Paragraph 81a of the German Code of Criminal Procedure regulates bodily examination of the suspect and taking of blood samples from his body. Since taking blood sample from the body of the suspect is an intervention to the physical integrity of the person in question, as a rule, the judge is authorized to decide about this intervention, and for non-delayable cases, public prosecutor and police are authorized. However, this regulation is disputable as far as traffic offenses are concerned. It is because blood sample must be immediately taken from the suspect on site in order to determine whether he was driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drug and consequently to determine whether some types of offenses defined by the criminal law is applicable in the relevant case. For that reason, in practice, public prosecution office and the police interpreted the concept of “non-delayable case” in a very broad sense with respect to traffic offenses and the decision for taking blood sample from the suspect was given, as a rule, by the police and sometimes the public persecutor; but never by the judge. In 2007, German Federal Constitutional Court stated that this practice was wrong and that the decision for taking of blood samples must be given by the judge and that the existence of a non-delayable case may only be accepted in very exceptional cases. However, this decision was criticized by the legal doctrine arguing that it is not compatible with the facts, and was also never accepted fully by the courts dealing with traffic offenses. Furthermore, the German Federal Parliament made amendments on the subparagraph 2 of the paragraph 81a of the German Code of Criminal Procedure in 2017 in order to remove this inconsistency between the practice and the Supreme Court decisions and added a new sentence to that subparagraph. With this amendment, the necessity to obtain the judge’s approval for taking blood sample from the suspect was cancelled regarding the cases of jeopardizing traffic security and drink-driving, and public prosecutor and police were authorized to decide to take blood samples. This study examines the reasons of introduction of this change, explains the views on assessment of the current legal situation how this issue is and must be regulated in the Turkish law.