, 19(1), 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| Chicago | Dokur Emrah,ceyhan salim,Kurban Mehmet Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. Electrica 19, no.1 (2019): 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| MLA | Dokur Emrah,ceyhan salim,Kurban Mehmet Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. Electrica, vol.19, no.1, 2019, ss.22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| AMA | Dokur E,ceyhan s,Kurban M Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. Electrica. 2019; 19(1): 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| Vancouver | Dokur E,ceyhan s,Kurban M Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions. Electrica. 2019; 19(1): 22 - 28. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| IEEE | Dokur E,ceyhan s,Kurban M "Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions." Electrica, 19, ss.22 - 28, 2019. 0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
| ISNAD | Dokur, Emrah vd. "Comparative Analysis of Wind Speed Models Using Different Weibull Distributions". Electrica 19/1 (2019), 22-28. https://doi.org/0.26650/electrica.2018.28091 |
