Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 73 - 77 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 İndeks Tarihi: 22-02-2020
Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi
Öz: Et tipi tavukların seleksiyonu öncelikle büyüme hızına ve vücut kompozisyonunun geliştirilmesine odaklanmıştır. Büyüme ve üreme ile ilgili özellikler arasındaki negatif ilişki ıslah ve yetiştiricilik uygulamalarını zorlaştırmaktadır. Tavuk ıslahıyla ilgili çalışmalar yaklaşık 150 yıllık bir geçmişe dayanıyor olmasına karşın üretimdeki verim artışları son 75 yıllık dönemde sağlanabilmiştir. Damızlık hayvanlar seçilirken; iskelet yapısı, vücut konformasyonu ve kondisyonu, morbidite vb. fenotipik özellikler dikkate alınmaktadır. Yıllar içinde etlik ebeveyn düzeyinde kuluçkalık yumurta sayısı, yumurta ağırlığı ve kuluçka randımanı açısından ilerleme kaydedilmiştir. Et tipi tavuklar için, 20. yüzyılın ilk çeyreğinde kesim yaşına kadar günlük canlı ağırlık artışı ortalama 8 g ve yemden yararlanma oranı 5,0 iken 21. yüzyılın başında bu özellikler için sırasıyla 66 g ve 1,7 değerlerine ulaşmıştır. Etlik piliç üretiminde kullanılan genotiplerin canlı ağırlığındaki ve yemden yararlanma oranındaki iyileşmede etkili asıl faktör genetik çalışmalardır. Bu gelişmelerin yanında, etlik piliçlerin bağışıklık sistemi, iskelet sistemi bozuklukları, yaşama gücü ve damızlıklardaki üreme ile ilgili bazı olumsuzluklar ortaya çıkan sorunlardır
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Evolution of Broilers and Broiler Breeders
Öz: Selection of meat-type chickens is primarily focused on growth rate and body composition improvement. The negative relationship between growth and reproduction related characteristics makes rearing and breeding applications difficult. Although the studies on chicken breeding have more than 150 years of history, the speed-up have been derived only in last 75 years. While selection breeding birds based on their phenotype for such traits as skeletal integrity, body conformation, condition, morbidity etc. Over the years, progress has been made in terms of number of hatching eggs, egg weight and hatchability at the parent stocks. For the meat-type chickens, the average body weight gain was 8 g per day and feed conversion rate was 5.0 until the age of slaughter in the first quarter of the 20th century, whereas at the beginning of the 21th century, these characteristics reached 66 g and 1.7, respectively. Improvement in body weight and the feed conversion ratio of the genotypes which have been used for broiler production is because of the development in genetics. Besides these developments, some problems have surfaced regarding immune function, skeletal disorders, liability, and in the breeder level reproductive troubles.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Albers GAA. 1998. Future trends in poultry breeding. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Poultry Conference. WPSA, Israel Branch, Jerusalem, pp. 16–20.
- Anonim. 2017. The statistical reference for poultry executives. WATT Executive Guide to World Poultry Trends. http://www.wattglobalmedia.com/publications/watt-poultrytrends/
- Aviagen. 2014. Broiler performance objectives. http://tr.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross -308-Broiler-PO-2014-EN.pdf
- Aviagen. 2016. Ross 308 parent stock performance objectives. http://eu.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_PS//308SFPS-EU-PO-EN-16.pdf
- Barbato G, Siegel P, Cherry J. 1983. Inheritance of body weight and associated traits in young chickens. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 100: 350-360.
- Barbato G. 1991. Genetic architecture of growth curve parameters in chickens. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 83:24-32.
- Chambers J. 1990. Genetics of growth and meat production in chickens. Poultry Breeding and Genetics RD. Crawford, ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Pages 599–643
- Cheng KM, Burns JT, Shoffner RN. 1985. Mating behaviour and fertility in domestic chickens. I. Inbreeding. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 13: 371-381.
- Collins K, McLendon B, Wilson J. 2014. Egg characteristics and hatch performance of Athens Canadian Random Bred 1955 meat-type chickens and 2013 Cobb 500 broilers. Poultry Science, ps: 93: 2151-2155.
- De Jong I, Berg C, Butterworth A, Estevéz I. 2012. Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders. External Scientific Report: 116.
- Dunnington E, Siegel P. 1985. Long-term selection for 8-week body weight in chickens—direct and correlated responses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71: 305-313.
- Elibol O. 2002. Broiler damızlık horozların bakım ve idaresine ilişkin bazı uygulamalar ve bunların döllülük oranına etkileri. Çiftlik Dergisi:68-74.
- Emmerson D. 2000. A primary breeder perspective of breeder, hatchery and grow-out issues. In: Proceedings of the Delmarva Breeder Hatchery and Grow-Out Conference. Delmar, MD, pp. 10–14.
- FAOSTAT. FAO statistical database. (available at. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx).
- Fulton J. 2012. Genomic selection for poultry breeding. Animal Frontiers 2:30-36.
- Griffin H, Goddard C. 1994. Rapidly growing broiler (meattype) chickens. Their origin and use for comparative studies of the regulation of growth. International Journal of Biochemistry 26: 19-28.
- Han PFS, Smyth JR. 1972. The influence of restricted feed intake on the response of chickens to Marek’s disease. Poultry Science 51: 986-991.
- Havenstein G, Ferket P, Qureshi M. 2003. Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science 82: 1500-1508.
- Havenstein GB. 2006. Performance changes in poultry and livestock following 50 years of genetic selection. Lohmann Information, 41: 30-37.
- Hocking P, Gilbert A, Walker M, Waddington D. 1987. Ovarian follicular structure of White Leghorns fed ad libitum and dwarf and normal broiler breeders fed ad libitum or restricted until point of lay. British Poultry Science 28:493506.
- Hocking P, Duff S. 1989. Musculo‐Skeletal lesions in adult male broiler breeder fowls and their relationships with body weight and fertility at 60 weeks of age. British Poultry Science 30: 777-784.
- Hocking P, Waddington D, Walker M, Gilbert A. 1989. Control of the development of the ovarian follicular hierarchy in broiler breeder pullets by food restriction during rearing. British Poultry Science 30: 161-173.
- Hocking P, Maxwell M, Mitchell M. 1996. Relationships between the degree of food restriction and welfare indices in broiler breeder females. British Poultry Science 37: 263278.
- Hocking P, McCorquodale C. 2008. Similar improvements in reproductive performance of male line, female line and parent stock broiler breeders genetically selected in the UK or in South America. British poultry science 49: 282-289.
- Hubbard. 2016. Hubbard classic parent stock performance objectives, https://www.hubbardbreeders.com/media/ guide__ps__h1__08__01__2016_imp__022614300_1635_2 2012016.pdf
- Katanbaf M, Dunnington E, Siegel P. 1988. Allomorphic relationships from hatching to 56 days in parental lines and F1 crosses of chickens selected 27 generations for high or low body weight. Growth, Development, and Aging: GDA 52: 11-21.
- Katanbaf M, Dunnington E, Siegel P. 1989. Restricted feeding in early and late-feathering chickens. 1. Growth and physiological responses. Poultry Science 68: 344-351. Krause GF, Siegel P, Hurst D. 1967. A probability structure for growth curves. Biometrics: 217-225.
- Leeson S, Summers JD. 2010. Broiler breeder production. Nottingham University Press.
- Le Bihan-Duval E, Mignon-Grasteau S, Millet N, Beaumont C. 1998. Genetic analysis of a selection experiment on increased body weight and breast muscle weight as well as on limited abdominal fat weight. British Poultry Science, 39: 346–353.
- McGary S, Estevez I, Bakst M, Pollock D. 2002. Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility in male broiler breeders. Poultry Science, 81: 102-111.
- McKay J. 2008. The genetics of modern commercial poultry. Proc. Proceedings of the 23rd World’s Poultry Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 30 June to 4 July 2008.
- Millman S, Duncan I, Widowski T. 2000. Male broiler breeder fowl display high levels of aggression toward females. Poultry Science 79: 1233-1241.
- Millman ST, Duncan IJ. 2000. Effect of male-to-male aggressiveness and feed-restriction during rearing on sexual behaviour and aggressiveness towards females by male domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70: 6382.
- Nestor K, Bacon W, Renner P. 1980. The influence of genetic changes in total egg production, clutch length, broodiness, and body weight on ovarian follicular development in turkeys. Poultry Science 59: 1694-1699.
- Olkowski A, Laarveld B, Wojnarowicz C. 2014a. Trends in developmental anomalies in contemporary broiler chickens. International Hatchery Practice, Volume 28 (1): 7-11.
- Olkowski A, Laarveld B, Wojnarowicz C. 2014b. Trends in developmental anomalies in contemporary broiler chickens – part 2. International Hatchery Practice. Volume 28 (2): 1014.
- Quaas RL, Pollak EJ. 1980. Mixed model methodology for farm and ranch beef cattle testing programs. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1277-1287.
- Robinson F, Wilson J, Yu M, Fasenko G, Hardin R. 1993. The relationship between body weight and reproductive efficiency in meat-type chickens. Poultry Science 72: 912922.
- Sarıca M, Türkoğlu M, Yamak US. 2014. Tavukçuluktaki gelişmeler ve Türkiye tavukçuluğu. Tavukçuluk Bilimi Yetiştirme, Besleme, Hastalıklar: 1-39.
- Savory C, Maros K, Rutter S, 1993. Assessment of hunger in growing broiler breeders in relation to a commercial restricted feeding programme. Animal Welfare 2: 131-152.
- Siegel P, Wisman E. 1966. Selection for body weight at eight weeks of age: 6. Changes in appetite and feed utilization. Poultry Science 45: 1391-1397.
- Siegel P, Dunnington E. 1997. Genetic selection strategies-population genetics. Poultry Science 76: 1062-1065.
- Türkoğlu M, Sarıca M. 2014. Tavuk genetiği ve ıslahı. Tavukçuluk Bilimi Yetiştirme, Besleme, Hastalıklar. Bey Ofset Matbaacılık, 671, Ankara.
- Wolc A. 2014. Understanding genomic selection in poultry breeding. World's Poultry Science Journal 70: 309-314.
- Yang N, Jiang RS. 2005. Recent advances in breeding for quality chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 373381.
- Zelenka D, Dunnington E, Siegel P. 1986a. Growth to sexual maturity of dwarf and nondwarf White Rock chickens divergently selected for juvenile body weight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 73: 61-65.
- Zelenka D, Siegel P, Dunnington E, Cherry J. 1986b. Inheritance of traits associated with sexual maturity when populations of chickens reach 50% lay. Poultry Science 65: 233-240.
- Zuidhof M, Schneider B, Carney V, Korver D, Robinson F. 2014. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poultry Science, ps: 2970-2982. doi:10.3382/ps.2014-04291.
| APA | Uçar A, TÜRKOĞLU M, SARICA M (2018). Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. , 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| Chicago | Uçar Ahmet,TÜRKOĞLU Mesut,SARICA Musa Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. (2018): 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| MLA | Uçar Ahmet,TÜRKOĞLU Mesut,SARICA Musa Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. , 2018, ss.73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| AMA | Uçar A,TÜRKOĞLU M,SARICA M Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. . 2018; 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| Vancouver | Uçar A,TÜRKOĞLU M,SARICA M Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. . 2018; 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| IEEE | Uçar A,TÜRKOĞLU M,SARICA M "Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi." , ss.73 - 77, 2018. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| ISNAD | Uçar, Ahmet vd. "Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi". (2018), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| APA | Uçar A, TÜRKOĞLU M, SARICA M (2018). Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 6(1), 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| Chicago | Uçar Ahmet,TÜRKOĞLU Mesut,SARICA Musa Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 6, no.1 (2018): 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| MLA | Uçar Ahmet,TÜRKOĞLU Mesut,SARICA Musa Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.6, no.1, 2018, ss.73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| AMA | Uçar A,TÜRKOĞLU M,SARICA M Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2018; 6(1): 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| Vancouver | Uçar A,TÜRKOĞLU M,SARICA M Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2018; 6(1): 73 - 77. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| IEEE | Uçar A,TÜRKOĞLU M,SARICA M "Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 6, ss.73 - 77, 2018. 10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
| ISNAD | Uçar, Ahmet vd. "Etlik Piliç ve Ebeveynlerinin Gelişimi". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 6/1 (2018), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i1.73-77.175 |
