Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 185 - 192 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 İndeks Tarihi: 06-05-2020
Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials
Öz: Objective: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and serum prostatespecific antigen represents a diagnostic triad for the detection of prostatic carcinoma. About 50 years ago, Dr. Donald Gleason created a gradingsystem for prostate cancer based on its histologic patterns. Currently, this system maintains its validity with various changes. New updates weremade in 2005 and 2014 by the International Society of Urological Pathology. The goal of biopsies is to determine the Gleason score and prognosisin prostatectomy material. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance of the Gleason score, tumor volume and tumor lateralitybetween prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy materials.Material and Method: The study was performed with 112 patients who had biopsy and prostatectomy materials. The Gleason grades of thetumors have been evaluated with the new grading system. Tumor volumes were calculated by the number of positive blocks while tumor lateralitywas evaluated as unilateral or bilateral. Statistical analysis was performed on the obtained data.Results: Gleason score, tumor volume and tumor laterality discordance between needle biopsy and prostatectomy materials was found to bestatistically significant. However, the concordance increased as the Gleason score and tumor volume increased.Conclusion: Digital examination, serum prostate specific antigen value and needle biopsy together are very sensitive for a prostate adenocarcinomadiagnosis. The Gleason score, localization and volume of the tumors are important for patient follow-up, treatment and prognosis.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Epstein JI, Lotan TL. The lower urinary tract and male genital system. In: Kumar V, Abul KA, Aster JC, editors. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2015. 859-990.
- 2. Epstein JI. The prostate and seminal vesicles. In: Mills SE, Carter D, Greenson JK, Oberman HA, Reuter V, Stoler MH, editors. Sternberg’s diagnostic surgical pathology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2004. 2083-132.
- 3. Moch H, Humprey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. Tumours of the prostate. WHO classification tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016. 136-83.
- 4. Rosai J. Male reproductive system. Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology. 10th ed. Sydney: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. 1287-398.
- 5. Neşe N. Prostate and seminal vesicle. In: Yörükoğlu K, Tuna B editors. Uropathology. 1st ed. Izmir: Congress Bookshop, Kanyılmaz Printing House; 2016. 319-473.
- 6. Cupp MR, Bostwick DG, Myers RP, Oesterling JE. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen can not reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis. J Urol. 1995;153:1543-8.
- 7. Brimo F, Vollmer RT, Corcos J, Kotar K, Begin LR, Humphrey PA, Bismar TA. Prognostic value of various morphometric measurements of tumour extent in prostate needle core tissue. Histopathology. 2008;53:177-83.
- 8. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committe. The 2005 international society of urologic pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228-42.
- 9. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, John K, Humphrey PA; The Grading Committee. The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J SurgPathol. 2016;40:244-52.
- 10. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histologic grading and clinical staging. J Urol. 1974;111:58-64.
- 11. Marks RA, Lin H, Koch MO, Cheng L. Positive-block ratio in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:877-81.
- 12. Özdamar K. Biostatistics with SPSS. 4th ed. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi; 2001.
- 13. Prostate Cancer, Nutrition, and Dietary Supplements. PDQ integrative, alternative, and complementary therapies editorial board. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US);2002.2019.
- 14. Genetics of Prostate Cancer. PDQ Cancer Genetics Editorial Board. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US);2002.2018.
- 15. Conti DV, Wang K, Sheng X, Bensen JT, Hazelett DJ, Cook MB. Two novel susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in men of African ancestry. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109.
- 16. Cormier L, Kwan L, Reid K, Litwin MS. Knowledge and beliefs among brothers and sons of men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2002;59:895-900.
- 17. Yörükoğlu K. Current developments in uropathology. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Pathol-Special Topics. 2016;1:35-40.
- 18. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: Data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 2013;111:753-60.
- 19. Pourmand G, Gooran S, Hossieni SR, Guitynavard F, Safavi M, Sharifi A, Mokhtari E. Correlation of preoperative and radical prostatectomy Gleason score: Examining the predictors of upgrade and downgrade results. Acta Medica Iran. 2017;55:249- 53.
- 20. Khoddami M, Khademi Y, Aghdam MK, Soltanghoraee H. Correlation between Gleason scores in needle biopsy and correspondig radical prostatectomy specimens: A Twelve-year review. Iran J Pathol. 2016;11:120-6.
- 21. Gonzalgo ML, Bastian PJ, Mangold LA, Trock BJ, Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Partin AW. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology. 2006;67:115-9.
- 22. Shen BY, Tsui KH, Chang PL, Chuang CK, Hsieh ML, Huang ST, Wang TM, Lee SH, Huang HC, Huang SC. Correlation between the Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens. Chang Gung Med J. 2003;26: 919-24.
- 23. Tavangar SM, Razi A, Mashayekhi R. Correlation between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grading of 111 cases with prostatic adenocarcinoma. Urol J. 2004;1:246-9.
- 24. Epstein JI. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens. J Urol. 2011;186:790-7.
- 25. Honig SC, Stilmant MM, Klavans MS, Freedlund MC, Siroky MB. The Role of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the prostate in staging adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1992;69:2978-82.
- 26. Kryvenko ON, Diaz M, Meier FA, Ramineni M, Menon M, Gupta NS. Findings in 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy that predict more advanced cancer at prostatectomy: Analysis of 388 biopsy-prostatectomy pairs. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:739-46.
- 27. Lowenthal BM, Liao X, Wen F, Bagherzadeh N, Mahooti S. Discontinuous unilateral involvement of 12 part core biopsies by adenocarcinoma predicts bilateral involvement of subsequent radical prostatectomy. Pathol Int. 2016; 66:438-43.
| APA | YELDİR N, YILDIZ E, DÜNDAR G (2019). Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. , 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| Chicago | YELDİR Neşe,YILDIZ Esin,DÜNDAR Gökçe Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. (2019): 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| MLA | YELDİR Neşe,YILDIZ Esin,DÜNDAR Gökçe Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. , 2019, ss.185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| AMA | YELDİR N,YILDIZ E,DÜNDAR G Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. . 2019; 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| Vancouver | YELDİR N,YILDIZ E,DÜNDAR G Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. . 2019; 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| IEEE | YELDİR N,YILDIZ E,DÜNDAR G "Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials." , ss.185 - 192, 2019. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| ISNAD | YELDİR, Neşe vd. "Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials". (2019), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| APA | YELDİR N, YILDIZ E, DÜNDAR G (2019). Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, 35(3), 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| Chicago | YELDİR Neşe,YILDIZ Esin,DÜNDAR Gökçe Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. Türk Patoloji Dergisi 35, no.3 (2019): 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| MLA | YELDİR Neşe,YILDIZ Esin,DÜNDAR Gökçe Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, vol.35, no.3, 2019, ss.185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| AMA | YELDİR N,YILDIZ E,DÜNDAR G Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. Türk Patoloji Dergisi. 2019; 35(3): 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| Vancouver | YELDİR N,YILDIZ E,DÜNDAR G Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. Türk Patoloji Dergisi. 2019; 35(3): 185 - 192. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| IEEE | YELDİR N,YILDIZ E,DÜNDAR G "Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials." Türk Patoloji Dergisi, 35, ss.185 - 192, 2019. 10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
| ISNAD | YELDİR, Neşe vd. "Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials". Türk Patoloji Dergisi 35/3 (2019), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2018.01453 |
