Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 416 - 435 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-02-2020

Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions

Öz:
Optimal solution of a desired optimization problem is mostly obtained via minimizing ormaximizing a real function considering several predefined limitations. Selection of properoptimization algorithm as an optimizer tool plays a key role on the solution process. In thisrespect, current study intends to compare the performances of two different prevalentmetaheuristic optimization algorithms. These are integrated particle swarm optimizer (iPSO)and teaching and learning based optimizer (TLBO). The former method is a single-phasealgorithm while the latter one is the double-phase algorithm. Capabilities of both algorithmswere compared separately on some mathematical benchmark test problems. Furthermore, toexhibit and compare their performance on solving more complex problems, size and topologyoptimization of the structural systems are also examined. Achieved results demonstrate thesuperiority of iPSO in comparison with TLBO in both search capability and convergence rate.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Örkcü, H.H., Doğan, M.İ., Örkcü, M., “A hybrid applied optimization algorithm for training multilayer neural networks in data classification”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 28(1): 15-32, (2015).
  • Ozsoy, V.S., Orkcu, H., “Estimating the parameters of nonlinear regression models through particle swarm optimization”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 29: 187-99, (2016).
  • Satman, M.H., “Machine coded genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization problems”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 26: 85-95, (2013).
  • Mortazavi, A., Toğan, V., “Simultaneous size, shape, and topology optimization of truss structures using integrated particle swarm optimizer”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 54(7): 15- 36, (2016).
  • Dede, T., Togan, V., “A teaching learning based optimization for truss structures with frequency constraints”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 53(8): 33-45, (2015).
  • Mortazavi A, Toğan V. “Particle Swarm Optimizer integrated with fly-back mechanism and weighted particle for optimization of the truss structures”. Proceedings of 11st International congress on advances in civil engineering. Istanbul, Turkey, (2014).
  • Miguel, L.F.F., Lopez, R.H., Miguel, L.F.F., “Multimodal size, shape, and topology optimisation of truss structures using the Firefly algorithm”, Advances in Engineering Software, 56: 23-37, (2013).
  • Sonmez, M., “Discrete optimum design of truss structures using artificial bee colony algorithm”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43: 85-97, (2011).
  • Gökdaǧ, H., “A crack identification method for beam type structures subject to moving vehicle using particle swarm optimization”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 26(4): 39-48, (2013).
  • Türkşen, Ö., “Optimization and decision making stages for multiple responses: An application of NSGA-II and FCM clustering algorithm”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 28(3): 21-30 (2015).
  • Aydoğdu, İ., Akın, A., Saka, M.P., “Design optimization of real world steel space frames using artificial bee colony algorithm with Levy flight distribution”, Advances in Engineering Software, 92: 1-14, (2016).
  • Lamberti, L., “An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for design optimization of truss structures”, Computers & Structures, 86(19): 36-53, (2008).
  • Hasançebi, O., “Adaptive evolution strategies in structural optimization: Enhancing their computational performance with applications to large-scale structures”, Computers & Structures, 86(1): 19-32, (2008).
  • Camp, C., “Design of Space Trusses Using Big Bang–Big Crunch Optimization”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 133: 999-1008, (2007).
  • Achtziger, W., Stolpe, M., “Global optimization of truss topology with discrete bar areas—Part II: Implementation and numerical results”, Computational Optimization and Applications, 44(3): 15-41, (2007).
  • Camp, C., Bichon, B., “Design of Space Trusses Using Ant Colony Optimization”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(7): 41-51, (2004).
  • Noilublao, N., Bureerat, S., “Simultaneous Topology, Shape, and Sizing Optimisation of Plane Trusses with Adaptive Ground Finite Elements Using MOEAs”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013: 1-9, (2013).
  • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R., “Particle swarm optimization”, Neural Networks, 1995 Proceedings, IEEE International Conference , 4: 1942-1948, (1995).
  • Mortazavi, A., Toğan, V., “Simultaneous size, shape, and topology optimization of truss structures using integrated particle swarm optimizer”,Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1-22, (2016).
  • Rao, R.V., Savsani, V.J., Vakharia, D.P., “Teaching–learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems”, Computer-Aided Design, 43(30): 3-15, (2011).
  • Camp, C.V., Farshchin, M., “Design of space trusses using modified teaching–learning based optimization”, Engineering Structures, 62–63: 87-97, (2014).
  • Toğan, V., Mortazavi, A., “Sizing optimization of skeletal structures using teaching-learning based optimization”, Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, 7: 130-142, (2017).
  • Savsani, V.J., Tejani, G.G., Patel, V.K., “Truss topology optimization with static and dynamic constraints using modified subpopulation teaching–learning-based optimization”, Engineering Optimization, 48(11): 1990-2006, (2016).
  • Pickard, J.K., Carretero, J.A., Bhavsar, V.C., “On the convergence and origin bias of the TeachingLearning-Based-Optimization algorithm”, Applied Soft Computing, 46: 115-27, (2016).
  • Mortazavi, A., Togan, V., Daloğlu, A., “Investigation of the effect of teaching factor on optimization process”. Proceedings of International congress on advances in civil engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, (2016).
  • Rao, R.V., Waghmare, G.G., “Complex constrained design optimisation using an elitist teachinglearning-based optimisation algorithm”, International Journal of Metaheuristics, 3: 81-102, (2014).
  • Lim, W.H., Mat Isa, N.A., “Teaching and peer-learning particle swarm optimization”, Applied Soft Computing, 18: 39-58, (2014).
  • Degertekin, S.O., Hayalioglu, M.S., “Sizing truss structures using teaching-learning-based optimization”, Computers & Structures, 119(1): 77-88, (2013).
  • Toğan, V., “Design of planar steel frames using Teaching–Learning Based Optimization”, Engineering Structures, 34(2): 25-32, (2012).
  • Črepinšek, M., Liu, S.H., Mernik, L., “A note on teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm”, Information Sciences, 212: 79-93, (2012).
  • Mortazavi, A., Toğan, V., Nuhoğlu, A., “An integrated particle swarm optimizer for optimization of truss structures with discrete variables”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 61(3): 59-70, (2017).
  • Mortazavi, A., Toğan, V., “Sizing and layout design of truss structures under dynamic and static constraints with an integrated particle swarm optimization algorithm”, Applied Soft Computing, 51(2): 39-52, (2017).
  • Mortazavi, A., Togan, V., “Weight minimization of truss structures with sizing and layout variables using integrated particle swarm optimizer”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(8): 985-1001, (2017).
  • Lim, W.H., Mat Isa, N.A., “An adaptive two-layer particle swarm optimization with elitist learning strategy”, Information Sciences, 273: 49-72, (2014).
  • Li, N.J., Wang, W.J., James Hsu, C.C., Chang, W., Chou, H.G., Chang, J.W., “Enhanced particle swarm optimizer incorporating a weighted particle”. Neurocomputing, 124(2): 18-27, (2014).
  • Fan, Q., Yan, X., “Self-adaptive particle swarm optimization with multiple velocity strategies and its application for p-Xylene oxidation reaction process optimization”, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 139: 15-25, (2014).
  • Elsayed, S.M., Sarker, R.A., Mezura-Montes, E., “Self-adaptive mix of particle swarm methodologies for constrained optimization”. Information Sciences, 277(2): 16-33, (2014).
  • He, S., Prempain, E., Wu, Q.H., “An improved particle swarm optimizer for mechanical design optimization problems”, Engineering Optimization, 36: 585-605, (2004).
  • Deb, K., Gulati, S., “Design of truss-structures for minimum weight using genetic algorithms”, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 37(4): 47-65, (2001).
  • Suganthan, P.N., Hansen, N., Liang, J.J., Deb, K., Chen, Y., Auger, A., “Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2005 special session on real-parameter optimization”, Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, May 2005 AND KanGAL Report 2005005, IIT Kanpur, India, (2005).
  • Tang, K., Li, Z., Luo, L., Liu, B., “Multi-strategy adaptive particle swarm optimization for numerical optimization”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 37: 9-19, (2015).
  • Hajela, P., Lee, E. “Genetic algorithms in truss topological optimization”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 32(33):3341-57, (1995).
  • Ringertz, U.T., “On topology optimization of trusses”, Engineering Optimization, 9(2): 09-18, (1985).
APA MORTAZAVİ A, Toğan V, DALOĞLU A, NUHOĞLU A (2018). Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. , 416 - 435.
Chicago MORTAZAVİ Ali,Toğan Vedat,DALOĞLU Ayşe,NUHOĞLU Ayhan Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. (2018): 416 - 435.
MLA MORTAZAVİ Ali,Toğan Vedat,DALOĞLU Ayşe,NUHOĞLU Ayhan Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. , 2018, ss.416 - 435.
AMA MORTAZAVİ A,Toğan V,DALOĞLU A,NUHOĞLU A Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. . 2018; 416 - 435.
Vancouver MORTAZAVİ A,Toğan V,DALOĞLU A,NUHOĞLU A Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. . 2018; 416 - 435.
IEEE MORTAZAVİ A,Toğan V,DALOĞLU A,NUHOĞLU A "Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions." , ss.416 - 435, 2018.
ISNAD MORTAZAVİ, Ali vd. "Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions". (2018), 416-435.
APA MORTAZAVİ A, Toğan V, DALOĞLU A, NUHOĞLU A (2018). Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science, 31(2), 416 - 435.
Chicago MORTAZAVİ Ali,Toğan Vedat,DALOĞLU Ayşe,NUHOĞLU Ayhan Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science 31, no.2 (2018): 416 - 435.
MLA MORTAZAVİ Ali,Toğan Vedat,DALOĞLU Ayşe,NUHOĞLU Ayhan Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol.31, no.2, 2018, ss.416 - 435.
AMA MORTAZAVİ A,Toğan V,DALOĞLU A,NUHOĞLU A Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2018; 31(2): 416 - 435.
Vancouver MORTAZAVİ A,Toğan V,DALOĞLU A,NUHOĞLU A Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2018; 31(2): 416 - 435.
IEEE MORTAZAVİ A,Toğan V,DALOĞLU A,NUHOĞLU A "Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions." Gazi University Journal of Science, 31, ss.416 - 435, 2018.
ISNAD MORTAZAVİ, Ali vd. "Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions". Gazi University Journal of Science 31/2 (2018), 416-435.