Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 205 - 210 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 İndeks Tarihi: 02-04-2020
Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
Öz: Objective: Laryngeal mask (LMA) is an airway device that can be used as an alternative to face mask and tracheal intubation. Different drug combinations can beused to ensure suitable conditions during LMA insertion. Lidocaine and dexmedetomidine are drugs that can be used to reduce hemodynamic response and suppressoropharyngeal reflexes during both intubation and LMA insertion. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on LMAinsertion.Methods: Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo cystoscopy under general anesthesia with LMA were included in the study. Patients were randomly dividedinto two groups: Group L (those who received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine) and Group D (those who received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine). Number of attempts of LMA insertion,ease of LMA insertion, mouth opening, laryngospasm, gumming, stomach distention, limb movements and spontaneous breathing and hemodynamic parameterswere recorded.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of attempts of LMA insertion. In the first attempt, the LMAinsertion success rate was 70% for Group L and 73.3% for Group D. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mouth opening,laryngospasm, ease of LMA insertion, gumming, stomach distension, limb movement and spontaneous breathing. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure,mean blood pressure and heart rate were statistically lower in Group D after drug administration. It was determined that the decreases in the other times werestatistically significant compared to the baseline values after drug administration in both groups.Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine used before propofol induction provided similar conditionsfor LMA insertion. Dexmedetomidine has a more hypotensive effect and provides a greater reduction in heart rate than lidocaine. Furthermore, the use of lidocainebefore propofol induction provides better hemodynamic control than dexmedetomidine.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Wilkins CJ, Cramp PG, Staples J, Stevens WC. Comparison of the anesthetic requirement for tolerance of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg 1992;75:794-7.
- 2. Brown GW, Patel N, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia 1991;46:771-2.
- 3. Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:816-8.
- 4. Goh PK, Chiu CL, Wang CY, Chan YK, Loo PL. Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol, fentanyl-propofol and propofol-saline on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;33:223-8.
- 5. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Daaboul DG, Deeb PG, Massouh FM, et al. A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1204-9.
- 6. Lee MC, Absalom AR, Menon DK, Smith HL. Awake insertion of the laryngeal mask airway using topical lidocaine and intravenous remifentanil. Anaesthesia 2006;61:32-5.
- 7. Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Keller K, Frei FJ. The effect of intravenous lidocaine on laryngeal and respiratory reflex responses in anaesthetised children*. Anaesthesia 2013;68:13-20.
- 8. Koc C, Kocaman F, Aygenc E, Ozdem C, Cekic A. The use of preoperative lidocaine to prevent stridor and laryngospasm after tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:880-2.
- 9. Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, Eskitascoglu E, Mizrak A, Boyaci A. Single-dose dexmedetomidine attenuates airway and circulatory reflexes during extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1088-91.
- 10. Maroof M, Khan RM, Jain D, Ashraf M. Dexmedetomidine is a useful adjunct for awake intubation. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:776-7.
- 11. Uzumcugil F, Canbay O, Celebi N, Karagoz AH, Ozgen S. Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol vs. fentanyl-propofol for laryngeal mask insertion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:675-80.
- 12. Wei L, Deng X, Sui J, Wang L, Liu J. Dexmedetomidine Improves Intubating Conditions Without Muscle Relaxants in Children After Induction With Propofol and Remifentanil. Anesth Analg 2015;121:785-90.
- 13. Rashmi HD, Komala HK. Clinical evaluation of the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing thyroid surgeries. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:483-7.
- 14. Nellore SS, Waychal AD, Rustagi PS. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine- Propofol versus Fentanyl-Propofol on Insertion Conditions of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:UC06-UC9.
- 15. Kocamanoglu IS, Cengel Kurnaz S, Tur A. Effects of lignocaine on pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during general anaesthesia in rigid suspension laryngoscopy. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:79- 85.
- 16. Hashemian AM, Zamani Moghadam Doloo H, Saadatfar M, Moallem R, Moradifar M, Faramarzi R, et al. Effects of intravenous administration of fentanyl and lidocaine on hemodynamic responses following endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2018;36:197-201.
- 17. Baik HJ, Kim YJ, Kim JH. Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26:377-81.
- 18. Hanci V, Erdoğan G, Okyay RD, Yurtlu BS, Ayoğlu H, Baydilek Y, Turan IO. Effects of fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol and dexmedetomidine-lidocainepropofol on tracheal intubation without use of muscle relaxants. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2010;26:244-50.
- 19. Yoo JY, Kwak HJ, Kim YB, Park CK, Lee SY, Kim JY. The effect of dexmedetomidine pretreatment on the median effective bolus dose of propofol for facilitating laryngeal mask airway insertion. J Anesth 2017;31:11-7.
- 20. Harsoor SS, Rani D, Roopa MN, Lathashree S, Sudheesh K, Nethra SS. “Anesthetic Sparing Effect of Intraoperative Lignocaine or Dexmedetomidine Infusion on Sevoflurane during General Anesthesia”. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2015;23:301-7.
- 21. Goyagi T, Tanaka M, Nishikawa T. Fentanyl decreases propofol requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:771-4.
- 22. Talke P, Lobo E, Brown R. Systemically administered alpha2-agonist-induced peripheral vasoconstriction in humans. Anesthesiology 2003;99:65-70.
- 23. Snapir A, Posti J, Kentala E, Koskenvuo J, Sundell J, Tuunanen H, et al. Effects of low and high plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine on myocardial perfusion and cardiac function in healthy male subjects. Anesthesiology 2006;105:902-10.
- 24. Colin PJ, Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, Reyntjens K, Absalom AR, Vereecke HEM, et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers: 2. Haemodynamic profile. Br J Anaesth 2017;119:211-20.
- 25. Totonchi Z, Salajegheh S, Mohaghegh MR, Kiaei MM, Shirvani M, Ghorbanlo M. Hemodynamic effect of intravenous lidocaine during aortic cannulation in cardiac surgery. Interv Med Appl Sci 2017;9:56-60.
- 26. Lin CC, Yu JH, Lin CC, Li WC, Weng YM, Chen SY. Postintubation hemodynamic effects of intravenous lidocaine in severe traumatic brain injury. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1782-7.
- 27. Kodaka M, Okamoto Y, Koyama K, Miyao H. Predicted values of propofol EC50 and sevoflurane concentration for insertion of laryngeal mask Classic and ProSeal. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:242-5.
| APA | KAVAKLİ A, KİTAPÇIOĞLU D (2019). Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. , 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| Chicago | KAVAKLİ Ali Sait,KİTAPÇIOĞLU Dilek Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. (2019): 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| MLA | KAVAKLİ Ali Sait,KİTAPÇIOĞLU Dilek Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. , 2019, ss.205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| AMA | KAVAKLİ A,KİTAPÇIOĞLU D Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. . 2019; 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| Vancouver | KAVAKLİ A,KİTAPÇIOĞLU D Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. . 2019; 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| IEEE | KAVAKLİ A,KİTAPÇIOĞLU D "Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion." , ss.205 - 210, 2019. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| ISNAD | KAVAKLİ, Ali Sait - KİTAPÇIOĞLU, Dilek. "Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion". (2019), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| APA | KAVAKLİ A, KİTAPÇIOĞLU D (2019). Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. European Archives of Medical Research, 35(4), 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| Chicago | KAVAKLİ Ali Sait,KİTAPÇIOĞLU Dilek Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. European Archives of Medical Research 35, no.4 (2019): 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| MLA | KAVAKLİ Ali Sait,KİTAPÇIOĞLU Dilek Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. European Archives of Medical Research, vol.35, no.4, 2019, ss.205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| AMA | KAVAKLİ A,KİTAPÇIOĞLU D Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. European Archives of Medical Research. 2019; 35(4): 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| Vancouver | KAVAKLİ A,KİTAPÇIOĞLU D Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. European Archives of Medical Research. 2019; 35(4): 205 - 210. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| IEEE | KAVAKLİ A,KİTAPÇIOĞLU D "Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion." European Archives of Medical Research, 35, ss.205 - 210, 2019. 10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
| ISNAD | KAVAKLİ, Ali Sait - KİTAPÇIOĞLU, Dilek. "Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion". European Archives of Medical Research 35/4 (2019), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.4274/eamr.galenos.2018.48344 |
