Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience

ÇINAR, Hamza; ÖZDEMİR, Özlem; Akalin, Cagri

doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience

Hamza ÇINAR, (Ordu University)

Çağrı AKALIN, (Ordu University)

Özlem ÖZDEMİR (Ordu University)

Annals of Medical Research

2 0

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 148 - 151 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215 İndeks Tarihi: 19-12-2019

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience

Öz:

Aim: We aimed to present our experience and findings in patients which in we applied percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion because of the oral nutritional deficiency.Material and Methods: The data of 41 patients who had PEG tube insertion between 2014 and 2018 years in the General Surgery Clinic of Medicine Faculty of Ordu University were evaluated retrospectively. The indications, complications, mortality and short-term outcomes of the patients were analyzed.Results: 43 patients underwent gastroscopy due to insertion of PEG. In 41(95.3%) patients, PEG insertion was successful. In 2(4.7%) patients, PEG insertion failed due to obesity. 16(39%) of the PEG patients were males and 25 (61%) were females. The mean age was 77.68 ± 13.9 (20-94) years. PEG indications were chronic neurological disease in 22 (53.6%) patients, cerebrovascular disease in 15 (36.6%) patients and malignancy in 4 (9.8%) patients. Minor complications in 11(26.8%) patients and major complications in 2 (4.9%) patients were observed. 10 (24.4%) of the complications were in the early period and 3 (7.3%) were in the late period. During the follow up, the PEG tube in 3 (7.3%) patients was pull out. No mortality due to PEG insertion was observed. During the mean follow-up period of 9.37 ± 7.8 months, 14 (34.1%) of the PEG-treated patients died due to their primary disease.Conclusions: PEG tube insertion is an easy method with the low rates of the complication and mortality in the patients with poor oral intake who have a functional gastrointestinal system. PEG is the first choice for long-term enteral nutrition in appropriate patients.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, et al. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003;27:355-73.
2. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872-5.
3. Roche V. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Clinical care of PEG tubes in older adults. Geriatrics 2003;58:22-6, 28-9.
4. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW, Stellato TA. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Review of 150 cases. Arch Surg 1983;118:913-4.
5. Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donelly MT, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous gastrostomy and nasogastric feding after acute dysphagic stroke. BMJ 1996;312:13-16.
6. Kirby DF, DeLegge MH, Fleming CR. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 1995;108:1282-301.
7. Russell TR, Brotman M, Norris F. Percutaneous gastrostomy. A new simplified and cost-effective technique. Am J Surg 1984;148:132-7.
8. Campoli PM, Cardoso DM, Turchi MD, et al. Assessment of safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an experience with 435 cases. BMC Gastroenterol 2009;9:48.
9. Löser C, Aschl G, Hebuterne X, et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition-Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr 2005;24:848-61.
10. Yuruker S, Koca B, Karabicak I, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: technical problems, complications, and management. Indian J Surg 2015;77:1159-64.
11. Löser C. Clinical aspects of long-term enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). J Nutr Health Aging 2000;4:47-50.
12. Eleftheriadis E, Kotzampassi K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy after abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 2001;15:213-6.
13. Foutch PG, Talbert GA, Waring JP, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with prior abdominal surgery: virtues of the safe tract. Am J Gastroenterol 1988;83:147-50.
14. Fortunato JE, Cuffari C. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011;13:293-9.
15. Fröhlich T, Richter M, Carbon R, et al. Review article: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:788-801.
16. Srinivasan R, Irvine T, Dalzell M. Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and procedure-related outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009;49:584-8.
17. Kwon RS, Banerjee S, Desilets D, et al. Enteral nutrition access devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:236-48.
18. Sheehan JJ, Hill AD, Fanning NP, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: 5 years of clinical experience on 238 patients. Ir Med J 2003;96:265-7.
19. Skelly RH, Kupfer RM, Metcalfe ME, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): change in practice since 1988. Clin Nutr 2002;21:389-94.
20. Rimon E. The safety and feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement by a single physician. Endoscopy 2001;33:241-4.
21. McClave SA, Chang WK. Complications of enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:739-51.
22. Pearce CB, Goggin PM, Collett J, et al. The ‘cut and push’ method of per-cutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal. Clin Nutr 2000;19:133-5.
23. Taylor CA, Larson DE, Ballard DJ, et al. Predictors of outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community-based study. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:1042-9. 24.
Binicier OB, Soytürk M, Bengi G, et al. Indications, Complications and Patient Satisfaction in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gastroenterohepatol 2010;17:9-16
25. Vanis N, Saray A, Gornjakovic S, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): retrospective analysis of a 7-year clinical experience. Acta Inform Med 2012;20:235-7.
26. Preclik G, Grüne S, Leser HG, et al. Prospective, randomised, double blind trial of prophylaxis with single dose of co-amoxiclav before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. BMJ 1999;319:881-4.
27. Guloglu R, Taviloglu K, Alimoglu O. Colon injury following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003;13:69-72.
28. Rosenberger LH, Newhook T, Schirmer B, et al. Late accidental dislodgement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube: an underestimated burden on patients and the health care system. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3307-11.
29. Dwyer KM, Watts DD, Thurber JS, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of elective feeding tube placement in trauma patients. J Trauma 2002;52:26-32.
30. Karaca AS, Ali R, Çapar M, et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Experience İn A General Surgery Clinic. J Clin Anal Med 2015;6:71-4.

APA	ÇINAR H, Akalin C, ÖZDEMİR Ö (2019). Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. , 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
Chicago	ÇINAR Hamza,Akalin Cagri,ÖZDEMİR Özlem Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. (2019): 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
MLA	ÇINAR Hamza,Akalin Cagri,ÖZDEMİR Özlem Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. , 2019, ss.148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
AMA	ÇINAR H,Akalin C,ÖZDEMİR Ö Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. . 2019; 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
Vancouver	ÇINAR H,Akalin C,ÖZDEMİR Ö Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. . 2019; 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
IEEE	ÇINAR H,Akalin C,ÖZDEMİR Ö "Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience." , ss.148 - 151, 2019. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
ISNAD	ÇINAR, Hamza vd. "Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience". (2019), 148-151. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215

APA	ÇINAR H, Akalin C, ÖZDEMİR Ö (2019). Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. Annals of Medical Research, 26(2), 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
Chicago	ÇINAR Hamza,Akalin Cagri,ÖZDEMİR Özlem Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. Annals of Medical Research 26, no.2 (2019): 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
MLA	ÇINAR Hamza,Akalin Cagri,ÖZDEMİR Özlem Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. Annals of Medical Research, vol.26, no.2, 2019, ss.148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
AMA	ÇINAR H,Akalin C,ÖZDEMİR Ö Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. Annals of Medical Research. 2019; 26(2): 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
Vancouver	ÇINAR H,Akalin C,ÖZDEMİR Ö Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience. Annals of Medical Research. 2019; 26(2): 148 - 151. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
IEEE	ÇINAR H,Akalin C,ÖZDEMİR Ö "Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience." Annals of Medical Research, 26, ss.148 - 151, 2019. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215
ISNAD	ÇINAR, Hamza vd. "Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: One surgeon experience". Annals of Medical Research 26/2 (2019), 148-151. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.10.215