ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 22 Sayfa Aralığı: 315 - 332 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 10-02-2020

ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME

Öz:
This paper evaluates and criticizes Martin Heidegger’s account of spaceand spatiality as offered in his Being and Time, predominantly in sections 22-24 ofChapter III. Heidegger’s basic argument is that everyday space is structured byDasein’s concerns. After exploring this theme, it will be argued that Heidegger’saccount of spatiality is vague and unsatisfactory because whilst emphasizing theessential interdependency and interwovenness of Dasein and the world, Heideggerfails to give a plausible account of the materiality of Dasein’s spatiality. His wholenotion of spatiality is built at the expense of the loss of Dasein’s physicalembodiment. It will be suggested that Heidegger’s motive in ignoring the bodilynature of Dasein stems from his worry of introducing the notion of (Cartesian)subjectivity into his account which would contradict his philosophical project.However, the absence of the materiality of Dasein’s existence eventually promptsHeidegger to present non-spatial concepts - such as familiarity and attention – asspatial categories, which constitutes not only the provocation but also the limitationof his account on spatiality.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Etik Siyasi Bilimler Beşeri Bilimler Sosyoloji Bilim Felsefesi ve Tarihi Felsefe Edebi Teori ve Eleştiri

Heidegger’in Varlık ve Zaman’ında Uzamsallık ve Beden Sorunu

Öz:
Bu çalışma, Martin Heidegger’in Varlık ve Zaman isimli eserinin 3. Bölümünün 22-24’üncü kısımlarında ele aldığı uzay ve uzamsallık izahatını değerlendirip ve eleştirmektedir. Heidegger’in temel argümanı gündelik uzamın Dasein’ın kaygıları tarafından yapılandırıldığını savunmaktadır. Bu mesele açıklığa kavuşturulduktan sonra Heidegger’in uzamsallık izahatının belirsiz ve yetersiz olduğu savunulacaktır - çünkü Dasein ve dünya arasındaki temel karşılıklı bağımlılık ve iç içe geçmelik durumunu vurgularken, Heidegger’in Dasein’ın maddesel uzamsallığına dair tatmin edici bir açıklama getiremediği görülmektedir. Öyle ki, Heidegger, uzamsallık kavramını Dasein’ın fiziksel bedenini görmezden gelme pahasına yapılandırmaktadır. Heidegger’in Dasein’ın bedensel doğasını görmezden gelen tavrının, (Kartezyen) öznellik kavramına yer açarak kendi felsefi projesiyle çelişmek istememesinden kaynaklanabileceği öne sürülecektir. Ancak, Dasein’ın maddesel yokluğu, eninde sonunda Heidegger’i temelde uzamsal olmayan kavramları – aşinalık ve dikkat gibi - uzamsal olarak ele almaya yönlendirmektedir. Bu durum ise, Heidegger’in uzamsallık izahatinin kışkırtıcılığının yanı sıra yetersizliğine de dikkat çekmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Etik Siyasi Bilimler Beşeri Bilimler Sosyoloji Bilim Felsefesi ve Tarihi Felsefe Edebi Teori ve Eleştiri
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AHO, K. A. (2009): Heidegger’s Neglect of the Body. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
  • ALWEISS, L. (2003): The World Unclaimed: A Challenge to Heidegger’s Critique of Husserl. Ohio: Ohio University Press.
  • CERBONE, D. (2013): Heidegger on Space and Spatiality. The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time. (Mark A. Wrathall, Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • DREYFUS, H. (1991): Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge and Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • HEIDEGGER, M. (1962): Being and Time. (John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, Trans). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
  • HEIDEGGER, M. (1978): Letter on Humanism. Basic Writings. (David Farrell Krell, Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
  • HEIDEGGER, M. (2001): Zollikon Seminars: Protocols – Conversations – Letters. (Medard Boss, Ed., Franz Mayr, Richard Askay, Trans.). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
  • LEVINAS, E. (1969): Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. (Alphonso Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
  • MALPAS, J. (2006): Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge and Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • MITCHELL, A. J. (2010): Heidegger Among the Sculptors: Body, Space and the Art of Dwelling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • MULHALL, S. (1996): Heidegger and Being and Time. London and New York: Routledge Press.
  • POLT, R. (1999): Heidegger: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge Press.
  • SARTRE, J. P. (2001): Existentialism and Humanism. Jean-Paul Sartre: Basic Writings, (Stephen Priest, Ed.). London and New York: Routledge Press.
  • VALLEGA, A. A. (2003): Heidegger and the Issue of Space: Thinking On Exilic Grounds. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
APA Keki B (2016). ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. , 315 - 332.
Chicago Keki Başak ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. (2016): 315 - 332.
MLA Keki Başak ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. , 2016, ss.315 - 332.
AMA Keki B ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. . 2016; 315 - 332.
Vancouver Keki B ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. . 2016; 315 - 332.
IEEE Keki B "ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME." , ss.315 - 332, 2016.
ISNAD Keki, Başak. "ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME". (2016), 315-332.
APA Keki B (2016). ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), 11(22), 315 - 332.
Chicago Keki Başak ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 11, no.22 (2016): 315 - 332.
MLA Keki Başak ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), vol.11, no.22, 2016, ss.315 - 332.
AMA Keki B ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi). 2016; 11(22): 315 - 332.
Vancouver Keki B ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi). 2016; 11(22): 315 - 332.
IEEE Keki B "ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME." FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), 11, ss.315 - 332, 2016.
ISNAD Keki, Başak. "ON SPATIALITY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BODY IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME". FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 11/22 (2016), 315-332.