Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1003 - 1018 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.30831/akukeg.407289 İndeks Tarihi: 15-02-2020
Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme
Öz: Çevrimiçi öğrenme aynı anda büyük kitlelere ulaşmada, eğitim-öğretim faaliyetleri yürütmede etkili, hızlı veverimli çözümler sunabilmektedir. Birbirinden farklı özelliklere sahip katılımcıların bulunduğu bu ortamlardabireylere çeşitlendirilmiş olsa da ideal kullanıcı varsayımına göre içerik türleri sunulmaktadır. Oysaki her bireydoğuştan getirdiği ve sonradan kazandığı bir takım özelliklere sahiptir. Bu bireysel farklılıklar da öğrenmeortamlarında etkili öğrenme deneyimleri sağlayabilmek adına önemlidir. Bu bağlamda alanyazın incelendiğinde debireysel farklılıkları odağına alan birçok e-öğrenme çalışması olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmalarda kişiliközellikleri, bilişsel özellikler, geçmiş öğrenme deneyimleri gibi sıralanabilen bu değişkenlerin bireylerin akademikbaşarılarına, motivasyonlarına, katılım düzeylerine ve sistemde kalmalarına olan etkileri ve aralarındaki ilişkilerincelenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı sistematik bir alanyazın taraması gerçekleştirilerek, 2010-2017 yıllarıarasında yayınlanan çalışmalara konu olan bireysel farklılıkların belirlenmesi ve bu farklılıkların hangi değişkenlerleincelendiğinin ortaya konulmasıdır. Bu kapsamda belirlenen alanyazın tarama kriterlerine göre (anahtar kelimeler,seçim kriterleri, yöntem) ISI Web of Knowledge, Ebscohost, Scopus ve JSTOR veritabanlarında taramalargerçekleştirilmiş olup 38 makale çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Öne çıkan bulgular bireysel farklılıklar bağlamındabilişsel özelliklerin diğer değişkenlere oranla daha az incelendiğini gösterirken en fazla incelenen değişkenlerindemografik değişkenler ve kişilik özellikleri oldukları bulunmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
A Systematic Review of Online Learning Researches in the Context of Individual Differences
Öz: Online learning has been offering practical, efficient and effective solutions for reaching out big groups of learners in terms of learning and education. In these environments, where the participants have distinct properties, although the contents have been diversified, it has been represented with the assumption of ideal user. These environments consist many people who have very distinct properties from each other. Even if the presented content has been diversified, mostly it is designed for the ideal user. However, every person has some individual characteristics, which can be natal and acquired in time. These individual differences are important in order to provide effective learning experiences in learning environments. In this context when the e-learning studies analyzed it can be seen that there are several studies, which focused on individual differences. In these studies, the effects of the variables such as personal traits, cognitive characteristics, and prior learning experiences on individuals’ academic success, motivation, participation levels, and staying on system, and the relationships had been analyzed. The main objective of this study is conducting a systematic review with the aim of identifying which individual differences studied and their relationships with other variables between 2010-2017 years. In this context, researcher defined review criteria (keywords, selection criteria, method) and conducted review process. According to search results, 38 research articles have been included in this study. Prominent results show that cognitive differences have been worked less in comparison with the other variables in terms of individual differences perspective, while the most worked variables are demographic variables and personal traits.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Accuray Research LLP. (2017). Global e-learning market analysis & trends - Industry forecast to 2025. Retrieved from https://www.researchandmarkets. com/ research/qgq5vf/global_elearning.
- Al-Dujaily, A., Kim, J., & Ryu, H. (2013). Am i extravert or introvert? Considering the personality effect toward e-learning system. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 14-27.
- Alhajri, R. A., Counsell, S., & Liu, X. (2013). Investigating attributes affecting the performance of WBI users. Computers & Education, 68, 117-128. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.003
- Chen, L. H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1028-1035. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.008
- Chen, Y. C. (2015). Linking learning styles and learning on mobile Facebook. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(2), 94- 114.
- Cho, M.H., Demei, S., & Laffey, J. (2010). Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297-316.
- Clay, M. N., Rowland, S., & Packard, A. (2009). Improving undergraduate online retention through gated advisement and redundant communication. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 93–102.
- Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2011). Mining learning preferences in web-based instruction: holists vs. serialists. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (4), 266–277.
- Cochran, J. D., Campbell, S. M., Baker, H. M., & Leeds, E. M. (2014). The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 27-48.
- Deborah, L. J., Baskaran, R., & Kannan, A. (2014). Learning styles assessment and theoretical origin in an e-learning scenario: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4), 801–819.
- Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C. V., & Tian-Lih, T. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414-427. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2014.06.011
- Fan-Ray, K., Gwo-Jen, H., Szu-Chuang, C., & Sherry, Y. C. (2012). A cognitive apprenticeship approach to facilitating web-based collaborative problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 319-331.
- Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
- Flores, R., Ari, F., Inan, F. A., & Arslan-Ari, I. (2012). The impact of adapting content for students with individual differences. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 251-261.
- Ghorbani, F., & Montazer, G. A. (2015). E-learners' personality identifying using their network behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(PA), 42-52. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.043
- Gonzalez-Gomez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodriguez, O. M., & Alonso, M. A. M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.017
- Gökçearslan, Ş., & Alper, A. (2015). The effect of locus of control on learners' sense of community and academic success in the context of online learning communities. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 64-73. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.003
- Granić, A., & Adams, R. (2011). User sensitive research in e-learning: Exploring the role of individual user characteristics. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10(3), 307-318. doi:10.1007/s10209-010-0207-7
- Grieve, R., Kemp, N., Norris, K., & Padgett, C. R. (2017). Push or pull? Unpacking the social compensation hypothesis of Internet use in an educational context. Computers & Education, 109, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.008
- Higgins, JPT, & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from http://handbook.cochrane.org.
- Hsia, J. W., Chang, C. C., & Tseng, A. H. (2014). Effects of individuals' locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(1), 51-64. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2012.702284
- IAl-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 1-23. doi:10.14742/ajet.2741
- Ilgaz, H., Altun, A., & Aşkar, P. (2014). The effect of sustained attention level and contextual cueing on implicit memory performance for e-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 39. 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.008
- Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–135.
- Jashapara, A., & Tai, W. C. (2011). Knowledge mobilization through e-learning systems: understanding the mediating roles of self-efficacy and anxiety on perceptions of ease of use. Information Systems Management, 28(1), 71-83. doi:10.1080/10580530.2011.536115
- Jraidi, I., & Frasson, C. (2013). Student’s uncertainty modeling through a multimodal sensor-based approach. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 219–230.
- Kanar, A. M., & Bell, B. S. (2013). Guiding learners through technology-based instruction: The effects of adaptive guidance design and individual differences on learning over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1067-1081.
- Keller, H., & Karau, S. J. (2013). The importance of personality in students' perceptions of the online learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2494-2500. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007
- Kirschner, P. A. & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169-183. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
- Kizilcec, R. F., Perez-Sanagustin, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593-618. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
- Lee, D. Y., & Shin, D.-H. (2011). Effects of spatial ability and richness of motion cue on learning in mechanically complex domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1665-1674. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.005
- Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185-204. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
- Lin, P.-C., Hou, H.-T., Wang, S.-M., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60(1), 110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.017
- López-Vargas, O., Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J., & Racines-Prada, O. (2017). Students metacognition and cognitive style and their effect on cognitive load and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 145-157.
- Lu, H.-P., & Chiou, M.-J. (2010). The impact of individual differences on e-learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 307-323. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00937.x
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
- McCrae, R. R. and John, O. P. (1992), An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 6494.1992.tb00970.x
- Nawrot, I., & Doucet, A. (2014). Building engagement for MOOC students: introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, 1077-1082.
- Norwich, B. (2002). Education, inclusion and individual differences: Recognising and resolving dilemmas. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 482-502. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00215
- Orvis, K. A., Brusso, R. C., Wasserman, M. E., & Fisher, S. L. (2011). E-nabled for elearning? The moderating role of personality in determining the optimal degree of learner control in an e-learning environment. Human Performance, 24(1), 60- 78. doi:10.1080/08959285.2010.530633
- Park, J.Y., & Choi, H.J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217.
- Poll, K., Widen, J., & Weller, S. (2014). Six instructional best practices for online engagement and retention. Journal of Online Doctoral Education, 1(1), 56- 72
- Price, L. (2004). Individual differences in learning: Cognitive control, cognitive style, and learning style. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 681-698. doi: 10.1080/0144341042000262971
- Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82-94. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010
- Randler, C., Horzum, M. B., & Vollmer, C. (2014). The influence of personality and chronotype on distance learning willingness and anxiety among vocational high school students in Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 93-110.
- Ren, Y., Dai, Z.-X., Zhao, X.-H., Fei, M.-M., & Gan, W.-T. (2017). Exploring an online course applicability assessment to assist learners in course selection and learning effectiveness improving in e-learning. Learning & Individual Differences, 60, 56-62. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.09.002
- Riding, R. (2005). Individual differences and educational performance. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 659-672. doi:10.1080/01443410500344712
- Rovai, A. P. (2001). Classroom community at a distance: A comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(2), 105- 118.
- Sabah, N. M. (2016). Exploring students' awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 522-533. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.009
- Sanchez-Franco, M. J., Peral-Peral, B., & Villarejo-Ramos, A. F. (2014). Users' intrinsic and extrinsic drivers to use a web-based educational environment. Computers & Education, 74, 81-97. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.001
- Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J. L., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Selfregulation of motivation when learning online: the importance of who, why and how. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 199-212.
- Schaeffer, C. E., & Konetes, G. D. (2010). Impact of learner engagement on attrition rates and student success in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(5), 3-9.
- Sheng-Wen, H. (2011). Effects of cognitive styles on an MSN virtual learning companion system as an adjunct to classroom instructions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 161-174.
- Sun, J. C.-Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2). 191–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2010.01157.x
- Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on elearning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 153-163. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020
- Tempelaar, D. T., Niculescu, A., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W. H., & Giesbers, B. (2012). How achievement emotions impact students' decisions for online learning, and what precedes those emotions. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.003
- Walkowiak, S., Foulsham, T., & Eardley, A. F. (2015). Individual differences and personality correlates of navigational performance in the virtual route learning task. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 402-410. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.041
- Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
- Wu, Y. (2016). Factors impacting students' online learning experience in a learnercentred course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 416-429. doi:10.1111/jcal.12142
| APA | ILGAZ H (2018). Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. , 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| Chicago | ILGAZ HALE Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. (2018): 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| MLA | ILGAZ HALE Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. , 2018, ss.1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| AMA | ILGAZ H Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. . 2018; 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| Vancouver | ILGAZ H Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. . 2018; 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| IEEE | ILGAZ H "Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme." , ss.1003 - 1018, 2018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| ISNAD | ILGAZ, HALE. "Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme". (2018), 1003-1018. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| APA | ILGAZ H (2018). Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 11(4), 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| Chicago | ILGAZ HALE Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi 11, no.4 (2018): 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| MLA | ILGAZ HALE Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, vol.11, no.4, 2018, ss.1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| AMA | ILGAZ H Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi. 2018; 11(4): 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| Vancouver | ILGAZ H Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi. 2018; 11(4): 1003 - 1018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| IEEE | ILGAZ H "Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme." Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 11, ss.1003 - 1018, 2018. 10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
| ISNAD | ILGAZ, HALE. "Bireysel Farklılıklar Kapsamında Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Araştırmalarına İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme". Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi 11/4 (2018), 1003-1018. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.407289 |
