Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 10 Sayfa Aralığı: 1311 - 1316 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765 İndeks Tarihi: 20-02-2020

The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants

Öz:
Pheasant rearing is rated in three main categories: show and hobby, public interest, andstocking for game birds and edible purposes. The goal of this pheasant breeding station isto put stocking for game birds in their natural habitat, mainly in the Karadeniz region.Contribution to the issues related to incubation in this station and determination ofeffective reproduction age by setting production period. The aim of this study is todetermine how significant performance criteria like egg production, fertility, hatchabilityand embryonic mortality are, depending on age and on seasonal changes. Our researchhas been carried out at the Gelemen Pheasant Breeding Station in Samsun. The pheasantbreeds that are used on the farm are made up of 114 male and 800 female pheasants(1♂:7♀), of Hungarian and Caucasian genotypes. During the egg-laying period, whichlasts for 16 weeks from the end of March (at the age of 45 weeks) to the middle of July(at the age of 60 weeks), egg production was recorded daily and evaluated once a week,and incubation yield was recorded nine times in total. Differences between weeks ofage, in terms of egg production, egg and chick weights, fertility rate, incubation yield andembryonic mortality, have been found to be statistically significant. However,hatchability has been found to be statistically insignificant.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği Gıda Bilimi ve Teknolojisi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aktas H. 2009. Türkiye’de hobi amacli olarak yetistirilen bazi sülün türlerinin verim ozellikleri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selcuk Üniversitesi, Saglik Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, in Turkish.
  • Briganti F, Papeschi A, Mugnai T, Dessi-Fulgheri F. 1999. Effect of testosterone on male traits and behaviour in juvenile pheasants, Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 11:2, 171-178.
  • Cetin O, Tepeli C, Kirikci K. 1997a. Sülünlerin (P. colchicus) entansif ortam ve karasal iklimde yetistirilme imkanlarinin arastirilmasi. I. Yumurta verimi ve kulucka ozellikleri. Vet. Bil. Derg. 13, 1;5-10, in Turkish.
  • Cetin O, Kirikci K, Tepelı C. 1997b. Sülünlerin (P. colchicus) entansif ortam ve karasal iklimde yetistirilme imkanlarinin arastirilmasi: II. büyüme ve karkas ozellikleri, Vet. Bil. Derg. , 13, 1; 69-76, in Turkish.
  • Cetin O, Kirikci K. 2000. Alternatif kanatli yetistiriciligi sülünkeklik. SEL-ÜN Vakfi Yayinlari, Konya, in Turkish.
  • Deeming DC, Wadland D. 2001. Observations on patterns of embriyonic mortality over the laying season of pheasant. British Poultry Science, 42, 580-584.
  • Deeming DC, Wadland D. 2002. Influence of mating sex ratio in commercial pheasant flocks on bird health and the production, fertility, and hatchability of eggs. British Poultry Science, 43:1, 16-23.
  • Deeming DC, Hodges HR, Cooper JJ. 2011. Effect of sight barriers in pens of breeding ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) II. Reproductive parameters. British Poultry Science, 52:4, 415-422.
  • Duzgunes O, Kesici T, Kavuncu O, Gurbuz F. 1987. Arastirma ve Deneme Metotlari. Ankara Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayinlari, Ankara, 381s, in Turkish.
  • Elibol O, Turkoglu M. 2014. Embriyo gelisimi ve kulucka. Editorler: Türkoglu, M., Sarica, M. Tavukculuk Bilimi (Yetistirme, Besleme, Hastaliklar). Bey Ofset Matbaacilik, 165-206, Ankara, in Turkish.
  • Esen F, Ozbey O, Genc F. 2010. The effect of age on egg production, hatchability and egg quality characteristics in pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 9 (8): 1237-1241.
  • Fuller RA, Garson PJ. 2000. Pheasants: status survey and conservation action plan 2000-2004. Page:2
  • Genc F, Ozbey O. 2013. Sülünlerin (Phasianus colchicus) yumurta verimi ve kulucka ozelliklerine farkli yetistirme sistemlerinin etkisi F.Ü.Sag.Bil.Vet.Derg.; 27 (1): 43 – 47, in Turkish.
  • Gibes C, Wasilewski M, Lukasiewicz M. 1974. Performance estimation of pheasant flock bred at the state farm Malczewo. Zesz. Nauk. AR Warszawa, Zoot. 10: 181-191. (İn Polish).
  • Ipek A, Yilmaz DB. 2006. The effect of egg laying period on artificial incubation of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). World Poultry Science. J.62(suplement): 529-530.
  • Kirikci K. 2012. Doganin gizemli kuslari sülünler. Dortrenk Yayin Tanitim Matbaacilik Ltd. Sti., Ankara, in Turkish.
  • Krystianiak S, Kontecka H, Nowaczewski S, Rosinski A. 2007. Laying characteristics of one- and two-year old pheasants (Phasianus colchicus, L.). Folia biol. (Kraków) 55: 65-72.
  • Kuzniacka J, Bernacki Z, Adamski M. 2005. Effect of the date of egg-laying on the biological value of eggs and reproductive traits in pheasants (Phasianus colchicuc L.). Folia biologica (Krakow), 53: 73-78.
  • Llanas SG. 2014. Common pheasant. Editors: Baltzer, R., Gunderson, M.M., O’brien, B. ABDO Publishing Company PO Box 398166, Minneapolis, MN 55439, Amerika.
  • Long JL.1981. Introduced birds of the world. The worldwide history, distribution and influence of birds introduced to new environments. David & Charles, London.
  • Marzoni M, Zanobini S, Romboli I, Gazzano A, Ducci M. 2000. Semen characteristics of pheasants during the first
  • reproductive season, British Poultry Science, 41: S1, 20-21 Ozdamar K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Kaan Yayinlari, 4. Baski, Eskisehir, in Turkish.
  • Pfaff WK, Moreng RE, Klenholz EW. 1990. The utilization of brewers' dried grains in the diets of chinese ringneck pheasant-breeder hens. Poultry Sci.; 69:1491-1495.
  • Sarica M, Karacay N. 1994. A research on the growth performances and carcass traits of pheasants. Tr. J. Of Vet. and Animal Sciences 18: 371-376
  • Sarica M, Camci O, Selcuk E. 2003. Bildircin, sülün, keklik, etci güvercin, bec tavugu ve devekusu yetistiriciligi. 3. Baski, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabi, 45-70, Samsun, in Turkish.
  • Scheid W. 1986. Raising game birds. P.O. Box, 62., Brookfield, Wİ, 53008-0624
  • Ucar A, Duman M, Sekeroglu A. 2012. Sülün yetistiriciliginin genel ozellikleri. 8. Ulusal Zootekni Ogrenci Kongresi Bildiri Kitabi: 248-256 (Poster), Sanliurfa, in Turkish.
  • Usturoi MG. 2008. Reprodüksiyon performance of the adult pheasants, bred under the intensive system. Cercetari Agronomice în Moldova Vol. XLİ, No. 1 (133).
  • Usturoi A, Vacaru-Opris I, Usturoi MG. 2010. Contributions on the knowledge of incubation eggs produced by adult pheasant females. Lucrari Ştiintifice - vol. 54, Seria Zootehnie.
  • Wise DR. 1995. Egg production of wild and gamefarm pheasant strains under captive breeding systems. Game Wildl. 12: 321-330.
  • Woodard AE, Snyder RL. 1978. Cycling for production in the pheasant. Poultry Sci. 57:349-352.
  • Yamak US. 2015. Artificial breeding of wild birds in Turkey: Partridge breeding case. Indian Journal of Animal Research 49.2: 258-261.
  • Yannakopoulos AL. 1992. Greek experiences with gamebirds. Poultry Abstr.18:1359.
  • Yılmaz MR. 2004. Ciftlesme doneminde farkli bicimde yetistirilen sülünlerde (Phasianus colchicus) bazi verim ozellikleri. S.Ü. Saglik Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Doktora Tezi, Konya, in Turkish.
APA Uçar A, SARICA M (2018). The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. , 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
Chicago Uçar Ahmet,SARICA Musa The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. (2018): 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
MLA Uçar Ahmet,SARICA Musa The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. , 2018, ss.1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
AMA Uçar A,SARICA M The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. . 2018; 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
Vancouver Uçar A,SARICA M The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. . 2018; 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
IEEE Uçar A,SARICA M "The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants." , ss.1311 - 1316, 2018. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
ISNAD Uçar, Ahmet - SARICA, Musa. "The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants". (2018), 1311-1316. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
APA Uçar A, SARICA M (2018). The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 6(10), 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
Chicago Uçar Ahmet,SARICA Musa The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 6, no.10 (2018): 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
MLA Uçar Ahmet,SARICA Musa The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.6, no.10, 2018, ss.1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
AMA Uçar A,SARICA M The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2018; 6(10): 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
Vancouver Uçar A,SARICA M The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2018; 6(10): 1311 - 1316. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
IEEE Uçar A,SARICA M "The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 6, ss.1311 - 1316, 2018. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765
ISNAD Uçar, Ahmet - SARICA, Musa. "The Relationships Between Egg Production, Age and The Hatching Traits of Pheasants". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 6/10 (2018), 1311-1316. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1311-1316.1765