Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT)

Ida KANIAWATI, (Adres Yazılmamış)
Nuzulira Janeusse FRATIWI, (Adres Yazılmamış)
Agus DANAWAN, (Adres Yazılmamış)
Iyon SUYANA, (Adres Yazılmamış)
Achmad SAMSUDIN, (Adres Yazılmamış)
Endi SUHENDI (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia)
Journal of Turkish Science Education
7 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 110 - 122 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.12973/tused.10269a İndeks Tarihi: 22-05-2020

Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT)

Öz:
This research aimed at analyzing student misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). The research involved 30 students (15 boys and 15 girls, whose ages were middling of 16 years-old) at one of Senior High School in Bandung, Indonesia. The data were analyzed through mixed methods. Based on the quantitative analysis, the highest percentage of student misconceptions through four-tier test was 66% and through two-tier test was 100%. According to qualitative analysis, it was found student misconceptions about Newton’s Laws. From the research, it can be concluded that FTNT can be used in analyzing student misconceptions on Newton’s Laws concepts and more effective than using the two-tier test. Teachers or researchers can expand the concepts of Newton’s Laws that are used in designing diagnostic test and developed for other physics concepts.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adadan, E. & Savasci, F. (2012). An analysis of 16–17 years-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic ınstrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513-544.
  • Adams, W & Wieman, C. (2010). Development and validation of ınstruments to measure learning of expert-like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 1-24.
  • Baran, M. & Sozbilir, M. (2017). An application of context- and problem-based learning (CPBL) into teaching thermodynamics. Research in Science Education, 1-27.
  • Bayraktar, S. (2009). Misconceptions of Turkish pre-service teachers about force and motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 273-291.
  • Calik M., Ayas A. & Coll, R. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in ımproving students’ conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 651-676.
  • Cantinho, P., Matos, M., Trancoso, M. & Santos, M. (2016). Behaviour and fate of metals in urban wastewater treatment plants: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(1), 359-386.
  • Cataloglu, E & Ates, S. (2014). The effects of cognitive styles on naive ımpetus theory application degrees of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 699-719.
  • Cepni, S., Ulger, B. B. & Ormanci, U. (2017). Pre-service science teachers’ views towards the process of associating science concepts with everyday life. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 1-15.
  • Chen, F., Zhang, S., Guo, Y. & Xin, T. (2017). Applying the rule space model to develop a learning progression for thermochemistry. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1357-1378.
  • Chen, Y., Pan, P., Sung, Y. & Chang, K. (2013). Correcting misconceptions on electronics: effects of a simulated-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 212-227.
  • Costu, B., Ayas, A. & Niaz, M. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-Based Teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. Instructional Science, 40, 47-67.
  • Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. United State of America: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
  • Demirdogen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Kondakci, E. & Koseoglu, F. (2016). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 575-612.
  • Eshach, H. (2010). Using photographs to probe students’ understanding of physical concepts: the case of Newton’s 3rd law. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 589-603.
  • Fratiwi, N. J., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Suyana, I. & Samsudin, A. (2017). The transformation of two-tier test into four tier test on Newton’s laws concepts. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848, 050011.
  • Fratiwi, N. J., Samsudin, A. & Costu, B. (2018). Enhancing K-10 students’ conceptions through computer simulations-aided PDEODE*E (CS-PDEODE*E) on Newton’s laws. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 214-223.
  • Gok, T. (2015). An ınvestigation of students’ performance after peer ınstruction with stepwise problem-solving strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 561-582.
  • Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A. & McDermott, L. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238-260.
  • Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic ınstruments to ıdentify students’ misconception in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008.
  • Kaltakci, D & Didis, N. (2007). Identification of pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions on gravity concept: a study with a 3-tier misconception test. In AIP Proceedings, 899(1), 499-500.
  • Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., Hasopa, Y., Sutrisno, A. D. & Suhendi, E. (2016). The ınfluence of using momentum and ımpulse computer simulation to senior high school students’ concept mastery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 739, 1-4.
  • Leppavirta, J. (2012). Assessing undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding and confidence of electromagnetics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1099-1117.
  • Liampa, V., Malandrakis, G. N., Papadopoulou, P. & Pnevmatikos, D. (2017). Development and evaluation of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess undergraduate primary teachers’ understanding of ecological footprint. Research in Science Education, 1-26.
  • Liu, G. & Fang, N. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19-29.
  • Mainali, B & Heck, A. (2017). Comparison of traditional ınstruction on reflection and rotation in a nepalese high school with an ICT-Rich, student-centered, ınvestigative approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 487-507.
  • McLaughlin, C. A. & MacFadden B. J. (2014). At the Elbows of Scientists: Shaping science teachers’ conceptions and enactment of ınquiry-based ınstruction. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 927-947.
  • Osman, E., BouJaoude, S. & Hamdan, H. (2017). An ınvestigation of lebanese G7-12 students’ misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and their genetics literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1257-1280.
  • Pesman, H &Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 208-222.
  • Poutot, G. & Blandin, B. (2015). Exploration of students’ misconceptions in mechanics using the FCI. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 116-120.
  • Preston, C. M. (2017). Effect of a diagram on primary students’ understanding about electric circuits. Research in Science Education, 1-24.
  • Purwanto, M. G., Nurliani, R., Kaniawati, I. & Samsudin, A. (2018). Promoting the Hydrostatic Conceptual Change Test (HCCT) with four-tier diagnostic test ıtem. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1013, 1-6.
  • Reese, S. A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism VS Dissociation. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 579-588.
  • Rico, E, Dios, H. & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidence in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(3), 449-460.
  • Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., and Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27, 94-104.
  • Saat, R., Fadzil, H., Aziz, N., Haron, K., Rashid, K., Shamsuar, N. (2016). Development of an Online Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-University Students’ Understanding of Cellular Respiration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 532-546.
  • Samsudin, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Amien, N., Wiendartun. Supriyatman, Wibowo, F., Faizin, M. & Costu, B. (2018). Improving Students’ Conceptions on Fluid Dynamics through Peer Teaching Model with PDEODE (PTM-PDEODE). Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1013, 1-6
  • Samsudin, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Hermita, N., Suhandi, A., Wibowo, F. C., Costu, B., Akbardin, J. & Supriyatman S. (2017a). Alleviating Students’ Misconceptions About Newton’s First Law Through Comparing PDEODE*E Tasks and POE Tasks: Which is More Effective? The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Special Issue for INTE 2017, 215-221.
  • Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana D., Kaniawati I. & Costu B. (2016). Investigating the Effectiveness of an Active Learning Based-Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ALBICI) on Electric Field Concept. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1-41.
  • Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I. & Costu, B. (2017b). Promoting conceptual understanding on magnetic field concepts through Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ICI) with PDEODE*E Tasks. Advanced Science Letters, 23, 1205-1209.
  • Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I. & Costu, B. (2015). Fields conceptual change ınventory: a diagnostic test ınstrument on the electric field and magnetic field to diagnose student’s conceptions. International Journal of Industrial Electronic Engineering, 3(12), 74-77.
  • Solas, E. C. & Wilson, K. (2017). Instructor’s use of student-generated annotated concept sketches in formative assessment in general science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 144-161.
  • Stein, M., Larrabee, T. & Barman, C. (2008). A study of common beliefs and misconceptions in physics science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 1-11.
  • Tellez, A., Garcia, C. & Verdugo, V. (2015). Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8(3), 27-46.
  • Unal, S., Costu, B. & Ayas, A. (2010). Secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 3-29.
  • Wong, C., Chu, H. & Yap, K. (2016). Are alternative conceptions dependent on researchers’ methodology and definition? A review of empirical studies related to concepts of heat. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 499-526.
  • Yang, D. (2017). Performance of fourth graders when judging the reasonableness of a computational result. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-19.
  • Zhou, S., Wang, Y. & Zhang, C. (2016). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ PCK: Inconsistency of Pre-Service Teachers’ Predictions and Student Learning Difficulties in Newton’s Third Law. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 373-385.
APA KANIAWATI I, FRATIWI N, DANAWAN A, SUYANA I, SAMSUDIN A, SUHENDI E (2019). Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). , 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
Chicago KANIAWATI Ida,FRATIWI Nuzulira Janeusse,DANAWAN Agus,SUYANA Iyon,SAMSUDIN Achmad,SUHENDI Endi Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). (2019): 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
MLA KANIAWATI Ida,FRATIWI Nuzulira Janeusse,DANAWAN Agus,SUYANA Iyon,SAMSUDIN Achmad,SUHENDI Endi Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). , 2019, ss.110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
AMA KANIAWATI I,FRATIWI N,DANAWAN A,SUYANA I,SAMSUDIN A,SUHENDI E Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). . 2019; 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
Vancouver KANIAWATI I,FRATIWI N,DANAWAN A,SUYANA I,SAMSUDIN A,SUHENDI E Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). . 2019; 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
IEEE KANIAWATI I,FRATIWI N,DANAWAN A,SUYANA I,SAMSUDIN A,SUHENDI E "Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT)." , ss.110 - 122, 2019. 10.12973/tused.10269a
ISNAD KANIAWATI, Ida vd. "Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT)". (2019), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10269a
APA KANIAWATI I, FRATIWI N, DANAWAN A, SUYANA I, SAMSUDIN A, SUHENDI E (2019). Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
Chicago KANIAWATI Ida,FRATIWI Nuzulira Janeusse,DANAWAN Agus,SUYANA Iyon,SAMSUDIN Achmad,SUHENDI Endi Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education 16, no.1 (2019): 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
MLA KANIAWATI Ida,FRATIWI Nuzulira Janeusse,DANAWAN Agus,SUYANA Iyon,SAMSUDIN Achmad,SUHENDI Endi Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol.16, no.1, 2019, ss.110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
AMA KANIAWATI I,FRATIWI N,DANAWAN A,SUYANA I,SAMSUDIN A,SUHENDI E Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2019; 16(1): 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
Vancouver KANIAWATI I,FRATIWI N,DANAWAN A,SUYANA I,SAMSUDIN A,SUHENDI E Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2019; 16(1): 110 - 122. 10.12973/tused.10269a
IEEE KANIAWATI I,FRATIWI N,DANAWAN A,SUYANA I,SAMSUDIN A,SUHENDI E "Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT)." Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16, ss.110 - 122, 2019. 10.12973/tused.10269a
ISNAD KANIAWATI, Ida vd. "Analyzing Students’ Misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT)". Journal of Turkish Science Education 16/1 (2019), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10269a
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 11:46

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları