Objective: The aim of study was to evaluate the use of ultrasonography in clinical anesthesia and its role in clinical practice among anesthetists through a questionnaire survey. Methods: The study was approved by the independent ethics committee. The questions in the survey forms were directed to 146 anesthesiologists by face- to- face interviews or by e-mail.Their attitudes towards clinical ultrasonography were evaluated with a 5-point type Likert scale. Results: The mean age of the participants was 38.45±9.49 years, and study population consisted of research workers (28%) and specialists (72%); while 53.79% of them were employed in the educational research, 21.38 in the state, 16.55% in the university and 8.28% in the private hospi- tals.. Research workers used ultrasonography more frequently in both regional and clinical anes- thesia interventions compared to specialists (p=0.008). As compared to specialists, research workers thought that their residency training is sufficient for ultrasonography use. There was no difference between physicians in terms of the need for an additional course. The majority of participants thought that use of ultrasonography contributes to clinical practice. Clinical ultra- sonography is mostly (97.3%) preferred in central venous interventions. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is frequently used in the detection and treatment of perioperative clinical problems as well as regional methods. In our study, the use of ultrasonography in the field of regional and clinical anesthesia was more preferred among the research workers who were continuing their residency training compared to the specialist physicians. The rate of ultrasonog- raphy use was found to be higher in education clinics.