Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 189 - 200 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-02-2020

Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey

Öz:
Due to its geostrategic position, security problems such as terrorism and illegal immigrationhave been experienced in southern Turkey so far. While Turkey uses UAVs to prevent thethreats that may come from this region, National Defense Ministry is planning to use alternativetechnologies such as Tethered Aerostats. Because of the high investment cost, a considerableplanning period is required before implementation of these systems. In this study; consideringproject budget, camera sensor capabilities, geographical analysis data and appropriatenessparameters of candidate locations, three scenarios are developed for the site selection problemof Aerostats on southern Turkey. Goal Programming approach including Set CoveringAlgorithm and fuzzy-TOPSIS is applied and the results are tested with Viewshed Analysis ofGIS. The study results present important recommendations for the probable success of TAs insouthern Turkey.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • URL: https://www.mgk.gov.tr/index.php, (2017).
  • URL: http://www.otonomteknoloji.com/tr.html, (2015).
  • Hakimi, S.L., “Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph”, Operations Research, 450-459, (1964).
  • Church, R. and Revelle, C., “The maximal covering location problem”, Papers, Regional Science Association, 32:101-118, (1974).
  • White, J. and Case, K., “On covering problems and the central facilities location problem”, Geographical Analysis, 6:281-293, (1974).
  • Gary, M.R. and Johnson, D.S., Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP Completeness, W.F.Freeman and Co., (1978).
  • Schilling, D.A., “Dynamic location modeling for multisector facilities: a multi-criteria approach”, Decision Science, 4:714-724, (1980).
  • Boeffey, B. and Narula, S.C., Multiobjective Covering and Routing Problems, Essays In Decision Making: A Voluma In Honor of Stanley Zionts, Springer, Berlin, (1997).
  • Megiddo, N., Zemel E. and Hakimi S.L., “The maximum coverage location problem”, SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 4(2):253-261, (1983).
  • Mehrez A. and Stulman A., “The maximal covering location problem with facility placement on the entire plane”, Journal of Regional Science, 22(3):361-365, (1982).
  • Schilling, D.A., Jayaraman V. and Barkhi R., “A review of covering problem in facility location”, Location Science, 1(1):25-55, (1993).
  • Farahani, R.Z., Asgari, N., Heidari, N., Hosseininia, M. and Goh, M., “Covering problems in facility location: a review”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 62:368-407, (2012).
  • Sherali, H.D, Kim, S. and Parrish, E.L., “Probabilistic partial set covering problem”, Naval Research Logistics, 38:41-51, (1991).
  • Galvao, R.D. and Revelle C., “A Lagrangean heuristic for the maximal covering location problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, 88:114-123, (1996).
  • Karasakal, O. and Karasakal E.K., “A maximal covering location model in the presence”, Computers and Operations Research, 31:1515-1526, (2004).
  • Revelle, C., Scholssberg, M. and Williams, J., “Solving the maximal covering location problem with heuristic concentration”, Computers and Operations Research, 35:427-435, (2008).
  • Paolo, D.O., Nicolette, R. and Antonino, S., “A multiperiod maximal covering location model for the optimal location of intersection safety cameras on an urban traffic network”, Social and Behavioral Science, 108:106-117, (2014).
  • Fowler, R.J., Paterson, M.S. and Tonimoto, S.L., “Optimal packing and covering in the plane are NPComplete.”, Information Processing Letters, 12(3):133-137, (1991).
  • Sarıkaya, H.A., “Determination of the Places of Gendarmerie Stations in Tourism Regions”, MSc.Thesis, TMA Defense Science Institute, Ankara, (2003).
  • Tanergüçlü, T., “Selection of 35 mm. Oerlikon Batterys' Optimum Positions at Air Defence of Fixed Points”, MSc.Thesis, TMA Defense Science Instıtute, Ankara, (2004).
  • Gencer, C. and Açıkgöz, A., “Reorganizing the location of Turkish Army Force SAR stations”, J. Fac. Eng. and Archit. Gazi Uni., 21(1):87-105, (2006).
  • Ayöperken, E. and Ermiş, M., “Modeling and optimizing the bases of UAVs as a set- coverage problem”, Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 5(1):61-71, (2010).
  • Carlığoğlu, S., “Relocation of the Turkish Naval Forces Shore Surveillance Radars in Aegean Sea”, MSc. Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, (2005).
  • Kress, M. and Royset, J.O., “Aerial Search Optimization Model (ASOM) for UAVs in Special Operations”, Ph.D. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, (2007).
  • Kurban, Ö.F. and Can, T., “Allocation of Mini UAVs for Urgent ISR request”, Ph.D. Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul, (2016).
  • Çetinkaya, C., Özceylan, E., Erbaş, M. and Kabak, M., “GIS-based fuzzy MCDA approach for siting refugee camp: a case study for southeastern Turkey”, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18:218-231, (2016).
  • Young-Hoon, K., Sanjay, R. and Steve, W., “Exploring multiple VA using terrain features and optimization techniques”, Computer and Geosciences, 30:1019-1032, (2004).
  • Hussein, M. and Schwartz, F.W., “Application of terrain analysis and GIS to the construction of hydrologic databases: a case study”, Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 3(4), 549-562, (1997).
  • Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1981).
  • Chen, C., “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114:1-9, (2000).
  • Kutlu, A.C. and Emekçioğlu, M., “Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSISbased fuzzy AHP”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1):61-67, (2012).
  • Delice, E.K., “A fuzzy multicriteria model for airline companies selection”, J. Fac. Eng. and Archit. Gazi Uni., 31(2):263-276, (2016).
  • Kılıç, O. and Çerçioğlu, H., “Application of compromise multiple criteria decision making methods for evaluation of TCDD's railway lines projects”, J. Fac. Eng. and Archit. Gazi Uni., 31(1):211-220, (2016).
  • Iç, Y.T., Tekin, M., Pamukoğlu, F.Z., and Yıldırım, S.E., “Development of a financial performance benchmarking model for corporate firms”, J. Fac. Eng. and Archit. Gazi Uni., 30(1):71-85, (2014).
  • Stimers, M. and Lenagala, S., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process in GIS-Driven Military Operation Base Selection: A Case Study in Sri Lanka”, Journal of Defense Management, 7:157, (2017).
  • Kahraman, C., Çevik, S., Ates, N.Y. and Gülbay, M., “Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 52:414–433, (2007).
  • Nadaban, S., Dzitac, S. and Dzitac, I., “Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view”, Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 91:823-831, (2016).
  • Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W., Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, (1961).
  • Gass, S.I., “A process for determining priorities and weights for large-scale linear Goal Programmes”, Journal of Operation Research Society, 37, 779-785, (1986).
  • Jones, D. and Tamiz, M., Practical Goal Programming, Springer, New York, (2010).
  • Özcan, E.C. and Erol, S., “A multi-objective mixed integer LP model for energy resource allocation problem: the case of Turkey”, J. Fac. Eng. and Archit. Gazi Uni., 27(4):1157-1168, (2014).
  • Karaman, B. and Çerçioğlu, H., “0-1 Goal programming aided AHP – VIKOR integrated method: an application of hospital investment project selection”, J. Fac. Eng. and Archit. Gazi Uni., 30(4):567- 576, (2015).
  • Farahani, R.Z., M.Steadie, S. and Asgari, N., “Multiple criteria facility location problems: a survey”, Applied Mathematical Modeling, 34:1689-1709, (2010).
  • Göçken, H. and Ağpak, K., “A Goal programming approach to simple U-line balancing problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, 171:577–585, (2006).
  • URL: http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm.html, (2016).
APA YILMAZ N, GENCER C (2018). Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. , 189 - 200.
Chicago YILMAZ Nahit,GENCER Cevriye Temel Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. (2018): 189 - 200.
MLA YILMAZ Nahit,GENCER Cevriye Temel Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. , 2018, ss.189 - 200.
AMA YILMAZ N,GENCER C Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. . 2018; 189 - 200.
Vancouver YILMAZ N,GENCER C Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. . 2018; 189 - 200.
IEEE YILMAZ N,GENCER C "Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey." , ss.189 - 200, 2018.
ISNAD YILMAZ, Nahit - GENCER, Cevriye Temel. "Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey". (2018), 189-200.
APA YILMAZ N, GENCER C (2018). Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science, 31(1), 189 - 200.
Chicago YILMAZ Nahit,GENCER Cevriye Temel Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science 31, no.1 (2018): 189 - 200.
MLA YILMAZ Nahit,GENCER Cevriye Temel Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol.31, no.1, 2018, ss.189 - 200.
AMA YILMAZ N,GENCER C Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2018; 31(1): 189 - 200.
Vancouver YILMAZ N,GENCER C Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2018; 31(1): 189 - 200.
IEEE YILMAZ N,GENCER C "Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey." Gazi University Journal of Science, 31, ss.189 - 200, 2018.
ISNAD YILMAZ, Nahit - GENCER, Cevriye Temel. "Where To Locate Tethered Aerostats for an Effective Surveillance System: A Case Study on Southern Turkey". Gazi University Journal of Science 31/1 (2018), 189-200.