The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 85 - 95 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002 İndeks Tarihi: 14-01-2020

The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings

Öz:
More than two million school-age children in Yemen are unable to enroll in education because of a shortage of school buildings. This is one of the reasons the country missed the Millennium Development Goal of achieving Education for all by 2015. The struggle to afford school accommodation will continue, because of the lack of re-sources and high unit cost. Construction cost as time schedule for an identical school building vary by the implementing agency. This paper aims to study in-depth this multi-dimensional issue to find out the factors that lead to this variation, as well as the reasons for the high unit cost and lengthy periods of construction. To achieve this objective, comprehensive raw data that was resourced from agencies that are as-signed to implement the largest part of the construction program along with data collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were utilized. Complete sets of design and contracting documents of representative schools were used for deeper analysis and evaluation. The analysis shows that the employed de-sign approaches lead to large structural elements and consequently to longer imple-mentation period and 30% increase in cost. It also shows that contractors add up to 20% for the client’s procurement procedure, approvals, and payment cycle. Addition-ally, bidders price risks related to accessibility to building sites, availability of build-ing materials, and how trouble-prone is the region. The findings are of relevance to researchers, education planners, and practitioners as they are of high importance to policy makers and financiers whose main concern is to meet the growing need for school accommodation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İnşaat Mühendisliği Malzeme Bilimleri, Özellik ve Test İnşaat ve Yapı Teknolojisi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AL-kohlani M (2009). An investigation of the causes and extent of delay and cost overrun in school construction projects in Yemen. M.Sc. thesis, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies- University College Lon-don, UK.
  • AlMunifi A (1997). Lessons learned from Yemen earthquakes - engi-neering and environmental aspects. 29th General Assembly of IASPEI. Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • AlMunifi A (2004). The vision of the Ministry of Education: Programs and policies. The Pre-appraisal Workshop for the Preparation of the Basic Education Development Project. Sana’a, Yemen.
  • Brown G (2013). Accelerating progress to 2015-Yemen. A Report Se-ries to the UN Special Envoy for Global Education.
  • Choudhry R, Gabriel HF, Khan MK, Azhar S (2017). Causes of discrepan-cies between design and construction in the Pakistan construction in-dustry. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(2), 1–18.
  • Döring C (2010). Cross-Sector and Multi-Institutional Assessments Study on School Construction Costs in Yemen. The Proceedings of the 13th Architecture & Behaviour Colloquium. Lausanne, Switzer-land.
  • Dosumu OS (2018). Perceived effects of prevalent errors in contract documents on construction projects. Construction Economics and Building, 18(1), 1–26.
  • Fast Track Initiative (2004). Yemen experience with the fast track ini-tiative. Fast Track Initiative Partnership Meeting. Brasilia.
  • GET German Education and Training (2008). School Construction Costs in Yemen. Sana’a, Yemen.
  • Government of Yemen (2018). Yemen Constitution. retrieved from http://www.yemen.gov.ye/. Jan 2019.
  • Günhan S, Arditi D, Doyle J (2007). Avoiding change orders in public school construction. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(1), 67–73.
  • Khan Q, Chase S (2003). Yemen and the Millennium Development Goals. Working Paper Series. The World Bank.
  • Laryea S, Hughes W (2008). How contractors price risk in bids: Theory and practice, Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), 911–924.
  • Ministry of Education (2003). Analysis of the school construction 1996-2003. Sana’a, Yemen.
  • Ministry of Education (2004). Preparation of the school construction plans and policies.
  • Ministry of Education (2013). Yemen Education Sector Plan-Mid Term Results Framework 2013-2015.
  • National Information Center (2018). Law No. (23) for the year 2007 regarding tenders and auctions. https://www.yemen-nic.info/db/laws_ye/detail.php?ID=15594, Jan. 2019.
  • Ogawa K (2004). Achieving education for all in Yemen: Assessment and current status. Journal of International Cooperation Studies, 12, 2.
  • Oyeyipo O, Odusami KT, Ojelabi RA, Afolabi AO (2016). Factors affect-ing contractors' bidding decisions for construction projects in Ni-geria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 21(2), 21–35.
  • PWP (2018). Contracting procedures. Retrieved from www.pwpyemen.org/index.php/en/. Jan. 2019.
  • SFD (2018). Contracting procedures. The World Bank (2013). Report No: 72143-YE. Project Appraisal Document. Retrieved from www.sfd-yemen.org. Jan. 2019.
  • The World Bank (1999). Republic of Yemen-Education Sector Assis-tance Strategy. Human Development Sector.
  • The World Bank and the Republic of Yemen (2010). Education Status Report. Challenges and Opportunities. A joint publication of the In-ternational Bank of Reconstruction and Development.
  • The World Bank and Yemen Government (2005). Review of civil works components in four education projects. Mission Report.
  • UNICEF (2018). If not in school - The paths children cross in Yemen. Report.
  • Vincent M, Monkkonen P (2010). The impact of state regulations on the costs of public school construction. Journal of Education Finance, 35(4), 313–330.
  • Zaghloul R, Hartman F (2003). Construction contracts: The cost of mis-trust. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 419–424.
APA ALMUNİFİ A, ALAMERİ I (2019). The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. , 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
Chicago ALMUNİFİ Abdullatif A.,ALAMERİ Ibrahim Abdullah The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. (2019): 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
MLA ALMUNİFİ Abdullatif A.,ALAMERİ Ibrahim Abdullah The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. , 2019, ss.85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
AMA ALMUNİFİ A,ALAMERİ I The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. . 2019; 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
Vancouver ALMUNİFİ A,ALAMERİ I The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. . 2019; 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
IEEE ALMUNİFİ A,ALAMERİ I "The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings." , ss.85 - 95, 2019. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
ISNAD ALMUNİFİ, Abdullatif A. - ALAMERİ, Ibrahim Abdullah. "The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings". (2019), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
APA ALMUNİFİ A, ALAMERİ I (2019). The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 5(3), 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
Chicago ALMUNİFİ Abdullatif A.,ALAMERİ Ibrahim Abdullah The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics 5, no.3 (2019): 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
MLA ALMUNİFİ Abdullatif A.,ALAMERİ Ibrahim Abdullah The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, vol.5, no.3, 2019, ss.85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
AMA ALMUNİFİ A,ALAMERİ I The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics. 2019; 5(3): 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
Vancouver ALMUNİFİ A,ALAMERİ I The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics. 2019; 5(3): 85 - 95. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
IEEE ALMUNİFİ A,ALAMERİ I "The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings." Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 5, ss.85 - 95, 2019. 10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002
ISNAD ALMUNİFİ, Abdullatif A. - ALAMERİ, Ibrahim Abdullah. "The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings". Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics 5/3 (2019), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.002