Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 17 - 31 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 19-02-2020

Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz

Öz:
Geometrideki kare, daire, üçgen gibi bilindik ve basit şekillerle tanımlanamayan, farklı ölçeklerden incelendiğinde kendine benzeme özelliğigösteren karmaşık yapılara ‘fraktal’ denmektedir. Fraktal boyut arttıkça incelenen yapının karmaşıklığı artmaktadır. Fraktal analiz;kolay ulaşılabilir olması, projeksiyon geometrisi ve radyodensite gibi değişkenlerden etkilenmemesi ve trabeküler iç yapı hakkındaobjektif veriler sunması gibi özellikleriyle son dönemlerde kullanımı gittikçe artan bir yöntemdir. Diş hekimliğinde fraktal analizkullanılarak; alveolar kemikte meydana gelen erken dönem periodontal değişiklerin saptanması, osteoporöza bağlı ortaya çıkanpatolojilerin tanısı, implant bölgelerine komşu kemik dokunun değerlendirilmesi ve temporomandibular eklem disfonksiyonubulunan hastalarda hastalığın şiddeti ile trabeküler kemik yapıdaki değişimlerin korelasyonunun incelendiği çok sayıda çalışmayapılmıştır. Benzer şekilde tıp alanında da mevcut hastalığın şiddeti ve ilerleyişi hakkında bilgi edinmede veya potansiyel birhastalığın teşhisinde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; fraktal analiz yönteminin tanımlanmasının yanı sıra tıpta ve dişhekimliğinde kullanım alanlarının sunulmasıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Fractal Analysis in Medicine and Dentistry

Öz:
It is called 'fractal' which is a complex structure which can not be identified with simple shapes such as squares, circles, triangles in geometry, and shows its own resemblance when examined from different scales. As the fractal size increases, the complexity of the structure is increased. Fractal analysis is an increasingly common method because of its ease of accessibility, not being affected by variables such as projection geometry and radiodensity and providing objective data on the trabecular internal structure. Using fractal analysis in dentistry, a large number of studies have been conducted to determine the early periodontal changes in the alveolar bone, diagnose of osteoporosis-related pathologies, evaluate the bone tissue adjacent to the implant regions and determine the correlation of the severity of the disease of the trabecular bone structure in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Similarly, it is also used in medicine to learn about the severity and progress of the disease ortodiagnose a potential disease. The purpose of this study is to describe the method of fractal analysis as well as the areas of use in medicine and dentistry
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Lopes R, Betrouni N. Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review. Med Image Anal 2009; 13: 634-649.
  • Geraets WGM, van der Stelt PF. Fractal properties of bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 144- 153.
  • Mandelbrot BB. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. 3th Ed., W.H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1982, 3- 468.
  • Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G. Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 2011; 39: 273-292.
  • Demirbaş AK, Ergün S, Güneri P, Aktener BO, Boyacıoğlu H. Mandibular bone changes in sickle cell anemia: fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 41-48.
  • Buckland-Wright JC, Lynch JA, Bird C. Microfocal Techniques in Quantitative Radiography: Measurement of Cancellous Bone Organization. Rheumatology 1996; 35: 18-22.
  • Buckland-Wright JC, Lynch JA, Rymer J, Fogelman I. Fractal signature analysis of macroradiographs measures trabecular organization in lumbar vertebrae of postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 54: 106-112.
  • Badwal RSS. The application of fractal dimension to temporomandibular joint sounds. Comput Biol Med 1993; 23: 1-14.
  • Lynch JA, Hawkes DJ, Buckland-Wright JC. Analysis of texture in macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees using the fractal signature. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36: 709-722.
  • Weibel ER. Fractal geometry: a design principle for living organisms. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 1991; 261: 361-369.
  • Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG. Fractal dimension on dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 270-275.
  • White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 628-635.
  • Oliveira ML, Nascimento EF, Cruz AD, ve ark. Relationship between bone mineral density and trabecular bone pattern in postmenopausal osteoporotic Brazilian women. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 17: 1847-1853.
  • Ergün S, Saraçoğlu A, Güneri P, Özpınar B. Application of fractal analysis in hyperparathyroidism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 281-288.
  • Sansare K, Singh D, Karjodkar F. Changes in the fractal dimension on pre- and post-implant panoramic radiographs. Oral Radiol 2011; 28: 15-23.
  • Pothuaud L, Benhamou CL, Porion P, ve ark. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 691-699.
  • Wilding RJ, Slabbert JC, Kathree H, ve ark. The use of fractal analysis to reveal remodelling in human alveolar bone following the placement of dental implants. Arch Oral Biol 1995; 40: 61-72.
  • Jolley L, Majumdar S, Kapila S. Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 393-397.
  • Smith TG, Lange GD, Marks WB. Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals. J Neurosci Methods 1996; 69: 123-136.
  • Flook A. The use of dilation logic on the quantimet to achieve fractal dimension characterisation of textured and structured profiles. Powder Technol 1978; 21: 295-298.
  • Sanchez-Molina D, Velazquez-Ameijide J, Quintana V, ve ark. Fractal dimension and mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Med Eng Phys 2013; 35: 576-582.
  • Zeytinoğlu M, İlhan B, Dündar N, Boyacıoğlu H. Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 19: 519- 524.
  • Southard TE, Southard KA, Jakobsen JR, Hillis SL, Najim CA. Fractal dimension in radiographic analysis of alveolar process bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 569-576.
  • Heymans O, Fissette J, Vico P, ve ark. Is fractal geometry useful in medicine and biomedical sciences? Med Hypotheses 2000; 54: 360-366.
  • Cross SS. Fractals in pathology. J Pathol 1997; 182: 1-8.
  • Lee KI, Choi SC, Park TW, You DS. Fractal dimension calculated from two types of region of interest. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 284- 289.
  • Iftekharuddin KM, Jia W, Marsh R. Fractal analysis of tumor in brain MR images. Mac Vis Appl 2003; 13: 352-362.
  • Narter F, Köse O. Kanser geometrisi ve mesane kanserinde fraktallar. Üroonkoloji Bülteni 2013; 12: 11-17
  • Cheung N, Donaghue KC, Liew G, ve ark. Quantitative assessment of early diabetic retinopathy using fractal analysis. Diabetes Care 2008; 32: 106-110.
  • Tapanainen JM, Thomsen PEB, Køber L, ve ark. Fractal analysis of heart rate variability and mortality after an acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 347-352.
  • Mäkikallio TH, Huikuri HV, Mäkikallio A, ve ark. Prediction of sudden cardiac death by fractal analysis of heart rate variability in elderly subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1395-1402.
  • Kurşun-Çakmak EŞ, Bayrak S. Comparison of fractal dimension analysis and panoramic-based radiomorphometric indices in the assessment of mandibular bone changes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2018; 126: 184-191.
  • Demirbaş AK, Ergün S, Güneri P, Aktener BO, Boyacıoğlu H. Mandibular bone changes in sickle cell anemia: fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 41-48.
  • Gumussoy I, Miloglu O, Cankaya E, Bayrakdar IS. Fractal properties of the trabecular pattern of the mandible in chronic renal failure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150389.
  • Torres S, Chen C, Leroux B, ve ark. Fractal dimension evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in patients with bisphosphonateassociated osteonecrosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 501-505.
  • Apolinário AC, Sindeaux R, de Souza Figueiredo PT, ve ark. Dental panoramic indices and fractal dimension measurements in osteogenesis imperfecta children under pamidronate treatment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150400.
  • Southard TE, Southard KA, Krizan KE, ve ark. Mandibular bone density and fractal dimension in rabbits with induced osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 89: 244-249.
  • Fazzalari NL, Parkinson IH. Fractal properties of cancellous bone of the iliac crest in vertebral crush fracture. Bone 1998; 23: 53-57.
  • Law AN, Bollen AM, Chen SK. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1734-1742.
  • Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Hazelrig JB. Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone. A possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 98-110.
  • Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG. Case-control study on self-reported osteoporotic fractures and mandibular cortical bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 518-524.
  • Yaşar F, Akgünlü F. The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 1-9.
  • Şener E, Baksı BG. Sağlıklı Ve Osteoporoz Tanılı Hastalarda Fraktal Boyut Ve Mandibular Kortikal İndeks Değerlendirilmesi. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2016; 37: 159-167.
  • Yaşar F. Osteoporotik kemik trabekül bulgularının radyografik, dijital analiz ve kemik mineral densite yöntemleriyle karşılaştırılması. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, 2002, Doktora Tezi.
  • Park GM, Jung YH, Nah KS. Prediction of osteoporosis using fractal analysis on periapical radiographs. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2005; 35: 41-46.
  • Updike SX, Nowzari H. Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res 2008; 43: 658-664.
  • Shrout MK, Roberson B, Potter BJ, Mailhot JM, Hildebolt CF. A comparison of 2 patient populations using fractal analysis. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 9-13.
  • Chen S-K, Oviir T, Lin C-H, ve ark. Digital imaging analysis with mathematical morphology and fractal dimension for evaluation of periapical lesions following endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 467-472.
  • Huang C, Chen J, Chang Y, Jeng J, Chen C. A fractal dimensional approach to successful evaluation of apical healing. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 523-529.
  • Lee DH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, ve ark. A clinical study of alveolar bone quality using the fractal dimension and the implant stability quotient. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010; 40: 19-24.
  • Heo M-S, Park K-S, Lee S-S, ve ark. Fractal analysis of mandibular bony healing after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 763-767.
  • Kayıpmaz S, Akçay S, Sezgin ÖS, Çandirli C. Trabecular structural changes in the mandibular condyle caused by degenerative osteoarthritis: a comparative study by cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Oral Radiol 2018; 1-8.
  • Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2017; 123: 382-391.
  • Oshida Y, Munoz CA, Winkler MM, Hashem A, Itoh M. Fractal dimension analysis of aluminum oxide particle for sandblasting dental use. Biomed Mater Eng 1993; 3: 117-126.
  • Drummond JL, Thompson M, Super BJ. Fracture surface examination of dental ceramics using fractal analysis. Dental Materials 2005; 21: 586- 589.
  • Drummond JL. Fractals, surface roughness, and fracture toughness of dental composite and unfilled resin fracture surfaces. Cells and Materials 1997; 7: 2.
  • Pefferkorn A, Pefferkorn E, Haikel Y. Influence of the colloidal crystal-like arrangement of polymethylmethacrylate bonded aerosil particles on the polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 661-670.
  • Umemori S, Tonami K-i, Nitta H, Mataki S, Araki K. The possibility of digital imaging in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Int J Dent 2010.
  • Gutierrez P, Piña C, Lara VH, Bosch P. Characterization of enamel with variable caries risk. Arch Oral Biol 2005; 50: 843-848.
  • Goutzanis L, Papadogeorgakis N, Pavlopoulos P, ve ark. Nuclear fractal dimension as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2008; 44: 345-353.
  • Margaritescu C, Raica M, Pirici D, ve ark. Podoplanin expression in tumor-free resection margins of oral squamous cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical and fractal analysis study. Histol Histopathol 2010; 25: 701.
  • Chikui T, Tokumori K, Yoshiura K, ve ark. Sonographic texture characterization of salivary gland tumors by fractal analyses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1297-1304.
  • Mol A, Dunn SM. The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 373-382.
  • Ortman L, Dunford R, McHenry K, Hausmann E. Subtraction radiography and computer assisted densitometric analyses of standardized radiographs: a comparison study with 125I absorptiometry. J Periodontal Res 1985; 20: 644- 651.
  • Benn D. Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990; 19: 97-104.
  • Law AN, Bollen A-M, Chen S-K. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1734-1742.
  • Soğur E, Baksı BG, Gröndahl H-G, Şen BH. Pixel intensity and fractal dimension of periapical lesions visually indiscernible in radiographs. J Endod 2013; 39: 16-19.
  • Tosoni GM, Lurie AG, Cowan AE, Burleson JA. Pixel intensity and fractal analyses: detecting osteoporosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by using digital panoramic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 235-241.
  • Amer ME, Heo M-S, Brooks SL, Benavides E. Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 5-12.
  • Mağat G, Şener SÖ. Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol 2018; 1-8.
  • Karperien A, Jelinek H, Milosevic N, Cracow P, editors. Reviewing lacunarity analysis and classification of microglia in neuroscience. 8th European Conference on Mathematical and Theoretical Biology; 2011.
  • Gefen Y, Aharony A, Mandelbrot BB. Phase transitions on fractals. III. Infinitely ramified lattices. J Phys A Math Gen 1984; 17: 1277.
  • Yaşar F, Akgünlü F. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 261-267.
  • Önem E, Baksı G, Soğur E. Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 1009-1013.
  • Shrout MK, Hildebolt CF, Potter BJ. The effect of varying the region of interest on calculations of fractal index. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 295-298.
  • Baksı BG, Fidler A. Fractal Analysis of Periapical Bone from Lossy Compressed Radiographs: A Comparison of Two Lossy Compression Methods. J Digit Imaging 2011; 24: 993-998.
  • Shrout MK, Farley BA, Patt SM, ve ark. The effect of region of interest variations on morphologic operations data and gray-level values extracted from digitized dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 636-639.
  • Lee KI, Choi SC, Park TW, You DS. Fractal dimension calculated from two types of region of interest. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 284- 289.
  • Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Hildebolt CF. The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84: 96-100.
  • Chen SK, Oviir T, Lin CH, ve ark. Digital imaging analysis with mathematical morphology and fractal dimension for evaluation of periapical lesions following endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 467-472.
APA Güleç M, Tassoker M, OZCAN S (2019). Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. , 17 - 31.
Chicago Güleç Melike,Tassoker Melek,OZCAN SEVGI Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. (2019): 17 - 31.
MLA Güleç Melike,Tassoker Melek,OZCAN SEVGI Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. , 2019, ss.17 - 31.
AMA Güleç M,Tassoker M,OZCAN S Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. . 2019; 17 - 31.
Vancouver Güleç M,Tassoker M,OZCAN S Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. . 2019; 17 - 31.
IEEE Güleç M,Tassoker M,OZCAN S "Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz." , ss.17 - 31, 2019.
ISNAD Güleç, Melike vd. "Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz". (2019), 17-31.
APA Güleç M, Tassoker M, OZCAN S (2019). Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 40(1), 17 - 31.
Chicago Güleç Melike,Tassoker Melek,OZCAN SEVGI Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 40, no.1 (2019): 17 - 31.
MLA Güleç Melike,Tassoker Melek,OZCAN SEVGI Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, vol.40, no.1, 2019, ss.17 - 31.
AMA Güleç M,Tassoker M,OZCAN S Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2019; 40(1): 17 - 31.
Vancouver Güleç M,Tassoker M,OZCAN S Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2019; 40(1): 17 - 31.
IEEE Güleç M,Tassoker M,OZCAN S "Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz." Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 40, ss.17 - 31, 2019.
ISNAD Güleç, Melike vd. "Tıpta ve Diş Hekimliğinde Fraktal Analiz". Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 40/1 (2019), 17-31.