Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Begüm SATICI, (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Psikolojik Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Mehmet Engin DENİZ (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Psikolojik Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
6 3
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 1077 - 1095 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 14-02-2020

Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Öz:
Cinsiyetin ilişki doyumu üzerindeki rolüne ilişkin alanyazında tutarsız sonuçların olduğugörülmektedir. Bu çalışma ile cinsiyetin romantik ilişki doyumu üzerindeki rolünü meta-analiz yöntemiyleile ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda öncelikle literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiş ve 548çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. Ardından dâhil etme kriterleriyle çalışmalar ele alınmış ve kriterleri karşılayan 67bağımsız çalışmaya ait 95 etki büyüklüğü ile meta-analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Meta-analizde 289.708örneklem sayısına ulaşılmıştır (163.058 kadın ve 126.650 erkek). Meta-analiz sonucunda; romantik ilişkidoyumunun cinsiyete göre anlamlı farklılaşmadığı tespit edilmiştir [k = 95, d = -.007, %95GA (-.03, .02), p> .05]. Moderatörlük analizi bulgularına göre cinsiyet ile romantik ilişki doyumu bağlantısında bireyci vekolektif kültürün düzenleyici bir role sahip olmadığı saptanmıştır [Qb(1) = .003, p > .05]. Tüm bu bulgularneticesinde; kadınların ve erkeklerin romantik ilişki doyum düzeylerinin birbirlerine yakın oldukları ifadeedilebilir. Çalışmanın bulguları ilgili alanyazın çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve sınırlıklar ile önerilersunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Gender Differences in Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis Study

Öz:
The literature on male–female differences in relationship satisfaction has produced inconsistent results regarding the strength and direction of this relationship. To address this issue, a meta-analysis was conducted to examine the direction and magnitude of gender differences in romantic relationship satisfaction. Systematic review and meta-analysis was reached 548 studies by literature search. Then, the inclusion criteria were considered and meta-analysis was performed with 95 effect sizes for 67 independent studies that met the criteria. These studies included a total of 289.708 participants (163.058 female and 126.650 male). Meta-analysis indicated that romantic relationship satisfaction did not differ significantly according to gender [k = 95, d = -.007, %95GA (-.03, .02), p > .05]. The culture was found to have no moderator effect between sex and relationship satisfaction [Qb(1) = .003, p > .05]. In the light of all these findings; it can be said that the romantic relationship satisfaction levels of women and men are similar to each other. The findings of the study were discussed with the related literature and the limitations and suggestions were presented.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abakay, A. (2015). Romantic relationship satisfaction as predicted by perceived family of origin experiences and education. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Syracuse University.
  • Ackerman, J. M. (2012). The relevance of relationship satisfaction and continuation to the gender symmetry debate. Journal of interpersonal Violence, 27(18), 3579-3600.
  • Ackerman, J., & Field, L. (2011). The gender asymmetric effect of intimate partner violence on relationship satisfaction. Violence and Victims, 26(6), 703-724.
  • Altınok, A. (2014). Genç yetişkinlerin romantik ilişki doyumları ile anne-baba çatışmasını algılamaları arasındaki ilişkide problem çözme tarzları ve ilişkilere yönelik akılcı olmayan inançların aracı rolü. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi.
  • Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone Together, How Marriage in America Is Changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Backes, S., Brandstätter, V., Kuster, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Bradbury, T. N., Bodenmann, G., & Sutter-Stickel, D. (2017). Who suffers from stress? Action-state orientation moderates the effect of external stress on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 894-914.
  • Basow, M. A. (2013). The role of sexual satisfaction in couple relationship satisfaction, individual stress, and quality of life. The City University of New York.
  • Berg, E. C., Trost, M., Schneider, I. E., & Allison, M. T. (2001). Dyadic exploration of the relationship of leisure satisfaction, leisure time, and gender to relationship satisfaction. Leisure Sciences, 23(1), 35-46.
  • Beştav, F. G. (2007). Romantik ilişki doyumu ile cinsiyet, bağlanma stilleri, rasyonel olmayan inançlar ve aşka ilişkin tutumlar arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi
  • Biehle, S. N., & Mickelson, K. D. (2011). Worries in expectant parents: Its relation with perinatal well‐being and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 697-713.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to MetaAnalysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
  • Bower, D., Jia, R., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Mangelsdorf, S. C., & Brown, G. L. (2013). Trajectories of couple relationship satisfaction in families with infants: The roles of parent gender, personality, and depression in first-time and experienced parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(4), 389-409.
  • Bradbury, T N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. 2000. Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 62, 964-980.
  • Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Longitudinal and behavioral analysis of masculinity and femininity in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 328-341.
  • Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Longitudinal and behavioral analysis of masculinity and femininity in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 328-341.
  • Brewster, K. (2013). Openness and relationship satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kean University
  • Bunt, S., & Hazelwood, Z. J. (2017). Walking the walk, talking the talk: Love languages, self‐regulation, and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 280-290.
  • Burgess, M. F. (2004). Romantic love and relationship satisfaction: The roles of attachment, caregiving and sexuality. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. The Unıversıty of New Brunswıck.
  • Büyükşahin, A. (2005). Çokboyutlu İlişki Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16(2), 97-105.
  • Calmes, C. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2008). Rumination in interpersonal relationships: Does co-rumination explain gender differences in emotional distress and relationship satisfaction among college students?. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(4), 577-590.
  • Cederblad, M., Engsheden, N., Ghaderi, A., Enebrink, P., Engvall, G., Nevéus, T., & Sarkadi, A. (2016). No Difference in Relationship Satisfaction Between Parents of Children with Enuresis and Normative Data. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(4), 1345-1351.
  • Coates-Vallée, L. I. (2007). Comparative relationship satisfaction of individuals in same-versus mixedethnicity, French-Canadian English-Canadian, dual-career, professional, heterosexual couples in Ontario. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fielding Graduate University.
  • Conradi, H. J., Noordhof, A., Dingemanse, P., Barelds, D. P., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2017). Actor and partner effects of attachment on relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction across the genders: An APIM Approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(4), 700-716.
  • Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and metaanalysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Cunningham, J. E. (2007). The association between psychopathological symptoms and relationship satisfaction: Direct effect and mediation through partner cognitions. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Maryland.
  • Curtis, D. S., Epstein, N. B., & Wheeler, B. (2017). Relationship satisfaction mediates the link between partner aggression and relationship dissolution: The importance of considering severity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(8), 1187-1208.
  • Çelen-Demirtaş, S. (2010). The role of gender, relationship status, romantic relationship satisfaction, and commitment to career choices in the components of subjective well-being among senior university students. Unpublished Masters Dissertation. Graduate School Of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University. Turkey.
  • Davidson, B. (1984). A test of equity theory for marital adjustment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 36-42.
  • Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391-406.
  • Edelstein, R. S., van Anders, S. M., Chopik, W. J., Goldey, K. L., & Wardecker, B. M. (2014). Dyadic associations between testosterone and relationship quality in couples. Hormones and Behavior, 65(4), 401-407.
  • Erol, R. Y., & Orth, U. (2014). Development of self-esteem and relationship satisfaction in couples: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental psychology, 50(9), 2291-2303.
  • Fabes, R. A., & Martin, C. L. (1991). Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 532-540.
  • Falconier, M. K. (2005). Economic strain, friends' support, and relationship satisfaction in Argentinean Couples: Paths of influence and gender differences. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Maryland.
  • Falconier, M. K., & Epstein, N. B. (2010). Relationship satisfaction in Argentinean couples under economic strain: Gender differences in a dyadic stress model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(6), 781-799.
  • Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. H. (2006). Relationship Satisfaction. İçinde A. L. Vangelisti, D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (ss. 579-594). New York, NY US: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 630–649.
  • Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20-36.
  • Fowers, B. J. (1991). His and her marriage: A multivariate study of gender and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24(3/4), 209-221.
  • Harper, J. M., & Elliott, M. L. (1988). Can there be too much of a good thing? The relationship between desired level of intimacy and marital adjustment. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 351-360.
  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2002). Passionate love and sexual desire: Cross-cultural and historical perspectives. İçinde A. Vangelisti, H. T. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (ss. 306-324). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haugen, P. T., Welsh, D. P., & McNulty, J. K. (2008). Empathic accuracy and adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 31(6), 709-727.
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal Of Marriage And The Family, 50(1), 93-98.
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1995). Close relationships: What couple therapists can learn. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta analyses. Bmj, 327(7414), 557-560.
  • Hill, M. T. (2009). Intimacy, passion, commitment, physical affection and relationship stage as related to romantic relationship satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Oklahoma State University.
  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Holm, K. E., Werner-Wilson, R. J., Cook, A. S., & Berger, P. S. (2001). The association between emotion work balance and relationship satisfaction of couples seeking therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 193-205.
  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 239-244.
  • Hromatko, I., Bajoghli, H., Rebernjak, B., Joshaghani, N., & Tadinac, M. (2015). Relationship satisfaction as a function of mate value. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 242-256.
  • Kail, R. V., & Cavanuagh, J. C. (2015). Human Development: A Life-Span View (7th Ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Katz, J., Kuffel, S. W., & Coblentz, A. (2002). Are there gender differences in sustaining dating violence? An examination of frequency, severity, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 17(3), 247-271.
  • Kaura, S. A., & Lohman, B. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6), 367-381.
  • Kershaw, T., Murphy, A., Lewis, J., Divney, A., Albritton, T., Magriples, U., & Gordon, D. (2014). Family and relationship influences on parenting behaviors of young parents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(2), 197-203.
  • Lavalekar, A., Kulkarni, P., & Jagtap, P. (2007). Gender wise comparison on emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction. Gender and Behaviour, 5(2), 1388-1405.
  • Lee, C. E. (2016). Body image and relationship satisfaction among couples: The role of perceived partner appearance evaluations and sexual satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Windsor.
  • Lee, C. M. (2017). The impact of text messaging dependence on relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships and the role of attachment. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Alliant International University.
  • Lesch, E., & Engelbrecht, S. K. (2011). Relationship satisfaction and gender differences in a South African farm-worker community. South African Review of Sociology, 42(1), 58-77.
  • Li, P. F., & Johnson, L. N. (2018). Couples’ depression and relationship satisfaction: examining the moderating effects of demand/withdraw communication patterns. Journal of Family Therapy, 40(S1), 63-85.
  • Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Jackson, T. (2017). Towards explaining relationship dissatisfaction in Chinese dating couples: Relationship disillusionment, emergent distress, or insecure attachment style?. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 42-48.
  • Mark, K. P., & Murray, S. H. (2012). Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 38(2), 198-215.
  • McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88-95.
  • McGlade, E. C. (2008). Relationship status and relationship satisfaction: The importance of complementarity. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Idaho State University.
  • McLeland, K. C. (2010). Couples' forgiveness and relationship satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Regent University.
  • McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 85-97.
  • Melkonyan, A. (2013). The relationship between differentiation of self, biculturalism and committed relationship satisfaction in Armenian Americans. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Alliant International University.
  • Meyers, L. L. (2006). The role of attachment style, gender, and relationship history in romantic relationship satisfaction and partner selection. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of South Carolina.
  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Sex differences in distress: Real or artifact? American Sociological Review, 60, 449-468.
  • Molina, A. B. (2001). The function of gender, ethnicity, acculturation and gender-role attitudes with relationship satisfaction among Latino and Euro-American college students. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Oregon.
  • Munk, A. C. (2000). Relationship satisfaction and stability among Latinos with respect to communication styles and conflict resolution types. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Utah State University.
  • Neto, F., & da Conceição Pinto, M. (2015). Satisfaction with love life across the adult life span. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(2), 289-304. Ogletree, S. M. (2010). With this ring, I thee wed: Relating gender roles and love styles to attitudes towards engagement rings and weddings. Gender Issues, 27, 67-77.
  • Öztürk, A. (2015). Bireylerin sosyal medya kullanım davranışları ile ilişki doyumu düzeyi arasındak bağlantıların değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans. Üskadar Üniversitesi.
  • Paap, C. E. (2010). Body image disturbance as a predictive factor of relationship satisfaction among college students. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. University of Colorado at Denver.
  • Peterson, C. C. (1990). Husbands’ and wives’ perceptions of marital fairness across the family life cycle. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31, 179-188.
  • Proulx, C.M., Helms, H.M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576-593.
  • Rodrigues, D., Lopes, D., & Pereira, M. (2016). “We agree and now everything goes my way”: Consensual sexual nonmonogamy, extradyadic sex, and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(6), 373-379.
  • Rodriguez, A., Ratanasiripong, P., Hayashino, D., & Locks, A. (2014). The effects of attachment and acculturation on Latino college students’ relationship satisfaction with a close friend. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 13(4), 323-333.
  • Rodriguez, L. M., & Neighbors, C. (2015). An interdependent look at perceptions of spousal drinking problems and marital outcomes. Alcohol, 49(6), 597-605.
  • Rosen, N. O., Bailey, K., & Muise, A. (2018). Degree and direction of sexual desire discrepancy are linked to sexual and relationship satisfaction in couples transitioning to parenthood. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(2), 214-225.
  • Rosen, N. O., Muise, A., Bergeron, S., Delisle, I., & Baxter, M. L. (2015). Daily associations between partner responses and sexual and relationship satisfaction in couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia. The journal of sexual medicine, 12(4), 1028-1039.
  • Røysamb, E., Vittersø, J., & Tambs, K. (2014). The Relationship Satisfaction Scale-psychometric properties. Norsk Epidemiologi, 24(1-2), 187-194.
  • Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal Of Social And Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175-204.
  • Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2015). Felt security in daily interactions as a mediator of the effect of attachment on relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 187-200.
  • Sadikaj, G., Rappaport, L. M., Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C., Koestner, R., & Powers, T. (2015). Consequences of interpersonal spin on couple-relevant goal progress and relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 722-737.
  • Sakallı-Ugurlu, N. (2003). How do romantic relationship satisfaction, gender stereotypes, and gender relate to future time orientation in romantic relationships?. The Journal of Psychology, 137(3), 294-303.
  • Santtila, P., Wager, I., Witting, K., Harlaar, N., Jern, P., Johansson, A. D. A., ... & Sandnabba, N. K. (2007). Discrepancies between sexual desire and sexual activity: Gender differences and associations with relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 34(1), 31-44.
  • Satıcı, S. A. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin affetme, intikam, sosyal bağlılık ve öznel iyi oluşları: Farklı yapısal modellerin denenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  • Shinne, E. D. (2017). The relationship between sexual objectification and self-objectification, adult romantic attachment, and relationship satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Detroit Mercy.
  • Sigelman, C. K., & Rider, E. A. (2017). Life-span human development (9th Ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
  • Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self reports of feelings and expressive behavior? American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1137–1176
  • Smith, J. R. (2008). Ethnic identity and relationship satisfaction among African American heterosexual couples. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Maryland.
  • Sprecher, S., & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of Earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 46, 131-147.
  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.
  • Vera Cruz, G. (2014). The Effect of Sex Knowledge, Parent–Child Attachment, and Family Characteristics on Intimate Relationship Satisfaction of Mozambican Students. Sexuality & Culture, 18(1), 1-15.
  • Whitton, S. W., & Kuryluk, A. D. (2012). Relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms in emerging adults: Cross-sectional associations and moderating effects of relationship characteristics. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(2), 226-235.
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
APA SATICI B, DENİZ M (2018). Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. , 1077 - 1095.
Chicago SATICI Begum,DENİZ Mehmet Engin Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. (2018): 1077 - 1095.
MLA SATICI Begum,DENİZ Mehmet Engin Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. , 2018, ss.1077 - 1095.
AMA SATICI B,DENİZ M Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. . 2018; 1077 - 1095.
Vancouver SATICI B,DENİZ M Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. . 2018; 1077 - 1095.
IEEE SATICI B,DENİZ M "Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması." , ss.1077 - 1095, 2018.
ISNAD SATICI, Begum - DENİZ, Mehmet Engin. "Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması". (2018), 1077-1095.
APA SATICI B, DENİZ M (2018). Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 17(2), 1077 - 1095.
Chicago SATICI Begum,DENİZ Mehmet Engin Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 17, no.2 (2018): 1077 - 1095.
MLA SATICI Begum,DENİZ Mehmet Engin Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), vol.17, no.2, 2018, ss.1077 - 1095.
AMA SATICI B,DENİZ M Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2018; 17(2): 1077 - 1095.
Vancouver SATICI B,DENİZ M Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2018; 17(2): 1077 - 1095.
IEEE SATICI B,DENİZ M "Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması." İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 17, ss.1077 - 1095, 2018.
ISNAD SATICI, Begum - DENİZ, Mehmet Engin. "Cinsiyetin Romantik İlişki Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması". İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 17/2 (2018), 1077-1095.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
03-04-2024 11:0

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları