Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 461 - 475 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21449/ijate.561154 İndeks Tarihi: 25-04-2020

Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students

Öz:
Developing scientific literacy for all students is the most oftenstated purpose of contemporary science education. Nature of science (NOS)is seen as an important component of scientific literacy. There are variousperceptions of NOS in the science education community and NOS itself isan ever-changing construct. This makes it challenging to developinstruments for measuring understanding of NOS at different levels. Manyinstruments have been developed and are being developed to assess NOSlearning, which indicates the importance attributed to this subject. In thisstudy, we developed a multiple-choice test to measure NOS understandingof middle school students. The instrument was applied to 1397 middleschool students. The 24 item multiple-choice test had KR-20 reliabilitycoefficient of 0.74. A 12 item multiple-choice test created as a subset of the24 items of the original test. This test was easier and had higherdiscrimination, which can provide useful measurement data about students’understanding of NOS for diagnostic or formative purposes.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
2
2
2
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). The evolving landscape related to assessment of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 635-664). New York: Routledge.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of research in science teaching, 25(8), 607-629.
  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: ‘Views on Science—Technology—Society’(VOSTS). Science education, 76(5), 477-491.
  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Cooley, W. W. & Klopfer, L. E. (1961). TOUS: Test on understanding science. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
  • Hacıeminoğlu, E., Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö., & Ertepınar, H. (2014) Development and validation of nature of science instrument for elementary school students. Education 3-13, 42(3), 258- 283
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C, Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (2010). Item response theory: principles and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331- 359.
  • Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell &N.G.
  • Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497- 521.
  • Lederman, J. S., & Khishfe, R. (2002) Views of nature of science, Form D. Unpublished paper: Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239.
  • Matthews, M. R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(2), 161–174.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. [Primary schools (elementary and middle) science lesson (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades) curriculum]. Ankara: MEB
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. [Primary schools (elementary and middle) science lesson (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades) curriculum]. Ankara: MEB
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1973). Research strategies and measurement methods for investigating human development. In J. R. Nesselroade & H. W. Reese, Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological issues. Oxford, England: Academic Press.
  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill,
  • Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4(3), 207-230.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Temel, S., Şen, Ş. & Özcan, Ö. (2018) The development of the nature of science view scale (NOSvs) at university level. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(1), 55- 68
  • Wang, Y. & Liu, Q. (2005). Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of stock–recruitment relationships. Fisheries Research, 77, 220–225.
APA Yalaki Y, DOĞAN N, İREZ O, Dogan N, ÇAKMAKCI G, ERDEM KARA B (2019). Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. , 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
Chicago Yalaki Yalcin,DOĞAN Nuri,İREZ OSMAN SERHAT,Dogan Nihal,ÇAKMAKCI Gültekin,ERDEM KARA Başak Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. (2019): 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
MLA Yalaki Yalcin,DOĞAN Nuri,İREZ OSMAN SERHAT,Dogan Nihal,ÇAKMAKCI Gültekin,ERDEM KARA Başak Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. , 2019, ss.461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
AMA Yalaki Y,DOĞAN N,İREZ O,Dogan N,ÇAKMAKCI G,ERDEM KARA B Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. . 2019; 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
Vancouver Yalaki Y,DOĞAN N,İREZ O,Dogan N,ÇAKMAKCI G,ERDEM KARA B Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. . 2019; 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
IEEE Yalaki Y,DOĞAN N,İREZ O,Dogan N,ÇAKMAKCI G,ERDEM KARA B "Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students." , ss.461 - 475, 2019. 10.21449/ijate.561154
ISNAD Yalaki, Yalcin vd. "Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students". (2019), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.561154
APA Yalaki Y, DOĞAN N, İREZ O, Dogan N, ÇAKMAKCI G, ERDEM KARA B (2019). Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(3), 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
Chicago Yalaki Yalcin,DOĞAN Nuri,İREZ OSMAN SERHAT,Dogan Nihal,ÇAKMAKCI Gültekin,ERDEM KARA Başak Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 6, no.3 (2019): 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
MLA Yalaki Yalcin,DOĞAN Nuri,İREZ OSMAN SERHAT,Dogan Nihal,ÇAKMAKCI Gültekin,ERDEM KARA Başak Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol.6, no.3, 2019, ss.461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
AMA Yalaki Y,DOĞAN N,İREZ O,Dogan N,ÇAKMAKCI G,ERDEM KARA B Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2019; 6(3): 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
Vancouver Yalaki Y,DOĞAN N,İREZ O,Dogan N,ÇAKMAKCI G,ERDEM KARA B Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2019; 6(3): 461 - 475. 10.21449/ijate.561154
IEEE Yalaki Y,DOĞAN N,İREZ O,Dogan N,ÇAKMAKCI G,ERDEM KARA B "Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students." International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6, ss.461 - 475, 2019. 10.21449/ijate.561154
ISNAD Yalaki, Yalcin vd. "Measuring Nature of Science Views of Middle School Students". International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 6/3 (2019), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.561154